Search

• A zebrafish embryo PBPK model for neutral or ionizable chemicals is proposed. • Organs' growth and changes in metabolic clearance with time are considered. • Bayesian calibration can be used to improve predictions. • We apply the model to valproic acid analogues' developmental toxicity. In order to better explain, predict, or extrapolate to humans the developmental toxicity effects of chemicals to zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos, we developed a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model designed to predict organ concentrations of neutral or ionizable chemicals, up to 120 h post-fertilization. Chemicals' distribution is modeled in the cells, lysosomes, and mitochondria of ten organs of the embryo. The model's partition coefficients are calculated with sub-models using physicochemical properties of the chemicals of interest. The model accounts for organ growth and changes in metabolic clearance with time. We compared ab initio model predictions to data obtained on culture medium and embryo concentrations of valproic acid (VPA) and nine analogs during continuous dosing under the OECD test guideline 236. We further improved the predictions by estimating metabolic clearance and partition coefficients from the data by Bayesian calibration. We also assessed the performance of the model at reproducing data published by Brox et al. (2016) on VPA and 16 other chemicals. We finally compared dose-response relationships calculated for mortality and malformations on the basis of predicted whole embryo concentrations versus those based on nominal water concentrations. The use of target organ concentrations substantially shifted the magnitude of dose-response parameters and the relative toxicity ranking of chemicals studied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Read-across approaches often remain inconclusive as they do not provide sufficient evidence on a common mode of action across the category members. This read-across case study on thirteen, structurally similar, branched aliphatic carboxylic acids investigates the concept of using human-based new approach methods, such as in vitro and in silico models, to demonstrate biological similarity. Five out of the thirteen analogues have preclinical in vivo studies. Three out of them induced lipid accumulation or hypertrophy in preclinical studies with repeated exposure, which leads to the read-across hypothesis that the analogues can potentially induce hepatic steatosis. To confirm the selection of analogues, the expression patterns of the induced differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analysed in a human liver model. With increasing dose, the expression pattern within the tested analogues got more similar, which serves as a first indication of a common mode of action and suggests differences in the potency of the analogues. Hepatic steatosis is a well-known adverse outcome, for which over 55 adverse outcome pathways have been identified. The resulting adverse outcome pathway (AOP) network, comprised a total 43 MIEs/KEs and enabled the design of an in vitro testing battery. From the AOP network, ten MIEs, early and late KEs were tested to systematically investigate a common mode of action among the grouped compounds. The targeted testing of AOP specific MIE/KEs shows that biological activity in the category decreases with side chain length. A similar trend was evident in measuring liver alterations in zebra fish embryos. However, activation of single MIEs or early KEs at in vivo relevant doses did not necessarily progress to the late KE "lipid accumulation". KEs not related to the read-across hypothesis, testing for example general mitochondrial stress responses in liver cells, showed no trend or biological similarity. Testing scope is a key issue in the design of in vitro test batteries. The Dempster-Shafer decision theory predicted those analogues with in vivo reference data correctly using one human liver model or the CALUX reporter assays. The case study shows that the read-across hypothesis is the key element to designing the testing strategy. In the case of a good mechanistic understanding, an AOP facilitates the selection of reliable human in vitro models to demonstrate a common mode of action. Testing DEGs, MIEs and early KEs served to show biological similarity, whereas the late KEs become important for confirmation, as progression from MIEs to AO is not always guaranteed. • Integration of new approach methods into human hazard characterization • Read-across on systemic toxicity assessment supported by New Approach Methods • AOP informed testing strategy for hazard characterization • Uncertainty characterization • Case studies as alternative tools for model validation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]