1. Cesarean delivery for HIV-infected women: recommendations and controversies
- Author
-
Jamieson, Denise J., Read, Jennifer S., Kourtis, Athena P., Durant, Tonji M., Lampe, Margaret A., and Dominguez, Kenneth L.
- Subjects
Children -- Health aspects ,Women ,HIV (Viruses) ,Health - Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.034 Byline: Denise J. Jamieson (1), Jennifer S. Read (2), Athena P. Kourtis (1), Tonji M. Durant (3), Margaret A. Lampe (3), Kenneth L. Dominguez (3) Keywords: cesarean delivery; HIV transmission Abstract: Two studies that were published in 1999 demonstrated that cesarean delivery before labor and before the rupture of membranes (elective cesarean delivery) reduces the risk of mother-to-child transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). On the basis of these results, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the US Public Health Service recommend that HIV-infected pregnant women with plasma viral loads of >1000 copies per milliliter be counseled regarding the benefits of elective cesarean delivery. Since the release of these guidelines, the cesarean delivery rate among HIV-infected women in the United States has increased dramatically. Major postpartum morbidity is uncommon, and cesarean delivery among HIV-infected women is relatively safe and cost-effective. However, a number of important questions remain unanswered, including whether cesarean delivery has a role among HIV-infected women with low plasma viral loads or who receive combination antiretroviral regimens. Author Affiliation: (1) Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA (2) Pediatric, Adolescent, and Maternal AIDS Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (3) Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (proposed), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Article History: Received 15 December 2006; Accepted 26 February 2007 Article Note: (footnote) The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Health and Human Services.
- Published
- 2007