Search

There is emerging evidence that people with both fibromyalgia and functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders report more severe psychological symptoms than people with only fibromyalgia or a functional GI disorder. We use Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to examine whether, for people with fibromyalgia, accompanying GI symptoms result in stronger bidirectional relationships between distress and bodily pain or fatigue. Participants were 67 women with fibromyalgia from a study by Okifuji et al. (2011; 13), in which EMA data on pain, fatigue, and distress was collected over 30 days. Thirty-three participants reported GI symptoms at baseline, and 34 participants reported no GI symptoms but at least one other bodily symptom. Using multilevel linear regressions with interaction terms, we compared the two groups on the strength of reciprocal within-day and day-to-day relationships between pain, fatigue, and distress. GI symptom status did not moderate relationships between distress and pain. However, participants with GI symptoms uniquely reported more distress following increased fatigue within days (b = 0.120, 95%CI: 0.041,0.198), and sharper distress escalations across days (b = 0.078 95%CI: 0.007, 0.149). We do not find evidence of stronger bidirectional within-day and day-to-day relationships between distress and bodily symptoms in this patient group. We do, however, find evidence of heightened fatigue-related distress and escalating distress. These cyclical processes can become a focus for cognitive behavioural therapy, patient education, and physical (exercise/sleep) therapy aimed at addressing fatigue. • We reanalyse experience sampling data on pain, fatigue and distress in fibromyalgia. • We focus on bidirectional links between distress and pain and fatigue. • We find that gastrointestinal(GI) symptoms do not moderate these links. • GI symptoms do predict greater distress following earlier distress and fatigue. • Distress and fatigue should be a focus for treatment in this patient group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of European Review of Applied Psychology is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Siblings of children with a disability are an at risk group for emotional and behavioral problems. This study evaluated an intervention to promote the emotional and behavioral functioning of siblings of children with disabilities and chronic health conditions. SibworkS is a six-week manual-based, cognitive–behavioral group support program focussed on strengthening siblings’ perceived social support, self-esteem, problem-solving skills, adaptive coping behaviors and positive sibling relationships. Fifty-six children aged 7–12 were allocated to either the SibworkS program ( n = 30) or waitlist control ( n = 26) in alternating sequence. The primary outcome was siblings’ emotional and behavioral functioning. Additional outcomes were self-esteem, perceived social support, the sibling relationship and coping behaviors. Siblings were followed-up immediately after the intervention and at 3-months. Siblings participating in the SibworkS intervention were reported to have fewer emotional and behavioral difficulties than siblings in the control group immediately following the intervention and at the 3-month follow-up. Participation in SibworkS was associated with fewer emotional and behavioral difficulties for siblings. Implications for practice and future research include recommendations for improving program participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anorectal biofeedback (BF) is commonly used to treat patients with fecal incontinence (FI), but demand usually exceeds availability. It is therefore important to identify patients most likely to respond to BF treatment. We aimed to identify pre-treatment clinical or physiologic factors that might be used to predict completion and success of BF in women with FI. We analyzed data from 400 women with FI (mean age, 61 ± 14 y) undergoing instrumental BF in a tertiary care setting from 2003 through 2016. All patients completed questionnaires before BF, including Rome and the hospital anxiety and depression scale questionnaires. Histories of medication use, surgery, medical conditions, and bowel pattern were recorded, urge was assessed, and patients kept stool diaries. Before and after treatment (6 weekly sessions with a gastroenterologist-supervised nurse specialist, 4 involving instrumented anorectal biofeedback), patients were examined by a physician and fecal incontinence severity index and visual analogue scale scores were recorded. The main outcome measure was response to therapy, defined as improvement of 50% or more in weekly FI episodes at the end of BF compared with before BF. The BF treatment was completed by 363 women (91%); of these, 62 had low baseline symptom frequency (no FI episodes in the 2 weeks before BF). Younger age was associated with failure to complete treatment. Of the 301 patients remaining, 202 patients (67%) had a response to therapy; among these women, urge FI was associated with response at end of BF, but not at follow up (6 months after therapy). Baseline severity of symptom scores and quality of life measures were associated with greater improvement in the same variable at the end of BF and after 6 months. Patients with low baseline symptom frequency improved in all secondary outcome measures, similar to patients with higher baseline symptom frequency. In an analysis of 363 women with FI, approximately two-thirds had a response to BF treatment. Urge FI was the only baseline variable associated with response. Baseline severity of symptoms and quality of life measures were associated with greater improvement in the same variable, but not overall response. It is therefore a challenge to select treatment for patients with FI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]