Search

Purpose As part of the approval process, regulatory authorities often require postauthorization studies that involve patient registries; it is unknown, however, whether such registry studies are adequately completed. We investigated whether registry studies for new drugs were performed as agreed at time of approval. Methods This study reviewed protocols and follow-up reports for 73 registry studies that were proposed for 43 drugs approved by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use in Europe in the period 2007 to 2010. Results The data lock point of January 1, 2016, was taken to allow a 5-year follow-up period for each drug after approval. At that time, 2 studies (3%) in registries had been finalized, 19 registries (26%) had not enrolled any patients, and 52 studies (71%) were ongoing. The median enrollment was 31% (interquartile range [IQR], 6–104) of the required number of patients for 41 registry studies that had a predefined sample size, 30% (IQR, 2–101) for nonimposed registries, and 61% (IQR, 18–144) for imposed registries. Implications Enrollment of patients into postapproval registries is poor, although the results for imposed registries seem better. Currently, registries only have a limited impact on resolving gaps in the knowledge of a drug’s benefits and risks at time of marketing authorization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]