Search

Abstract: The blood brain barrier (BBB) is a major impediment to the delivery of therapeutics into the central nervous system (CNS). Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been successfully employed in multiple potential therapeutic and diagnostic applications outside the CNS. However, AuNPs have very limited biodistribution within the CNS following intravenous administration. Magnetic resonance imaging guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a novel technique that can transiently increase BBB permeability allowing delivery of therapeutics into the CNS. MRgFUS has not been previously employed for delivery of AuNPs into the CNS. This work represents the first demonstration of focal enhanced delivery of AuNPs into the CNS using MRgFUS in a rat model both safely and effectively. Histologic visualization and analytical quantification of AuNPs within the brain parenchyma suggest BBB transgression. These results suggest a role for MRgFUS in the delivery of AuNPs with therapeutic potential into the CNS for targeting neurological diseases. From the Clinical Editor: Gold nanoparticles have been successfully utilized in experimental diagnostic and therapeutic applications; however, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is not permeable to these particles. In this paper, the authors demonstrated that MRI guided focused ultrasound is capable to transiently open the BBB thereby enabling CNS access. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: Limited data exist quantifying the risk of adverse radiation effect (ARE) specific to hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS). We present our analyses of the risk of ARE after 5 daily fractions of HSRS to surgical cavities and intact metastases.Methods and Materials: One hundred and eighty-seven consecutively treated patients with 118 surgical cavities and 132 intact metastases were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with 5 daily fractions with a 2 mm planning target volume applied. Clinical and dosimetric variables were assessed to identify predictors of ARE.Results: The median total prescribed dose was 30 Gy (range, 20-35 Gy) and median follow-up was 12 months. One hundred forty-four patients (77%) received treatment to a single target. Median planning target volumes for resection cavity and intact metastases were 24.9 cm3 and 7.7 cm3, respectively. ARE and symptomatic ARE were observed 21.2% and 10.8% of targets, respectively, and the median time to ARE was 8 months. Time to ARE was <6 months for 38%, 6 to 12 months for 43%, and >12 months for 19% of targets. Multivariable analysis identified intact metastases versus cavities (odds ratio [OR], 3.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-10) as a significant predictor of symptomatic ARE. Specific to cavity HSRS, prior whole brain radiation therapy (OR 7.73; 95% CI, 1.67-35.69) and prior stereotactic radiosurgery (OR 8.66; 95% CI, 1.14-65.7) were significant predictors of symptomatic ARE. For intact metastases, the total brain minus gross tumor volume (GTV) receiving 30 Gy (BMC30) was a significant predictor of symptomatic ARE (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.02-1.43), and a volume-based BMC30 threshold of 10.5 cm3 was significant with an OR of 7.21 (95% CI, 1.31-39.45).Conclusions: The risk of ARE was greater for intact metastases compared with cavities after HSRS. For intact lesions, the BMC30 was predictive for symptomatic necrosis, and a threshold of 10.5 cm3 may guide treatment planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Computer-assisted three-dimensional navigation often guides spinal instrumentation. Optical topographic imaging (OTI) offers comparable accuracy and significantly faster registration relative to current navigation systems in open posterior thoracolumbar exposures. We validate the usefulness and accuracy of OTI in minimally invasive spinal approaches. Mini-open midline posterior exposures were performed in 4 human cadavers. Square exposures of 25, 30, 35, and 40 mm were registered to preoperative computed tomography imaging. Screw tracts were fashioned using a tracked awl and probe with instrumentation placed. Navigation data were compared with screw positions on postoperative computed tomography imaging, and absolute translational and angular deviations were computed. In vivo validation was performed in 8 patients, with mini-open thoracolumbar exposures and percutaneous placement of navigated instrumentation. Navigated instrumentation was performed in the previously described manner. For 37 cadaveric screws, absolute translational errors were (1.79 ± 1.43 mm) and (1.81 ± 1.51 mm) in the axial and sagittal planes, respectively. Absolute angular deviations were (3.81 ± 2.91°) and (3.45 ± 2.82°), respectively (mean ± standard deviation). The number of surface points registered by the navigation system, but not exposure size, correlated positively with the likelihood of successful registration (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.009–1.024; P < 0.001). Fifty-five in vivo thoracolumbar pedicle screws were analyzed. Overall (mean ± standard deviation) axial and sagittal translational errors were (1.79 ± 1.41 mm) and (2.68 ± 2.26 mm), respectively. Axial and sagittal angular errors were (3.63° ± 2.92°) and (4.65° ± 3.36°), respectively. There were no radiographic breaches >2 mm or any neurovascular complications. OTI is a novel navigation technique previously validated for open posterior exposures and in this study has comparable accuracy for mini-open minimally invasive surgery exposures. The likelihood of successful registration is affected more by the geometry of the exposure than by its size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Spinal intraoperative computer-assisted navigation (CAN) may guide pedicle screw placement. Computer-assisted navigation techniques have been reported to reduce pedicle screw breach rates across all spinal levels. However, definitions of screw breach vary widely across studies, if reported at all. The absolute quantitative error of spinal navigation systems is theoretically a more precise and generalizable metric of navigation accuracy. It has also been computed variably and reported in less than a quarter of clinical studies of CAN-guided pedicle screw accuracy.Purpose: This study aimed to characterize the correlation between clinical pedicle screw accuracy, based on postoperative imaging, and absolute quantitative navigation accuracy.Design/setting: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively collected cohort.Patient Sample: We recruited 30 patients undergoing first-time posterior cervical-thoracic-lumbar-sacral instrumented fusion±decompression, guided by intraoperative three-dimensional CAN.Outcome Measures: Clinical or radiographic screw accuracy (Heary and 2 mm classifications) and absolute quantitative navigation accuracy (translational and angular error in axial and sagittal planes).Methods: We reviewed a prospectively collected series of 209 pedicle screws placed with CAN guidance. Each screw was graded clinically by multiple independent raters using the Heary and 2 mm classifications. Clinical grades were dichotomized per convention. The absolute accuracy of each screw was quantified by the translational and angular error in each of the axial and sagittal planes.Results: Acceptable screw accuracy was achieved for significantly fewer screws based on 2 mm grade versus Heary grade (92.6% vs. 95.1%, p=.036), particularly in the lumbar spine. Inter-rater agreement was good for the Heary classification and moderate for the 2 mm grade, significantly greater among radiologists than surgeon raters. Mean absolute translational-angular accuracies were 1.75 mm-3.13° and 1.20 mm-3.64° in the axial and sagittal planes, respectively. There was no correlation between clinical and absolute navigation accuracy.Conclusions: Radiographic classifications of pedicle screw accuracy vary in sensitivity across spinal levels, as well as in inter-rater reliability. Correlation between clinical screw grade and absolute navigation accuracy is poor, as surgeons appear to compensate for navigation registration error. Future studies of navigation accuracy should report absolute translational and angular errors. Clinical screw grades based on postoperative imaging may be more reliable if performed in multiple by radiologist raters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Economic evaluations provide a unique opportunity to identify the optimal strategies for the diagnosis and management of traumatic brain injury (TBI), for which uncertainty is common and the economic burden is substantial. Objective The objective of this study was to systematically review and examine the quality of contemporary economic evaluations in the diagnosis and management of TBI. Methods Two reviewers independently searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Health Technology Assessment Database, EconLit, and the Tufts CEA Registry for comparative economic evaluations published from 2000 onward (last updated on August 30, 2013). Data on methods, results, and quality were abstracted in duplicate. The results were summarized quantitatively and qualitatively. Results Of 3539 citations, 24 economic evaluations met our inclusion criteria. Nine were cost-utility, five were cost-effectiveness, three were cost-minimization, and seven were cost-consequences analyses. Only six studies were of high quality. Current evidence from high-quality studies suggests the economic attractiveness of the following strategies: a low medical threshold for computed tomography (CT) scanning of asymptomatic infants with possible inflicted TBI, selective CT scanning of adults with mild TBI as per the Canadian CT Head Rule, management of severe TBI according to the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, management of TBI in dedicated neurocritical care units, and early transfer of patients with TBI with nonsurgical lesions to neuroscience centers. Conclusions Threshold-guided CT scanning, adherence to Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines, and care for patients with TBI, including those with nonsurgical lesions, in specialized settings appear to be economically attractive strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]