Search

[Display omitted] • Potassium peroxymonosulphate effectively disrupts the sludge exopolymeric matrix. • A COD solubilization of 35.67% was achieved by phase separated pretreatment. • Phase separated pretreatment has significantly reduced the specific energy input. • Phase separated pretreatment produces higher biohydrogen of 79.76 mL/g VS. Disintegration of sludge by microwave irradiation is considered an energy-intensive pretreatment as it demands more significant energy input to achieve the desirable solubilization. Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) present in the floc matrix of sludge limits the extent of sludge solubilization. Hence, this study attempted to disrupt the EPS with potassium peroxymonosulphate (PPMS) before microwave (MW) pretreatment to attain maximal solubilization in an energy-efficient way. A maximal EPS disruption was achieved at 0.009 g/g TS of PPMS dosage and treatment time of 36 min. The outcome of the phase-separated pretreatment shows that PPMS induced MW pretreatment (PPMS-MW) obtained a maximum chemical oxygen demand (COD) solubilization of 35.67 % at a specific energy input of 8795 kJ/kg TS. In contrast, the MW pretreatment achieved only 22.41 % at a specific energy input of 21973 kJ/kg TS. When comparing both PPMS-MW and MW pretreatments, an ample amount of energy was saved by PPMS-MW than MW. The biohydrogen production potential assay showed that PPMS-MW obtained an increased biohydrogen production of 79.76 mL/g VS compared to MW (50.10 mL/g VS). Thus, this phase-separated PPMS-MW pretreatment was considered efficient compared to MW pretreatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Food waste (FW) can be utilized as a raw material to produce energy such as hydrogen via fermentation, which is a more attractive and environmentally friendly approach compared to incineration and land-filling. Food waste must be pretreated before being used in various biological processes. The choice of the pretreatment method usually depends on the composition of the food waste. Therefore, various pretreatment methods generally employed to treat FW, including physical, physiochemical, chemical and biological pretreatments, are summarized in this review. The different pretreatment methods are compared in terms of their efficiency and biohydrogen yield. Additionally, the energy efficiencies of the various pretreatment methods are compared, thereby leading to the selection of the most efficient pretreatment method. • BioH2 production from food wastes have been reviewed. • Pretreatment methods and their energy analysis have been compared. • Combined pretreatments for better efficiencies are suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]