Search

Background and Purpose: Contrary to anterior circulation, the legitimacy of endovascular treatment in posterior circulation stroke is still being questioned. Finding reliable prognostic factors and determining how patient selection should be done has become top priority.Methods: Observational and retrospective study from two Portuguese hospitals, including all consecutive patients with posterior circulation occlusions who underwent thrombectomy between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2019.Results: Out of a total of 126 patients, the median age was 74 (IQR 61-80) and 39.7% were female. A good clinical outcome (mRS ≤2) was associated with a lower incidence of coma (24,2% vs 66,7%, p < 0,001) and of sudden onset coma (3% vs 18%,=0,04), a lower NIHSS at admission (14 vs 19, p < 0,001), a higher pc-ASPECTS at admission (10 vs 9, p < 0,001) and at 24 h (8 vs 6, p < 0,001) and a higher BATMAN score (7 vs 6, p = 0,017). Differences in the times of symptom-onset-to-recanalization (496 vs 536, p = 0,19) and symptom-onset-to-coma (130 vs 195, p = 0,52) were not remarkable. When excluding NIHSS and pc-ASPECTS at 24 h, coma (p = 0,003; OR=0,22; 95% CI: 0,08-0,59) and the pc-ASPECTS at admission (p = 0,037; OR=1,63; 95% CI: 1,03-2,57) become independent predictors of good outcome.Conclusions: In strokes from the posterior circulation, coma, more than time, appears to be an important prognostic factor. The BATMAN and the pc-ASPECTS scores were also associated with clinical outcome and coma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]