Search

The use of temporary intravascular shunts (TIVSs) allow for restoration of distal perfusion and reduce ischemic time in the setting of arterial injury. As a damage control method, adjunct shunts restore perfusion during treatment of life-threatening injuries, or when patients require evacuation to a higher level of care. Single-center reports and case series have demonstrate that TIVS use can extend the opportunity for limb salvage. However, few multi-institutional studies on the topic have been reported. The objective of the present study was to characterize TIVS use through a multi-institutional registry and define its effects on early limb salvage. Data from the Prospective Observation Vascular Injury Treatment registry was analyzed. Civilian patients aged ≥18 years who had sustained an extremity vascular injury from September 2012 to November 2018 were included. Patients who had a TIVS used in the management of vascular injury were included in the TIVS group and those who had received treatment without a TIVS served as the control group. An unadjusted comparison of the groups was conducted to evaluate the differences in the baseline and outcome characteristics. Double robust estimation combining logistic regression with propensity score matching was used to evaluate the effect of TIVS usage on the primary end point of limb salvage. TIVS use was identified in 78 patients from 24 trauma centers. The control group included 613 patients. Unmatched analysis demonstrated that the TIVS group was more severely injured (mean ± standard deviation injury severity score, 18.83 ± 11.76 for TIVS vs 14.93 ± 10.46 for control; P =.002) and had more severely mangled extremities (mean ± standard deviation abbreviated injury scale, extremity, score 3.23 ± 0.80 for TIVS vs 2.95 ± 0.87 for control; P =.008). Logistic regression demonstrated that propensity-matched control patients had a three times greater likelihood of amputation compared with the TIVS patients (odds ratio, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.1; P =.026). Concomitant nerve injury and orthopedic fracture were associated with a greater risk of amputation. The median follow-up for the TIVS group was 12 days (interquartile range, 4-25 days) compared with 9 days (interquartile range, 4-18 days) for the control group. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first multicenter, matched-cohort study to characterize early limb salvage as a function of TIVS use in the setting of extremity vascular injury. Shunts expedite limb perfusion and resulted in lower rates of amputation during the early phase of care. The use of TIVS should be one part of a more aggressive approach to restore perfusion in the most injured patients and ischemic limbs. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endovascular techniques in trauma surgery are becoming increasingly important in patient management, with procedures such as pelvic and splenic angioembolization becoming the standard of care for certain injuries. Traditionally, such interventions are performed via femoral access, although the morbidity of this approach is not insignificant (3%-10%). Transradial access (TRA) is an attractive alternative, pioneered by cardiologists, with low rates of access site complications in patients undergoing coronary intervention. Recently, this technology has extended to other interventions. The aim of this study was to present the initial experience of a radial program in a busy trauma center, with specific regard to safety and complications. The medical records of trauma patients undergoing endovascular procedures via TRA between March 2018 and December 2018 were queried for procedural and postoperative data. Demography and injury characteristics were presented for the overall cohort, followed by a comparison of procedural data and complications between laterality. Continuous variables were compared using a two-tailed t -test and categorical variables were compared using a χ 2 test. Over a 9-month period, 65 patients underwent 81 interventions via TRA, most commonly solid organ or pelvic angiography/embolization. Radial artery access was achieved in all patients, with procedural success achieved in all but two patients (n = 63 [96.9%]) who had hypoplastic radial artery anatomy, who underwent ulnar access. The overall technique-related complication rate was 1.5% with no difference observed between laterality (n = 1; P =.523). One patient with an admission Glasgow Coma Score of 3 and coagulopathy developed radial artery thrombosis after pelvic angiography via right TRA. Mortality was seen in seven patients (10.8%) owing to hemorrhagic shock (n = 3 [42.8%]) or multiorgan failure (n = 4 [57.1%]). There were no cases of postprocedural access site bleeding, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, vascular injury, intraoperative arrhythmia or cerebrovascular accident, arteriovenous fistula formation, or infection. TRA is a feasible and low-risk alternative for endovascular intervention in the trauma patient. It yields good technical success with low morbidity. Although larger studies are needed to establish the full efficacy of TRA at the multi-institutional level, this single-institution study demonstrates the legitimacy of an alternative means for endovascular intervention in the trauma patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Tissue oximetry data did not contribute additional information regarding the detection of early occult shock, mortality, or the need for lifesaving interventions when analyzed using state-of-the art statistical techniques. • Sensitivity and specificity using hemoglobin saturation in the capillaries, venules, and arterioles (StO 2) to detect occult shock was poor (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.505; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.53). • StO 2 did not correlate with the requirement for lifesaving interventions. • Although the results from this study cannot be used to endorse the use of the device tested, handheld tissue oximetry is an attractive technology that may have utility once refinements to the devices and techniques are made. Improved prehospital methods for assessing the need for lifesaving interventions (LSIs) are needed to gain critical lead time in the care of the injured. We hypothesized that threshold values using prehospital handheld tissue oximetry would detect occult shock and predict LSI requirements. This was a prospective observational study of adult trauma patients emergently transported by helicopter. Patients were monitored with a handheld tissue oximeter (InSpectra Spot Check; Hutchinson Technology Inc, Hutchinson, MN), continuous vital signs, and 21 laboratory measurements obtained both in the field with a portable analyzer and at the time of admission. Shock was defined as base excess ≥ 4 or lactate > 3 mmol/L. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled with a median Injury Severity Score of 16 (interquartile range, 5-29). The median hemoglobin saturation in the capillaries, venules, and arterioles (StO 2) value for all patients was 82% (interquartile range, 76%-87%; range, 42%-98%). StO 2 was abnormal (< 75%) in 18 patients (20%). Eight were hypotensive (9%) and had laboratory-confirmed evidence of occult shock. StO 2 correlated poorly with shock threshold laboratory values (r = −0.17; 95% confidence interval, −0.33 to 1.0; P =.94). The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.63) for StO 2 < 75% and laboratory-confirmed shock. StO 2 was not associated with LSI need on admission when adjusted for multiple covariates, nor was it independently associated with death. Handheld tissue oximetry was not sensitive or specific for identifying patients with prehospital occult shock. These results do not support prehospital StO 2 monitoring despite its inclusion in several published guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The availability of endovascular techniques has led to a paradigm shift in the management of vascular injury. Although previous reports showed trends towards the increased use of catheter-based techniques, there have been no contemporary studies of practice patterns and how these approaches differ by anatomic distributions of injury. The objective of this study is to provide a temporal assessment of the use of endovascular techniques in the management of torso, junctional (subclavian, axillary, iliac), and extremity injury and to evaluate any association with survival and length of stay. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Prospective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment registry (PROOVIT) is the only large multicenter database focusing specifically on the management of vascular trauma. Patients in the AAST PROOVIT registry from 2013 to 2019 with arterial injuries were queried, and radial/ulnar, and tibial artery injuries were excluded. The primary aim was to evaluate the frequency in use of endovascular techniques over time and by body region. A secondary analysis evaluated the trends for junctional injuries and compared the mortality between those treated with open vs endovascular repair. Of the 3249 patients included, 76% were male, and overall treatment type was 42% nonoperative, 44% open, and 14% endovascular. Endovascular treatment increased an average of 2% per year from 2013 to 2019 (range, 17%-35%; R2 =.61). The use of endovascular techniques for junctional injuries increased by 5% per year (range, 33%-63%; R2 =.89). Endovascular treatment was more common for thoracic, abdominal, and cerebrovascular injuries, and least likely in upper and lower extremity injuries. Injury severity score was higher for patients receiving endovascular repair in every vascular bed except lower extremity. Endovascular repair was associated with significantly lower mortality than open repair for thoracic (5% vs 46%; P <.001) and abdominal injuries (15% vs 38%; P <.001). For junctional injuries, endovascular repair was associated with a non-statistically significant lower mortality (19% vs 29%; P =.099), despite higher injury severity score (25 vs 21; P =.003) compared with open repair. The reported use of endovascular techniques within the PROOVIT registry increased more than 10% over a 6-year period. This increase was associated with improved survival, especially for patients with junctional vascular injuries. Practices and training programs should account for these changes by providing access to endovascular technologies and instruction in the catheter-based skill sets to optimize outcomes in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The current Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines suggest urgent (<24 hours) thoracic endovascular aortic repair for grade (G) II to G IV blunt thoracic aortic injuries (BTAIs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether some patients may require more emergency treatment. Methods We reviewed imaging variables of prospectively collected BTAI patients between 1999 and 2014. We used computed tomographic angiography to classify BTAIs into four categories: G I, intimal tear; G II, intramural hematoma; G III, aortic pseudoaneurysm; and G IV, free rupture. Specific examination of G III injuries was undertaken in an effort to predict aortic-related mortality (ARM) before repair. For this subset, we examined pseudoaneurysm size, lesion/normal aortic diameter ratio, and mediastinal hematoma location and size. Results Among 331 patients with BTAIs, 86 died before imaging. Admission computed tomographic angiography was available for 205 patients (71.2% male; mean age, 39.3 years) with BTAIs (24 G I, 49 G II, 124 G III, 8 G IV). The mean Injury Severity Score was 35.6, and 22.4% had hypotension (<90 mm Hg). Overall mortality was 11.2% (G I/G II, 4.1%; G III/G IV, 15.3%; P = .02). ARM was 2.4% (G I/G II, 0%; G III/G IV, 3.8%; P = .09). ARM was significantly greater in G IV (3 of 8 [37.5%]) than G III (2 of 124 [1.6%]) vs G I/II (0 of 73 [0%]) injuries ( P < .0001). Medical management alone was used in 53 (20 G I, 18 G II, 13 G III, and 2 G IV). Open repair was performed in 51 (3 G I, 9 G II, 36 G III, and 3 G IV) at a mean time to repair (TTR) of 10.6 hours. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair was conducted for 101 patients (1 G I, 22 G II, 75 G III, and 3 G IV) at a mean TTR of 9.4 hours. Median TTR for the overall population of BTAI patients was 24.0 hours from admission. (G I, 64.5 hours; G II, 24.0 hours; G III, 19.7 hours; and G IV, 3.5 hours). ARM occurred in four of five patients before planned repair (2 G III and 2 G IV), 7.0 ± 3.6 hours from admission. No G I/II ARM occurred. Among eight G IV injuries, there were three ARMs. Focus on G III injuries through regression analysis demonstrated that early clinical/imaging variables (eg, mediastinal hematoma dimensions and lesion/normal aortic diameter ratio) were not significant predictors of ARM. Conclusions Injury grade is a predictor of ARM among patients with BTAIs. Aggressive use of the current Society for Vascular Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines at a busy level I trauma center resulted in low rates of ARM. In this setting, identification of additional physiologic and radiographic criteria indicating the need for emergency (vs urgent) repair of aortic pseudoaneurysms remains elusive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Endovascular repair (ER) of axillosubclavian arterial injuries is a minimally invasive alternative to open repair (OR). The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of ER vs OR. Methods A retrospective study was performed of patients who sustained axillosubclavian arterial injuries admitted to two high-volume academic trauma centers between 2003 and 2013. Patients undergoing ER and OR were matched according to 25 different demographic and clinical variables in a 1:3 ratio using propensity scores. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were complications and length of stay. Results Among 153 patients (79.7% male; mean age, 32.7 ± 15.9 years) who sustained axillosubclavian arterial injuries, 18 (11.8%) underwent ER and 135 (88.2%) had OR. Matched cases (ER, n = 18) and controls (OR, n = 54) had similar demographic and clinical data, such as age, gender, admission systolic blood pressure and Glasgow Coma Scale score, body Abbreviated Injury Scale scores, Injury Severity Score, and transfusion requirements. Patients undergoing ER had significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared with patients undergoing OR (5.6% vs 27.8%; P = .040; odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-0.9). Similarly, patients undergoing ER had substantially lower rates of surgical site infections and a trend toward lower rates of sepsis. Outpatient follow-up was available in 88.2% (n = 15) of the patients at a median time of 8 months (1-30 months). Two ER patients required open reintervention for stent-related complications (one for a type Ia endoleak and another for stent thrombosis). Conclusions In our experience with axillosubclavian arterial injuries, ER was associated with improved mortality and lower complication rates. Patient follow-up demonstrates an acceptable reintervention rate after ER. Further multicenter prospective evaluation is warranted to determine long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The treatment of segmental arteriovenous fistula aneurysms (AVFAs) remains a challenge in dialysis access preservation. We examined our experience with the use of tubularized extracellular matrix (ECM; CorMatrix, Roswell, Ga) for AVFA repair. Methods Between October 2013 and January 2015, we conducted a prospective study of CorMatrix ECM for AVFA repair. All patients underwent intraoperative fistulography. Patients with central venous stenosis or occlusion had simultaneous angioplasty and stenting as indicated. The aneurysm and overlying skin were then resected, and an ECM patch was fashioned into a tube for interposition repair. Patients with multiple AVFAs underwent staged repair. Cannulation of the repaired segments was allowed after 6 weeks. Results During the study period, 15 patients (40% male; mean age, 49.5 years) underwent 18 AVFA repairs using ECM (3 staged repairs). Six patients (40%) underwent simultaneous treatment of central vein lesions, whereas eight patients (53%) had associated skin erosion. Treated sites included radiocephalic (2), brachiobasilic (1), and brachiocephalic (15) AVFAs. All patients had hemodialysis at an alternative location on the same extremity without the need for catheter placement. Five patients underwent a follow-up ultrasound examination at a mean of 6 weeks. All studies demonstrated patency of the ECM segments without stenosis. At a mean follow-up time of 6.9 months, two thrombosis events were observed, both in patients with known refractory central venous stenosis treated with previous angioplasty (2) and stenting (1). Both patients required new access placement. No complications were attributable to ECM sites. Conclusions ECM is an alternative conduit for salvage of an autologous AVFA. This technique may help avoid the use of prosthetic grafts and hemodialysis catheters. Patients with associated central venous stenosis are at risk of thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Historic improvements in operative trauma care have been driven by war. It is unknown whether recent battlefield innovations stemming from conflicts in Iraq/Afghanistan will follow a similar trend. The objective of this study was to survey trauma medical directors (TMDs) at level 1–3 trauma centers across the United States and gauge the extent to which battlefield innovations have shaped civilian practice in 4 key domains of trauma care. Methods Domains were determined by the use of a modified Delphi method based on multiple consultations with an expert physician/surgeon panel: (1) damage control resuscitation (DCR), (2) tourniquet use, (3) use of hemostatic agents, and (4) prehospital interventions, including intraosseous catheter access and needle thoracostomy. A corresponding 47-item electronic anonymous survey was developed/pilot tested before dissemination to all identifiable TMD at level 1–3 trauma centers across the US. Results A total of 245 TMDs, representing nearly 40% of trauma centers in the United States, completed and returned the survey. More than half ( n = 127; 51.8%) were verified by the American College of Surgeons. TMDs reported high civilian use of DCR: 95.1% of trauma centers had implemented massive transfusion protocols and the majority (67.7%) tended toward 1:1:1 packed red blood cell/fresh-frozen plasma/platelets ratios. For the other 3, mixed adoption corresponded to expressed concerns regarding the extent of concomitant civilian research to support military research and experience. In centers in which policies reflecting battlefield innovations were in use, previous military experience frequently was acknowledged. Conclusion This national survey of TMDs suggests that military data supporting DCR has altered civilian practice. Perceived relevance in other domains was less clear. Civilian academic efforts are needed to further research and enhance understandings that foster improved trauma surgeon awareness of military-to-civilian translation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Endovascular repair of peripheral arterial trauma using covered stent grafts is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery in selected patients. Although the technical feasibility of endovascular repair has been established, there are a paucity of data regarding outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of endovascular repair in patients with peripheral arterial trauma. Methods A review of a prospectively collected institutional trauma registry captured all patients with peripheral arterial injury who underwent endovascular repair from August 2004 to June 2012. Data collected included demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanism, location and type of injury, imaging modality, intervention type, complications and reintervention, length of stay, and follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Results During the study period, we performed endovascular repair in 28 patients with peripheral arterial injuries. There were 20 male patients (71%) with a median age of 39 years (range, 13-88 years). The mean ISS was 17.2 (range, 9-41). The mechanism of injury was penetrating in 21 (75%) and blunt in seven (25%). The anatomic locations of the 28 arterial injuries were carotid (3 [11%]), subclavian (7 [25%]), axillary (6 [22%]), iliac (3 [11%]), and femoral/popliteal (9 [32%]). Findings consistent with injury on imaging included pseudoaneurysms (9 [32%]), extravasations (9 [32%]), occlusions (6 [22%]), and arteriovenous fistulas (4 [14%]). Technical success was achieved in all patients. The overall complication rate was 21%, with six patients requiring a secondary procedure. Two patients underwent a planned, elective conversion to open repair during the initial hospitalization. Four patients required conversion secondary to stent graft thrombosis. Three conversions were early (<30 days) and one was late (>30 days). The mean length of stay was 18.4 ± 22.9 days (range, 1-93 days), with a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 1-60 months). The overall limb salvage rate was 92% at 45 days and 79% at 93 days. Conclusions The present study outlines our early experience with endovascular repair of peripheral arterial injuries in a variety of anatomic locations. Overall complication rates are appreciable but can be effectively detected and managed with additional intervention. The inclusion of endovascular modalities in algorithms of trauma care holds considerable promise. The need to better define optimal algorithms for utilization and determine long-term outcomes of intervention requires significant additional study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Failure to achieve primary fascial closure (PFC) after damage control laparotomy is costly and carries great morbidity. We hypothesized that time from the initial laparotomy to the first take-back operation would be predictive of successful PFC. Methods Trauma patients managed with open abdominal techniques after damage control laparotomy were prospectively followed at 14 Level 1 trauma centers during a 2-year period. Time to the first take-back was evaluated as a predictor of PFC using hierarchical multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 499 patients underwent damage control laparotomy and were included in this analysis. PFC was achieved in 327 (65.5%) patients. Median time to the first take-back operation was 36 hours (interquartile range 24-48). After we adjusted for patient demographics, resuscitation volumes, and operative characteristics, increasing time to the first take-back was associated with a decreased likelihood of PFC. Specifically, each hour delay in return to the operating room (24 hours after initial laparotomy) was associated with a 1.1% decrease in the odds of PFC (odds ratio 0.989; 95% confidence interval 0.978-0.999; P = .045). In addition, there was a trend towards increased intra-abdominal complications in patients returning after 48 hours (odds ratio 1.80; 95% confidence interval 1.00-3.25; P = .05). Conclusion Data from this prospective, multicenter study demonstrate that delays in returning to the operating room after damage control laparotomy are associated with reductions in PFC. These findings suggest that emphasis should be placed on returning to the operating room within 24 hours after the initial laparotomy if possible (and no later than 48 hours). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: The role of endovascular treatment for vascular trauma, including injury to the subclavian and axillary arteries, continues to evolve. Despite growing experience with the utilization of these techniques in the setting of artherosclerotic and aneurysmal disease, published reports in traumatic subclavian and axillary arterial injuries remain confined to sporadic case reports and case series. Methods: We conducted a review of the medical literature from 1990 to 2012 using Pubmed and OVID Medline databases to search for all reports documenting the use of endovascular stenting for the treatment of subclavian or axillary artery injuries. Thirty-two published reports were identified. Individual manuscripts were analysed to abstract data regarding mechanism, location and type of injury, endovascular technique and endograft type utilized, follow-up, and radiographic and clinical outcomes. Results: The use of endovascular stenting for the treatment of subclavian (150) or axillary (10) artery injuries was adequately described for only 160 patients from 1996 to the present. Endovascular treatment was employed after penetrating injury (56.3%; 29 GSW; 61 SW), blunt trauma (21.3%), iatrogenic catheter-related injury (21.8%) and surgical injury (0.6%). Injuries treated included pseudoaneurysm (77), AV fistula (27), occlusion (16), transection (8), perforation (22), dissection (6), or other injuries otherwise not fully described (4). Initial endovascular stent placement was successful in 96.9% of patients. Radiographic and clinical follow-up periods ranging from hospital discharge to 70 months revealed a follow-up patency of 84.4%. No mortalities related to endovascular intervention were reported. New neurologic deficits after the use of endovascular modalities were reported in only one patient. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of traumatic subclavian and axillary artery injuries continues to evolve. Early results are promising, but experience with this modality and data on late follow-up remain limited. Additional multicenter prospective study and capture of data for these patients is warranted to further define the role of this treatment modality in the setting of trauma. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the anatomic distribution and associated mortality of combat-related vascular injuries comparing them to a contemporary civilian standard. Design: The Joint Trauma Theater Registry (JTTR) was queried to identify patients with major compressible arterial injury (CAI) and noncompressible arterial injury (NCAI) sites, and their outcomes, among casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2003 to 2006. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was then queried over the same time frame to identify civilian trauma patients with similar arterial injuries. Propensity score-based matching was used to create matched patient cohorts from both populations for analysis. Results: Registry queries identified 380 patients from the JTTR and 7020 patients from the NTDB who met inclusion criteria. Propensity score matching for age, elevated Injury Severity Score (ISS; >15), and hypotension on arrival (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <90) resulted in 167 matched patients from each registry. The predominating mechanism of injury among matched JTTR patients was explosive events (73.1%), whereas penetrating injury was more common in the NTDB group (61.7%). In the matched cohorts, the incidence of NCAI did not differ (22.2% JTTR vs 26.6% NTDB; P = .372), but the NTDB patients had a higher incidence of CAI (73.7% vs 59.3%; P = .005). The JTTR cohort was also found to have a higher incidence of associated venous injury (57.5% vs 23.4%; P < .001). Overall, the matched JTTR cohort had a lower mortality than NTDB counterparts (4.2% vs 12.6%; P = .006), a finding that was also noted among patients with NCAI (10.8% vs 36.4%; P = .008). There was no difference in mortality between matched JTTR and NTDB patients with CAI overall (2.0% vs 4.1%; P = .465), or among those presenting with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <8 (28.6% vs 40.0%; P = 1.00) or shock (SBP <90; 10.5% vs 7.7%; P = 1.00). The JTTR mortality rate among patients with CAI was, however, lower among patients with ISS >15 compared with civilian matched counterparts (10.7% vs 42.4%; P = .006). Conclusions: Mortality of injured service personnel who reach a medical treatment facility after major arterial injury compares favorably to a matched civilian standard. Acceptable mortality rates within the military cohort are related to key aspects of an organized Joint Trauma System, including prehospital tactical combat casualty care, rapid medical evacuation to forward surgical capability, and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Aspects of this comprehensive combat casualty care strategy may translate and be of value to management of arterial injury in the civilian sector. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Introduction: The relationship between outcomes following severe trauma and American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma centre designation has been studied. Little is known, however, about the association between ACS level and outcomes associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: The National Trauma Databank (NTDB, Version 5.0) was queried to identify adult (age≥18) trauma patients who (1) developed VAP and (2) were admitted to either an ACS level I or level II centre. Transfer and burn patients were excluded. Univariate analysis defined differences between patient cohorts. Logistic regression analysis was utilised to identify independent risk factors for mortality. Results: A total of 3465 patients were identified where 65.6% were admitted to a level I facility and 34.4% to a level II centre. Patients admitted to a level I centre were more likely to have an age>55 (71.5% vs. 66.8%, p =0.004) and to be hypotensive (SBP<90) on admission (16.2% vs. 13.6%, p =0.042). They were also more likely to have a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (18.5 days vs. 16.5 days, p =0.001), longer hospital LOS (34.2 days vs. 29.6 days, p <0.001) and a higher rate of early (≤7 days) tracheostomy (33.1% vs. 29.1%, p =0.017). Level I admission was, however, associated with lower mortality rates (10.8% vs. 14.7%, p =0.001) and a higher likelihood of achieving discharge to home (20.2% vs. 16.1%, p <0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified admission to a level II facility as an independent risk factor for mortality (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08–1.66; p =0.008) in patients developing post-traumatic VAP. Conclusion: For adults who develop VAP after trauma, admission to a level I facility is associated with improved survival. Further prospective study is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Several authors have examined the relationship between outcomes following severe trauma and American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma centre designation. Little is known, however, about the association between ACS level and outcomes following complications of trauma. Methods: The National Trauma Databank (NTDB, v. 5.0) was queried to identify adult (Age ≥18) trauma patients developing post-traumatic ARDS, who were admitted to either ACS level 1 or level 2 trauma centres from 2000 to 2004. Patients transferred between institutions and injuries following burns were excluded. Univariate analysis was used to assess differences between those patients admitted to ACS level 1 and level 2 facilities. Adjusted mortality was derived using logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 902 adult trauma patients with ARDS after 48h of mechanical ventilation were identified from the NTDB. Five hundred and thirty six patients were admitted to a level 1 ACS verified centre and 366 to a level 2 facility. Univariate analysis revealed no statistical differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between the two groups. On univariate comparison, patients admitted to level 1 facilities had longer mean hospital and ICU length of stay and higher hospital related charges than level 2 counterparts. Patients admitted to a level 1 centre were, however, significantly more likely to achieve discharge to home. Using multivariate logistic regression, ACS level designation was shown to have no statistical effect on mortality. Hypotension on admission and age greater than 55 were the only independent predictors of mortality. Conclusion: ACS trauma centre designation level is not an independent predictor of mortality following post-traumatic ARDS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: The association between hospital volume and outcomes following mechanical ventilation has been previously examined in diverse patient populations. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma has outlined criteria for trauma centre level designations with specific requirements for both specialty capabilities and hospital volume. Our objective is to determine the relationship between ACS centre designation and outcomes for trauma patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Databank (NTDB), identifying 13,933 adult (age≥18) trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation for greater than 48h from 2000 to 2004 who were admitted to either an ACS Level I or Level II trauma centre. The primary endpoints examined were mortality, pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Univariate analysis defined differences between those patients admitted to ACS Level I and Level II facilities. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify if ACS level designation was an independent risk factor for the goal outcomes. Results: Patients admitted to a Level I facility and mechanically ventilated for greater than 48h were more commonly greater than age 55 (71.3% vs. 67.9%, p <0.01), hypotensive (SBP<90) (16.1% vs. 12.8%, p <0.01), and likely to have sustained injury due to penetrating mechanism (11.1% vs. 5.1%, p <0.01). On univariate analysis, mortality and the incidence of pneumonia did not differ between the two groups. Level I admission was, however, less commonly associated with the development of ARDS (5.8% vs. 7.7%, p <0.01) and patients admitted to Level I facilities were significantly more likely to be discharged to home than Level II counterparts (29.7% vs. 22.9%, p <0.01). Logistic regression revealed that, while ACS Level designation was not a predictive factor for mortality or the development of pneumonia, admission to an ACS Level II facility was an independent predictor for the development of ARDS [p <0.01, odds ratio, 95% CI: 1.35 (1.18–1.59)]. Conclusion: For trauma patients requiring mechanical ventilation for >48h, ACS trauma centre designation had no effect on overall mortality or the incidence of pneumonia. Compared to Level I counterparts, however, patients admitted to an ACS Level II facility were significantly more likely to develop ARDS following trauma. This finding needs further investigation in a large, prospective analysis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Major trauma to the pancreas is uncommon, but associated with significant overall morbidity and mortality. A vast majority of these adverse outcomes can be attributed to the presences of associated injuries. Among those patients who survive the initial injury, however, the subsequent development of pancreas-related complications represents a significant source of adverse outcomes. Methods and results: A total of 257 patients admitted from January 1996 to April 2007 were identified from the trauma registry database at our institution. One hundred and eighty-three patients surviving more than 48h after admission were selected for analysis. These patients were grouped according to the surgical management utilised to address their pancreatic injuries: either resection or operative drainage. After exclusion of patients with associated vascular injuries, those undergoing drainage had lower rate of associated hollow viscus injuries (51.9% vs. 69.9%; p =0.016) and lower rates of associated solid organ injuries (44.2% vs. 70.9%; p ≤0.001). Patients undergoing drainage were noted to have a higher incidence of pseudocyst formation (19.5% vs. 9.0%; OR: 2.47, 95% CI, 0.92–6.67; p =0.068), but lower hospital lengths of stay (18.7±18.5 vs. 33.8±63.5; p =0.001). No difference in mortality was noted between the two populations (5.7% vs. 3.0%; p =0.700). After multivariate analysis pseudocyst formation was the only complication that proved different between the two management groups, with patients undergoing operative drainage more commonly developing this adverse sequela (OR: 2.93, 95% CI, 1.02–8.36; p =0.041). Conclusions: In the absence of vascular injury, the choice of surgical management did not affect adjusted mortality or the overall occurrence of pancreas-related complications. Individuals treated with operative drainage alone, however, were significantly more likely to develop a post-operative pseudocyst than their resectional counterparts. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Introduction: The importance of tight glycaemic control has gained acceptance over the last 5 years as a critical component of routine intensive care unit (ICU) measures. In an environment already strained for resources and staffing, however, effective strategies providing for increased input and responsibility of bedside nursing personnel are paramount to successful implementation. Hypothesis: Increasing input and responsibilities of ICU nursing staff in tight glycaemic control policies improves glucose control in the trauma ICU. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, we conducted a prospective “before-after” trial examining the effect of nursing education and input on outcome of a tight (goal 80–120mg/dL) glycaemic control protocol. After a three month assessment of compliance with a previously physician-developed protocol, an educational in-service was conducted for all trauma ICU nursing staff. Nursing staff were then asked to provide input on the development of a new protocol using multiple-choice ballots to define 7 components of protocol criteria. Using nursing input, we developed and implemented a new glycaemic protocol that shifted much of the responsibility for initiation and subsequent adjustment of insulin infusion to the bedside nurse, allowing them to more liberally utilise their bedside clinical judgment and knowledge of the specific patient. Results: Nursing input on seven factors of protocol criteria did not differ significantly from the previously existing protocol, except with reference to nursing desire for increased responsibility in the implementation and maintenance of tight glycaemic control. After three months implementation of a new protocol developed utilising nursing input, both mean blood glucose levels achieved (137.8mg/dL vs. 128.2mg/dL, p =0.028) and time to first hourly blood glucose within goal range (<120mg/dL) was improved (36h vs. 9h). The number of hypoglycaemic (BS <60) episodes increased slightly after revision (1 event vs. 5 event), with no hypoglycaemic seizures or coma occurring during either period. Conclusion: Nursing input and increased responsibility improved the results of a tight glycaemic control in our trauma ICU. Increasing nursing input in the development and implementation of a tight glycaemic policies can result in safe and effective improved glucose control in the trauma ICU. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The natural history of posttraumatic renal failure (PTRF) is not well-established. Overall prognosis and risk factors for need for dialysis in the setting of PTRF need more precise definition. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective review of the trauma registry information from Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center from 1998 through 2005. PTRF was defined as the occurrence of serum creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL after admission for trauma. Clinical course and laboratory information from the trauma registry and ICU databases were analyzed. Results: Of 33,376 trauma patients identified, PTRF developed in 323 (1%), with an overall mortality of 38% (n = 120). Onset of PTRF occurred an average of 4 ± 7 days after admission, with average peak serum creatinine occurring 7 ± 1 days after admission and only 56% (n = 180) of patients normalizing serum creatinine before discharge. A total of 64 patients (20% of renal failure patients, 0.2% of all trauma patients) required hemodialysis. The only independent risk factor for the need for dialysis was laparotomy, with patients manifesting an elevated creatinine later in their course more likely to require dialysis. Although injury severity correlated well with outcomes, the only independent risk factors for mortality in this population were persistently elevated serum creatinine and head Abbreviated Injury Score > 3. Conclusions: Development of PTRF in severely injured patients represents a substantial risk for morbidity and mortality in this population. Additional study is needed to determine the importance of delayed onset of PTRF, particularly in the setting of multiorgan failure, in determining outcomes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The historic milestones that have brought the surgical management of breast cancer to its current state are recounted. The Halsted radical mastectomy, once considered the ideal cancer operation, no longer has a place in the routine management of patients with breast cancer. Breast conservation in the form of segmental mastectomy, axillary node dissection, and radiation is often chosen over the modified radical mastectomy, popular in the 1980s. Axillary lymphadenectomy, shown to be of questionable therapeutic value in breast cancer, is certainly of prognostic significance. Studies are ongoing to establish the validity of the less-invasive sentinel node biopsy in determining axillary nodal status. Perhaps the most significant change in today’s approach to breast cancer is the reliance on well-controlled prospective studies to evaluate outcome and determine the appropriate surgical procedure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) is life-saving in select patients and can be accomplished through a left anterolateral (AT) or clamshell thoracotomy (CT). CT may provide additional exposure, facilitating certain operative procedures, but the added blood and heat loss and time to perform it may increase complications. No prospective multicenter comparison of techniques has yet been reported.Study Design: The observational AAST Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute care surgery (AORTA) registry was used to compare AT and CT in RT.Results: AORTA recorded 1,218 RTs at 46 trauma centers from June 2014 to January 2020. Overall survival after RT was 6.0% (AT 6.6%; [59 of 900]; CT 4.2% [13 of 296], p = 0.132). Among all RTs, 11.1% (142 of 1,278) surviving at least 24 hours were used tocompare AT (112) and CT (30). There was no difference between the 2 groups withregard to age, sex, Injury Severity Score, or mechanism of injury (Table 1). CT was significantly more likely to be used in patients needing resection of the lung or cardiac repair. CT was not associated with increased local thoracic/systemic complications, higher transfusion requirement, or greater ventilator, ICU, or hospital days compared with AT.Conclusions: Clamshell thoracotomy facilitates thoracic life-saving procedures withoutincreased systemic or thoracic complications compared with AT in patients undergoing RT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blunt carotid artery injury (BCI) is present in approximately 1.0% to 2.7% of all blunt trauma admissions and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Management ranges from antithrombotic therapy alone to surgery, where potential indications include pseudoaneurysm, failed or contraindication to medical therapy, and progression of neurologic symptoms. Still, optimal management, including approach and timing, continues to be an active area for debate. The goal of this study was to assess the epidemiologic characteristics of BCI, and, after controlling for presenting features intrinsic to the data, compare outcomes based on management, operative approach, and timing of intervention. A retrospective review was conducted of adult BCI patients identified within the National Trauma Data Bank from 2002 to 2016. The National Trauma Data Bank is the largest trauma database in the United States, collating data from each trauma admission for more than 900 trauma centers. Independent variables of interest included nonoperative versus operative management (OM); endovascular versus open intervention, and early (within 24 hours) versus delayed (after 24 hours) intervention. For each independent variable, groups were compared after propensity score matching to control for presenting factors and patterns of injury. There were 9190 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 812 of whom underwent operative intervention (open, n = 288; endovascular, n = 481, both: n = 43). During the review, there was no difference in proportion of OM over time, although there was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of open intervention (0.48% per year; P <.05). For outcomes, operative versus nonoperative management (nOM) resulted in no difference in mortality, but the operative group demonstrated an increased risk of stroke (11.8% vs 6.5%), longer hospital and intensive care length of stay, and more days on mechanical ventilation (P <.001 for each). With regard to timing: mortality was increased for early intervention (early, 16% vs delayed, 6.3%; P <.001), which was predominantly driven by the endovascular cohort (early, 19.2% vs delayed, 2.5%; P <.001). In this study, there was no significant trend in the overall volume of operative or nOM; however, when considering approach to OM, there was a significant decrease in open procedures. Consistent with previous literature, injury to the neck, head, and chest was significant associated with BCI. Also outcomes demonstrated an increased prevalence of stroke after operative relative to nOM. Importantly, after critically assessing the timing to intervention, results strongly suggested that, if possible, intervention should be delayed for at least 24 hours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Incidence and treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) has evolved, likely from improved imaging and emergence of endovascular techniques; however, multicenter data demonstrating this are lacking. We examined trends in incidence, management, and outcomes in BTAI.Study Design: The American College of Surgeons National Trauma Databank (2003 to 2013) was used to identify adults with BTAI. Management was categorized as nonoperative repair, open aortic repair (OAR), or thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR). Outcomes included demographics, management, and outcomes.Results: There were 3,774 patients. Median age was 46.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 29.3, 62.0 years), with 70.8% males, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 34.0 (IQR 26.0, 45.0). The number of BTAIs diagnosed over the decade increased 196.8% (p < 0.001), median ISS decreased from 38 to 33 (p < 0.001), and significantly more patients were treated at a level I trauma center (p < 0.001). After FDA approval of TEVAR devices, there was a significant increase in endovascular repair overall (1.0% to 30.6%, p < 0.001) and in those treated operatively (0.0% to 94.9%, p < 0.001), with a marked decrease in OAR. Use of TEVAR was associated with significantly reduced median ICU LOS (9.0 vs 12.0 days, p = 0.048) and mortality (9.3% vs 16.6%; p = 0.015) compared with OAR. In modern BTAI care, TEVAR has nearly completely replaced OAR.Conclusions: The diagnosis of BTAI has increased, likely due to more sensitive imaging. Nearly 70% of patients get nonoperative care. Treatment with TEVAR improves outcomes relative to OAR. Part of the proportional increase in TEVAR use may represent overtreatment of lower grade BTAI amenable to medical management, and warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is widely used for treatment of traumatic aortic injury (TAI). Stent graft coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) may be required in up to 40% of patients. We evaluated the long-term effects of intentional LSA coverage (LSAC) on symptoms and return to normal activity in TAI patients compared with a similarly treated group whose LSA was uncovered (LSAU). Methods Patients were identified from a prospective institutional trauma registry between September 2005 and July 2012. TAI was confirmed using computed tomography angiography. The electronic medical records, angiograms, and computed tomography angiograms were reviewed in a retrospective fashion. In-person or telephone interviews were conducted using the SF-12v2 (Quality Metrics, Lincoln, RI) to assess quality of life. An additional questionnaire was used to assess specific LSA symptoms and the ability to return to normal activities. Data were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation and multiple linear and logistic regression analysis with appropriate transformations using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results During the study period, 82 patients (57 men; mean age 40.5 ± 20 years, mean Injury Severity Score, 34 ± 10.0) underwent TEVAR for treatment of TAI. Among them, LSAC was used in 32 (39.5%) and LSAU in 50. A group of the LSAU patients (n = 22) served as matched controls in the analysis. We found no statistically significant difference in SF-12v2 physical health scores (ρ = −0.08; P = .62) between LSAC and LSAU patients. LSAC patients had slightly better mental health scores (ρ = 0.62; P = .037) than LSAU patients. LSAC patients did not have an increased likelihood of experiencing pain (ρ = −0.0056; P = .97), numbness (ρ = −0.12; P = .45), paresthesia (ρ = −0.11; P = .48), fatigue (ρ = −0.066; P = .69), or cramping (ρ = −0.12; P = .45). We found no difference between groups in the ability to return to activities. The mean follow-up time was 3.35 years. Six LSAC patients (19%) died during the follow-up period of unrelated causes. Conclusions Intentional LSAC during TEVAR for TAI appears safe, without compromising mental or physical health outcomes. Furthermore, LSAC does not increase the long-term risk of upper extremity symptoms or impairment of normal activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The rapid evolution of endovascular surgery has greatly expanded management options for a wide variety of vascular diseases. Endovascular therapy provides a less invasive alternative to open surgery for critically ill patients who have sustained arterial injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate recent trends in the management of arterial injuries in the United States with specific reference to the use of endovascular strategies and to examine the outcomes of endovascular vs open therapy for the treatment of civilian arterial traumatic injuries. Methods A 9-year analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank was performed to identify all patients who sustained arterial injuries. Demographics, clinical data, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. Propensity scores were used to match endovascular patients to those undergoing open operation. Patient outcomes were compared according to treatment approach. Results A total of 23,105 patients were available for analysis. Overall, there was a significant increase in the use of endovascular procedures during 9 years (from 0.3% in 2002 to 9.0% in 2010; P < .001), particularly among blunt trauma patients (from 0.4% in 2002 to 13.2% in 2010; P < .001). This increase was noteworthy and dramatic for injuries of the internal iliac artery (from 8.0% in 2002 to 40.3% in 2010; P < .001), thoracic aorta (from 0.5% in 2002 to 21.9% in 2010; P < .001), and common/external iliac arteries (from 0.4% in 2002 to 20.4% in 2010; P < .001). A significant decrease was noted for open procedures (49.1% in 2002 to 45.6%; P < .001), especially for blunt trauma (42.9% in 2002 to 35.8% in 2010; P < .001). There was a stepwise increase in the proportion of patients managed by endovascular therapy as the Injury Severity Score increased (highest in the spectrum Injury Severity Score 31-50). When outcomes were compared between matched patients who underwent endovascular and open procedures, patients who underwent endovascular procedures had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (12.9% vs 22.4%; odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-0.6; P < .001). Endovascular patients also had decreased rates of sepsis (7.5% vs 5.4%; odds ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.9; P = .025). Conclusions The use of endovascular therapy in the United States has increased dramatically during the last decade, in particular among severely injured blunt trauma patients. Endovascular therapy was associated with improved in-hospital mortality and lower rates of sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• It is feasible to create a fully perfused human specimen model with circulating arterial and venous flow via a single arterial inflow cannula. • This perfused human flow model can be used in trauma scenario training for realistic training of advanced bleeding control techniques. • The use of AnubiFiX embalmed human specimen has the advantage of reusability while preserving color, flexibility, and suppleness of the tissues. • Regional arteriovenous flow can be used to reduce the development of tissue edema and increase the durability of the flow model. Prompt and effective hemorrhage control is paramount to improve survival in patients with catastrophic bleeding. In the ever-expanding field of bleeding control techniques, there is a need for a realistic training model to practice these life-saving skills. This study aimed to create a realistic perfused post-mortem human specimen (PMHS) flow model that is suitable for training various bleeding control techniques. This laboratory study was conducted in the SkillsLab & Simulation Center of Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands. One fresh frozen and five AnubiFiX® embalmed PMHS were used for the development of the model. Subsequent improvements in the exact preparation and design of the flow model were made based on model performance and challenges that occurred during this study and are described. Circulating arteriovenous flow with hypertonic saline was established throughout the entire body via inflow and outflow cannulas in the carotid artery and jugular vein of embalmed PMHS. We observed full circulation and major hemorrhage could be mimicked. Effective bleeding control was achieved by placing a resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) catheter in the model. Regional perfusion significantly reduced the development of tissue edema. Our perfused PMHS model with circulating arterial and venous flow appears to be a feasible method for the training of multiple bleeding control techniques. Regional arteriovenous flow successfully reduces tissue edema and increases the durability of the model. Further research should focus on reducing edema and enhancing the durability of the model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aortic occlusion (AO) to facilitate the acute resuscitation of trauma and acute care surgery patients in shock remains a controversial topic. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is an increasingly deployed method of AO. We hypothesized that in patients with non-compressible hemorrhage below the aortic bifurcation, the use of REBOA instead of open AO may be associated with a survival benefit.Methods: From the AAST Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry, we identified 1494 patients requiring AO from 45 Level I and 4 Level II trauma centers. Presentation, intervention, and outcome variables were analyzed to compare REBOA vs open AO in patients with non-compressible hemorrhage below the aortic bifurcation.Results: From December 2014 to January 2019, 217 patients with Zone 3 REBOA or Open AO who required pelvic packing, pelvic fixation or pelvic angio-embolization were identified. Of these, 109 AO patients had injuries isolated to below the aortic bifurcation (REBOA, 84; open AO, 25). Patients with intra-abdominal or thoracic sources of bleeding, above deployment Zone 3 were excluded. Overall mortality was lower in the REBOA group (35.% vs 80%, p <.001). Excluding patients who arrived with CPR in progress, the REBOA group had lower mortality (33.33% vs. 68.75%, p = 0.012). Of the survivors, systemic complications were not significantly different between groups. In the REBOA group, 16 patients had complications secondary to vascular access. Intensive care lengths of stay and ventilator days were both significantly shorter in REBOA patients who survived to discharge.Conclusions: This study compared outcomes for patients with hemorrhage below the aortic bifurcation treated with REBOA to those treated with open AO. Survival was significantly higher in REBOA patients compared to open AO patients, while complications in survivors were not different. Given the higher survival in REBOA patients, we conclude that REBOA should be used for patients with hemorrhagic shock secondary to pelvic trauma instead of open AO.Level Iii Evidence: Therapeutic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trauma is the leading cause of death for children and adolescents. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a minimally invasive method of hemorrhage control used primarily in adults. We aimed to characterize REBOA use in pediatric patients.Methods: The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry was queried for patients <18 years old undergoing REBOA placement (2013-2020). The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes included injury severity score (ISS), additional interventions, and complications.Results: Eleven patients with a median age of 17 years old had REBOA placed, with a survival rate of 30%. Inflation of the REBOA balloon resulted in a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (median SBP pre-REBOA 53 mmHg vs. post-REBOA 110 mmHg, p=0.0007). Patients were severely injured with a median ISS of 29 (interquartile range 16-42). There were no access-site complications. All three surviving patients had a discharge Glasgow Coma Scale of 15.Conclusion: REBOA is used in patients <18 years old, but all reported patients in this registry were adolescents. No REBOA-related complications were reported. Identifying pediatric patients who may benefit from REBOA and modifying currently existing technology for this group of patients is an area of ongoing research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a therapy for hemorrhagic shock to limit ongoing bleeding and support proximal arterial pressures. Current REBOA algorithms recommend zone selection based on suspected anatomic location of injury rather than severity of shock. We examined the effects of Zone 1 versus Zone 3 REBOA in patients enrolled in the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) Registry.Patients and Methods: The prospective observational AORTA Registry was queried from November 2013 to November 2017. Patients who received REBOA were included if their initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 90 mmHg upon arrival and they were not receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Results: There were 762 patients recorded in the AORTA database during the study period. Of these, 245 underwent REBOA and 99 patients met inclusion criteria. The initial balloon position was Zone 1 in 55 patients, Zone 3 in 36 patients, and unknown or Zone 2 in 8 patients. The change in proximal SBP was greater after REBOA in the Zone 1 group compared to the Zone 3 group (58 ± 4 mmHg vs 41 ± 4 mmHg, P = 0.008). The zone of occlusion was significantly associated with the change in proximal SBP in a linear regression analysis which included initial SBP, Glasgow Coma Scale score, and Injury Severity Score (Coefficient 26.82, 95% Confidence Interval 8.11-45.54, P = 0.006).Conclusions: In the hypotensive trauma patient, initial Zone 1 REBOA provides maximal hemodynamic support. Algorithms recommending initial Zone 3 placement for hypotensive trauma patients should be reconsidered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) has become the gold standard for the early assessment of lower extremity vascular injury. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of MDCTA documented vessel run-off to the foot on limb salvage rates after lower extremity vascular injury. Methods All trauma patients undergoing lower extremity MDCTA for suspected vascular injury assessed at 2 high-volume Level I trauma centers between January 2009 and December 2012. Demographics, clinical data and outcomes (compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy and limb salvage) were extracted. The predictive value of MDCTA vessel run-off was tested against an aggregate gold standard of operative intervention, clinical follow-up and all imaging obtained. Results During the 4-year study period, 398 patients sustained lower extremity trauma and were screened for inclusion into this study. Of those, 166 (41.7%) patients (72.9% at MHH and 27.1% at LAC + USC Medical Center) underwent initial evaluation with MDCTA, 86 (51.8%) had vascular injury below the knee identified by MDCTA. Among these, the average age was 38.0 ± 15.8 years, 80.2% were men and 83.7% sustained a blunt injury mechanism. On admission, 8.1% were hypotensive and the median ISS was 10 (range 1–57). There was a direct correlation between the number of patent vessels to the foot and the need for operative intervention (86.4% with no patent vessels, 56.0% with 1 patent vessel, 33.3% with 2 and 0.0% with 3, p < 0.001). When outcomes were analysed, the rates of fasciotomy for compartment syndrome decreased in a stepwise fashion as the number of patent vessels to the foot increased (63.6% with no patent vessels; 44.0% with 1; 21.2% with 2; and 0.0% with 3; p = 0.003). No amputations occurred in patients with 2 or more patent vessels to the foot (68.2% for no patent vessel; 16.0% for 1; 0.0% for 2; and 0.0% for 3; p < 0.001). Conclusions In this multicenter evaluation of patients undergoing MDCTA for suspected below-the-knee vascular injury, there was a stepwise increase in the need for operative intervention, fasciotomy and amputation as the number of patent vessels to the foot decreased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Introduction: Although gunshot and stab wounds are a common cause of self-inflicted injury, very little is understood about this mechanism of injury. The aim of this study was to characterise the epidemiology and outcomes of patients who injured themselves with a gun or sharp object. Methods: After IRB approval, the LAC+USC Trauma Registry was utilised to identify all patients who sustained a self-inflicted injury caused by firearm (GSW) or stabbing (SW) from 1997 to 2007. Demographic data, injury characteristics, surgical interventions, and outcomes were abstracted and analysed. Results: During the 11-year study period, a total of 753 patients (1.6%) were admitted for a self-inflicted injury. Of these, 369 (49.0%) had a self-inflicted penetrating injury, with 72 (19.5%) having sustained a GSW and 297 (80.5%) having a SW. Overall, the mean age was 36.4±15.8 years, 83.5% were male, with a mean ISS of 7.4±11.0. The most commonly injured body region in GSW patients was the head (76.4%), followed by the chest (15.3%) and in SW patients the upper extremity (37.0%), followed by the abdomen (36.4%). When compared to SW, GSW were significantly more frequent in males (21.4% vs. 9.8%, p =0.04), and were most commonly to the head (21.4% vs. 8.2%, p =0.02). Patients sustaining a GSW were more likely to be older than 55 years (22.2% vs. 8.4%, p <0.001). Intoxication was noted at presentation in 38.3% of screened GSW patients and 39.9% of SW patients. SW patients required operative intervention more frequently (40.9% vs. 22.2%, p <0.01), with 12.8% of them requiring exploratory laparotomy. However, patients who shot themselves were much more likely to die (66.7%) than those presenting with SW (1.7%). For those presenting with a GSW to the head, the mortality rate was even higher, at 80%. Mortality did not differ between males and females in either group. Conclusion: Although a self-inflicted SW is far more common than a self-inflicted GSW, patients sustaining a GSW are more severely injured, and have a nearly 110-fold increased risk of death. Though less lethal, stab wounds still consume significant amounts of healthcare resources and incur large in-hospital costs. The average hospital charge incurred for treating these self-inflicted injuries was five times the amount spent per annum on American citizens. Self-inflicted penetrating injuries represent a golden opportunity for secondary prevention through psychiatric intervention. These interventions may not only preserve life but also improve resource utilisation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Introduction: Although gunshot and stab wounds are a common cause of self-inflicted injury, very little is understood about this mechanism of injury. The aim of this study was to characterise the epidemiology and outcomes of patients who injured themselves with a gun or sharp object. Methods: After IRB approval, the LAC+USC Trauma Registry was utilised to identify all patients who sustained a self-inflicted injury caused by firearm (GSW) or stabbing (SW) from 1997 to 2007. Demographic data, injury characteristics, surgical interventions, and outcomes were abstracted and analysed. Results: During the 11-year study period, a total of 753 patients (1.6%) were admitted for a self-inflicted injury. Of these, 369 (49.0%) had a self-inflicted penetrating injury, with 72 (19.5%) having sustained a GSW and 297 (80.5%) having a SW. Overall, the mean age was 36.4±15.8 years, 83.5% were male, with a mean ISS of 7.4±11.0. The most commonly injured body region in GSW patients was the head (76.4%), followed by the chest (15.3%) and in SW patients the upper extremity (37.0%), followed by the abdomen (36.4%). When compared to SW, GSW were significantly more frequent in males (21.4% vs. 9.8%, p =0.04), and were most commonly to the head (21.4% vs. 8.2%, p =0.02). Patients sustaining a GSW were more likely to be older than 55 years (22.2% vs. 8.4%, p <0.001). Intoxication was noted at presentation in 38.3% of screened GSW patients and 39.9% of SW patients. SW patients required operative intervention more frequently (40.9% vs. 22.2%, p <0.01), with 12.8% of them requiring exploratory laparotomy. However, patients who shot themselves were much more likely to die (66.7%) than those presenting with SW (1.7%). For those presenting with a GSW to the head, the mortality rate was even higher, at 80%. Mortality did not differ between males and females in either group. Conclusion: Although a self-inflicted SW is far more common than a self-inflicted GSW, patients sustaining a GSW are more severely injured, and have a nearly 110-fold increased risk of death. Though less lethal, stab wounds still consume significant amounts of healthcare resources and incur large in-hospital costs. The average hospital charge incurred for treating these self-inflicted injuries was five times the amount spent per annum on American citizens. Self-inflicted penetrating injuries represent a golden opportunity for secondary prevention through psychiatric intervention. These interventions may not only preserve life but also improve resource utilisation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose: After adopting a night float system, the residency program at the University of Virginia Health System Department of Surgery initiated a daily morning report (MR). The conference was originated to sign out new admissions and consults from the previous day to the services that would assume care. Although initially oriented toward transfer of patient information, MR is also hypothesized to serve as a competency-based resident education tool. Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to on-service residents (n = 25). Questions were asked on a 5-point Likert scale. Respondents also ranked the weekly conferences, including MR, in terms of educational benefit derived. Results: Most residents agreed that MR is an efficient method to sign-out patient care [84% stongly agree (SA) or agree (A)] and that it provides an excellent educational experience (88% SA or A). They agreed that it is presented in an evidence-based format (88% SA or A). Regarding the core competencies, residents all asserted that MR addresses “patient care” (100% SA or A) and “medical knowledge” (100% SA or A). Most agreed that it addresses “professionalism” (60% SA or A), “interpersonal skills and communication” (76% SA or A), and “practice-based learning and improvement” (92% SA or A). The 4 most important components identified with respect to continuing to improve both patient care and resident education were the presence of the on-call attending, a review of relevant radiology, provision of follow-up on select cases, and critical review of the literature. On average, MR was seen as the most educational conference, with 52% of residents ranking it first. Conclusions: Although MR is ubiquitous in most primary care residency programs, such a conference has not typically been held on surgical services. The MR was developed at the University of Virginia Health System Department of Surgery as a necessity for patient sign-out. As this conference has continued to evolve, it has become an excellent tool for resident education. It now serves the purpose of enhancing patient care and medical education and of providing evidence of learning and assessment of the general competencies. The MR provides an example for program directors of how to tailor existing resident work sessions or conferences to meet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competency requirements. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]