Search

New metabolic tracers have improved sensitivity and specificity for the real extent of tumor burden in prostate cancer. This study aims to compare the impact of these tracers for metastasis-directed therapy. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography-guided metastasis-directed therapy in castration-sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer patients resulted in higher rates of androgen deprivation therapy-free survival, when compared with 18F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography-guided treatments (P = .00). Background: The present analysis aims to compare the impact of 18F-fluorocholine (18F-choline) and gallium-68 prostatespecific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT)eguided metastases-directed therapies (MDTs) in patients with castration-sensitive oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PC). Materials and Methods: Inclusion criteria were: (1) histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma; (2) evidence of biochemical relapse after primary tumor treatment; (3) ≤ 3 hypermetabolic oligorecurrent lesions detected by 18F-choline or 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT; (4) PET-CT imaging performed in a single nuclear medicine department; (5) patients treated with upfront stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) without hormone therapy; and (6) SBRT delivered with a dose per fraction ≥ 5 Gy. In the case of oligoprogression (≤ 3 lesions outside the previous RT field) after MTD, a further course of SBRT was proposed; otherwise, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered. Results: A total of 118 lesions in 88 patients were analyzed. Forty-four (50%) patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET-guided SBRT, and the remaining underwent choline PET-based SBRT. The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 5-87 months) for the entire cohort. Overall survival and local control were both 100%. Distant progression occurred in 48 (54.5%) patients, for a median distant progression-free survival of 22.8 months (range, 14.4-28.8 months). The median pre-SBRT prostate-specific antigen was 2.04 ng/mL in the choline PET cohort and 0.58 ng/mL in the PSMA-PET arm. Disease-free survival rates were 63.6% and 34%, respectively, in the 68Ga-PSMA and choline PET group (P = .06). The ADT administration rate was higher after choline-PETeguided SBRT (P = .00) owing to the higher incidence of polymetastatic disease after first-course SBRT compared with 68Ga-PSMA-based SBRT. Conclusion: In the setting of oligorecurrent castration-sensitive PC, PSMA-PET-guided SBRT produced a higher rate of ADT-free patients when compared with the 18F-choline-PET cohort. Randomized trials are advocated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Significant benefit for ONB if compared to ICUD was detected only for specific subdomains of QoL questionnaires. • No direct comparison between ICUD/ONB and TMT is available. • These data should be used in clinical practice to empower patients in deciding about local treatment choice. Radical cystectomy (RC) is considered the standard treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, RC is often burdened by significant impact on quality of life (QoL); Continence preserving methods (e.g., continent cutaneous urinary diversion and orthotopic neobladder-ONB), have been proposed as alternatives to improve postoperative QoL. Trimodal therapy (TMT) emerged as alternative to surgery. To assess the impact of these treatments from the patients' perspective, we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature, focusing on studies reporting QoL data about each of the abovementioned approaches. A systematic review was carried out including all prospective and retrospective studies enrolling patients treated with radical intent for non-metastatic MIBC from 1999 to 2021 (either RC or TMT). All studies included specifically reported QoL for one of the main treatment approaches explored (RC followed by ileal conduit urinary diversion-ICUD, ONB or TMT). Pooled analysis for EORTC QLQ-C30 and BLM-30 questionnaires showed that ONB yielded a significant advantage only for Physical Functioning (pooled mean standardized difference −0.73 SD, p-value 0.019, I 2 = 93 %) and for Emotional Functioning (pooled mean standardized difference −0.16 SD, p-value 0.029, I 2 = 0 %). A trend in favour of higher mean reported values after TMT for Global Health Score, Physical Functioning and Role Functioning was found, if compared to both RC approaches. Significant benefit for ONB if compared to ICUD was detected only for specific subdomains of QoL questionnaires. No direct comparison with TMT is available, but data suggest advantage of this approach when compared to both reconstructive scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Ablative radiotherapy is an effective treatment for oligometastatic prostate cancer. • The lack of randomized phase III trials hampers the generalization of this therapy. • In clinical practice, ablative radiotherapy should be adopted in some cases only. • This position paper explores available literature and proposes some recommendations. Oligometastatic prostate cancer comprises a wide spectrum of conditions, ranging from de novo oligometastatic cancer at diagnosis to oligometastatic castration-resistant disease, which are distinct entities in terms of biology and prognosis. In order to clarify and standardize the clinical role of ablative radiotherapy in oligometastatic prostate cancer, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) formed an expert panel to review the current literature and develop a formal consensus. Oligometastatic prostate cancer was defined as the presence of up to three metastatic lesions involving bones or nodes outside pelvis. Thereafter, four clinical scenarios were explored: metastatic castration-sensitive disease at diagnosis and after primary treatment, and metastatic castration-resistant disease at diagnosis and during treatment, where the role of ablative radiotherapy was defined either in conjunction with systemic therapy or as the only treatment in selected cases. This paper summarizes the current literature about these issues and the proposed recommendations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The primary aim of this review is to provide practical recommendations in terms of fractionation, dose, constraints and selection criteria to be used in the daily clinical routine. Based on the analysis of the literature reviewed, in order to keep the risk of severe side effects ≤3,5%, patients should be stratified according to the target volume. Thus, patients should be treated with different fractionation and total EQD2 (<12.5 ml: EQD2 < 65 Gy with radiosurgery; >12.5 ml and <35 ml: EQD2 < 50 Gy with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy; >35 ml and <50 ml: EQD2 < 36 Gy with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy). Concurrent approaches with temozolomide or bevacizumab do not seem to improve the outcomes of reirradiation and may lead to a higher risk of toxicity but these findings need to be confirmed in prospective series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose To report on a Quality assessment (QA) of Skagen Trial 1, exploring hypofractionation for breast cancer patients with indication for regional nodal radiotherapy. Material and methods Deviations from protocol regarding target volume delineations and dose parameters (Dmin, Dmax, D98%, D95% and D2%) from randomly selected dose plans were assessed. Target volume delineation according to ESTRO guidelines was obtained through atlas based automated segmentation and centrally approved as gold standard (GS). Dice similarity scores (DSC) with original delineations were measured. Dose parameters measured in the two delineations were reported to assess their dosimetric outcome. Results Assessment included 88 plans from 12 centres in 4 countries. DSC showed high agreement in contouring, 99% and 96% of the patients had a complete delineation of target volumes and organs at risk. No deviations in the dosimetric outcome were found in 76% of the patients, 82% and 95% of the patients had successful coverage of breast/chestwall and CTVn_L2-4-interpectoral. Dosimetric outcomes of original delineation and GS were comparable. Conclusions QA showed high protocol compliance and adequate dose coverage in most patients. Inter-observer variability in contouring was low. Dose parameters were in harmony with protocol regardless original or GS segmentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A systematic review of studies comparing TMT and RC for MIBC patients was performed. • Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of outcomes was performed with GRADE system. • A final weak positive recommendation in favour of TMT versus RC was developed. To compare trimodality therapy (TMT) versus radical cystectomy (RC) and develop GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Recommendation by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) for treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Prospective and retrospective studies comparing TMT and RC for MIBC patients were included. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of evidence was made. Ten studies were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis showed salvage cystectomy and pathological complete response rates after TMT of 12 % and 72–77.5 %, respectively. Pooled rates of G3-G4 GU toxicity and serious toxicity rate were 18 vs 3% and 45 vs 29 % for patients undergoing TMT vs RC, respectively. The panel assessed a substantial equivalence in terms of OS and CSS at 5 years between TMT and RC. TMT could be suggested as an alternative treatment to RC in non-metastatic MIBC patients, deemed fit for surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Loco-regional recurrence (LRR) is the predominant pattern of failure in locally-advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), both in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and non-squamous histotypes. Despite the proven role of radiotherapy (RT) as primary treatment strategy, there is sparse evidence on the use of reirradiation (ReRT) in recurrent HNC (rHNC). Various regimens of hypofractionation have been described in the literature, without a clear consensus. The aim of our single-centre study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of unresectable rHNC patients treated with Cyberknife-based (CK) hypofractionated reRT. We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive patients with rHNC who received CK reRT at our institution. All eligible patients had a recurrent, non-metastatic, previously irradiated unresectable HNC. Each case was discussed at a multidisciplinary level before treatment. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test with time measured from the date of last day of reRT to date of local recurrence, progression of disease or death, respectively. [Display omitted] First curatively intended course of RT was delivered from 1997 to 2020, concomitantly with chemotherapy or not. Thirty-five patients received Cyberknife (CK)-based hypofractionated reRT. The majority of patients (22, 63%) had a diagnosis of SCC and 13 patients (37%) had other histotypes than SCC. The median age of the cohort was 62 years at diagnosis. The CK reRT was performed from 2012 to 2022. The most commonly adopted schedules of reRT were 25Gy (57%) and 30Gy (43%) in 5 fractions on alternating days. After a median follow-up of 12 months (range 2-48), 6 out of 35 patients were alive. Causes of death were related to HNC in 12 patients and in 9 to other causes. The median LC and the 1-year LC rate were 10 months (95% CI 6,6-13,4 months) and 42%, respectively. The median PFS and OS and the 1-year PFS and OS rates were 8 months (95% CI 6.1-9,8 months), 18 months (95% CI 11,8-24,1 months) and 15% and 71% (Figure 1), respectively. At univariate analysis, a negative correlation between time to CK reRT < 12 months and LC (p 0.01) was reported. Moreover, a positive trend association between time from first to second irradiation ≥ 12 months and OS (p 0.09) was shown, in line with findings available from the literature. A significantly better OS was found in patients aged < 65 years (p 0.045). From our analysis, hypofractionated ReRT can be viewed as a well-tolerated treatment option for rHNC with potential for prolonged local control in appropriately selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitors were used in combination with SBRT in 93% of cases. • Radiotherapy schedules of single fraction doses were 10–20 Gy. • Radiotherapy schedules of hypofractionated doses were 35–60 Gy in 3–5 fractions. • Local control of irradiated lesions was achieved in 76–100% of the patients. • The 2-year overall survival was 71% after combined approach. To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of SBRTdrug combination in patients affected by mRCC and associated oncologic outcomes and toxicity profiles. We performed a critical review of the Pubmed, Medline, and Embase databases from January 1, 2000 through April 30, 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items and Meta-Analyses statement. To assess the overall quality of the literature reviewed, we used a modified Delphi tool. A total of 6 studies were included, corresponding to a cohort of 216 patients. Tyrosine Kinases Inhibitors were the most widely used drugs in combination with SBRT, being administered in 93% patients. No study reported an increase of radiation-induced toxicity. SBRT resulted to be safe, without increase in terms of drugs-related adverse events in this setting. Moreover, this approach showed promising clinical outcomes in terms of LC and OS [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The standard of care for early-stage breast cancer (BC) consists of breast-conserving surgery followed by postoperative irradiation. Recently, the concept of changing the usual sequence of treatment components in BC RT has been investigated. Potential advantages of preoperative RT in BC include a possible tumor downstaging with improved surgical cosmetic outcomes, accurate tumor site identification and better target volume delineation. Furthermore, preoperative RT could serve as a tool for treatment stratification for de-escalation of treatments in the event of pathological complete response. The present literature review analyzed the available clinical data regarding the potential impact of preoperative RT. Overall, available clinical evidence of preoperative RT in BC remains limited, deriving mostly from retrospective case series. Nevertheless, the experiences prove the feasibility of the preoperative RT approach and confirm the efficacy in almost all analyzed studies, including experiences using higher prescription RT doses or RT in combination with systemic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Aim We present the final results of the BONADIUV trial, a single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study to evaluate the impact of ibandronate treatment on bone mineral density (BMD) in osteopenic women taking aromatase inhibitors (AI). Patients and methods Between 2011 and 2014, 171 osteopenic patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either placebo or oral monthly ibandronate (150 mg). Treatment duration was 2 years, with 6-month evaluation. Primary end-point was the 2-year lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) T-score mean differences as measure of BMD variation. Secondary analyses of survival outcomes have been performed at a 5-year median follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02616744. Results Median age of study population was 60.2 years (range 44–75). At the database cut-off time, the median follow-up was 63.3 months (range 2.7–87.3). No difference in terms of T-score was shown at baseline between arms both for TH (P = 0.61) and LS (P = 0.96). At 2-year follow up, the mean change was statistically significant in favour of ibandronate arm both at TH (P = 0.0002) and LS (P < 0.0001). No significant difference in terms of adverse events was observed between arms. At a median follow-up of 63.3 months (range 2.7–87.3), the overall survival (OS) rate was 97.5% in the placebo group and 93.0% in the ibandronate arm (P = 0.19). The invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) rates did not differ between groups (P = 0.42). Conclusions Ibandronate compared to placebo improved BMD change in osteopenic women treated with adjuvant AI. Five-year survival analyses showed no difference between arms in terms of OS and iDFS rates. Highlights • Bisphosphonates prevent bone loss in adjuvant osteopenic breast cancer patients. • A bone loss prevention strategy for patients receiving adjuvant AI is crucial. • Longer follow-up and further investigations are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose Radiotherapy plus cetuximab is an effective combination therapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of our study was to determine the frequency of skin toxicity in patients receiving the combined treatment. Results Forty-eight studies were included in our analysis, for a total of 2152 patients. The mean rates of G3/G4 radiation dermatitis and acneiform rash were 32.5% (SD: 20.4; 95% CI: 28.5–36.5) and 13.4% (SD: 11.5; 95% CI: 11.2–15.6), respectively. The majority of studies referred to CTCAE scales for reporting both side effects (85.7% and 92.1%, respectively). Data on the management of skin toxicity were available in only 35.4% of the reviewed literature. Conclusions severe radiation dermatitis is a frequent side effect induced by the combination of radiotherapy and cetuximab in head and neck cancer. The lack of predictive biomarkers of toxicity hampers the possibilty to design preventive measures on a personalized basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of our work was to report on the clinical outcome of a moderately hyprofractionated radiotherapy regimen in elderly patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).Material and Methods: HNSCC aged ≥65 deemed unsuitable for curatively-intended concurrent chemo-radiotherapy or high-dose radiotherapy by clinical judgement were further evaluated with the Geriatric 8 (G8) questionnaire and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). In case of a G8 score ≤14, a de-intensified radiation schedule of 40 Gy delivered in 16 fractions was prescribed.Results: Thirty-six patients were treated between 2011 and 2016. The median age of the cohort was 77.5 (range: 65-91 years) with a combined ECOG PS of 2-3 in 77.8% and CCI of ≥8 in 25% patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 2-62 months), the 6-month and 1-year rates of loco-regional control and progression-free survival were 42%, 28% and 36% and 20%, respectively. At univariate analysis, log-rank test showed that age >75 years (p=0.036), worse PS (ECOG≥2; p=0.027), lower G8 score (<9; p=0.027) and PTV volume greater than 200 cc (p=0.038) had a significant correlation with PFS. The negative impact of the PTV volume on PFS was the only parameter confirmed in the multivariate analysis (HR 2.68; 95% CI: 1.24-5.81, p=0.013). No grade 4-5 toxicity was observed, while 13/36 patients (36%) had G3 acute side effects.Conclusion: The hypofractionated radiation schedule evaluated provides clinical benefit with low toxicity in frail, elderly patients affected by locally advanced HNSCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) represents a valid option for selected early breast cancer (BC). We recently published the 5-year results of the APBI-IMRT-Florence phase 3 randomised trial ( NCT02104895 ), showing a very low rate of disease failure, with acute and early–late toxicity in favour of APBI. We present the early and 2-year follow-up health-related quality of life (HRQoL) results. Methods Eligible patients were women aged more than 40 years with early BC suitable for breast-conserving surgery. APBI consisted of 30 Gy in five fractions delivered with IMRT technique. Standard whole breast irradiation (WBI) consisted of 50 Gy in 25 fractions plus a 10 Gy in five fractions boost on tumour bed. A total of 520 patients were enrolled in the phase 3 trial. Overall, 205 patients (105 APBI and 100 WBI) fully completed all the given questionnaires and were therefore included in the present analysis. As HRQoL assessment, patients were asked to complete the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, and the BR23 questionnaires at the beginning (T0), at the end (T1) and after 2 years from radiation (T2). Findings No significant difference between the two arms at QLQ-C30 and BR23 scores emerged at T0. Global health status (p = 0.0001), and most scores of the functional and symptom scales of QLQ-C30 at T1 showed significant differences in favour of the APBI arm. Concerning the BR23 functional and symptom scales, the body image perception, future perspective and breast and arm symptoms were significantly better in the APBI group. Similar significant results emerged at T2: significant differences in favour of APBI emerged for GHS (p = 0.0001), and most functional and symptom QLQ-C30 scales. According to QLQ-BR23 module, among the functional scales, the body image perception and the future perspective were significantly better in the APBI group (p = 0.0001), whereas among the symptom scales significant difference emerged by breast and arm symptoms with better outcomes in APBI arm (p < 0.01). Interpretation Early BC treated with APBI showed an improved short-term, and 2-year follow-up HRQoL outcome as compared with WBI. Early BC treated with APBI showed an improved short-term, and 2-year follow-up HRQoL outcome as compared with WBI. APBI should be strongly considered in the treatment choice for selected low-risk patients. Mature local control results from ongoing adequately powered randomised trials are awaited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an option in patients with brain metastases (BM). • No consensus on optimal salvage modality for local failure in BM after SRS. • Stereotactic reirradiation (SRS2) is an option despite concern for Radionecrosis (RN). • A systematic review was carried out to test efficacy and safety of SRS2. • Eleven studies were included. • Pooled 1-year Local Failure rate was 24 % and median Overall Survival was 14 months. • A pooled crude RN rate of 13 % was reported. • SRS2 is an effective option in patients with recurrent BM following prior SRS. Local failure (LF) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastases (BM) may be treated with a second course of SRS (SRS2), though this procedure may increase the risk of symptomatic radionecrosis (RN). A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA to identify studies reporting LF, overall survival (OS) and RN rates following SRS2. Meta-analysis was performed to identify predictors of RN. Analysis included 11 studies (335 patients,389 metastases). Pooled 1-year LF was 24 %(CI95 % 19–30 %): heterogeneity was acceptable (I2 = 21.4 %). Median pooled OS was 14 months (Confidence Interval 95 %, CI95 % 8.8–22.0 months). Cumulative crude RN rate was 13 % (95 %CI 8 %–19 %), with acceptable heterogeneity (I2 = 40.3 %). Subgroup analysis showed higher RN incidence in studies with median patient age ≥59 years (13 % [95 %CI 8 %–19 %] vs 7 %[95 %CI 3 %–12 %], p = 0.004) and lower incidence following prior Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT, 19 %[95 %CI 13 %–25 %] vs 7%[95 %CI 3 %–13 %], p = 0.004). SRS2 is an effective strategy for in-site recurrence of BM previously treated with SRS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]