Search

Administering chemotherapy until progression to metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients lacks of supporting evidence and causes cumulative toxicity. We explored the role of cyclophosphamide as maintenance therapy. PDAC germline BRCA1–2 wild-type patients who were progression-free after ≥6 months of any regimen and line of chemotherapy and received maintenance cyclophosphamide (mCTX) (50 mg/day), were included in the analysis. 42 patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-nine patients had progression of disease. Median PFS was 3.5 (range 1.0–31+) months. PFS rates at 6 and 12 months were 26.2% and 11.9%. At a median follow-up of 20.0 months (range 12.1–31.0 months), 20 patients died and 22 are alive. Median OS was 20.0 months (range 2.2–31.0+). OS at 6 and 12 months was 97.6% (95%CI: 93.4–100), and 73.8% (95% CI: 61.1–86.5), respectively. Only 2 patients receiving mCTX had Grade 3 toxicity. mCTX therapy yielded promising PFS and OS outcome in PDAC patients who were progression-free after induction chemotherapy, with unremarkable toxicity. Accordingly, this approach warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on the proper post-surgical chemotherapy (PSC) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients already treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) are lacking, especially for stage ypIA. We retrospectively analyzed ypT1N0M0 (ypIA) PDAC patients resected after NAT between 2015 and 2020 at our Institution. Primary endpoint was median disease free-survival (DFS) according to PSC treatment. Seventy-five out of 363 patients achieved a pathological ypIA after NAT (20.6%) and 72 were analyzed. Among the study population 34 patients (47%) were treated with NAT ≤4 months and 38 (53%) >4 months. After surgery, 10 patients (14%) received PSC using the same multidrug NAT regimen (Group A); 35 (49%) received PSC with a different regimen (Group B), with either single agents in 24 patients (68.5%) or combination schedules in 11 (31.5%); 27 patients (14%) did not receive any PSC (Group C). DFS was longer in group A and C as opposed to group B (p = 0.006). Patients affected by ypIA PDAC treated with a proper multi-agent chemotherapy for more than 4 months show an improved DFS, regardless of the peri‑operative or totally pre-surgical administration of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic chemotherapy (CT) is the treatment of choice for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Biliary obstruction is common in this setting and may interfere with CT administration due to jaundice or cholangitis related to biliary stent malfunction. To evaluate the impact of biliary events on CT administration and survival in patients with stage III-IV PDAC. Patients enrolled in a randomized trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine with/without capecitabine and cisplatin in advanced PDAC were included. Data on management of jaundice, biliary stents/complications and CT were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Modified overall (mOS) and progression-free (mPFS) survival were evaluated. Eighty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria (50% females; median age 65years). Seven of eight (87.5%) patients who placed plastic stents developed biliary complications versus 14/30 (46.7%) with metallic stents (p = 0.071). Patients without biliary complications completed planned CT in 64.2% versus 47.6% of cases (p = 0.207). CT completion was related to longer mOS (17 vs 12 months, p = 0.005) and mPFS (9 vs 6 months, p = 0.011). mOS was shorter when biliary complications occurred (12 vs 17 months, p = 0.937), as was mPFS (6 vs 8 months, p = 0.438). Complications related to biliary obstruction influence chemotherapy completion and survival in patients with advanced PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive disease, for which it is crucial to promptly detect actionable and prognostic alterations to drive specific therapeutic decisions, regardless of tumor resectability status. Endoscopic ultrasonography–guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is of key importance for PDAC diagnosis and can contribute significantly to tumor molecular profiling. Comprehensive genomic profile by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on 2 independent PDAC patient cohorts. Cohort 1 consisted of 77 patients with resectable PDAC for whom the histologic sample at the time of resection was available; for 56 patients cytologic specimens at the time of diagnosis also were obtained by EUS-FNA. Cohort 2 consisted of 20 patients with unresectable PDAC, for whom only the EUS-FNA cytologic sample was available. In cohort 1, a complete concordant mutational profile between the cytologic sample at diagnosis and the corresponding histologic specimen after surgery was observed in 88% of the cases, proving the ability to detect potential clinically relevant alterations in cytologic samples by NGS analysis. Notably, clinically actionable mutations were identified in 20% of patients. In cohort 2, comprehensive mutational profiling was obtained successfully for all samples. Consistent with the findings of cohort 1, KRAS , TP53 , CDKN2A , and SMAD4 were the most altered genes. Most importantly, 15% of the patients harbored actionable mutations. Our findings show the feasibility of an NGS approach using both surgical specimens and cytologic samples. The model proposed in this study can be included successfully in the clinical setting for comprehensive molecular profiling of all PDAC patients irrespective of their surgical eligibility. ▪ [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Older patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPDAC) are under-represented in clinical trials. Our single-center, retrospective study enrolled MPDAC patients ≥ 70 treated with chemotherapy 105 patients were divided in groups based on the received treatments: 44 gemcitabine or capecitabine monotherapy (A), 34 nabpaclitaxel-gemcitabine (B) 27 4-drugs combinations (gemcitabine, cisplatin, capecitabine plus either nab-paclitaxel or epirubicin or docetaxel) (C). Group A: median age was 78 (70–87) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥80 was found in 84% of patients; Group B: median age 77 (71–84) and KPS ≥ 80 in 88% of patients; Group C: median age 73 (70–78) and KPS ≥ 80 in 93% of patients. Median OS was 7.9, 11.7 and 14.2 months in group A, B and C respectively; 1 and 2-year OS were 27% and 8% in group A; 44% and 5% in group B; 52% and 22% in group C. When lung metastatic only patients were excluded, patients <75 and ≥ 75 had similar OS in group A (6.4 vs 5.6 months) and in group B (12.3 vs 11.1 months). In group B grade 3 thrombocytopenia, fatigue and peripheral neuropathy were more frequent in patients ≥ 75. In older patients, combination chemotherapy shows acceptable feasibility and promising efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

By 2030 70% of newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) will occur in older adults. Elderly patients, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as people older than 65 years, represent a heterogeneous group with different biological and functional characteristics that need personalized anticancer treatments. Since older patients are under-represented in randomized phase III trials, their management is mostly extrapolated from studies performed in younger patients, without robust evidence-based recommendations. However, data from retrospective studies and case-control series show that elderly may benefit from chemotherapy in both the adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Although with discordant results, gemcitabine-based treatment and dose-adapted fluorouracil combination regimens seem to be effective and well tolerated in this subset of patients. A proper balance of potential treatment benefits and side effects represent the crucial point for managing elderly patients with PDAC. Therefore an appropriate patient selection is essential to maximize the therapeutic benefit in the older population: randomized studies aiming to better standardizing fitness parameters and implementing the routine use of comprehensive geriatric assessments are strongly warranted. In this light, the detection of molecular prognostic markers able to detect patients who may benefit more from oncological treatments should be a primary endpoint of age-focused clinical trials. Altogether, the field of geriatric oncology will expand in the next years, and the clinical management of elderly patients affected by PDAC will become a major public health issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Retrospective studies on malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO) highlighted several advantages of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) over enteral stenting (ES). However, no prospective evidence is available. The aim of this study was to report on clinical outcomes of EUS-GE in a prospective cohort study, with a subgroup comparison versus ES. All consecutive patients endoscopically treated for mGOO between December 2020 and December 2022 in a tertiary, academic center were enrolled in a prospective registry (Prospective Registry of Therapeutic Endoscopic Ultrasound [PROTECT]; NCT04813055) and followed up every 30 days to register efficacy/safety outcomes. EUS-GE and ES cohorts were matched according to baseline frailty and oncologic disease. A total of 104 patients were treated for mGOO during the study; 70 (58.6% male subjects; median age, 64 [interquartile range, 58-73] years; 75.7% pancreatic cancer, 60.0% metastatic cancer) underwent EUS-GE via the wireless simplified technique. Technical success was 97.1% and clinical success was 97.1% after a median of 1.5 (interquartile range, 1-2) days. Adverse events occurred in 9 (12.9%) patients. After a median follow-up of 105 (49-187) days, symptom recurrence was 7.6%. In the matched comparison versus ES (28 patients per arm), EUS-GE–treated patients experienced higher and faster clinical success (100% vs 75.0%, P =.006), reduced recurrences (3.7% vs 33.3%, P =.02), and a trend toward shorter time to chemotherapy. In this first, prospective, single-center comparison, EUS-GE showed excellent efficacy in treating mGOO, with an acceptable safety profile and long-term patency, and several clinically significant advantages over ES. While awaiting randomized trials, these results might endorse EUS-GE as first-line strategy for mGOO, where adequate expertise is available. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is increasing over the last years, while patients prognosis remains grim. Recently germline BRCA1 and 2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA1-2) have emerged as risk factors for PDAC development, as well as new predictors of response to specific therapeutic interventions. However, data on gBRCA1-2 incidence in PDAC are currently sparse and limited to selected categories of patients, as for positive cancer history cases, for patients affected only by early or late stages of disease and mainly from the North-American population, thus generating incomplete information about the gBRCA1/2 epidemiology. In Western Countries gBRCA1-2 incidence ranges between 4.5% and 8% in unselected PDAC patients, raising up to 26% in cohorts with positive family cancer history. To date a limited number of studies from Asian countries are available, reporting a 10% as highest incidence of gBRCA1-2 in familiar PDAC, claiming at least in part a role of ethnicity in the gBRCA1-2 incidence and in other genes potentially implicated in the therapeutic decisions. Drawing a better defined map for the incidence of gBRCA1-2 and other germline pathogenic variants of DNA Damage Response genes (gDDR) might help assessing the therapeutic strategies for mutated patients according to the geographic areas. These informations may enhance the chance to predict efficacy and toxicity of selected chemotherapy regimens, fostering the development and implementation of the pharmaco-ethnicity knowledge in the routine-clinical practice, and increasing the awareness of the potential incorrect generalization of trials results outside of the geographic area where they are conducted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Personalized treatments and predictive biomarkers of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) are still lacking. Recently germline mutations in BRCA 1 and 2 genes, leading to homologous repair deficiency, have emerged as new targets for more specific and effective therapies, exploiting the increased susceptibility to platinum salts and PARP inhibitors. In addition to BRCA, pathogenic variants in PALB2 and in other genes involved in the DNA damage response pathway (DDR) represent potential targets, as well as their respective somatic alterations. This enlarged molecularly-selected population sharing the BRCAness phenotype, is expected to show a higher sensibility to a number of DNA damaging agents and DDR inhibitors. However, the possibility of new therapeutic opportunities for DDR defective PDAC patients has to face the lack of solid evidence about the proper type and timing of targeted-treatments, the potential combination strategies and most importantly, the lack of informations on the functional impact of each specific pathogenic variant on the DDR pathway. This review summarizes the current and near-future options for the clinical management of PDAC patients harboring a DDR deficiency, analyzing the state of the art of the indications of platinum salts and other cytotoxic agents in the advanced and early stage PDAC, the development of PARP inhibitors and the rational for new combinations with immunotherapy and cycle checkpoint inhibitors, as well as the strategy to overcome the development of resistance over treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Germline BRCA1–2 test is routinely recommended in Pancreatic Cancer (PC) patients, due to its clinical-epidemiological relevance. Data on the prevalence of germline pathogenic variants (gPV) in other cancer predisposition and DNA Damage Repair (DDR) system-related genes in unselected PC cases are sparce in Italy. We assessed this prevalence in a multicentre cohort, to derive recommendations for PC patients. Clinical data of 1200 consecutive PC patients, of any age and stage, tested with a multigene germline panel were collected. A descriptive analysis of gPV frequency and clinical variables was performed both in 1092 patients tested for an 18 genes core-panel (CP-18 cohort) and in 869 patients screened only for CDKN2A. 11.5 % (126/1092) of CP-18 cohort patients harbored a gPV in ≥ 1 gene. Highest gPV frequencies were detected in ATM (3.1 %), BRCA2 (2.9 %), BRCA1 (1.6 %), CHEK2 (1.1 %). Patients harboring any CP-18 gene and BRCA1–2 gPV were younger and with a higher rate of personal (PH) or family history (FH) of cancer when compared to no gPV patients. The risk of having a gPV was ≥ 7 % in all subgroups of patients, including those aged > 73, with tumor stage I-III and negative FH/PH. CDKN2A gPV were detected in 2.6 % (23/869) of patients. A remarkable prevalence of gPV in cancer predisposition and DDR genes is reported in this large multicentre cohort of consecutive and unselected PC patients. Therefore, we recommend multigene germline testing (at least including BRCA1–2, ATM, CDKN2A, PALB2) for all PC patients, irrespective of age, stage, PH/FH. ● Germline genomic pathogenic variants (gPV) can promote Pancreatic Cancer (PC). ● The prevalence of cancer predisposition genes (CPG) gPV in PC in Italy is unknown. ● 14 % of unselected, consecutive PC patients had a gPV in at least 1/19 CPG tested. ● CPG gPV rate remained relevant across different subgroups (age, stage, history). ● Multigene germline testing, beyond BRCA1-2 , should be offered to all PC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The current trial assessed whether the addition of cisplatin and capecitabine to the nab-paclitaxel–gemcitabine backbone is feasible and active against borderline and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Method Fifty-four chemo-naive patients, aged between 18 and 75 years, with a pathological diagnosis of locally advanced or borderline resectable PDAC were randomised to receive either nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, cisplatin and oral capecitabine (PAXG; arm A; N = 26) or nab-paclitaxel followed by gemcitabine (AG; arm B; N = 28). The primary end-point was the tumour resection rate. If at least four such resections were performed, the treatment was considered as active. The secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours response rate, Hartman's pathologic response, carbohydrate antigen 19.9 response rate and toxicity. Results Eight patients (31%) in the PAXG arm and nine (32%) in the AG arm underwent resection. PFS at 1-year was 58% in arm A and 39% in arm B. OS at 18-month was 69% in arm A and 54% in arm B. Conclusions In this phase II study, the addition of cisplatin and capecitabine to the AG backbone was feasible and yielded promising results in terms of disease control without detrimental impact on tolerability. The approach warrants further investigation in a phase III study. Trial registration NCT01730222. Highlights • No standard therapy has been yet identified in borderline/locally advanced disease. • A very limited number of randomised trials have been completed in this setting. • This current trial evaluates the activity and feasibility of cisplatin, nab-paclitaxel, capecitabine, gemcitabine (PAXG) and nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine (AG) regimens. • Both regimens were effective in terms of disease control. • PAXG regimen appears more convenient from several perspectives than AG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Within the gastrointestinal stem cell niche, nerves help to regulate both normal and neoplastic stem cell dynamics. Here, we reveal the mechanisms underlying the cancer-nerve partnership. We find that Dclk1 + tuft cells and nerves are the main sources of acetylcholine (ACh) within the gastric mucosa. Cholinergic stimulation of the gastric epithelium induced nerve growth factor (NGF) expression, and in turn NGF overexpression within gastric epithelium expanded enteric nerves and promoted carcinogenesis. Ablation of Dclk1 + cells or blockade of NGF/Trk signaling inhibited epithelial proliferation and tumorigenesis in an ACh muscarinic receptor-3 (M3R)-dependent manner, in part through suppression of yes-associated protein (YAP) function. This feedforward ACh-NGF axis activates the gastric cancer niche and offers a compelling target for tumor treatment and prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Catecholamines stimulate epithelial proliferation, but the role of sympathetic nerve signaling in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is poorly understood. Catecholamines promoted ADRB2-dependent PDAC development, nerve growth factor (NGF) secretion, and pancreatic nerve density. Pancreatic Ngf overexpression accelerated tumor development in LSL- Kras +/G12D ; Pdx1 -Cre (KC) mice. ADRB2 blockade together with gemcitabine reduced NGF expression and nerve density, and increased survival of LSL- Kras +/G12D ;LSL- Trp53 +/R172H ; Pdx1 -Cre (KPC) mice. Therapy with a Trk inhibitor together with gemcitabine also increased survival of KPC mice. Analysis of PDAC patient cohorts revealed a correlation between brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression, nerve density, and increased survival of patients on nonselective β-blockers. These findings suggest that catecholamines drive a feedforward loop, whereby upregulation of neurotrophins increases sympathetic innervation and local norepinephrine accumulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]