Search

Radiographically assessed body composition (BC) variables, including muscle and adipose tissue, may serve as prognostic biomarkers in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We examined associations between baseline BC variables and outcomes for 99 patients with mRCC receiving first-line ipilimumab/nivolumab. Low skeletal muscle index (SMI) and low subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI) were associated with significantly better progression-free survival. Introduction: Biomarkers are needed to identify patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. We examined associations between radiographically assessed body composition (BC) variables and body mass index (BMI) with clinical outcomes for patients with mRCC receiving first-line ipilimumab + nivolumab (ipi/nivo). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with mRCC treated with first-line ipi/nivo at one institution before June 1, 2021 with an analyzable baseline computed tomography (CT) scan. BC variables (skeletal muscle index [SMI], subcutaneous adipose tissue index [SATI], and visceral adipose tissue index [VATI]) were measured using baseline CT scans. Relationships between BC variables and clinical outcomes were examined using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: Ninety-nine patients were analyzed (74% male, 64% overweight/obese, 75% low SMI). Controlling for age, IMDC risk, and sex (for BMI analyses), high vs. low SMI (HR = 2.433, CI: 1.397-4.238, P = .0017), high vs. low SATI (HR = 1.641, CI: 1.023-2.632, P = .0398), and obese BMI (≥ 30 kg/m²) vs. normal/overweight BMI (< 30 kg/m²) (HR = 1.859, CI: 1.156-2.989, P = .0105) were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Median overall survival (OS) for low SMI patients was higher (42.74 months, CI: 26.84, NR) than median OS for high SMI patients (27.01 months, CI: 15.28, NR) (adjusted HR = 1.728, CI: 0.909-3.285, P = .0952). No BC variables were significantly associated with OS or objective response rate. Conclusions: Low SMI and low SATI were associated with significantly better PFS for patients with mRCC receiving first-line ipi/nivo. Radiographic BC variables may be useful prognostic biomarkers in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This analysis of 2800 Veterans Health Administration patients found that relative to patients with PSADT > 12 months, PSADT =2, > 2-=4, > 4-=6, > 6-=8, and > 8-=10 months had significantly higher metastasis and mortality risk, and healthcare costs. This can help select patients for novel hormonal therapy and who can delay such treatments for nmCRPC. Introduction: In patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) is associated with risk of metastasis and survival. This study evaluated the association of PSADT with clinical and economic outcomes in a real-world setting among patients with nmCRPC not receiving novel hormonal therapy (NHT), using 2-month PSADT thresholds. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified Veterans Health Administration patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer and =2 PSA increases after medical/surgical castration (2012-2016). The third measurement was the index (CRPC) date. Patients with =3 postindex PSA measurements, including index, were followed until death or =12 months until disenrollment, study end, or death, and grouped into 2-month cohorts based on postindex PSADT. Cox regression models assessed association between PSADT, time to metastasis, and death. Healthcare resource utilization and costs were evaluated. Results: Among 2800 evaluable patients, median follow-up was 30 months and median PSADT was 17 months. Relative to the reference cohort (PSADT > 12 months), all cohorts had significantly higher metastasis risk. PSADT =10-month cohorts had significantly greater mortality risk than the reference; hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) ranged from 12.3 (9.2, 16.4) in the PSADT =2-month cohort to 1.3 (0.9, 2.0) in the > 10 to =12-month cohort. Total costs were significantly higher for cohorts up to and including the PSADT > 8 to =10-month cohort, than for the reference cohort. Mean per patient per month all-cause medical plus pharmacy costs were $6623, $4768, and $4049 in the PSADT =2-month, > 2 to =4-month cohort, and > 4 to =6-month cohorts, respectively, versus $1911 in the PSADT > 12-month cohort (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Most patients with nmCRPC have PSADT > 12 months and a long natural history. For those with shorter PSADT, the risk of metastasis, death, and costs increased. These data can help select patients for NHT and conversely those who can safely delay NHT for nmCRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To characterize the impact of concomitant prostate cancer treatments with use of relugolix in advanced prostate cancer, a subgroup and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses of the HERO study was undertaken. Treatment with relugolix was associated with similar efficacy and safety profiles with and without concomitant enzalutamide or docetaxel. Standard-of-care use of relugolix in combination with these agents is supported by these data. Background: To characterize the impact of concomitant prostate cancer treatments with the use of relugolix, the oral GnRH receptor antagonist, in advanced prostate cancer, a subgroup and phar macokinetic/phar macodynamic analyses of the HERO study was undertaken. Patients and Methods: Overall, 934 patients were randomized 2:1 to receive relugolix 120 mg orally once daily or leuprolide injections every 12 weeks for 48 weeks. In the setting of rising PSA, patients could receive enzalutamide or docetaxel 2 months after study initiation. Assessments included sustained testosterone suppression to castrate levels (< 50 ng/dL) through 48 weeks and safety parameters. Subgroups analyzed included patients with or without concomitant enzalutamide or docetaxel. A sensitivity analysis of the primary endpoint was performed excluding patients who received concomitant therapies that may affect testosterone. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses of 20 participants in the relugolix treatment group assessed the net effect of enzalutamide on exposure to relugolix. Results: Overall, 125 patients (13.4%) took concomitant therapies that could impact testosterone levels. Enzalutamide (n = 23) was the most frequently used therapy in the relugolix (2.7%) and leuprolide groups (1.9%). Docetaxel (n = 13) was used by 1.3% and 1.6% of patients in the relugolix and leuprolide groups, respectively. All other relevant concomitant therapy were used in < 1% of population. Sensitivity analysis showed concomitant therapy did not impact the testosterone levels. Castration rates were similar with and without concomitant use of enzalutamide or docetaxel. No clinically relevant differences in adverse events were observed between subgroups in either treatment group. No differences in relugolix C trough or testosterone concentrations were observed, suggesting that any induction or inhibition properties of enzalutamide on relugolix metabolism result in a neutral net effect on relugolix exposure and testosterone suppression. Conclusion: Treatment with relugolix was associated with similar efficacy and safety profiles with and without concomitant enzalutamide or docetaxel. Standard-of-care use of relugolix in combination with these agents is supported by these data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral anticancer agents (OAAs) could improve survival and reduce disparities for medically underserved patients. We evaluated characteristics associated with mortality among a population-based multi-payer cohort of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who initiated OAAs. Frailty, de novo metastatic diagnosis, and Medicare were associated with mortality. These real-world data underscore the importance of access to high-quality care for resource-limited patients. Purpose: In an era of rapid expansion of FDA approvals for oral anticancer agents (OAAs), it is important to understand the factors associated with survival among real-world populations, which include groups not well-represented in pivotal clinical trials of OAAs, such as the elderly, racial minorities, and medically complex patients. Our objective was to evaluate patient- and provider-level characteristics' associations with mortality among a multi-payer cohort of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who initiated OAAs. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the North Carolina state cancer registry linked to multi-payer claims data for the years 2004 to 2015. Provider data were obtained from North Carolina Health Professions Data System and the National Plan & Provider Enumeration System. Included patients were individuals with mRCC who initiated an OAA and survived =90 days after beginning treatment. We estimated hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence limits (CL) using Cox hazard models for associations between patient demographics, patient clinical characteristics, provider-level factors, and 2-year all-cause mortality. Results: The cohort included 207 patients with mRCC who received OAAs. In multivariable models, clinical variables such as frailty (HR: 1.36, 95% CL: 1.11-1.67) and de novo metastatic diagnosis (HR: 2.63, 95%CL: 1.67-4.16) were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Additionally, patients solely on Medicare had higher adjusted all-cause mortality compared with patients with any private insurance (HR: 2.35, 95% CL: 1.32-4.18). No provider-level covariates investigated were associated with all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Within a real-world population of mRCC patients taking OAAs, survival differed based on patient characteristics. In an era of rapid expansion of FDA approvals for OAAs, these real-world data underscore the continued importance of access to high-quality care, particularly for medically complex patients with limited resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been no previous set of quality indicators (QIs) regarding the management of men with metastatic prostate cancer. Using a modified Delphi process, a panel of fourteen multidisciplinary experts identified 23 quality indicators. The QIs will enable comparison between the quality of care delivered by institutions and can be used to identify potential targets for improvements. Background: There is variation in the care provided to men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). There has been no previous set of quality indicators (QIs) regarding the management of men with mPCa. The objective of this study is to develop a set of international mPCa-specific QIs, which will enable global benchmarking of quality of care. Materials and methods: Potential QIs were identified through a literature review. Fourteen multidisciplinary mPCa experts (representing medical and radiation oncology, nursing, psychology, palliative care and urology) from eight countries participated in a modified Delphi process, which consisted of two online surveys, one face-to-face meeting and two teleconferences. Panelists were asked to rate each indicator 's importance and feasibilit y on a Likert scale from 1 to 9. Indicators that received median importance and median feasibility scores = 7.5, and a disagreement index < 1 for both measures, on the final round of voting were included in the final set. Results: There was consensus on 23 QIs out of total of 662. Four regarding "general management", 12 "therapies", three "complications" and four "patient-reported quality of life". One of the inherent limitations of the Delphi process is that there is a small expert panel involved. Conclusion: The quality indicator set defined by our process for management of men with mPCa will enable greater understanding of the standard and variation of care globally and will promote consistency of good practice. Future directions will include retrospective evaluation for compliance with these indicators, as well as prospective monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The availability of molecularly targeted agents has improved outcomes for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), a disease long considered refractory to systemic therapy. The hypervascularity observed in RCC tumors, which is driven by the inactivation of the von Hippel–Lindau gene, provided a rationale for targeting angiogenesis, in particular vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Bevacizumab, a potent and specific anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant clinical benefits when used in combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-α) for the treatment of metastatic RCC in two randomized phase III trials. The use of bevacizumab with IFN-α received approval in Europe for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic RCC, and more recently this combination was approved for use in patients with mRCC in the United States. Bevacizumab with IFN-α has also been recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for first-line therapy of relapsed or metastatic unresectable RCC with predominantly clear cell histology. Two phase II studies suggest that bevacizumab has single-agent activity, which is characterized by encouraging progression-free survival rates and evidence of tumor regressions in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. Here we review these trials along with recent and ongoing studies that explore the combination of bevacizumab with other targeted agents, its optimal sequencing with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and its combination with low-dose IFN-α. Collectively, these studies allow the role of bevacizumab-based therapy to be defined in the context of a new and evolving algorithm for the treatment of patients with advanced RCC. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In 2007, drug development in castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRPC) remains challenging, due to the number of potentially viable molecular targets and clinical trials available, the lack of established surrogates for overall survival, and competing causes of mortality. This review will highlight the highest impact phase II and phase III trials of novel agents in the current CRPC landscape, and focus on both molecular targets and clinical trial designs that are more likely to demonstrate clinical benefit. The need for tissue correlative studies for target evaluation and drug mechanism is stressed to continue to advance the field and to define biomarkers that may identify patient populations that may derive a greater benefit from these molecular agents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Over the past 5 years the clinical applications of anti-angiogenic strategies have grown exponentially. This past year was no exception with the rapid development and introduction into practice of two multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. The development of TKIs for the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors in particular validates this target further in its role in angiogenesis and suggests further mechanisms that may complement previously established neutralizing antibodies to VEGF and similar strategies. Ongoing studies will combine these and other agents in what may be further advances in angiogenesis inhibition in the years to come. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: To test the hypothesis that chromogranin A (CgA) levels are prognostic in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The extent of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer correlates with aggressive disease and with progression to HRPC. Plasma CgA levels in patients with prostate cancer may reflect the extent of the tumor neuroendocrine phenotype. Methods: Pretreatment plasma was collected from 390 patients with metastatic HRPC enrolled in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9480 trial, a study of three different doses of suramin. Plasma CgA levels were determined in 321 samples in duplicate using a quantitative sandwich immunoassay. The proportional hazards model was used to assess the prognostic significance of CgA in predicting overall survival. Results: The median plasma CgA level was 12 U/L (interquartile range 7.7 to 19.3). In univariate analysis, plasma CgA correlated inversely with survival times, with a survival time of 17 months for low CgA (less than 12 U/L, 95% CI 14 to 19) compared with 11 months for high CgA (95% CI 8 to 14, P = 0.014) and at all exploratory cutpoints, including CgA of 9.5 U/L or less versus greater than 9.5 U/L, with survival of 19 months compared with 12 months (P = 0.0015). In multivariate models (adjusting for performance status, prostate-specific antigen, and lactate dehydrogenase), the plasma CgA levels remained predictive of overall survival. Conclusions: These results support the hypothesis that serum CgA levels correlate with outcome in patients with HRPC, although the clinical significance needs to be established in confirmatory studies before incorporation of CgA measurements in clinical practice. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: ObjectivesTo measure the change in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to examine the association of pre-RP VEGF levels with known prognostic factors.: MethodsPlasma was collected from patients in two separate cohorts. The first cohort included 86 patients who consented to give blood before and after RP. The second cohort consisted of 280 plasma samples, obtained from untreated patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Plasma VEGF levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The change in plasma VEGF before and 6 to 8 weeks after RP was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. The associations between the pre-RP VEGF levels and prognostic factors were assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient and the Kruskal-Wallis test.: ResultsIn a cohort of 86 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, the median preoperative VEGF level was 49.8 pg/mL. The median level 1 month after surgery was significantly lower at 39.1 pg/mL (P = 0.006, 20% decrease). A repeat analysis 6 months or more after surgery demonstrated that the percentage of decrease in the plasma VEGF levels persisted. Plasma VEGF levels were also measured in a separate cohort of 280 patients with localized prostate cancer and demonstrated no statistically significant association with risk groups or known tumor-associated prognostic factors.: ConclusionsThese results suggest that the prostate gland itself may be a significant source of systemic VEGF and raises the possibility that elevated plasma VEGF levels could be a reflection of prostatic VEGF production. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: PurposeTo present a case of rapid and durable recovery of visual function in a patient with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and optic nerve head hemangioblastoma after systemic treatment with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitor SU5416.: DesignInterventional case report.: MethodsVisual function parameters, including visual acuity, automated visual field, and contrast sensitivity, were evaluated using standardized methods repeatedly over a 15-month period. Fundus photographs and fluorescein angiograms were also obtained. Central nervous system lesions were monitored by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Treatment involved the systemic administration of the VEGF receptor inhibitor SU5416.: Main outcome measuresClinical presentation, visual acuity using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol, Humphrey automated perimetry, (Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, CA) Vistech contrast sensitivity (Vistech Consultants Inc., Dayton, OH) Farnsworth (Farnsworth-Munsell Color Services, New Windsor, NY) dichotomous panel D-15, retinal photography, fluorescein angiography, and CT and MRI scans.: ResultsWithin 4 weeks of therapy, visual acuity had improved from 20/32−2 to 20/16−1, the visual field had expanded from being circumferentially constricted to within 8° of fixation to normal, and contrast sensitivity improved in all but the lowest spatial frequency (1.5 cycles/degree). No change was observed in lesion size by fundus photography. Improvement has been maintained over 18 months with intermittent SU5416 therapy.: ConclusionsWe report rapid, extensive, and durable recovery of visual function after systemic administration of the VEGF receptor inhibitor SU5416 to a patient with VHL syndrome and optic nerve head hemangioblastoma. These findings suggest that continued evaluation of VEGF inhibitors for ocular neovascular disorders is warranted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Over the past 15 years, numerous signal transduction pathways have been elucidated whose dysregulation may play an important role in the growth and survival of cancer cells. The success of imatinib mesylate (Gleevec; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ), a small molecule that inhibits the activation of the BCR-Abl oncogene in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia, has demonstrated how effective targeted strategies can be when properly applied. With the hope of selectively targeting other critical components of cancer growth and survival while minimizing toxicity to the host, numerous strategies have been developed to inhibit receptor tyrosine kinases for various growth factors commonly expressed by cancer cells. Success of targeted inhibitors is inherently dependent on the proper selection of patients whose tumors are dependent on these growth factor pathways. Unfortunately, in prostate cancer, such selection has been a difficult-to-impossible task to date. Because of the vast number of mutational events, it is difficult to demonstrate that any particular growth factor signaling pathway is critical. In addition, because of the type (mostly bone only) and nature (usually small foci) of metastases, limited access to tumor tissue in the advanced cancer population has hampered attempts to characterize patients by their molecular features or phenotype. This article will focus on defining alternative criteria for a rational drug target and novel study designs for testing these agents in prostate cancer. In particular, the neoadjuvant setting represents a unique opportunity for new drug development in prostate cancer. An example of a neoadjuvant study testing, imatinib mesylate, is presented to display the advantages and limitations of this study design. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Activation of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway is common in advanced castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), typically through PTEN loss. Preclinical studies suggest that Akt-driven CaP cells are genetically susceptible to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR, or TORC1) inhibition. Everolimus is a Food and Drug Administration-approved inhibitor of TORC1.Materials and Methods: We performed a phase II study of everolimus in patients with mCRPC, who were refractory to standard of care hormonal and chemotherapeutic agents. Patients received everolimus 10 mg daily until unacceptable adverse events or disease progression. The primary efficacy outcome was confirmed 50% or greater prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, using a 2 stage design with futility rules. Paired biopsies were utilized to assess for treatment effect on downstream TORC1 targets as well as tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis.Results: Out of 35 men enrolled with heavily pretreated mCRPC, 32 were evaluable for clinical efficacy. No PSA responses were observed, the median progression-free survival time was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval = 2.9-4.8) and the median overall survival time was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval = 5.8-15.8). Several patients had declines in serum PSA upon cessation of everolimus. Thus, the study was closed due to clinical futility. The most common toxicities were mucositis, fatigue, anorexia, hypertriglyceridemia, and thrombocytopenia and were largely low grade. Pathologic evaluation of paired metastatic biopsies demonstrated consistent inhibition of pS6, a downstream mTOR pharmacodynamics biomarker, but the tumor proliferation marker Ki-67 increased with therapy.Conclusions: Everolimus demonstrated predictable toxicity in advanced and heavily pretreated patients with mCRPC. No clinical or clear pathologic effects despite downstream TORC1 target inhibition, suggesting that single agent everolimus has no clinical utility in men with mCRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The therapeutic armamentarium for metastatic renal cell carcinoma has rapidly expanded over the past decade to include a number of anti-angiogenic therapies and more recently, an immunotherapy. Biomarkers in the peripheral circulation are easily accessible, can provide important prognostic value, and have the potential to give important information about disease progression and treatment sensitivity or response.Main Findings: Herein, we review a variety of circulating markers including circulating protein markers (VEGF-A, inflammatory cytokines, and LDH), circulating nucleic acids (cell free DNA and micro RNAs), and circulating cellular factors (circulating tumor cells, circulating endothelial cells, and immune cell subsets). We discuss these biomarkers in the context of their ability to provide prognostic and predictive information to anti-angiogenic and immunotherapeutic agents.Principal Conclusions: While promising, there is still much work to be done, and prospective evaluation of any potential predictive biomarker for these therapies is greatly needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers are enriched for DNA repair gene defects (DRDs) that can be susceptible to synthetic lethality through inhibition of PARP proteins. We evaluated the anti-tumour activity and safety of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers and DRDs who progressed on previous treatment with an androgen signalling inhibitor and a taxane.Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mixed histology accepted, with the exception of the small cell pure phenotype) and DRDs (assessed in blood, tumour tissue, or saliva), with progression on a previous next-generation androgen signalling inhibitor and a taxane per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 or Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, were eligible. Enrolled patients received niraparib 300 mg orally once daily until treatment discontinuation, death, or study termination. For the final study analysis, all patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis population; patients with germline pathogenic or somatic biallelic pathogenic alterations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA cohort) or biallelic alterations in other prespecified DRDs (non-BRCA cohort) were included in the efficacy analysis population. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in patients with BRCA alterations and measurable disease (measurable BRCA cohort). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02854436.Findings: Between Sept 28, 2016, and June 26, 2020, 289 patients were enrolled, of whom 182 (63%) had received three or more systemic therapies for prostate cancer. 223 (77%) of 289 patients were included in the overall efficacy analysis population, which included BRCA (n=142) and non-BRCA (n=81) cohorts. At final analysis, with a median follow-up of 10·0 months (IQR 6·6-13·3), the objective response rate in the measurable BRCA cohort (n=76) was 34·2% (95% CI 23·7-46·0). In the safety analysis population, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were nausea (169 [58%] of 289), anaemia (156 [54%]), and vomiting (111 [38%]); the most common grade 3 or worse events were haematological (anaemia in 95 [33%] of 289; thrombocytopenia in 47 [16%]; and neutropenia in 28 [10%]). Of 134 (46%) of 289 patients with at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event, the most common were also haematological (thrombocytopenia in 17 [6%] and anaemia in 13 [4%]). Two adverse events with fatal outcome (one patient with urosepsis in the BRCA cohort and one patient with sepsis in the non-BRCA cohort) were deemed possibly related to niraparib treatment.Interpretation: Niraparib is tolerable and shows anti-tumour activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and DRDs, particularly in those with BRCA alterations.Funding: Janssen Research & Development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Context: The purpose of this report is to review immunotherapies under investigation for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the most common form of kidney cancer, for which the incidence and mortality rate continue to increase. Objective: To summarize and evaluate current data on immunotherapies for RCC and discuss issues to be resolved before integration into the RCC treatment paradigm. Evidence acquisition: A search of Medline, clinicaltrials.gov, and congress abstracts/treatment guidelines was performed in May 2012 using the following terms (and variations): metastatic renal cell carcinoma, practice guidelines, response/resistance to current treatments, immunotherapy, novel immunotherapeutic strategies, T-cell modulation, immune priming, innate immunity, and combination therapy. Evidence synthesis: Prior to the advent of novel agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor and mechanistic target of rapamycin pathways, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-α were the mainstays of RCC treatment. IL-2 remains one of the only treatments capable of curing advanced RCC, albeit in few patients. Despite recent advances, unmet need still exists for patients in the adjuvant setting, those with poor prognostic factors, and those who have progressed on prior targeted therapies. Improved understanding of host–tumor immune interactions has led to development of novel immunotherapeutic agents, including antibodies against immune checkpoint proteins (eg, programmed death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4), and various vaccines. Because many of these compounds are in development, clinical experience with them is limited, although some have demonstrated activity in preliminary studies. Conclusions: It is not yet clear where these new immunotherapies will fit into RCC treatment paradigms, but they may provide new options for patients whose current choices are limited. Furthermore, predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients who will derive the greatest benefit from immunotherapy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: Long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care in combination with radiation therapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC), despite substantial toxicity from the resulting hypogonadism. We hypothesized that a combination of more potent but shorter-term androgen inhibition in men with intermediate- or high-risk localized PC would synergize with definitive RT to provide short-term testosterone recovery and improve disease control.Methods and Materials: This prospective phase 2 single-arm trial enrolled men with low-volume unfavorable intermediate or high-risk localized PC. Treatment included 6 months of ADT concurrent with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) once daily and RT to prostate and seminal vesicles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of men with an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at 12-months; secondary objectives included biochemical progression-free survival (PFS), testosterone recovery, toxicity, and sexual and hormonal quality of life.Results: We enrolled 37 men between January 2014 and August 2016, 45% of whom were high risk. All patients had T1-2 disease and PSA < 20 ng/mL. Median follow-up is 37 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.7-39.1). Treatment noted 32% grade 3 toxicities related to AAP, predominantly hypertension, with no toxicities ≥G4. The rate of undetectable PSA at 12 months was 55% (95% CI, 36%-72%). With 46 months of median follow-up, 2 of 37 patients developed PSA progression (36-month PFS = 96%; 95% CI, 76%-99%), and 81% of patients recovered testosterone with a median time to recovery of 9.2 months. Hormonal or sexual function declined at 6 months with subsequent improvement by 24 months.Conclusions: The combination of RT and 6 months of ADT and AAP demonstrated acceptable toxicity and a high rate of testosterone recovery with restoration of quality of life and excellent disease control in men with low-volume, intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer. Prospective comparative studies are justified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Disulfiram in conjunction with copper has been shown to be a potent anticancer agent. However, disulfiram's therapeutic potential in prostate cancer is hindered by off-target effects due to its reactive and nucleophilic thiol-containing component, diethyldithiocarbamate (DTC). To minimize undesirable reactivity, we have strategically blocked the thiol moiety in DTC with a cleavable p -aminobenzyl (p AB) group linked to peptide substrates recognized by prostate specific antigen (PSA). Here we report the synthesis and evaluation in cancer cell models of two PSA-activatable prodrugs: HPD (Ac-HSSKLQL- p AB-DTC and RPD (RSSYYSL- p AB-DTC). In vitro exposure to PSA was found to trigger activation of HPD and RPD to release diethyldithiocarbamate, and both prodrugs were found to induce toxicity in prostate cancer cells, with HPD showing the most promising selectivity. With copper supplementation, the IC 50 of HPD was 1.4 µM in PSA-expressing LNCaP cells, and 11 µM in PC3 cells that do not express PSA. These studies demonstrate the utility of using peptide recognition handles to direct the activity of dithiocarbamate prodrugs for selective cytotoxicity of cancer cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Adjuvant sunitinib significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) versus placebo in patients with locoregional renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of recurrence after nephrectomy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59–0.98; p = 0.03). Objective To report the relationship between baseline factors and DFS, pattern of recurrence, and updated overall survival (OS). Design, setting, and participants Data for 615 patients randomized to sunitinib ( n = 309) or placebo ( n = 306) in the S-TRAC trial. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Subgroup DFS analyses by baseline risk factors were conducted using a Cox proportional hazards model. Baseline risk factors included: modified University of California Los Angeles integrated staging system criteria, age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), weight, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and Fuhrman grade. Results and limitations Of 615 patients, 97 and 122 in the sunitinib and placebo arms developed metastatic disease, with the most common sites of distant recurrence being lung (40 and 49), lymph node (21 and 26), and liver (11 and 14), respectively. A benefit of adjuvant sunitinib over placebo was observed across subgroups, including: higher risk (T3, no or undetermined nodal involvement, Fuhrman grade ≥2, ECOG PS ≥1, T4 and/or nodal involvement; hazard ratio [HR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.99; p = 0.04), NLR ≤3 (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54–0.95; p = 0.02), and Fuhrman grade 3/4 (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.98; p = 0.04). All subgroup analyses were exploratory, and no adjustments for multiplicity were made. Median OS was not reached in either arm (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.66–1.28; p = 0.6); 67 and 74 patients died in the sunitinib and placebo arms, respectively. Conclusions A benefit of adjuvant sunitinib over placebo was observed across subgroups. The results are consistent with the primary analysis, which showed a benefit for adjuvant sunitinib in patients at high risk of recurrent RCC after nephrectomy. Patient summary Most subgroups of patients at high risk of recurrent renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy experienced a clinical benefit with adjuvant sunitinib. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00375674 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and androgen receptor pathway activation is common in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Buparlisib is an oral, pan-class I PI3 kinase inhibitor. Methods This was a multisite single arm phase II trial of buparlisib 100 mg ± enzalutamide daily in men with mCRPC whose disease progressed on or who were not candidates for docetaxel. The primary end-point was the rate of radiographic/clinical progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Results Thirty men were accrued: 67% post-docetaxel; median prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 70 ng/dl, 83% had ≥4 prior therapies for mCRPC; 43% received concurrent enzalutamide. The final 6 month PFS rate was estimated to be 10% (95% confidence interval 2.5–23.6%). Median PFS was 1.9 months and was 3.5 months with concurrent enzalutamide. Median overall survival was 10.6 months. Concurrent enzalutamide led to a five-fold reduction in buparlisib concentrations. PSA declines were observed in 23%; no patients achieved a ≥50% decline, and no radiographic responses were observed. Severe adverse events occurred in four men including respiratory infection and multi-organ failure, urinary tract obstruction, confusion and one seizure in the setting of a new central nervous system (CNS) metastasis. Grade III adverse events were seen in 43% of patients; common toxicities included grade I–II weight loss, diarrhoea, nausea, fatigue, anorexia, rash, hyperglycemia and anxiety/mood disorders. Conclusions Buparlisib did not demonstrate significant activity in men with mCRPC, suggesting that PI3K inhibition is not sufficient to reverse resistant mCRPC progression. Future studies of PI3K pathway inhibitors with concurrent enzalutamide should develop optimal dosing and focus on selected patients more likely to benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Evidence suggests differences in androgen receptor AR signaling between black (B) and white (W) patients with prostate cancer, but pivotal trials of abiraterone acetate (AA) for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) enrolled few black patients, a population with a higher mortality from prostate cancer. Our primary objective was to determine differences in response to AA between B and W patients.Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study of B vs. W patients treated with AA between May 1, 2008 and June 16, 2015 at Duke University Medical Center. Patients were identified (W control patients were matched 2:1 to B patients stratified based on previous docetaxel exposure) through pharmacy records and were eligible if treated with AA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients with previous enzalutamide use were excluded. The primary objective was to compare the rate of≥90% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline from baseline between B vs. W patients. Secondary outcomes included comparing time on therapy, time to PSA progression, and overall survival among groups.Results: Baseline characteristics among patients (n = 45 B, n = 90 W) were identified; these included Karnofsky performance status, PSA, Gleason score, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, opiate use for pain, and metastatic sites. Baseline characteristics among groups were similar except for median hemoglobin (B = 11.4g/dl, W = 12.3g/dl). The proportion of B patients achieving a≥90% PSA level decline was 37.8% vs. 28.9% for W patients (P = 0.296). Statistically significant differences were found in the proportion of patients achieving a≥50% PSA level decline (B = 68.9%, W = 48.9% [P = 0.028]) and≥30% PSA level decline (B = 77.8%, W = 54.4% [P = 0.008]). Rates of primary abiraterone-refractory disease (PSA increase as best response) trended higher in W (31.1%) than in B (15.6%) patients (P = 0.052). Median treatment duration (B = 9.4 mo, W = 8.3 mo) did not differ (Wilcoxon P = 0.444). Median overall survival (B = 27.3 mo [95% CI: 13.9, not estimable], W = 24.8 mo [95% CI: 19, 31.6] [P = 0.669]) and median time to PSA progression (B = 11.0 mo [95% CI: 4.3, 18.0], W = 9.4 mo [95% CI: 6.2, 13.0] [P = 0.917]) did not differ.Conclusions: Black patients may have a higher PSA response to AA than white patients. An ongoing prospective clinical study (NCT01940276) is evaluating outcomes between black and white patients treated with AA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas are histologically and genetically diverse kidney cancers with variable prognoses, and their optimum initial treatment is unknown. We aimed to compare the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the VEGF receptor inhibitor sunitinib in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Methods: We enrolled patients with metastatic papillary, chromophobe, or unclassified non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma with no history of previous systemic treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive everolimus (10 mg/day) or sunitinib (50 mg/day; 6-week cycles of 4 weeks with treatment followed by 2 weeks without treatment) administered orally until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomisation was stratified by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk group and papillary histology. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population using the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Safety was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01108445.Findings: Between Sept 23, 2010, and Oct 28, 2013, 108 patients were randomly assigned to receive either sunitinib (n=51) or everolimus (n=57). As of December, 2014, 87 progression-free survival events had occurred with two remaining active patients, and the trial was closed for the primary analysis. Sunitinib significantly increased progression-free survival compared with everolimus (8·3 months [80% CI 5·8-11·4] vs 5·6 months [5·5-6·0]; hazard ratio 1·41 [80% CI 1·03-1·92]; p=0·16), although heterogeneity of the treatment effect was noted on the basis of histological subtypes and prognostic risk groups. No unexpected toxic effects were reported, and the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (12 [24%] of 51 patients in the sunitinib group vs one [2%] of 57 patients in the everolimus group), infection (six [12%] vs four [7%]), diarrhoea (five [10%] vs one [2%]), pneumonitis (none vs five [9%]), stomatitis (none vs five [9%]), and hand-foot syndrome (four [8%] vs none).Interpretation: In patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, sunitinib improved progression-free survival compared with everolimus. Future trials of novel agents should account for heterogeneity in disease outcomes based on genetic, histological, and prognostic factors.Funding: Novartis and Pfizer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background There are no universally monitored outcomes relevant to men with advanced prostate cancer, making it challenging to compare health outcomes between populations. Objective We sought to develop a standard set of outcomes relevant to men with advanced prostate cancer to follow during routine clinical care. Design, setting, and participants The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement assembled a multidisciplinary working group to develop the set. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We used a modified Delphi method to achieve consensus regarding the outcomes, measures, and case mix factors included. Results and limitations The 25 members of the multidisciplinary international working group represented academic and nonacademic centers, registries, and patients. Recognizing the heterogeneity of men with advanced prostate cancer, the group defined the scope as men with all stages of incurable prostate cancer (metastatic and biochemical recurrence ineligible for further curative therapy). We defined outcomes important to all men, such as overall survival, and measures specific to subgroups, such as time to metastasis. Measures gathered from clinical data include measures of disease control. We also identified patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as degree of urinary, bowel, and erectile dysfunction, mood symptoms, and pain control. Conclusions The international multidisciplinary group identified clinical data and PROMs that serve as a basis for international health outcome comparisons and quality-of-care assessments. The set will be revised annually. Patient summary Our international group has recommended a standardized set of patient-centered outcomes to be followed during routine care for all men with advanced prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Pain negatively affects quality of life for cancer patients. Preliminary data in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) suggested a benefit of the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor cabozantinib to pain palliation. Objective Prospective evaluation of cabozantinib's benefits on pain and narcotic use in mCRPC. Design, setting, and participants This was a nonrandomized expansion (NRE) cohort ( n = 144) of a phase 2 randomized discontinuation trial in docetaxel-refractory mCRPC patients. Pain and interference of symptoms with sleep and general activity were electronically self-reported daily for 7-d intervals at baseline and regularly scheduled throughout the study. Mean per-patient scores were calculated for each interval. Narcotic use was recorded daily during the same intervals. Intervention Open-label cabozantinib (100 mg or 40 mg). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The following stringent response definition was used: clinically meaningful pain reduction (≥30% improvement in mean scores from baseline) confirmed at a later interval without concomitant increases in narcotics. Only patients with moderate or severe baseline pain were analyzed. Results and limitations Sixty-five patients with moderate or severe baseline pain were evaluable. Of these, 27 (42%) experienced pain palliation according to the stringent response definition. Thirty-seven patients (57%) had clinically meaningful pain relief at two consecutive intervals, reported ≥6 wk apart in the majority. Forty-four patients (68%) had palliation at one or more intervals; 36 (55%) decreased narcotics use during one or more intervals. Clinically meaningful pain reduction was associated with significant ( p ≤ 0.001) improvements in sleep quality and general activity. A limitation of this study was its open-label design. Conclusions Cabozantinib demonstrated clinically meaningful pain palliation, reduced or eliminated patients’ narcotic use, and improved patient functioning, thus meriting prospective validation in phase 3 studies. Patient summary We evaluated the potential of cabozantinib to improve symptoms in patients with metastatic prostate cancer that no longer responds to standard therapies. We saw a promising reduction in pain and reduced need for narcotic painkillers. Larger, well-controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Background In the final analysis of the phase 3 COU-AA-301 study, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone significantly prolonged overall survival compared with prednisone alone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after chemotherapy. Here, we present the final analysis of an early-access protocol trial that was initiated after completion of COU-AA-301 to enable worldwide preapproval access to abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after chemotherapy. Methods We did a multicentre, open-label, early-access protocol trial in 23 countries. We enrolled patients who had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after taxane chemotherapy. Participants received oral doses of abiraterone acetate (1000 mg daily) and prednisone (5 mg twice a day) in 28-day cycles until disease progression, development of sustained side-effects, or abiraterone acetate becoming available in the respective country. The primary outcome was the number of adverse events arising during study treatment and within 30 days of discontinuation. Efficacy measures (time to prostate-specific antigen [PSA] progression and time to clinical progression) were gathered to guide treatment decisions. We included in our analysis all patients who received at least one dose of abiraterone acetate. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01217697 . Findings Between Nov 17, 2010, and Sept 30, 2013, 2314 patients were enrolled into the early-access protocol trial. Median follow-up was 5·7 months (IQR 3·5–10·6). 952 (41%) patients had a grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse event, and grade 3 or 4 serious adverse events were recorded in 585 (25%) people. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hepatotoxicity (188 [8%]), hypertension (99 [4%]), cardiac disorders (52 [2%]), osteoporosis (31 [1%]), hypokalaemia (28 [1%]), and fluid retention or oedema (23 [1%]). 172 (7%) patients discontinued the study because of adverse events (64 [3%] were drug-related), as assessed by the investigator, and 171 (7%) people died. The funder assessed causes of death, which were due to disease progression (85 [4%]), an unrelated adverse experience (72 [3%]), and unknown reasons (14 [1%]). Of the 86 deaths not attributable to disease progression, 18 (<1%) were caused by a drug-related adverse event, as assessed by the investigator. Median time to PSA progression was 8·5 months (95% CI 8·3–9·7) and median time to clinical progression was 12·7 months (11·8–13·8). Interpretation No new safety signals or unexpected adverse events were found in this early-access protocol trial to assess abiraterone acetate for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who progressed after chemotherapy. Future work is needed to ascertain the most effective regimen of abiraterone acetate to optimise patients' outcomes. Funding Janssen Research & Development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER-2 tyrosine kinases may be involved in activation of androgen receptor and progression of prostate cancer. They represent potential therapeutic targets in prostate cancer. Lapatinib is an oral inhibitor of EGFR and HER-2. The objective of this study is to assess the preliminary clinical efficacy of lapatinib in the therapy of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label trial, patients with rising PSA on androgen deprivation therapy and not having received chemotherapy were eligible. They were treated with lapatinib at a dose of 1,500 mg once daily. The primary end point was a >50% confirmed PSA decline from baseline; safety, tolerability, and time to PSA progression were secondary outcomes. Results: Twenty-nine patients enrolled in the study had a median age of 73 years and a baseline PSA of 21.6 ng/ml. Seven patients had no radiologic evidence of metastatic disease, while the remaining patients had bone or measurable disease or both. Treatment was well tolerated with only grade 3 treatment-related toxicities being diarrhea (14%) and rash (3%). One of 21 evaluable patients had >50% reduction in PSA, while another patient had 47% reduction in PSA with an ongoing duration of response of 45+ months. The median time to PSA progression was 29 days. Conclusions: Lapatinib showed single agent activity in a small subset of unselected patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, as measured by PSA. Future trials should explore a trial design with time-to-event end points and predictive biomarkers and a combination with other agents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Context: We present a summary of the Second International Consultation on Bladder Cancer recommendations on chemotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer using an evidence-based strategy. Objective: To review the data regarding chemotherapy in patients with clinically localized and metastatic bladder cancer with a focus on its use for patients in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Evidence acquisition: Medline databases were searched for original articles published prior to April 1, 2012, using the following search terms: bladder cancer, urothelial cancer, metastatic, advanced, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant therapy. Proceedings of major conferences from the last 5 yr also were searched. Novel and promising drugs currently in clinical trials were included. Evidence synthesis: The major findings are addressed in an evidence-based manner. Prospective trials and important cohort data were analyzed. Conclusions: Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy for advanced and metastatic bladder cancer is an established standard, improving overall survival. In the advanced setting, cisplatin-ineligible patients may benefit from gemcitabine and carboplatin. Meta-analyses undertaken for neoadjuvant cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy show a 5% benefit in overall survival. Pathologic complete remission may be an intermediate surrogate for survival, but requires further validation. Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is low, and is attributable to patient and physician choice because of limited benefit, advanced age, and comorbidities including renal and/or cardiac dysfunction. Sufficient data to support adjuvant chemotherapy are lacking. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: To evaluate the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation to discontinue prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening at age 75. Methods: Public survey: A cohort of 340 patients was surveyed at our PSA screening clinic and stratified by awareness of the recommendation and education level. Age (< 75, ≥ 75), race, health insurance status, knowledge of prostate cancer, and opinion on screening discontinuation at age 75 was evaluated between groups. Disease risk and survival analysis: A cohort of 4196 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 2008 was stratified into age groups: < 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75. Associations between clinicopathologic variables, disease risk, and survival were compared between age groups using univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Approximately 78% of men surveyed disagreed with the USPSTF recommendation. The number of men who disagreed was not significantly different between awareness groups (P = .962). Awareness of new screening guidelines showed a significant difference (P = .006) between education groups. Age ≥ 75 years was predictive of high-risk disease based on D''Amico''s criteria (odds ratio = 2.72, P = .003). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses showed an association of men aged ≥ 75 years with higher rate of PSA recurrence, distant metastasis, and disease specific death compared with the age groups of < 65 and 65-74 (P <.05). Conclusions: Men presenting to our PSA screening clinic disagreed with discontinuation of screening at age 75. Men aged ≥ 75 years had higher risk disease and poorer survival. The USPSTF recommendation was supported neither by public opinion nor disease risk and survival results. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Aims of the study: There are no known predictive factors of response in men receiving chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We investigated pre-treatment factors that predicted a ⩾30% PSA decline (30% PSAD) within 3 months of starting chemotherapy, and assessed performance of a risk group classification in predicting PSA declines and overall survival (OS) in men with mCRPC. Methods: In TAX327, 1006 men with mCRPC were randomized to receive docetaxel (D) in two schedules, or mitoxantrone (M), each with prednisone: 989 provided data on PSA decline within 3 months. Predictive factors for a 30% PSAD were identified using multivariable regression in D-treated men (n =656) and validated in M-treated men (n =333). Results: Four independent risk factors predicted 30% PSAD: pain, visceral metastases, anaemia and bone scan progression. Risk groups (good: 0–1 factors, intermediate: 2 factors and poor: 3–4 factors) were developed with median OS of 25.7, 18.7 and 12.8 months (p <0.0001); 30% PSAD in 78%, 66% and 58% of men (p <0.001); and measurable disease response in 19%, 9% and 5% of men (p =0.018), respectively. In the validation cohort, similar predictive ability was noted for 30% PSAD, tumour response and OS. PCWG2 subtypes were also predictive but resulted in unequal grouping. C-indices were 0.59 and 0.62 for 30% PSAD and OS in the validation dataset, respectively. Conclusions: Risk groups have been identified and validated that predict PSAD and OS in men with mCRPC and may facilitate evaluation of new systemic regimens warranting definitive testing in comparison with docetaxel and prednisone. Prospective validation of this classification system is needed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Sensitive detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients' peripheral blood facilitates on-demand monitoring of tumor progression. However, clinically significant capture of renal cell carcinoma CTCs (RCC-CTCs) remains elusive due to their heterogenous surface receptor expression. Herein, a novel capture platform is developed to detect RCC-CTCs through integration of dendrimer-mediated multivalent binding, a mixture of antibodies, and biomimetic cell rolling. The nanoscale binding kinetics measured using atomic force microscopy reveal that dendrimer-coated surfaces exhibit an order of magnitude enhancement in off-rate kinetics compared to surface without dendrimers, which translated into cell capture improvements by ~60%. Selectin-induced cell rolling facilitates surface recruitment of cancer cells, further improving cancer cell capture by up to 1.7-fold. Lastly, an antibody cocktail targeting four RCC-CTC surface receptors, which included epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (c-Met), improves the capture of RCC cells by up to 80%. The optimal surface configuration outperforms the conventional assay solely relying on EpCAM, as demonstrated by detecting significantly more CTCs in patients' samples (9.8 ± 5.1 vs. 1.8 ± 2.0 CTCs mL-1). These results demonstrate that the newly engineered capture platform effectively detects RCC-CTCs for their potential use as tumor biomarkers. • Three effective CTC isolation strategies were integrated for RCC-CTC capture. • A new platform has been tested from nanoscale analysis to clinical application. • Dendrimer nanoparticles exploited the strong multivalent binding to the tumor cells. • Recruitment of the flowing CTCs via cell rolling enhanced capture of RCC cells. • The combination of the 4 antibodies allowed sensitive detection of RCC cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Targeted inhibitors and immunotherapy have entered the treatment landscape of metastatic prostate cancer. Genomic testing may uncover which patients benefit most from these therapies. We report the clinical utility and benefits of FoundationOne testing in men with advanced prostate cancer.Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified all men with prostate cancer who received tissue FoundationOne testing at our institution between January 2010 and April 2017. Genomic alterations, treatment selection based on FoundationOne results, and clinical outcomes including response and duration of therapy following matched targeted therapy were analyzed.Results: A total of 77 men with metastatic prostate cancer were referred for FoundationOne testing; 59 (77%) had sufficient tumor tissue for testing. Of these, 22% (17/77) of men had a targetable mutation and 9% (7/77) of men received matched off-label targeted therapy. Overall, 5% (4/77) of patients derived clinical benefit. One patient with a BRCA2 loss had a complete response on olaparib (>27 months) and 3 patients (ATM substitution, PALB2 frameshift, CDK12 frameshift) had stable disease with olaparib (10.3, 18.7, and 7.8 months, respectively). Three patients (BRCA2 frameshift, PDL1 + PDL2 amplification, PMS2 missense) had progressive disease despite targeted therapy.Conclusions: Tissue genomic testing can uncover patients who may benefit from targeted therapies such as poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors or immunotherapy. In our limited single institution study, genomic testing led to clinical benefit in 5% of patients. Combined germline and circulating tumor DNA testing may be helpful to identify additional patients suitable for matched genomic therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This phase 1/2 study evaluated the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerated dose of MLN2704, a humanized monoclonal antibody MLN591 targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen, linked to the maytansinoid DM1 in patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Patients and Methods: A total of 62 patients received MLN2704 at ascending doses on 4 schedules: weekly (60, 84, 118, and 165mg/m2; 12 patients); every 2 weeks (120, 168, 236, and 330mg/m2; 15 patients); every 3 weeks (330 and 426mg/m2; 18 patients); and on days 1 and 15 of a 6-week schedule (6-week cycle, 330mg/m2; 17 patients). The primary efficacy endpoint was a sustained ≥50% decline from baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) without evidence of disease progression. Toxicity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity were assessed.Results: Neurotoxicity was dose-limiting. Overall, 44 patients (71%) exhibited peripheral neuropathy: 6 (10%) had grade 3/4. Neurotoxicity rates remained high despite increasing the dosing interval to 3 (13 of 14; one grade 3) and 6 weeks (16 of 17; three grade 3). MLN2704 pharmacokinetics were dose-linear. Rapid deconjugation of DM1 from the conjugated antibody was seen. In all, 5 patients (8%) experienced ≥50% decline in PSA; 5 (8%) had PSA stabilization lasting≥90 days. Only 2 of 35 patients on the 3- and 6-week schedules achieved a PSA decline of >50%.Conclusions: MLN2704 has limited activity in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Disulfide linker lability and rapid deconjugation lead to neurotoxicity and a narrow therapeutic window. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The presence of ≥5 circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is prognostic for shorter survival in men with metastatic castration–resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, some men have low CTCs despite widespread disease, suggesting heterogeneity in CTC phenotype or detection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of CTC enumeration with clinical disease characteristics and overall survival in men with mCRPC at our institution. Design CTCs were enumerated using the CellSearch method in a prospective correlative study in men with mCRPC starting a new systemic therapy. The primary objective was to determine the clinical phenotype of the subset of men with mCRPC who have a poor prognosis and low CTCs. Secondary end points included associations of CTCs with survival and known prognostic biomarkers, before therapy and at progression. Results At baseline, median CTC count was 16 cells and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 178 ng/ml. At progression, median CTC count was 42, PSA level was 245 ng/ml, levels of lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase rose, and level of hemoglobin dropped. The median overall survival for this heavily pretreated population was 11.2 months, and the multivariable hazard ratio for death of men with CTCs<5 vs.≥5 was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.24–0.77). Median progression-free survival was 4.4 months. CTC enumeration modestly correlated with lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase levels but only weakly correlated with PSA and hemoglobin levels. We were unable to identify a consistent subgroup of poor prognosis men with a low number of CTCs. Conclusion CTC enumeration appears to be prognostic in men with mCRPC and describes a phenotype of hematogenous dissemination that cannot be predicted based on standard clinical and laboratory assessments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]