Search

Objective The present study evaluated the optimal measuring criteria to assess spinal tumor response to surgery followed by stereotactic spine radiosurgery (SRS) and reports the local control and wound complication rates following combined multimodality treatment. Methods and Materials Prospectively collected patient information was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients treated with spine surgery followed by SRS. Tumor sizes and volumetric assessment were formally measured. Local control status was defined according to World Health Organization (WHO, bidimensional), RECIST (unidimensional), or volumetric size change. Statistical comparative assessments of tumor measurements were performed. Results Twenty-two patients were eligible for evaluation after having undergone surgery followed by single-fraction SRS within a 2-month period. Seventeen had follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a mean patient follow-up of 12.59 months (range 3–36 months). None developed wound complication after radiation therapy (95% lower confidence bound 13%). Two patients had clinical recurrence while 15 of 17 achieved local control (88.3%). A test of marginal homogeneity for RECIST versus WHO was not statistically significant, P = 1.0 suggesting similar response classifications with both systems. Spearman correlations among 1) volumetric assessment, 2) bidimensional size, and 3) unidimensional size were significant for all groups ( P < 0.05). Conclusion High local control rates can be achieved with surgery followed by SRS. Further, adjuvant SRS following spine tumor surgery delivers less radiation to the wound than conventional radiation and thus potentially reduces wound complications. Unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric tumor assessments demonstrate similar results. Hence the use of the simpler RECIST criteria is suitable and appropriate for evaluating the response to treatment after spine radiosurgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with spine tumors frequently require timely, multistep, and multidisciplinary care. A Spine Tumor Board (STB) provides a consistent forum wherein diverse specialists can interact, facilitating complex coordinated care for these patients. This study aims to present a single, large academic center's STB experience specifically reviewing case diversity, recommendations, and quantifying growth over time. All patient cases discussed at STB from May 2006 (STB inception) to May 2021 were evaluated. Collected data submitted by presenting physicians and formal documentation completed during the STB are summarized. A total of 4549 cases were reviewed by STB over the study period, representing 2618 unique patients. Over the course of the study, a 266% increase in number of cases presented per week was observed (4.1 to 15.0). Cases were presented by surgeons (74%), radiation oncologists (18%), neurologists (2%), and other specialists (6%). The most common pathologic diagnoses discussed were spinal metastases (n = 1832; 40%), intradural extramedullary tumors (n = 798; 18%), and primary glial tumors (n = 567; 12%). Treatment recommendations included surgery, radiation therapy, or systemic therapy for 1743 cases (38%), continued routine follow-up/expectant management for 1592 cases (35%), supplementary imaging to better clarify the diagnosis for 549 cases (12%), and variable tailored recommendations for the remainder of cases (18%). Care of patients with spine tumors is complex. We believe that the formation of a stand-alone STB is instrumental to accessing multidisciplinary input, enhancing confidence in management decisions for both patients and providers, assisting with care orchestration, and improving quality of care for patients with spine tumors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale and Objectives: Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) requires the rapid injection of contrast media ideally through an 18-gauge intravenous line in the antecubital fossa. Patients with CVCs undergoing CTA, however, are typically injected at low rates for two reasons: the potential for catheter failure and because of the lack of manufacturer recommendations for high injection rates typically used during CTA. The purpose of the study is to measure the injection rate thresholds of CVC. The results suggest that CVC can be used at high injection rates that are now typically used with peripheral intravenous catheters during CTA. Materials and Methods: We used 16-cm-long catheters and 20-cm-long catheters in six groups (n = 5 for each catheter length). After the catheters were placed into a water bath, each group was injected at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 ml/sec. New contrast, pressure tubing, and catheters were used for each test. Results: No catheter ruptures were encountered during the experiment, but there was one episode of power injector tubing rupture during the injection of a 16-cm catheter at an injection rate of 30 ml/sec. Conclusion: No catheter failures were demonstrated in this study using injection rates well above those used in conventional CTA. Power injector tubing failure was demonstrated at an injection rate of 30 ml/sec, which generated mean pressures in the 16-cm catheters of 920 psi (tubing rating per manufacturer is 300 psi). This study demonstrated no catheter or injector tubing failure at injection rates of 5 to 25 ml/sec. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

: Rationale and ObjectivesRenal tubular vacuolization (RTV), which has been shown to occur after the use of iodinated contrast material, may be one of the earliest signs of contrast medium–induced renal injury. In this study, the authors tested a method for preventing RTV with the administration of acetylcysteine, theophylline, or both, prior to contrast medium administration.: Materials and MethodsEighty rats were randomly selected for inclusion in the study. The treatment group consisted of three subgroups, each of which received prophylactic acetylcysteine, theophylline, or both before injection of iohexol. The control group comprised five subgroups, each of which received acetylcysteine, theophylline, both, normal saline injection, or orally administered normal saline prior to iohexol injection.: ResultsThe occurrence of RTV in the treatment groups was compared with that in the control subgroup that received normal saline and iohexol. All of the rats in that control subgroup (n = 10) and 97% of the rats in the treatment group (n = 30) developed RTV.: ConclusionThe administration of acetylcysteine, theophylline, or both prior to iohexol injection did not prevent RTV from occurring in rats. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

A 12-year-old girl presented with several years of progressive painless proptosis and orbital fullness. On imaging, she was found to have marked expansion and remodeling centered in the right greater wing of the sphenoid bone with an adjacent middle cranial fossa arachnoid cyst. A clinical diagnosis of intradiploic arachnoid cyst was made. This entity was benign, and other ophthalmic and neurologic signs or symptoms were absent. Our patient was observed without surgical intervention. To our knowledge, this is the first such case reported in a child. Although this cyst has been described in the occipital and frontal bones, this is the first description of occurrence in the sphenoid bone.▪ [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

To evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in differentiating radiation necrosis (RN) from recurrent tumor after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for brain metastases (BMs). Forty-one patients with BM who underwent surgical intervention after GKRS at Cleveland Clinic (2006–2017) were included in this retrospective study. The ADC values of the growing lesions and the contralateral hemisphere were calculated using picture archiving and communication system. These values were correlated to the percentage of RN identified on pathologic evaluation of the surgical specimen. The median age of the patients was 59 years (range, 25–86 years), and lung cancer (63.4%) was the most common malignancy. Median initial (pre-GKRS) target volume of the lesions was 5.4 cc (range, 0.135–45.6 cc), and median GKRS dose was 18.0 Gy. Surgical resection or biopsy was performed at a median of 176 days after GKRS. Two variables were statistically significant predictors of predominate RN (75%–100%) in the surgical specimen: 1) ADC of the lesion on the preresection magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 2) initial pre-GKRS target volume. ADC >1.5 × 10−3 mm2/s within the lesion on MRI predicted significant RN on pathologic evaluation of the lesion (P < 0.05). Similarly, when the target volume before GKRS was large (>10 cc), the risk of identifying significant necrosis in the pathologic specimen was elevated (P < 0.05). Our data suggest that the combination of lesion ADC on MRI prior to surgical intervention and the initial target volume can predict RN with reasonable accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis is becoming more prevalent due to the aging population. Currently, there is no clinical guideline to clarify the utility of repeat MRI in patients with lumbar stenosis, without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniation.Purpose: To evaluate the utility of routine use of MRI as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis, and to help formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis.Study Design/setting: Retrospective radiographic analysis.Patient Sample: Retrospective chart review was performed to review patients with lumbar stenosis, who underwent lumbar decompression without fusion from 2011 to 2015 at a single institution.Outcome Measures: Previously established stenosis grading systems were used to measure and compare the initial and the subsequent repeat lumbar MRIs performed preoperatively. If patients were found to have a moderate or severe grade change, and if the surgical plan was altered due to such exacerbated radiographic findings, then their grade changes were considered clinically meaningful.Methods: We identified patients with lumbar stenosis without radiographic instability or neurological deficits, who had at least two preoperative lumbar MRIs performed and underwent decompressive surgeries. At each pathologic disc level, the absolute value of the change in grade for central and lateral recess stenosis, right foraminal stenosis, and left foraminal stenosis from the first preoperative MRI to the repeated MRI was calculated. These changed data were then used to calculate the mean and median changes in each of the three types of stenosis for each pathologic disc level. Identical calculations were carried out for the subsample of patients who only underwent discectomy or had a discectomy included as part of their surgery.Results: Among the 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 37 of those patients had more than one level surgically addressed, and a total of 161 lumbar levels were reviewed. Among the subset of patients that had any grade change, the majority of the grades only had a mild change of 1 (36 out of 42 patients, 85.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.1%-94.1%); there was a moderate grade change of 2 in two patients (4.8%, CI: 0.8%-14.0%), and a severe change of 3 in one patient (2.4%, CI: 0.2%-10.1%). There were three patients with decreased grade change (7.1%, CI: 1.8%-17.5%). All clinically meaningful grade changes were from the subset of patients who had only discectomy or discectomy as part of the procedure. Lastly, both patients that had a clinically meaningful grade change had their MRIs performed at an interval of greater than 360 days.Conclusions: The radiographic evaluation of the utility of routinely repeated MRIs in lumbar stenosis without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniations demonstrated that there were no significant changes found in the repeated MRI in the preoperative setting, especially if the MRIs were performed less than one year apart. The results of this present study can help to standardize the diagnostic evaluation of lumbar stenosis and to formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate whether stereotactic spine radiosurgery (SRS) results in lower rates of instrumentation failure or higher rates of fusion compared with surgical decompression and stabilization combined with conventional fractionated radiation (XRT) in patients with spine tumors. Methods: The Cleveland Clinic Spine Tumor board database was retrospectively reviewed. Only patients who underwent spine surgery with instrumentation followed by either SRS or XRT and who had at least 6 months of clinical and imaging follow-up were included. Results: The primary inclusion criteria were met by 15 instrumented and irradiated patients (8 SRS and 7 XRT). In the XRT group, 43% had instrumentation failure versus 0% instrumentation failure in the SRS group (P = 0.08). Excluding patients with no bone graft, fusion rates were 50% in the SRS group versus 17% in the XRT group (not significant). Conclusions: SRS precisely delivers ionizing radiation to tumors, while sparing the surrounding organs or vital structures. This study poses the question of whether a fusion site should also be considered a structure or organ at risk and whether SRS rather than XRT is more ideal in the postoperative setting. This relatively small series shows a trend toward higher fusion rates and a lower incidence of instrumentation failure with SRS and suggests that larger prospective studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis is becoming more prevalent due to the aging population. However, as the health care expenditure in the United States is rapidly increasing, it is imperative to minimize the use of costly imaging modalities by investigating the utility and cost effectiveness of images routinely obtained. PURPOSE Our study was designed to clarify the utility of routinely repeated MRI in patients with lumbar stenosis, without instability or neurological deficits. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective radiographic analysis was performed in the preoperative MRI's of all patients who underwent lumbar decompression via laminectomy, laminotomy, foraminotomy, and/or discectomy, performed at a single tertiary-care institution from 2011 to 2015. PATIENT SAMPLE Among the patients initially identified, those who had at least two preoperative MRI's and were without radiographic instability or clinical neurological deficits were selected. OUTCOME MEASURES For radiographic analysis, grading systems were adopted and modified from Schizas's grading system and Lee's et al. foraminal stenosis grading system, which were used to measure and compare the initial and the subsequent repeat lumbar MRI's performed preoperatively. If patients were found to have a moderate or severe grade change, and if the surgical plan was altered due to such exacerbated radiographic findings, then their grade changes were considered clinically meaningful. METHODS At each pathologic level, the absolute value of the change in grades for central or lateral recess stenosis, right foraminal stenosis, and left foraminal stenosis in the first preoperative MRI and the repeated MRI was calculated. These change data were used to calculate the mean and median change in each of the three types of stenosis for each pathologic level. Both the mean and median change in stenosis severity were also calculated for the subset of patients that actually had a change in severity. This analysis was undertaken to quantify the extent of change in stenosis severity that could be expected if a patient's stenosis changed at all. Finally, identical calculations were carried out for the subsample of patients who had discectomy as part of the procedure. RESULTS We identified 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria. A total of 17 of those patients had more than one level surgically addressed, and a total of 161 lumbar levels were reviewed. In the subset that had any change, the majority of the grades only had a mild change of one (33 out of 38 patients, 86.8%; 36 out of 41 levels, 87.8%); there was a moderate grade change of two in two levels (4.9%), and a severe change of three in one level (2.4%). There were three levels that had decreased grades (7.3%). All clinically meaningful grade changes were from the subset of patients who had only discectomy or discectomy as part of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS The radiographic evaluation of the utility of routinely repeated MRI's in lumbar stenosis without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniations demonstrated that there were no significant changes found in the repeated MRI in the preoperative setting. The results of the present study can help to standardize the diagnostic evaluation of lumbar stenosis and to formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]