Search

Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients with acute spinal fractures represent a challenge for practicing spine surgeons due to difficult operative anatomy and susceptibility to complications. Does intraoperative CT-navigation improve outcomes in patients with ankylosing spondylitis undergoing surgery? A retrospective review was carried out at our centre from 05/2016–06/2021 to identify AS patients presenting with a traumatic spinal fracture, managed surgically with posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Cohorts were categorised and compared for outcomes based on those who underwent PSF with intraoperative CT-navigation versus those surgically managed with traditional intraoperative fluoroscopy. 37 AS patients were identified. 29/37 (78.4%) underwent PSF. Intraoperative navigation was used in 14 (48.3%) cases. Mean age of the entire cohort was 67.6 years. No difference existed between the navigated and non-navigated groups for mean levels fused (5.35 vs 5.07; p ​= ​0.31), length of operation (217.9mins vs 175.3mins; p ​= ​0.07), overall length-of-stay (12 days vs 21.9 days; p ​= ​0.16), patients requiring HDU (3/14 vs 5/15; p ​= ​0.09) or ICU (5/14 vs 9/15; p ​= ​0.10), postoperative neurological improvement (1/14 vs 1/15; p ​= ​0.48) or deterioration (1/14 vs 0/15; p ​= ​0.15), intraoperative complications (2/14 vs 3/15; p ​= ​0.34), postoperative complications 4/14 vs 4/15; p ​= ​0.46), revision surgeries (3/14 vs 1/15; p ​= ​0.16) and 30-day mortality (0/14 vs 0/15). This is the first study that compares surgical outcomes of navigated vs non-navigated PSFs for AS patients with an acute spinal fracture. Although limited by its retrospective design and sample size, this study highlights the non-inferiority of intraoperative navigation as a surgical aid in a challenging cohort. • Patients with ankylosing spondylitis have difficult operative anatomy • Intraoperative CT-navigation may benefit patients with ankylosing spondylitis • Intraoperative CT-navigation has similar outcomes to intraoperative fluoroscopy [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alternative metrics, or altmetrics, have emerged as a promising tool for measuring the social impact of research, which is increasingly important in today's digital and social media-driven world. Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) is a weighted count of all the online attention garnered by a study, and it is currently unclear whether a relationship with traditional bibliometrics exists. The purpose of this article was to retrospectively review articles published in the Surgeon Journal from 2003 to 2020 to compare AAS with bibliometric parameters using an Independent t-test and Pearson's correlation analysis. There were statistically significant weakly positive relationships between AAS and sample size, number of reads, and number of citations. There was no statistically significant relationship between AAS and number of authors, H-index, or level of evidence. This study highlights the potential value of altmetrics by measuring the social impact of research as altmetrics can provide valuable information not captured by traditional metrics. It is currently unclear what the optimal balance of social and academic impact is in evaluating research impact and how altmetrics can be integrated into existing research frameworks. • Altmetrics, have emerged as a promising tool for measuring the social impact of research. • However, it is unclear how altmetrics relates to traditional bibliometrics. • This study evaluates this relationship for all studies published in The Surgeon. • Significant relationships were seen with sample size, number of reads and citations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Major trauma has seen a demographic shift in recent years and it is expected that the elderly population will comprise a greater burden on the major trauma service in the near future. However, whether a similar trend exists in those undergoing operative intervention for spinal trauma remains to be elucidated.Aims: To compare the presentation and outcomes of patients ≥65 years of age sustaining spine trauma to those <65 years at a national tertiary referral spine centre.Methods: The local Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database was analysed to identify spinal patients referred to our institution, a national tertiary referral centre, between 01/2016 and 05/2019. Patients were divided into a young cohort (16-64 years old) and an elderly cohort (> 64 years old). No explicit distinction was made between major and minor spine trauma cases. Variables analysed included patient demographics, injury severity, mortality, interventions, mechanism of injury and length of hospital stay.Results: A total of 669 patients were admitted of which 480 patients underwent operative intervention for spinal trauma. Within the elderly cohort, this represented 75.3% of cases. Among the younger population, road traffic collisions were the most common mechanism of injury (37.1%), while low falls (<2 m) (57.4%) were the most common mechanism among the older population. Patients ≥65 years old had significantly longer length of stay (21 days [1-194] v 14 days [1-183]) and suffered higher 30-day mortality rates (4.6% [0-12] v 0.97% [0-4]).Conclusion: Orthopaedic spinal trauma in older people is associated with a significantly higher mortality rate as well as a longer duration of hospitalization. Even though severity of injury is similar for both young and old patients, the mechanism of injury for the older population is of typically much lower energy compared to the high energy trauma affecting younger patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The preoperative identification of osteoporosis in the spine surgery population is of crucial importance. Limitations associated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, such as access and reliability, have prompted the search for alternative methods to diagnose osteoporosis. The Hounsfield Unit(HU), a readily available measure on computed tomography, has garnered considerable attention in recent years as a potential diagnostic tool for reduced bone mineral density. However, the optimal threshold settings for diagnosing osteoporosis have yet to be determined.Methods: We selected studies that included comparison of the HU(index test) with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry evaluation(reference test). Data quality was assessed using the standardised QUADAS-2 criteria. Studies were characterised into 3 categories, based on the threshold of the index test used with the goal of obtaining a high sensitivity, high specificity or balanced sensitivity-specificity test.Results: 9 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. In the high specificity group, the pooled sensitivity was 0.652 (95% CI 0.526 - 0.760), specificity 0.795 (95% CI 0.711 - 0.859) and diagnostic odds ratio was 6.652 (95% CI 4.367 - 10.133). In the high sensitivity group, the overall pooled sensitivity was 0.912 (95% CI 0.718 - 0.977), specificity was 0.67 (0.57 - 0.75) and diagnostic odds ratio was 19.424 (5.446 - 69.275). In the balanced sensitivity-specificity group, the overall pooled sensitivity was 0.625 (95% CI 0.504 - 0.732), specificity was 0.914 (0.823 - 0.960) and diagnostic odds ratio was 14.880 (7.521 - 29.440). Considerable heterogeneity existed throughout the analysis.Conclusion: In conclusion, the HU is a clinically useful tool to aide in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. However, the heterogeneity seen in this study warrants caution in the interpretation of results. We have demonstrated the impact of differing HU threshold values on the diagnostic ability of this test. We would propose a threshold of 135 HU to diagnose OP. Future work would investigate the optimal HU cut-off to differentiate normal from low bone mineral density. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vertebral artery injuries (VAI) can occur due to cervical spine trauma. VAI can prove a serious complication and potentially compromise vascular supply to the posterior aspect of the brain. Currently, there is a paucity of evidence with regards to incidence, management, and outcomes for these patients. The purpose of this study is to investigate and elucidate the incidence of VAI associated with cervical trauma at a national tertiary referral centre for spinal pathology, their respective management, and associated outcomes. A retrospective review was conducted from 2012 to 2021 to identify patients with VAI secondary to cervical spine trauma. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data was collected to identify common traits in injury characteristics and management. 1013 spine patients presented to our institution across the 10-year period. 739/1013 (72.9 %) were trauma patients. 42/739 (5.7 %) were imaged for suspected VAI secondary to trauma. There were 14/739 (1.9 %) confirmed VAI. All patients had CT-angiography for diagnosis. Four of the confirmed VAI patients (28.6 %) had additional MR-angiography imaging. Right-side was the most common side of VAI injury (7/14; 50 %), followed by left (5/14; 35.7 %) and bilateral (2/14; 14.3 %) injuries. 8/14 (57.1 %) patients were prescribed anti-thrombotic therapy. Acute mortality within 3-months was noted to be 2/14 (14.3 %) and occurred at 49 days and 57 days respectively. VAI associated with cervical spine injury is rare in occurrence. However, it can be associated with high morbidity and mortality. As such, a multi-disciplinary approach to care is integral to ensuring good outcomes in these patients. • 1013 patients presented to a national tertiary spine unit between 2012 and 2021. • 5.7 % were imaged for suspected VAI, 1.9 % were diagnosed with confirmed VAI. • All cases had surgery and 57.1 % were prescribed anti-thrombotic therapy. • VAI has high morbidity and mortality. Acute mortality at 3 months was 14.3 %. • A multi-disciplinary approach is integral to ensuring good outcomes in this cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]