Search

Abstract: Background: Rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical therapy are indicative of recurrent or residual prostate cancer (PCa). This biochemical recurrence typically predates clinically detectable metastatic disease by several years. Management of patients with biochemical recurrence is controversial. Objective: To assess the effect of dutasteride on progression of PCa in patients with biochemical failure after radical therapy. Design, setting, and participants: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 294 men from 64 centres across 9 European countries. Intervention: The 5α-reductase inhibitor, dutasteride. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary end point was time to PSA doubling from start of randomised treatment, analysed by log-rank test stratified by previous therapy and investigative-site cluster. Secondary end points included time to disease progression and the proportion of subjects with disease progression. Results and limitations: Of the 294 subjects randomised (147 in each treatment group), 187 (64%) completed 24 mo of treatment and 107 discontinued treatment prematurely (71 [48%] of the placebo group, 36 [24%] of the dutasteride group). Dutasteride significantly delayed the time to PSA doubling compared with placebo after 24 mo of treatment (p <0.001); the relative risk (RR) reduction was 66.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.35–76.90) for the overall study period. Dutasteride also significantly delayed disease progression (which included PSA- and non-PSA-related outcomes) compared with placebo (p <0.001); the overall RR reduction in favour of dutasteride was 59% (95% CI, 32.53–75.09). The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to study withdrawal were similar between the treatment groups. A limitation was that investigators were not blinded to PSA levels during the study. Conclusions: Dutasteride delayed the biochemical progression of PCa in patients with biochemical failure after radical therapy for clinically localised disease. The safety and tolerability of dutasteride were generally consistent with previous experience. Clinical trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00558363. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin provides significantly greater benefit than either monotherapy for various patient-reported outcomes in men with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatic enlargement. Objective: To investigate whether combination therapy is more effective than either monotherapy in reducing the relative risk for acute urinary retention (AUR), BPH-related surgery, and BPH clinical progression over 4 yr in men at increased risk of progression. Design, setting, and participants: The Combination of Avodart® and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study was a 4-yr, multicenter, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study in 4844 men ≥50 yr of age with a clinical diagnosis of BPH, International Prostate Symptom Score ≥12, prostate volume ≥30cm3, prostate-specific antigen 1.5–10ng/ml, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) >5 and ≤15ml/s with minimum voided volume ≥125ml. Intervention: Oral daily tamsulosin, 0.4mg; dutasteride, 0.5mg; or a combination of both. Measurements: The 4-yr primary end point was time to first AUR or BPH-related surgery. Secondary end points included BPH clinical progression, symptoms, Qmax, prostate volume, safety, and tolerability. Results and limitations: Combination therapy was significantly superior to tamsulosin monotherapy but not dutasteride monotherapy at reducing the relative risk of AUR or BPH-related surgery. Combination therapy was also significantly superior to both monotherapies at reducing the relative risk of BPH clinical progression. Combination therapy provided significantly greater symptom benefit than either monotherapy at 4 yr. Safety and tolerability of combination therapy was consistent with previous experience with dutasteride and tamsulosin monotherapies, with the exception of an imbalance in the composite term of cardiac failure among the three study arms. The lack of placebo control is a study limitation. Conclusions: The 4-yr CombAT data provide support for the long-term use of dutasteride and tamsulosin combination therapy in men with moderate-to-severe LUTS due to BPH and prostatic enlargement. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00090103 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00090103). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: This study evaluated the use of solifenacin in patients experiencing residual urgency symptoms during treatment with tolterodine extended release (ER) 4 mg for overactive bladder (OAB). Methods: This was a 12-week, multicenter, openlabel, flexible-dose study of the efficacy, tolerability, and effects on health-related quality of life (HRQL) of solifenacin in patients aged ≥18 years who had symptoms of OAB for ≥3 months, had been treated with tolterodine ER 4 mg for ≥4 weeks, and wished to switch therapy because of a lack of sufficient subjective improvement in urgency. At baseline (before washout of tolterodine), patients had to have ≥3 urgency episodes/24 hours. After ≥14 days'' washout of tolterodine, all patients received oral solifenacin 5 mg/d, with the option of a dose increase to 10 mg at weeks 4 and 8. On 3 consecutive days before the prewashout, postwashout (no drug treatment for OAB), and week 4, 8, and 12 visits (during and at the end of treatment with solifenacin), patients used a bladder diary to document daily symptoms of urgency, urge incontinence, frequency, nocturia, and nocturnal voids. Changes in these measures at study end were compared with prewashout and postwashout values. The Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) were used to assess patient-reported outcomes at prewashout, postwashout, and week 12. Tolerability was evaluated based on the nature, frequency, and severity of observed or reported adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 606 patients screened, 441 received study medication (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [13.8] years; 88.9% white; 88.2% female). Diary-documented urgency changed from a mean of 6.0 episodes/24 hours at prewashout to 2.6 episodes/24 hours at study end, a mean decrease of 3.4 episodes/24 hours (95% CI, -3.8 to -3.0; P < 0.001). The frequency of all other diary variables was also significantly reduced from prewashout to study end (P < 0.001). The mean PPBC score changed from 4.2 points at prewashout to 3.0 points at study end, a mean improvement of 1.2 points (95% CI, -1.3 to -1.1; P < 0.001). Changes in all OAB-q scales and domains (symptom bother, coping, concern, sleep, social interaction, and total HRQL) from prewashout and postwashout to study end were also statistically significant (P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent AEs were mainly mild or moderate (237/261 [90.8%]) and led to few discontinuations (16/441 [3.6%]). Treatment-emergent AEs included anticholinergic AEs such as dry mouth (77 [17.5%]), constipation (51 [11.6%]), and blurred vision (10 [2.3%]). Conclusions: Among these patients with residual urgency after treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg, solifenacin was associated with significant improvements in urgency and other diary-documented symptoms of OAB. Patients receiving solifenacin also had significant improvements in HRQL and the perceived bother of OAB. Clinical Trials Identification Number: NCT00454740. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]