Search

Patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis carry a significant risk of infective endocarditis (IE), but data on whether these patients differ from other patients with IE in terms of comorbidity, microbiology, rates of surgery and mortality are sparse. Using Danish nationwide registries, all patients with IE diagnosed between February 1, 2010, and May 14, 2018 were identified and categorized into a "hemodialysis group" and a "non-hemodialysis group." Patient groups were compared by comorbidities, microbiological etiology, cardiac surgery, and mortality. Risk factors associated with mortality were assessed in multivariable Cox regression analysis. In total, 4,366 patients with IE were included with 226 (5.2%) patients in the hemodialysis group. Patients in the hemodialysis group were younger (66.0 years [IQR 53.8-74.9] vs 72.2 years [IQR 62.2-80.0]), had more comorbidities and were surgically treated less often (10.6% vs 20.8%), compared with patients from the nonhemodialysis group. Staphylococcus aureus was more than twice as prevalent (58.0% vs 26.5%). No difference in in-hospital mortality was found between the 2 groups (20.8% vs 18.5%), but 1- and 5-year mortality were significantly higher in the hemodialysis group than in the nonhemodialysis group (37.7% vs 17.7% and 72.1% vs 42.5%, respectively). In adjusted analysis, hemodialysis was associated with higher 1-year (HR = 2.71, 95% CI 2.07-3.55) and 5-year mortality (HR = 2.72, 95% CI 2.22-3.34) Patients with IE on chronic hemodialysis were younger, had more comorbidity, a higher prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus IE, and a higher mortality than patients without hemodialysis. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Valve-in-valve-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a feasible and increasingly used treatment option for failed surgical aortic prosthesis, but data from clinical practice are limited. We aimed to examine patient characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing TAVI in a surgival valve (valve-in-valve TAVI) compared with patients undergoing TAVI in a native valve. Using nationwide registries, we identified all Danish citizens, who underwent TAVI from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2020. A total of 6,070 patients undergoing TAVI were identified; 247 (4%) patients had a history of SAVR (The valve-in-valve cohort). The median age of the study population was 81 (25th-75th percentile 77-85) and 55% were men. Patients with valve-in-valve-TAVI were younger but had a greater burden of cardiovascular comorbidities compared with patients with native-valve-TAVI. Within 30 days post procedure, 11 (0.2%) and 748 (13.8%) patients who underwent valve-in-valve-TAVI and native-valve-TAVI, respectively, had a pacemaker implantation. The cumulative 30-day risk of death among patients with valve-in-valve-TAVI was 2.4% (95% CI: 1.0%-5.0%) and 2.7% (95% CI: 2.3%-3.1%) in patients with native-valve-TAVI, respectively. Correspondingly, the cumulative 5-year risk of death was 42.5% (95% CI: 34.2%-50.6%) and 44.8% (95% CI: 43.2%-46.4%), respectively. In multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, valve-in-valve-TAVI was not associated with a significantly different risk of death at 30 days (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.95, 95% CI 0.41-2.19) and 5 years (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-1.00) post-TAVI compared with native-valve-TAVI. TAVI in a failed surgical aortic prosthesis as compared to TAVI in a native valve, was not associated with significantly different short- and long-term mortality, suggesting that valve-in-valve-TAVI is a safe procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The ability to return to work after infective endocarditis (IE) holds important socioeconomic consequences for both patients and society, yet data on this issue are sparse. We examined return to the workforce and associated factors in IE patients of working age.Methods: Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified 1,065 patients aged 18-60 years with a first-time diagnosis of IE (1996-2013) who were part of the workforce prior to admission and alive at discharge.Results: One year after discharge, 765 (71.8%) patients had returned to the workforce, 130 (12.2%) were on paid sick leave, 76 (7.1%) received disability pension, 23 (2.2%) were on early retirement, 65 (6.1%) had died, and 6 (0.6%) had emigrated. Factors associated with return to the workforce were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Younger age (18-40 vs 56-60 years; odds ratio, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.71-4.76) and higher level of education (higher educational level vs basic school; 5.47, 2.05-14.6) and income (highest quartile vs lowest; 3.17, 1.85-5.46) were associated with return to the workforce. Longer length of hospital stay (>90 vs 14-30 days; 0.16, 0.07-0.38); stroke during IE admission (0.38, 0.21-0.71); and a history of chronic kidney disease (0.29, 0.11-0.75), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (0.31, 0.13-0.71), and malignancy (0.39, 0.22-0.69) were associated with a lower likelihood of returning to the workforce.Conclusions: Seven of 10 patients who were part of the workforce prior to IE and alive at discharge were part of the workforce 1 year later. Younger age, higher socioeconomic status, and absence of major comorbidities were associated with return to the workforce. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), are beneficial both in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) and after myocardial infarction (MI). We examined the effects of the angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan, compared with the ACE-I enalapril, on coronary outcomes in PARADIGM-HF.Methods and Results: We examined the effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril on the following outcomes: i) the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death or HF hospitalization, ii) a pre-defined broader composite including, in addition, MI, stroke, and resuscitated sudden death, and iii) a post hoc coronary composite of CV-death, non-fatal MI, angina hospitalization or coronary revascularization. At baseline, of 8399 patients, 3634 (43.3%) had a prior MI and 4796 (57.1%) had a history of any coronary artery disease. Among all patients, compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of the primary outcome (HR 0.80 [0.73-0.87], P<.001), the broader composite (HR 0.83 [0.76-0.90], P<.001) and the coronary composite (HR 0.83 [0.75-0.92], P<.001). Although each of the components of the coronary composite occurred less frequently in the sacubitril/valsartan group, compared with the enalapril group, only CV death was reduced significantly.Conclusions: Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of both the primary endpoint and a coronary composite outcome in PARADIGM-HF. Additional studies on the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on atherothrombotic outcomes in high-risk patients are merited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

FREEDOM, a cardiovascular outcome trial with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, testing a continuous subcutaneous infusion of exenatide (ITCA 650), recently reported its findings. We meta-analysed its results with eight prior GLP-1 receptor agonists trials. GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced MACE by 13% (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.81–0.94]; p = 0.00065) and all-cause mortality by 11% (HR 0.89 [0.83–0.95]; p = 0.00084). However, FREEDOM results appear dissimilar to prior GLP-1 receptor agonist trials. FREEDOM results should not influence current considerations about the benefits or harms of approved formulations of GLP-1 receptor agonists. There is also an ongoing debate about the safety of ITCA 650. • The FREEDOM Cardiovascular Outcomes trial results were recently published. • Its results appear different to other GLP-1 receptor agonist outcome trials in a trial meta-analysis. • This and other concerns mean FREEDOM should not influence current perceptions about the benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Viral or idiopathic pericarditis is a frequent condition, often considered benign, although prior studies have suggested that pericarditis is associated with both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular disease, for example, malignancy.Objectives: This study sought to assess mortality risk and morbidity patterns in patients with incident viral or idiopathic pericarditis.Methods: In nationwide Danish registries, we identified patients discharged with a first-time diagnosis of pericarditis from 1996 to 2016. Patients with a severe underlying heart condition were excluded. The patients were matched 1:10 with individuals from the general population by sex and year of birth. We assessed 5-year mortality using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for baseline comorbidities and identified subsequent hospital admissions.Results: We identified 7,988 patients with pericarditis and 79,880 matched control individuals. The absolute 5-year survival probability was 92.9% and 95.8% in the pericarditis and control groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.31; 95% confidence interval: 1.13 to 1.52). The greatest difference in mortality was seen the first year, and it was primarily driven by the female part of the population. The incidence rate per 1,000 person-years of new-onset, admission-required diagnosis was higher in the pericarditis group both for cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases.Conclusions: We observed a higher mortality risk over 5 years in the pericarditis group, especially among the female patients, compared to matched control individuals. Furthermore, we observed a higher frequency of both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular hospital admissions, highlighting the need for focus on underlying morbidity in patients presenting with apparent viral or idiopathic pericarditis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are sparse.Objectives: This study sought to examine the long-term risk and prognosis associated with cardiovascular outcomes, including heart failure (HF), in patients with SLE.Methods: Using Danish administrative registries, risks of outcomes were compared between SLE patients (diagnosed 1996 to 2018, no history of cardiovascular disease) and age-, sex-, and comorbidity-matched control subjects from the background population (matched 1:4). Furthermore, mortality following HF diagnosis was compared between SLE patients developing HF and age- and sex-matched non-SLE control subjects with HF (matched 1:4).Results: A total of 3,411 SLE patients (median age: 44.6 years [25th to 75th percentile: 31.9 to 57.0 years]; 14.1% men) were matched with 13,644 control subjects. The median follow-up was 8.5 years (25th to 75th percentile: 4.0 to 14.4 years). Absolute 10-year risks of outcomes were: HF, 3.71% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.02% to 4.51%) for SLE patients, 1.94% (95% CI: 1.68% to 2.24%) for control subjects; atrial fibrillation, 4.35% (95% CI: 3.61% to 5.18%) for SLE patients, 2.82% (95% CI: 2.50% to 3.16%) for control subjects; ischemic stroke, 3.75% (95% CI: 3.06% to 4.54%) for SLE patients, 1.92% (95% CI: 1.66% to 2.20%) for control subjects; myocardial infarction, 2.17% (95% CI: 1.66% to 2.80%) for SLE patients, 1.49% (95% CI: 1.26% to 1.75%) for control subjects; venous thromboembolism, 6.03% (95% CI: 5.17% to 6.98%) for SLE patients, 1.68% (95% CI: 1.44% to 1.95%) for control subjects; and the composite of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation/ventricular arrhythmias/cardiac arrest, 0.89% (95% CI: 0.58% to 1.31%) for SLE patients, 0.30% (95% CI: 0.20% to 0.43%) for control subjects. SLE with subsequent HF was associated with higher mortality compared with HF without SLE (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.08 to 2.08).Conclusions: SLE patients had a higher associated risk of HF and other cardiovascular outcomes compared with matched control subjects. Among patients developing HF, a history of SLE was associated with higher mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It is estimated that 5% of patients with sarcoidosis have clinically manifest cardiac involvement, although autopsy and imaging studies suggest a significantly higher prevalence of cardiac involvement. There is a paucity of contemporary data on the risk of adverse cardiac outcomes, particularly heart failure (HF), in patients with sarcoidosis.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term risk of HF and other adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with sarcoidosis compared with matched control subjects.Methods: In this cohort study, all patients age ≥18 years with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis (1996 to 2016) were identified through Danish nationwide registries and matched 1:4 by age, sex, and comorbidities with control subjects from the background population without sarcoidosis.Results: Of the 12,042 patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis, 11,834 patients were matched with 47,336 subjects from the background population (median age: 42.8 years [25th to 75th percentile: 33.1 to 55.8 years], 54.3% men). The median follow-up was 8.2 years. Absolute 10-year risks of outcomes were as follows: HF: 3.18% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.83% to 3.57%) for sarcoidosis patients and 1.72% (95% CI: 1.58% to 1.86%) for the background population; the composite of ICD implantation, ventricular arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest: 0.96% (95% CI: 0.77% to 1.18%) for sarcoidosis patients and 0.45% (95% CI: 0.38% to 0.53%) for the background population; the composite of pacemaker implantation, atrioventricular block, and sinoatrial dysfunction: 0.94% (95% CI: 0.75% to 1.16%) for sarcoidosis patients and 0.51% (95% CI: 0.44% to 0.59%) for the background population; atrial fibrillation or flutter: 3.44% (95% CI: 3.06% to 3.84%) for sarcoidosis patients and 2.66% (95% CI: 2.49% to 2.84%) for the background population; and all-cause mortality: 10.88% (95% CI: 10.23% to 11.55%) for sarcoidosis patients and 7.43% (95% CI: 7.15% to 7.72%) for the background population.Conclusions: Patients with sarcoidosis had a higher associated risk of HF and other adverse cardiac outcomes compared with matched control subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine the association between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). The potential association of HRQoL and mortality in patients with HF is unclear. We investigated this association in The Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD) in Patients with Non-ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality (DANISH). In DANISH, a total of 1116 patients with non-ischemic systolic HF on guideline-recommended therapy were randomized to ICD therapy or usual clinical care. HRQoL was assessed at randomization using the disease-specific Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ, 0–105, high score indicating worse HRQoL). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality according to MLHFQ above or below 45, as recommended by a recent meta-analysis, to identify patients with poor HRQoL. HRQoL was completed by 935 (84%) patients at baseline with a median follow-up of 67 months (IQR 47–83). Patients with poor HRQoL (MLHFQ score > 45, median 60 (IQR 53–71) , n = 350) had a higher incidence of all-cause mortality than patients with moderate/good HRQoL (MLHFQ ≤45, median 23 (IQR 13–33), n = 585), respectively 26% vs. 18% with an unadjusted HR of 1.57 (95% CI 1.19–2.08, p =.002), and an adjusted HR of 1.39 (95% CI 1.01–1.91, p =.04). Poor HRQoL was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality after adjustment for traditional risk factors. https: // clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00542945 (DANISH). • Poor quality of life is associated with mortality in patients with nonischemic heart failure • The association was obtained following adjustment for multiple traditional risk factors • Cardiovascular mortality was likewise associated to poor quality of life in crude models • Patients who experienced deteriorating quality of life within 8 months had a higher rate of mortality [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) and antithrombotic treatment on the prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) as well as vascular disease. Background: HF, vascular disease, and AF are pathophysiologically related, and understanding antithrombotic treatment for these conditions is crucial. Methods: In hospitalized patients with HF and coexisting vascular disease (coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease) followed from 1997 to 2009, AF status was categorized as prevalent AF, incident AF, or no AF. Risk of thromboembolism (TE), myocardial infarction (MI), and serious bleeding was assessed by Cox regression models (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) with antithrombotic therapy and AF as time-dependent variables. Results: A total of 37,464 patients were included (age, 74.5 ± 10.7 years; 36.3% females) with a mean follow-up of 3 years during which 20.7% were categorized as prevalent AF and 17.2% as incident AF. Compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in prevalent AF, VKA plus antiplatelet was not associated with a decreased risk of TE (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.12) or MI (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.28), whereas bleeding risk was significantly increased (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.57). Corresponding estimates for incident AF were HRs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.56 to 1.06), 1.07 (95% CI: 0.89 to 1.28), and 2.71 (95% CI: 1.33 to 2.21) for TE, MI, and bleeding, respectively. In no AF patients, no statistical differences were seen between antithrombotic therapies in TE or MI risk, whereas bleeding risk was significantly increased for VKA with and without single-antiplatelet therapy. Conclusions: In AF patients with coexisting HF and vascular disease, adding single-antiplatelet therapy to VKA therapy is not associated with additional benefit in thromboembolic or coronary risk, but notably increased bleeding risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of ongoing NSAID treatment at time of admission for myocardial infarction (MI) on prognosis. Methods: All patients admitted with first-time MI in 1997–2006 were included by use of individual-level linkage of nationwide registries. By claimed prescription of NSAIDs, availability of tablets was estimated within 14days prior to inclusion and defined ongoing use. Risk of death within 30days and risk of death or MI within 1year was analyzed by logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazard models, respectively. Results: A total of 97,458 patients were included (mean age 69.9 [SD 13.2] years and 62% males); the 30day and 1year mortality rates were 18.1% and 27.7%, respectively. Ongoing NSAID treatment was identified in 12,156 (12.5%) patients and 30-day mortality was significantly increased in patients receiving rofecoxib (odds ratio [OR] 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–1.68) and celecoxib (OR 1.23; CI 1.03–1.47) relative to no use of NSAIDs. Correspondingly, the 1-year rate of death or recurrent MI was significantly increased in patients receiving rofecoxib (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15; CI 1.04–1.27), celecoxib (HR 1.13; CI 1.01–1.26), diclofenac (HR 1.12; CI 1.04–1.20) or any NSAID use (HR 1.05; CI 1.02–1.09). No association was found for naproxen or ibuprofen. Conclusion: Ongoing treatment with NSAIDs and in particular the cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors rofecoxib, celecoxib, and diclofenac is associated with worsened prognosis in patients admitted with first-time MI. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]