Search

Three-dimensional conformal accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is a treatment option for well selected women with breast cancer, despite reports of adverse cosmetic outcome with this technique. Dose-volume relationships may be responsible for this poor cosmesis. We aimed to determine the feasibility of limiting the exposure of nontarget breast tissue to radiation through smaller planning target volumes achieved through daily image guidance and 4-dimensional computed tomography simulation. Eligibility criteria included the following: women, age ≥50 years, Karnofsky performance status score ≥70, stage 0 and I breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery, margins clear by ≥2 mm, pathologic tumor size ≤2 cm, and 4-dimensional computed tomography with planning target volumes of 0.2 cm rather than the standard 1.0 cm. A dose of 3850 cGy was prescribed in 10 fractions. The study was considered successful if ≥50% of enrollees met dosimetric constraints on the breast (V50 < 45% and V100 < 23.5%). The study achieved its primary endpoint of feasibility of reducing the nontarget breast dose with a breast median of V50 = 31% and V100 = 11%. There were no recurrences and no toxicity grade >3. At baseline, fair/poor cosmesis was low (2.2%). By year 3, adverse cosmesis post-APBI had increased by 13.2% (to 15.4%). Patient decisional satisfaction was reached completely in 84.2% of patients. This study demonstrated that with 4-dimensional simulated APBI that uses stringent dosimetric constraints and image guidance radiation therapy, it is possible to obtain acceptable cosmetic outcomes. We report no locoregional recurrences in 3 years and no toxicity grade >3. The observed decline in cosmesis was acceptable compared with that of prior published studies, and patient satisfaction with APBI was excellent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Recently, it has been suggested that screening mammography may result in some degree of overdiagnosis (ie, detection of breast cancers that would never become clinically important within the lifespan of the patient). The extent and biology of these overdiagnosed cancers, however, is not well understood, and the effect of newer screening modalities on overdiagnosis is unknown. Methods We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of breast cancers diagnosed at the Yale Breast Center from 2004–2014. The mode of initial presentation was categorized into 5 groups: screening mammogram, screening magnetic resonance imaging, screening ultrasonography, self-detected masses, and physician-detected masses. Results Compared with cancers presenting with masses, cancers detected by image-based screening were more likely to present with ductal carcinoma-in-situ or T1 cancers ( P < .001). In addition to a simple stage shift, however, cancers detected by image-based screening were also more likely to be luminal and low-grade cancers; symptomatic cancers were more likely high-grade and triple-negative ( P < .001, respectively). On a multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, race, and tumor size, cancers detected by mammogram, US, and magnetic resonance imaging had greater odds of being luminal (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval, 1.5–2.3; odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval, 1.1–4.7; and odds ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval, 2.1–10.6, respectively), and low-grade (odds ratio 2.2, 95% confidence interval, 1.6–2.9; odds ratio 4.9, 95% confidence interval, 2.7–8.9; and odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval, 2.6–8.1, respectively) compared with cancers presenting with self-detected masses. Conclusion Screening detects cancers with more indolent biology, potentially contributing to the observed rate of overdiagnosis. With magnetic resonance imaging and US being used more commonly for screening, the rate of overdiagnosis may increase further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with mastectomy and reconstruction are poorly understood. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 196 patients presenting to one institution was performed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (24.0%) were treated with mastectomy, while 149 (76.0%) underwent breast-conserving surgery. Of the mastectomy patients, 28 (59.6%) elected for reconstruction. On bivariate analysis, patients who opted for mastectomy were younger than those treated with breast-conserving surgery (median age, 51.8 vs 56.5 years; P 5 .017) and had higher grade tumors (50.0% vs 34.6% grade 3, P 5 .009). Among patients treated with mastectomy, those who opted for reconstruction were younger than those forgoing reconstruction (49.4 vs 56.9 years, P 5.024). Race, ductal carcinoma in situ tumor size, and histologic subtype were not associated with the decision to pursue mastectomy or reconstruction (P . .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, the decision to pursue mastectomy and reconstruction appears to be driven by younger patient age and higher tumor grade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine factors predicting microinvasion and the prognostic role it plays in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 205 consecutive patients presenting to the Yale Breast Center, New Haven, CT, was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-one (24.9%) patients had microinvasion on pathology. Patients with microinvasion had larger areas of DCIS and were more likely to have high-grade DCIS of the comedo and solid type associated with necrosis and microcalcifications. On multivariate analysis, none of these factors were independent predictors of microinvasion.With a median follow-up of 8.5 years, there was no difference in the recurrence rate or 5-year actuarial survival between those with microinvasion vs those with pure DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: Microinvasion was associated with more extensive DCIS, higher grade, comedo or solid histology, necrosis, and microcalcifications although none of these were found to be an independent predictor of microinvasion. Furthermore, the presence of microinvasion does not seem to significantly increase the risk of recurrence or decrease survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recurring subareolar abscess and lactiferous duct fistula are frequently difficult to manage.Personal experience with 67 cases treated during the past 22 years is reviewed.There were 38 cases of subareolar abscess and 29 of lactiferous duct fistula. Thirty-three patients had resolution with antibiotics and needle aspiration or with incision and drainage,but 34 patients required definitive duct excision. Eight patients had duct excision through circumareolar incisions, and 5 of these had prolonged healing problems or recurrence within 1 year. Twenty-six patients had duct excision by placing a probe into the duct and radially excising an elliptical area of the nipple and areola like a “slice of pie,” and these all healed primarily (P <0.001).Approximately half of the patients with subareolar abscess can be managed medically, but the other half will require definitive duct excision. A radial elliptical incision with primary closure results in excellent cosmesis and low long-term recurrence rates. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used for breast cancer, if a patient has a complete clinical response, it is often difficult for the surgeon to know exactly where and how much breast tissue to remove. Methods: A method is described where the edges of the tumor are tattooed prior to chemotherapy, allowing all tissue initially involved with tumor to be resected following the chemotherapy. Results: Thirty-four cases have been tattooed prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the clinical and pathological complete response rates were 56% and 22%, respectively. The tattoos allowed very accurate localization of the residual tumor location and extent. Of the 22 patients who have so far undergone lumpectomy, 77% had residual pathologic evidence of tumor, but the margins were negative in 91% at the first operation. Only 2 patients had to undergo a mastectomy because of persistently positive margins. Conclusions: The technique of breast tattooing is a simple and practical method to guide the extent of breast surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast to placement of clips, the technique does not require needle localization, and it allows accurate determination of the initial tumor size and margins. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Positive margins have been reported in 20% to 40% of patients undergoing a partial mastectomy, often resulting in re-excision. How often the re-excision yields additional cancer and whether there are predictors of residual disease remain unknown.Study Design: Patients who had a positive margin (defined as tumor at ink for patients with invasive disease or within 1 mm for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ) in the SHAVE (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Shave Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients) trial before randomization were evaluated to determine the rate of additional disease either in cavity shave margins or at re-excision. Details of the SHAVE trial can be found elsewhere.Results: Of the 235 patients in the trial, 82 (34.9%) had a positive margin before randomization; 58 of these patients underwent either cavity shave margins excision or a re-excision of the positive margin(s). Twenty-one (36.2%) patients had residual disease. On bivariate analysis, residual disease was associated with younger patient age (median 51 vs 62 years; p = 0.007), and the presence of high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (57.1% vs 31.3% for grade 2 and 0% for grade 1; p = 0.025). The following factors were not associated with further disease: patient race; ethnicity; BMI; volume of resection; number of positive margins; extent of ductal carcinoma in situ; and extent, grade, and histologic subtype of invasive cancer. On multivariate analysis, only patient age younger than 60 years remained a significant predictor of residual disease (odds ratio 3.920; 95% CI 1.081 to 14.220; p = 0.038).Conclusions: Positive margins are associated with further disease in more than one-third of patients and, aside from young age, there are no predictors of this. These findings support continued re-excision of positive margins, particularly in patients younger than 60 years of age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the clinical-pathologic features and long-term outcomes for women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) vs. DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) treated with breast conservation therapy (BCT), to assess the impact of microinvasion. Patients and Methods: A total of 393 patients with DCIS/DCISM from our database were analyzed to assess differences in clinical-pathologic features and outcomes for the two cohorts. Results: The median follow-up was 8.94 years, and the mean age was 55.8 years for the entire group. The DCISM cohort was comprised of 72 of 393 patients (18.3%). Surgical evaluation of the axilla was performed in 58.3% (n = 42) of DCISM vs. 18.1% (n = 58) of DCIS, with only 1 of 42 DCISM (2.3%) vs. 0 of 58 DCIS with axillary metastasis. Surgical axillary evaluation was not an independent predictor of local-regional relapse (LRR), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), or overall survival (OS) in Cox proportional hazards analysis (p > 0.05). For the DCIS vs. DCISM groups, respectively, the 10-year breast relapse-free survival was 89.0% vs. 90.7% (p = 0.36), DRFS was 98.5% vs. 97.9% (p = 0.78), and OS was 93.2% vs. 95.7% (p = 0.95). The presence of microinvasion did not correlate with LRR, age, presentation, race, family history, margin status, and use of adjuvant hormonal therapy (all p > 0.05). In univariate analysis, pathology (DCIS vs. DCISM) was not an independent predictor of LRR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58–4.30; p = 0.36), DRFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.07–6.95; p = 0.77), or OS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.28–3.82; p = 0.95). Conclusions: Our data imply that the natural history of DCISM closely resembles that of DCIS, with a low incidence of local-regional and distant failures. On the basis of our large dataset, the incidence of axillary metastasis in DCISM appears to be small and not appear to correlate to outcomes, and thus, microinvasion alone should not be the sole criterion for more aggressive treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to increase the rate of breast conservation in clinical trials and small institutional series, but it has never been studied on a national level. Study Design We performed a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The NCDB is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society and contains about 80% of the cancer cases in the United States. All women in the NCDB diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2006 through 2011, who underwent definitive breast surgery and received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, excluding patients with distant metastases or T4 tumors, were included and rates of breast preservation were determined. Results Of 354,204 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 59,063 (16.7%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This proportion steadily increased from 13.9% in 2006 to 20.5% in 2011 (p < 0.001). Receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with larger tumor size (7% cT1, 25% cT2, and 58% cT3; p < 0.001), more advanced nodal disease (11% cN0, 39% cN1-3; p < 0.001), younger patient age (21% <50 years vs 14% >50 years; p < 0.001), higher tumor grade (18% grade 3, 15% grade 2, vs 12% grade 1; p < 0.001), and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (21% ER negative vs 15% ER postive; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that when adjusted for the above variables, patients with tumors larger than 3 cm undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to receive breast preservation than those who opted for primary surgery (odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.6 to 1.8). Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases breast preservation for patients with breast tumor size larger than 3 cm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare outcomes of salvage mastectomy (SM) and salvage breast-conserving surgery (SBCS) and study the feasibility of SBCS. Methods and Materials: Of 2,038 patients treated with breast-conserving therapy at Yale-New Haven Hospital before 1999, 166 sustained an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Outcomes and prognostic factors of patients treated with SM or SBCS were compared. Patients were considered amenable to SBCS if the recurrence was localized on mammogram and physical examination, and had pathologic size <3 cm, confined to the biopsy site, without skin or lymphovascular invasion, and with ≤3 positive nodes. Results: Of the 146 patients definitively managed at IBTR, surgery was SM (n = 116) or SBCS (n = 30). The median length of follow-up after IBTR was 13.8 years. The SM and SBCS cohorts had no significant differences, except at IBTR the SM cohort had a greater tumor size (p = 0.049). Of the SM cohort, 65.5% were considered appropriate for SBCS, and a localized relapse was predicted by estrogen-receptor positive, diploid, and detection of recurrence by mammogram. Multicentric disease correlated with BRCA1/2 mutation, estrogen-receptor negative, lymph node positive at relapse, and detection of recurrence by physical examination. Survival after IBTR was 64.5% at 10 years, with no significant difference between SM (65.7%) and SBCS (58.0%). Only 2 patients in the SBCS cohort subsequently had a second IBTR, and were salvaged with mastectomy. Conclusions: While mastectomy is considered the standard surgical salvage of IBTR, SBCS is feasible and prognostic factors are related to favorable tumor biology and early detection. Patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutations may be less appropriate for SBCS, as multicentric disease was more prevalent. Patients who underwent SBCS had comparable outcomes as those who underwent SM, but remain at continued risk for IBTR. A prospective trial evaluating repeat lumpectomy and partial breast reirradiation is discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]