Search

The translation initiation repressor 4E-BP2 is deamidated in the brain on asparagines N99/N102 during early postnatal brain development. This post-translational modification enhances 4E-BP2 association with Raptor, a central component of mTORC1 and alters the kinetics of excitatory synaptic transmission. We show that 4E-BP2 deamidation is neuron specific, occurs in the human brain, and changes 4E-BP2 subcellular localization, but not its disordered structure state. We demonstrate that deamidated 4E-BP2 is ubiquitinated more and degrades faster than the unmodified protein. We find that enhanced deamidated 4E-BP2 degradation is dependent on Raptor binding, concomitant with increased association with a Raptor-CUL4B E3 ubiquitin ligase complex. Deamidated 4E-BP2 stability is promoted by inhibiting mTORC1 or glutamate receptors. We further demonstrate that deamidated 4E-BP2 regulates the translation of a distinct pool of mRNAs linked to cerebral development, mitochondria, and NF-κB activity, and thus may be crucial for postnatal brain development in neurodevelopmental disorders, such as ASD. • Deamidated 4E-BP2 occurs in neurons and is susceptible to ubiquitination/degradation • mTORC1 or glutamate receptor inhibition stabilizes deamidated 4E-BP2 • A Raptor-CUL4B ubiquitin ligase complex binds to deamidated 4E-BP2 • Deamidated 4E-BP2 regulates postnatal brain translation and NF-κB activity Kouloulia et al. demonstrate that, during early postnatal brain development, deamidation of the translation initiation factor 4E-BP2 renders it susceptible to ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation via enhanced binding to the Raptor-CUL4B complex. mTORC1 or glutamate receptor inhibition stabilizes deamidated 4E-BP2. Moreover, deamidated 4E-BP2 regulates the translation of specific mRNAs and NF-κB activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertension is the leading risk factor for cerebral small vessel disease. We aimed to determine whether antihypertensive drug classes differentially affect microvascular function in people with small vessel disease. We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised crossover trial with blinded endpoint assessment at five specialist centres in Europe. We included participants aged 18 years or older with symptomatic sporadic small vessel disease or cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) and an indication for antihypertensive treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to one of three sequences of antihypertensive treatment using a computer-generated multiblock randomisation, stratified by study site and patient group. A 2-week washout period was followed by three 4-week periods of oral monotherapy with amlodipine, losartan, or atenolol at approved doses. The primary endpoint was change in cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) determined by blood oxygen level-dependent MRI response to hypercapnic challenge in normal-appearing white matter from the end of washout to the end of each treatment period. Efficacy analyses were done by intention-to-treat principles in all randomly assigned participants who had at least one valid assessment for the primary endpoint, and analyses were done separately for participants with sporadic small vessel disease and CADASIL. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03082014 , and EudraCT, 2016-002920-10, and is terminated. Between Feb 22, 2018, and April 28, 2022, 75 participants with sporadic small vessel disease (mean age 64·9 years [SD 9·9]) and 26 with CADASIL (53·1 years [7·0]) were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment. 79 participants (62 with sporadic small vessel disease and 17 with CADASIL) entered the primary efficacy analysis. Change in CVR did not differ between study drugs in participants with sporadic small vessel disease (mean change in CVR 1·8 × 10–4%/mm Hg [SE 20·1; 95% CI –37·6 to 41·2] for amlodipine; 16·7 × 10–4%/mm Hg [20·0; –22·3 to 55·8] for losartan; –7·1 × 10–4%/mm Hg [19·6; –45·5 to 31·1] for atenolol; p overall =0·39) but did differ in patients with CADASIL (15·7 × 10–4%/mm Hg [SE 27·5; 95% CI –38·3 to 69·7] for amlodipine; 19·4 × 10–4%/mm Hg [27·9; –35·3 to 74·2] for losartan; –23·9 × 10–4%/mm Hg [27·5; –77·7 to 30·0] for atenolol; p overall =0·019). In patients with CADASIL, pairwise comparisons showed that CVR improved with amlodipine compared with atenolol (–39·6 × 10–4%/mm Hg [95% CI –72·5 to –6·6; p=0·019) and with losartan compared with atenolol (–43·3 × 10–4%/mm Hg [–74·3 to –12·3]; p=0·0061). No deaths occurred. Two serious adverse events were recorded, one while taking amlodipine (diarrhoea with dehydration) and one while taking atenolol (fall with fracture), neither of which was related to study drug intake. 4 weeks of treatment with amlodipine, losartan, or atenolol did not differ in their effects on cerebrovascular reactivity in people with sporadic small vessel disease but did result in differential treatment effects in patients with CADASIL. Whether antihypertensive drug classes differentially affect clinical outcomes in people with small vessel diseases requires further research. EU Horizon 2020 programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]