Search

Objectives: To describe our experience with iatrogenic arterio-venous fistula (AVF) occurring during lower limb subintimal angioplasty, their management and the final clinical, radiological outcome. Design: Retrospective review of case series from two centres, from a computerised database over a period of five years. Material: Twelve patients whose lower limb subintimal angioplasty was complicated by Iatrogenic AVF. Results: The Majority of AVF occurred at the popliteal trifurcation vessels. And the incidence of this complication in our case series was 0.8%. This was managed with a variety of techniques-Coil embolisation, balloon tamponade, alternative dissection and stent placement. In one patient, the fistula was left open intentionally. All twelve patients had a successful angioplasty. The overall technical success rate for AVF ablation was eighty percent. Conclusions: AVF is a potential complication of angioplasty. The majority can be managed by endovascular means during the angioplasty procedure with good technical success. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Because subintimal angioplasty (SA) is a technique that can achieve recanalization of long arterial occlusions, it is considered an alternative to lower limb bypass operations. The aim of this prospective study was to identify the risk factors that affect patency of SA in patients suffering from critical limb ischemia (CLI). Methods and results: 51 consecutive infrainguinal SA were done in 46 patients suffered from CLI. The patients were followed-up with regular duplex scans up to 12 months post-intervention. Sex, atherosclerosis risk factors, and some technical details of the procedure (number of patent run-off vessels after the procedure, length and re-entry point of angioplasty) were examined as potential risk factors of patency, using survival analysis statistical techniques. The overall patency rate at 12 months post-intervention was 50%. According to Cox-regression analysis, the factors that affect patency were the number of run-off vessels and the length of occlusion. Patients with two or three run-off vessels had a hazard of occlusion of 0.30 (P =.027) compared to those who had one run-off vessel. The 12-months patency in patients with more than one run-off vessels was 81% vs. 25% in patients with one run-off vessel. Regarding the length of angioplasty, the hazard of reocclusion was 1.02 for every centimeter of occlusion (P =.049). Conclusions: The number of patent run-off crural vessels after the angioplasty and the length of occlusion are significant risk factors for reocclusion of infrainguinal SA in patients with CLI. Trying to recanalize more than one run-off vessels could raise the SA patency. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To investigate the value of duplex ultrasound scanning (DUSS) in the routine follow up of patients following EVAR. Methods: Imaging was reviewed for 310 consecutive patients undergoing EVAR at a single centre. Concurrent ultrasound and CT scans were defined as having occurred within 6 months of each other. There were 244 paired concurrent DUSS and CT scans which were used for further analysis. These modalities were compared with respect to sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and level of agreement (by Kappa statistics) using CT as the ‘gold standard’. Results: DUSS failed to detect a number of endoleaks which were seen on CT and the sensitivity of this test was therefore poor (67%). However, the specificity of DUSS compared more favourably with a value of 91%. Positive predictive values ranged from 33–100% but negative predictive values were more reliable with values of 91–100% at all time points post operatively. There were no type I leaks, or endoleaks requiring intervention which were missed on DUSS. Overall, there was a ‘fair’ level of agreement between the two imaging modalities using Kappa statistics. Conclusion: Although DUSS is not as sensitive as CT scanning in the detection of endoleak, no leaks requiring intervention were missed on DUSS in this study. DUSS is much cheaper than CT and avoids high doses of radiation. DUSS therefore remains a valuable method of follow up after EVAR and can reduce the need for repeated CT scans. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To report the experience of endovascular repair (ER) in patients with ruptured and symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA and sAAA), comparing results with a cohort of controls who underwent open repair (OR) of sAAA or rAAA. Design: A historically controlled cohort study. Materials: Retrospective data from 21 patients who underwent ER and prospective data from 23 patients who underwent OR. Methods: Results were compared using the Mann–Whitney U-test. Results: Eleven ER patients had sAAAs and 10 had rAAAs. Nine OR patients had rAAAs and 13 had sAAAs. Thirty-day mortality was 11% in patients with rAAA in the ER group, and 54% in the OR group (p=0.03). There were no post-operative deaths in the patients who had an sAAA in the ER group, and one death in the patients who had sAAA in the OR group. Results as expressed as mean ER value versus mean OR value and p-value. ER was associated with significant reductions in the length of operation (2.6 versus 3.1h, p=0.03), blood transfusion requirements (0.86 versus 10.7 units p<0.01), time in critical care (1.5 versus 6.1 days, p=0.02), and total hospital stay (8.5 versus 17.5 days, p=0.01) compared with OR. There was no difference in time from admission to arrival in theatre between the two groups (3.4 versus 5.0h, p=0.35). Conclusions: In patients with rAAA and sAAA that are suitable for stenting, ER has reduced mortality compared with open repair. Assessment for ER does not cause a pre-operative delay, operating time is reduced, blood transfusion requirements are reduced and there is a faster recovery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]