Search

Endoscopic suturing is a complex skill with broad applications. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel endoscopic suturing simulator and scoring system for the purse-string suture pattern. This was a prospective study of an endoscopic suturing simulator that consists of a circular opening representing a dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 12 small target holes around its circumference. Purse-string suturing is performed in a counterclockwise fashion. Time allotted is 5 minutes, and each successful bite is awarded 10 points. Participants were divided into the novice, intermediate, and experienced groups. Validity evidence based on content, validity evidence based on other variables, and validity evidence based on consequences of testing were assessed. Seventeen subjects (3 novice, 7 intermediate, and 7 experienced) participated in the study. Validity evidence based on content: The content validity index for realism, relevance, and representativeness was 0.89, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively. Validity evidence based on other variables: The novice, intermediate, and experienced groups scored 30.0 ± 8.2, 57.1 ± 28.1, and 131.2 ± 51.7 (P =.001). Validity evidence based on consequences of testing: The simulator group required 5 ± 5 transoral outlet reduction cases before being able to independently complete an entire purse-string, whereas the non-simulator group required 38 ± 11 clinical cases (P <.0001). This novel endoscopic suturing simulator seems realistic, relevant, and representative of the clinical suturing experience. In addition, it seems effective at objectively assessing suturing skills and shortening the clinical learning curve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) and antiobesity medication (AOM) are effective treatments for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study aims to assess the efficacy of combination therapy (TORe + AOM) for treating weight regain and to compare the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with AOM alone, TORe alone, and surgical revision of RYGB. This was a retrospective study of RYGB patients with weight regain who underwent combination therapy, defined as initiation of at least 1 AOM within 6 months before or after TORe. Outcomes were weight loss after combination therapy and comparison of combination therapy with AOM alone, TORe alone, and surgical revision. One hundred forty-five RYGB patients underwent combination therapy. Most commonly prescribed AOMs were topiramate, phentermine/topiramate, phentermine, and liraglutide. At 12 months, patients experienced 15.2% ± 7.4% total weight loss (TWL). Ninety percent of patients achieved ≥5% TWL at 12 months. Combination therapy was associated with greater weight loss than AOM alone (15.2% ± 7.4% vs 6.8% ± 8.2% TWL, P <.0001) or TORe alone (15.2% ± 7.4% vs 8.7% ± 8.3% TWL, P <.0001), with similar serious adverse event rates (2.1% vs 4.7% vs.6% for combination therapy vs AOM alone vs TORe alone, P >.05). Combination therapy yielded similar weight loss to surgical revision (15.2% ± 7.4% vs 16.4% ± 13.1% TWL, P =.34), with a lower serious adverse event rate (2.1% vs 14.3%, P =.0004). Combination of TORe with AOM is superior to either therapy alone, providing similar efficacy to surgical revision with a better safety profile for the treatment of weight regain after RYGB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic liver "palpation" can be performed by indenting the liver surface under EUS. Indentation depth is measured with the use of sonographic calipers. We hypothesized that fibrotic livers are more difficult to indent, and that indentation can accurately predict liver fibrosis staging. We compared EUS-guided liver palpation and conventional screening modalities in patients with suspected metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. This was a cross-sectional pilot study. Consecutive patients at 3 hospitals from 2021 to 2023 underwent EUS-guided palpation with liver biopsy. Liver palpation was compared with fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), and transient elastography in predicting fibrosis staging on histology. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. Seventy-three patients were included. Mean age was 49.1 years, and 71.2% were female. Mean body mass index was 41.1 kg/m.2 Indentation depth was negatively correlated with fibrosis stage (Kruskal-Willis test, P <.0001). EUS palpation demonstrated c-statistics of 0.79 and 0.95 in discriminating advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. EUS liver palpation was superior to NFS in predicting advanced fibrosis (P =.0057) and superior to APRI and NFS in predicting cirrhosis (P =.0099 and P =.045, respectively). EUS palpation was not significantly different from FIB-4. EUS palpation was superior to transient elastography in predicting cirrhosis (P =.045). When optimal cutoffs were used, indentation measurement ≤3.5 mm yielded 100% predictive value for ruling in advanced fibrosis, and ≥4.0 mm yielded 100% predictive value for ruling out cirrhosis. EUS liver palpation is a novel, accurate, and easy-to-use screening tool for advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Distal primary obesity surgery endolumenal (POSE) procedures involve plication of the gastric body, sparing the fundus. We aim to assess the efficacy of distal POSE procedures and to compare plication techniques (single-helix vs double-helix approaches). This is a prospective registry study of patients who underwent distal POSE procedures using 2 techniques: the single-helix plication technique, in which a single plication with serosa-to-serosa approximation is obtained with each device activation, and the double-helix plication technique, where 2 serosa-to-serosa plications with an internal mucosa-to-mucosa approximation are obtained with each device activation. One hundred ten patients (90 women; mean age, 43 ± 13 years) underwent distal POSE procedures. Baseline body mass index was 38.2 ± 6.1 kg/m2. Technical success was 100%. An average of 21 ± 5 plications were placed per case. The gastric body was shortened by 74%. At 12 months, patients experienced 15.8% ± 8.9% total weight loss (TWL) (P <.0001), with 93% and 61% achieving at least 5% and 10% TWL, respectively. Blood pressure, insulin resistance, and liver enzymes improved. The serious adverse event rate was.9%, including a case of gastric perforation. Of 110 patients, 42 and 68 underwent distal POSE procedures using a single- or double-helix technique, respectively. The double-helix technique resulted in greater reduction in gastric volume (length reduction by 78% vs 65%, P <.0001), weight loss (20.3% ± 8.3% vs 13.4% ± 8.3% TWL, P =.005), and proportion of patients achieving 10% TWL (94.7% vs 58.3%, P =.03) than the single-helix technique. Distal POSE techniques appear to be effective at treating obesity and its related comorbidities. The double-helix technique is associated with greater gastric volume reduction, weight loss, and response rate. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastric plication involves inverting the stomach with tissue anchor placement to achieve serosa-to-serosa apposition. One potential application of gastric plication is the treatment of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), a procedure also known as plication transoral outlet reduction (P-TORe). This study aims to assess technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of P-TORe. This was a registry study of RYGB patients who underwent P-TORe for weight regain. The primary outcome was the amount of weight loss and clinical success rate, defined as percentage of total weight loss (TWL) of at least 5% at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were technical success, adverse events (AEs), and predictors of weight loss. One hundred eleven RYGB patients underwent P-TORe. Average body mass index (BMI) was 38.5 ± 7.5 kg/m2. Baseline gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) and pouch sizes were 17 ± 6 mm and 5 ± 2 cm, respectively. The primary outcome was total weight loss, defined as patients experiencing 9.5% ± 8.5% TWL at 12 months. Clinical success rate was 73%. Technical success rate was 100%. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) was performed around the GJA in all patients (100%) before plication placement. The total number of plications per case was 7 ± 3. Overall AE rate was 12.6%. These included GJA stenosis (9.9%), melena because of marginal ulceration (1.8%), and deep vein thrombosis (.9%). The severe AE rate was 0%. Predictors of weight loss were the amount of weight regain and baseline pouch length. This novel P-TORe technique combining APC with gastric plication appears to be technically feasible, safe, and effective at treating weight regain after RYGB. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This joint ASGE-ESGE guideline provides an evidence-based summary and recommendations regarding the role of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) in the management of obesity. The document was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. It evaluates the efficacy and safety of EBMT devices and procedures that currently have CE mark or FDA-clearance/approval, or that had been approved within five years of document development. The guideline suggests the use of EBMTs plus lifestyle modification in patients with a BMI of ≥ 30 kg/m2, or with a BMI of 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with at least 1 obesity-related comorbidity. Furthermore, it suggests the utilization of intragastric balloons and devices for endoscopic gastric remodeling (EGR) in conjunction with lifestyle modification for this patient population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An enlarged gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) is associated with weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and can be corrected with endoscopic or surgical revision; however, there has been no direct comparison between techniques. This study aims to compare serious adverse event (AE) rates and weight loss profiles between endoscopic and surgical revisional techniques over a 5-year period. This is a retrospective matched cohort study of RYGB patients who underwent endoscopic or surgical revision for weight regain with an enlarged GJA (>12 mm). Patients who underwent endoscopic revision (ENDO group) were matched 1:1 to those undergoing surgical revision (SURG group) based on completion of 5-year follow-up, age, sex, body mass index, initial weight loss, and weight regain. Demographics, GJA size, serious AEs, and weight profiles were collected. The primary outcome was comparison of serious AE rates between groups. Secondary outcomes included weight loss comparisons. A Fisher exact test was used to compare the serious AE rate, and a Student t test was used for weight comparisons. Sixty-two RYGB patients with weight regain and an enlarged GJA (31 ENDO, 31 matched SURG) were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The AE rate in the ENDO group (6.5%) was lower than the SURG group (29.0%, P =.043). Zero and 6 (19.4%) serious (severe) AEs occurred in the ENDO and SURG groups, respectively (P =.02). There was no significant difference in weight loss at 1, 3, and 5 years. Endoscopic revision of the GJA is associated with significantly fewer total and serious AEs and similar long-term weight loss when compared with surgical revision. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) has traditionally been treated with open surgery or rigid endoscopy. With the advances in endoscopy, alternative flexible endoscopic treatments have been developed. This document reviews current endoscopic techniques and devices used to treat ZD. The endoscopic techniques may be categorized as the traditional flexible endoscopic septal division and the more recent submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division, also known as peroral endoscopic myotomy for ZD. This document also addresses clinical outcomes, safety, and financial considerations. Flexible endoscopic approaches treat symptomatic ZD with results that are favorable compared with traditional open surgical or rigid endoscopic alternatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, increasing numbers of patients undergo bariatric surgery. Management of adverse events of bariatric surgery may be challenging and often requires a multidisciplinary approach. Endoscopic intervention is often the first line of therapy for management of these adverse events. This document reviews technologies and techniques used for endoscopic management of adverse events of bariatric surgery, organized by surgery type. The MEDLINE database was searched through May 2018 for articles related to endoscopic management of adverse events of bariatric interventions by using relevant keywords such as adverse events related to "gastric bypass," "sleeve gastrectomy," "laparoscopic adjustable banding," and "vertical banded sleeve gastroplasty," in addition to "endoscopic treatment" and "endoscopic management," among others. Available data regarding efficacy, safety, and financial considerations are summarized. Common adverse events of bariatric surgery include anastomotic ulcers, luminal stenoses, fistulae/leaks, and inadequate initial weight loss or weight regain. Devices used for endoscopic management of bariatric surgical adverse events include balloon dilators (hydrostatic, pneumatic), mechanical closure devices (clips, endoscopic suturing system, endoscopic plication platform), luminal stents (covered esophageal stents, lumen-apposing metal stents, plastic stents), and thermal therapy (argon plasma coagulation, needle-knives), among others. Available data, composed mainly of case series and retrospective cohort studies, support the primary role of endoscopic management. Multiple procedures and techniques are often required to achieve clinical success, and existing management algorithms are evolving. Endoscopy is a less invasive alternative for management of adverse events of bariatric surgery and for revisional procedures. Endoscopic procedures are frequently performed in the context of multidisciplinary management with bariatric surgeons and interventional radiologists. Treatment algorithms and standards of practice for endoscopic management will continue to be refined as new dedicated technology and data emerge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gastroparesis is a symptomatic chronic disorder of the stomach characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Several endoscopic treatment modalities have been described that aim to improve gastric emptying and/or symptoms associated with gastroparesis refractory to dietary and pharmacologic management. In this report we review devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of gastroparesis, the evidence regarding their efficacy and safety, and the financial considerations for their use. Endoscopic modalities for treatment of gastroparesis can be broadly categorized into pyloric, nonpyloric, and nutritional therapies. Pyloric therapies such as botulinum toxin injection, stent placement, pyloroplasty, and pyloromyotomy specifically focus on pylorospasm as a therapeutic target. These interventions aim to reduce the pressure gradient across the pyloric sphincter, with a resultant improvement in gastric emptying. Nonpyloric therapies, such as venting gastrostomy and gastric electrical stimulation, are intended to improve symptoms. Nutritional therapies, such as feeding tube placement, aim to provide nutritional support. Several endoscopic interventions have shown utility in improving the quality of life and symptoms of select patients with refractory gastroparesis. Methods to identify which patients are best suited for a specific treatment are not well established. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy is a relatively recent development that may prove to be the preferred pyloric-directed intervention, although additional and longer-term outcomes are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Residual neoplasia after macroscopically complete EMR of large colon polyps has been reported in 10% to 32% of resections. Often, residual polyps at the site of prior polypectomy are fibrotic and nonlifting, making additional resection challenging. This document reviews devices and methods for the endoscopic treatment of fibrotic and/or residual polyps. In addition, techniques reported to reduce the incidence of residual neoplasia after endoscopic resection are discussed. Descriptions of technologies and available outcomes data are summarized for argon plasma coagulation ablation, snare-tip coagulation, avulsion techniques, grasp-and-snare technique, EndoRotor endoscopic resection system, endoscopic full-thickness resection device, and salvage endoscopic submucosal dissection. Several technologies and techniques discussed in this document may aid in the prevention and/or resection of fibrotic and nonlifting polyps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although traditional transoral outlet reduction (TORe) involves argon plasma coagulation (APC) before endoscopic suturing, modified endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has also been used. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of modified ESD-TORe in comparison with traditional APC-TORe. This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent modified ESD-TORe and APC-TORe for weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Our outcomes were technical success, adverse events as categorized by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon, and percent total weight loss (TWL) at 6 and 12 months and patients who underwent ESD-TORe were matched 1:3 based on gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) and pouch sizes to those who underwent APC-TORe. TWL between groups was compared. A linear regression was performed to control for any confounders. Nineteen RYGB patients underwent ESD-TORe. Technical success rate was 100%, with no severe adverse events. At 6 and 12 months, patients experienced 13.4% ± 6.6% and 12.1% ± 9.3% TWL, respectively (P <.05 for both). Nineteen ESD-TORe patients were also matched with 57 APC-TORe patients based on GJA and pouch sizes. At 12 months, the ESD-TORe group experienced greater weight loss compared with the APC-TORe group (12.1% ± 9.3% vs 7.5% ± 3.3% TWL, respectively; P =.036). On regression analysis, ESD remained a significant predictor of percent of TWL at 12 months after controlling for age, sex, body mass index, weight regain, and years from RYGB (β = 5.99, P =.02). Combining endoscopic tissue dissection with suturing provides greater and more durable weight loss for patients with weight regain after RYGB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Primary obesity surgery endoluminal (POSE) is a primary endoscopic bariatric therapy focusing on gastric remodeling. The original POSE procedure involved placement of full-thickness plications in the fundus. Here we aim to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a novel POSE procedure that involves plications of only the gastric body to reduce the width and length of the stomach. This was a pilot study of patients who underwent a distal POSE procedure with gastric body plications for the treatment of obesity. Outcomes included technical success rate, serious adverse event (AE) rate, and efficacy of this novel POSE procedure at inducing weight loss and improving obesity-related comorbidities. Ten patients (6 women, age 52 ± 20 years) underwent a distal POSE procedure. Baseline body mass index was 38.1 ± 6.2 kg/m2. The technical success rate was 100%. An average of 21 ± 4 plications were placed per case (6 ± 2 for distal belt, 10 ± 3 for suspenders, 4 ± 2 for proximal belt, and 3 ± 1 for fillers). The gastroesophageal junction was pulled distally by 3.0 ± 1.6 cm. The gastric body was shortened by 11.0 ± 5.1 cm, representing a 59% reduction. The serious AE rate was 0%. At 6 months, patients experienced 15.0% ± 7.1% total weight loss (TWL). All patients achieved at least 5% TWL, and 8 patients (80%) achieved at least 25% excess weight loss. Hypertension, diabetes, GERD, and obstructive sleep apnea improved after the procedure. This novel POSE procedure, focusing on gastric body plication and sparing the fundus, is technically feasible and appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of obesity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Argon plasma coagulation (APC) of gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) is effective in treating weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study aims to compare the efficacy of different APC settings for treating weight regain. This was a single-center retrospective study of patients who had undergone RYGB and then underwent APC from 2014 to 2018 for weight regain. Patients receiving only low-dose APC (45-55 W) or high-dose APC (70-80 W) were compared. The primary outcome was the difference in percentage total weight loss (% TWL) between the groups at 6 and 12 months after the last treatment. Secondary outcomes were technical success, adverse events (AEs), and predictors of weight loss at 12 months. Two hundred seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent 411 APC sessions. Of these, 116 (53.5%) patients underwent 267 low-dose APC sessions (2.4 ± 1.5 sessions/patient) and 101 (46.5%) patients underwent 144 high-dose APC sessions (1.4 ± 0.7 sessions/patient). Follow-up rates were 82.9% and 75.3% at 6 and 12 months. At 6 months, the low- and high-dose groups experienced 7.3% ± 6.6% and 8.1% ± 7.4% TWL, respectively (P =.41). At 12 months, the low- and high-dose groups experienced 5.1% ± 8.5% and 9.7% ± 10.0% TWL, respectively (P =.008). Technical success was 100%. The overall AE rate was 8.0%; the most common AE was GJA stenosis (4.6%). The GJA stenosis rate was similar for the low- and high-dose groups (3.0% vs 7.6%, P =.06). High-dose APC remained a significant predictor of greater weight loss at 1 year after controlling for confounders. APC is effective at treating weight regain after RYGB, and higher-watt APC was associated with greater weight loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transoral outlet reduction (TORe) is a common endoscopic treatment for patients with weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with a dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA). This study aims to assess long-term efficacy of TORe. This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on RYGB patients who underwent TORe for weight regain or inadequate weight loss. The primary outcome was efficacy of TORe at 1, 3, and 5 years. Secondary outcomes were procedure details, safety profile, and predictors of long-term weight loss after TORe. Three hundred thirty-one RYGB patients underwent 342 TORe procedures and met inclusion criteria. Of these, 331, 258, and 123 patients were eligible for 1-, 3- and 5-year follow-ups, respectively. Mean body mass index was 40 ± 9 kg/m2. Pre-TORe GJA size was 23.4 ± 6.0 mm, which decreased to 8.4 ± 1.6 mm after TORe. Patients experienced 8.5% ± 8.5%, 6.9% ± 10.1%, and 8.8% ± 12.5% total weight loss (TWL) at 1, 3, and 5 years with follow-up rates of 83.3%, 81.8%, and 82.9%, respectively. Of 342 TORe procedures, 76%, 17.5%, 4.4%, and 2.1% were performed using single purse-string, interrupted, double purse-string, and running suture patterns, respectively, with an average of 9 ± 4 stitches per GJA. Pouch reinforcement suturing was performed in 57.3%, with an average of 3 ± 2 stitches per pouch. There were no severe adverse events. Some patients (39.3%) had additional weight loss therapy (pharmacotherapy or procedure), with 3.6% getting repeat TORe. Amount of weight loss at 1 year (β =.43, P =.01) and an additional endoscopic weight loss procedure (β = 8.52, P =.01) were predictors of percentage of TWL at 5 years. TORe appears to be safe, effective, and durable at treating weight regain after RYGB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Weight regain (WR) after gastric bypass is thought to be multifactorial in etiology with behavioral, neurohormonal, and anatomic features playing a role. A significant proportion of patients complain of dysphagia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and may have difficulty tolerating solid foods. Our observations suggest that this subgroup of patients compensate for esophageal symptoms by increasing their intake of calorie-dense liquid and soft foods, which can precipitate WR. We hypothesize that dysphagia predisposes to greater WR than seen in individuals without swallowing symptoms. Single tertiary care referral center. This was a matched-cohort study analysis of prospectively collected data on RYGB patients. All individuals who underwent high-resolution manometry after RYGB were enrolled. Controls were identified via a retrospective analysis of a prospective institutional database. Patients who developed dysphagia were matched with controls, from a subset of 450 eligible controls. Each patient with dysphagia was matched with 4 control patients based on age, body mass index, and time since surgery. WR was defined as an increase of ≥15% from nadir. Χ2 and t test (or Wilcoxon rank sum, if applicable) were used for bivariable analysis. Multiple logistic and linear regression were used for multivariable calculations. Forty-nine patients with dysphagia were included. After matching, there were 196 RYGB controls that did not have swallowing or esophageal symptoms. Controls had similar baseline demographic characteristics and initial weight loss compared with dysphagia cases. WR was common in both groups; however, total WR in those with dysphagia was greater than controls (15.7 versus 11.4 kg, respectively; P =.02). In addition, percent WR in those with dysphagia exceeded that seen in controls (mean 37% versus 25%, P =.003), and more individuals regained 15% of nadir weight (55% of dysphagia cases versus 38% of controls, P =.03) when adjusting for baseline body mass index, age at surgery, and race. Dietary histories suggested that, among those with dysphagia, patients with partial or complete conversion to soft or liquid calories had greater WR than those who adhered to the solid food diet. Dysphagia is a risk factor for WR post-RYGB. This is likely due to increased intake of soft or liquid foods that are tolerable in these patients but lead to a positive energy balance and accelerated WR. More than half of patients with dysphagia after RYGB regain significant weight. Screening for and aggressively managing dysphagia in patients before or after RYGB may be warranted to prevent significant WR. • Dysphagia is a risk factor for weight regain in patients who have had Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), a finding which could be due to conversion of regular dietary intake to relatively calorie-dense liquid and soft foods. • Dysphagia in post-RYGB patients can be caused by primary motility disorders of the esophagus, for which high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) is the most accurate test. • HRM may be underutilized in the workup of upper GI symptoms in post-RYGB patients. • Identification of pre- or post-RYGB patients with esophageal motility disorders has the potential to improve the long-term weight loss outcomes of RYGB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obesity is a pandemic affecting approximately 700 million adults worldwide, with an additional 2 billion overweight. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a minimally invasive endoscopic bariatric therapy that involves remodeling of the greater curvature in an effort to reduce gastric capacity and delay gastric emptying. A variety of ESG suture patterns has been reported. This study is the first to use a uniform "U" stitch pattern across all centers to simplify technical aspects of the procedure and limit cost. This also uniquely assessed outcomes in all body mass index (BMI) categories and changes in metabolic rate, lean body mass, and adipose tissue composition. This is a multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data from 7 centers including patients with overweight and obesity who underwent ESG. Primary outcomes included absolute weight loss, percent total body weight loss (%TWL), change in BMI, and percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 6 and 12 months in overweight and obese classes I, II, and III. Secondary outcomes included adipose tissue, lean body mass reduction, and metabolic rate analyzed by bioimpedance. Additionally, immediate or delayed adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Clinical success was defined as achieving ≥25% EWL at 1 year with ≤5% serious AE (SAE) rate following the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)/American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) threshold. A total of 193 patients underwent ESG during the study period. All groups had >10% TWL and >25% EWL at 6 months of follow-up. On average, %TWL was 14.25% ± 5.26% and 15.06% ± 5.22% and the %EWL 56.15% ± 22.93% and 59.41% ± 25.69% at 6 months and 1 year of follow-up, respectively. %TWL was 8.91% ±.3%, 13.92% ± 5.76%, 16.22% ± 7.69%, and 19.01% ±.95% and %EWL 56.21% ± 2.0%, 62.03% ± 27.63%, 54.13% ± 23.46%, and 46.78% ± 2.43% for overweight and obesity classes I, II, and III, respectively, at 1 year. Male sex, age <41 years, and higher BMI were predictors of achieving a TWL ≥10% at 1-year follow-up. There was a significant reduction in adipose tissue from baseline. SAEs occurred in 1.03%, including 2 perigastric collections needing surgery. ESG appears to be feasible, safe, and effective in the treatment of patients with overweight and obesity according to ASGE/ASMBS thresholds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]