Search

Abstract Habitat degradation, entwined with land cover change, is a major driver of biodiversity loss. Effects of land cover change on species can be direct (when habitat is converted to alternative land cover types) or indirect (when land outside of the species habitat is altered). Hydrologic and ecological connections between terrestrial and aquatic systems are well understood, exemplifying how spatially disparate land cover conditions may influence aquatic habitats, but are rarely examined. We sought to quantify relative effects of land cover at two different but interacting scales on habitat suitability for the endangered arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus). Based on an existing distribution model for the arroyo toad and available land cover data, we estimated effects of land cover along streams and within entire watersheds on habitat suitability using structural equation modeling. Relationships between land cover and habitat suitability differed between scales, and broader, watershed-scale conditions influenced land cover along the embedded stream networks. We found anthropogenic development and forest cover at the watershed-scale negatively impacted habitat suitability, but development along stream networks was positively associated with suitability. The positive association between development along streams and habitat suitability may be attributable to increased spatial heterogeneity along urbanized streams, or related factors including policies designed to conserve riparian habitats amidst development. These findings show arroyo toad habitat is influenced by land cover across multiple scales, and can inform conservation of the species. Furthermore, our methodology can help elucidate similar dynamics with other taxa, particularly those reliant on both terrestrial and aquatic environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Information-based policy instruments are some of the most commonly used tools for influencing consumers' water use in the residential sector. However, their ability to change behavior remains an area in need of further research. This study describes the evaluation of an information-based demand management program, rooted in normative comparison, designed to increase the efficiency of households' residential outdoor water use. Results indicate that the program had an impact on water use among households that received persuasive messages regarding their past consumption, compared to estimates of lawn water requirements and the water use of neighbors. Additionally, the results demonstrate that the treatment effect gets stronger over time and varies among message recipients as a function of baseline water use. Unanticipated effects of the administration of the messages show an increase in water use among the lowest consuming households. Top users reduced their water use significantly as a function of the persuasive message. The findings suggest that utilities seeking to augment users' water consumption through persuasion must be cognizant of the way that messages are framed, and who receives them, or potentially face unanticipated side effects, and that message repetition may have some additionality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Our objective was to understand how social identity and values influenced general public and stakeholder trust in a state wildlife management agency (SWMA). In particular, we wanted to examine how stakeholder group, political ideology, and wildlife value orientation influenced trust in a SWMA. Data were derived from a study of state residents, hunters and livestock producers related to wolf management. Results suggest differences in agency trust correlated with all three factors and the interaction between stakeholder group and wildlife value orientation. Livestock producers reported lower levels of trust in the agency, compared to hunters and the general public. Individuals with conservative or middle-of-the-road ideologies reported less trust in the agency than individuals with a liberal ideology did. Respondents with traditional wildlife values also had less trust in the agency compared to mutualist, pluralist, and distanced respondents. Results suggested similarities in the ideologies and wildlife value orientations of livestock producers and hunters, although these groups differed significantly in their trust in the agency. Agencies face the challenge of managing common-pool, public-trust resources for stakeholders who hold different values and ideologies, and who are differentially affected by management decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]