Search

Sex differences in the ingestion of food and concentrated NaCl solutions by rats have been investigated for more than a quarter of a century, though the underlying mechanism(s) and the role of reproductive hormones remain the subject of debate. We hypothesized that sex differences in the ingestion of sucrose and NaCl solutions are attributable, in part, to sex differences in taste responses/taste perception. We employed short-access, 10-s tests along with 18-h, two-bottle preference tests to examine sex differences in sensitivity to and ingestion of sucrose and NaCl solutions. To evaluate the role of estrogen, we ovariectomized (OVX) female rats and then used an estrogen-replacement schedule that mimics the pattern of fluctuation of estrogen levels in intact female rats. We observed striking sex differences in the rate of licking NaCl mixed in a dilute sucrose solution. Compared to males, OVX rats with or without estrogen licked at higher rates to more concentrated NaCl solutions, suggesting that female rats are less sensitive to concentrated NaCl solutions. Although less pronounced, we also observed sex differences in the rate of licking to sucrose, particularly at lower concentrations. Compared to males, OVX rats with or without estrogen licked less, suggesting that female rats are less sensitive to lower concentrations of sucrose. Estrogen appeared to play, at most, a small role in mediating taste responses to specific concentrations of sucrose in these testing procedures. Nonetheless, sex differences in taste responses were clear, and it seems likely that such differences underlie, in part, observed differences in ingestion. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

To further elucidate the influence of estrogen on water consumption, we examined water intake by adult female rats stimulated by water deprivation, injection of hypertonic saline or injection of isoproterenol (ISOP), a β-adrenergic agonist that activates the renin–angiotensin system (RAS). Rats were ovariectomized (OVX) then injected with estradiol benzoate (EB; 10 μg/0.1 ml oil) or the oil vehicle (OIL; 0.1 ml) for 2 consecutive days. Twenty-four hours after the second injection, rats were deprived of food and water. On the following day, rats were given water and intake was measured after 2 h. EB significantly decreased water intake compared with that by OIL-treated rats following water deprivation. Two additional groups of adult female rats were OVX and treated with EB or OIL. Forty-eight hours after EB or OIL treatment, rats were injected with hypertonic saline (1 ml of 2 M NaCl) or ISOP (30 μg/kg in 0.15 M saline) and water intake was measured after 2 h. EB significantly attenuated water intake following ISOP but not after hypertonic saline. Finally, we examined plasma sodium concentration (pNa) after hypertonic saline and plasma renin activity (PRA) after ISOP in EB- and OIL-treated rats and found no differences in pNa or PRA. These results suggest that the stimuli for water intake after hypertonic saline and ISOP were comparable in EB- and OIL-treated rats. Taken together, these results raise the possibility that EB attenuation of stimulated water intake is specific to water intake elicited by activation of the RAS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]