1. Can Radiotherapy Quality Assurance (RT QA) Improve Nasopharyngeal Cancer Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) – Technical Results of the Second Phase of a Prospective International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Study.
- Author
-
Corry, J., Ng, W.T., Moore, A.J., Choi, H.C.W., Holmes, S., Le, Q.T., Munandar, A., Wang, S.Z., Camacho, A., Setakornnukul, J., Jiarpinitnun, C., Hiep, P.N., Faheem, M., Laskar, S. Ghosh, Hopkins, K., Abdel-Wahab, M., and Lee, A.W.M.
- Subjects
- *
HIGH-income countries , *PROGRESSION-free survival , *PATIENT experience , *NASOPHARYNX cancer , *PATIENTS' attitudes - Abstract
The majority of new nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) cases occur in LMICs, but these patients experience poorer overall survival than patients in high income countries. The goal of this study was to determine whether the introduction of a radiotherapy quality assurance (RT QA) program can improve NPC patient outcomes in LMICs. Phase 1 was composed of a survey of RT resources, patient characteristics and treatment, and results of RT QA performed post treatment by the expert panel for 134 patients treated at 10 participating centers. Each center received a detailed RT QA report for every patient they treated. An educational workshop, which included review of all RT QA details for every patient treated during Phase 1, was conducted prior to centers accruing patients for Phase 2. In Phase 2, the feedback from the RT QA performed by the expert panel was given prior to patients commencing treatment to allow for pre-treatment implementation of RT QA feedback. The primary endpoints of the study are: 1) Difference in major protocol deviations (defined as major deviations in contour and/or dosimetry of GTVs, high dose PTV and critical organs at risk (OARs), and 2) comparison of 3-year progression free survival (PFS), between Phase 1 and 2 patient cohorts. The results of the first phase of this study showing 60.4% cases with major protocol deviations have been reported previously. We now report the RT QA findings in the second phase of this study. 154 patients were accrued from 9 centers. 106 (69%) cases were reviewed pre-treatment and 48 (31%) post-treatment. In the pre-treatment group there were 32/106 (30.2%) with major protocol deviations. Among them, one case was not resubmitted, while 31 cases were corrected and resubmitted with 20 assessed as acceptable and 11 remaining unacceptable. In the post-treatment reviews, 6/48 (12.5%) had major protocol deviations. Overall, there were 18/154 (11.7%) cases with major protocol deviations. Introduction of a RTQA program for NPC resulted in a significant reduction in major protocol deviations in Phase 2 compared to the baseline previously documented in Phase 1 (60.4% to 11.7%, p<0.001). At this time there is insufficient follow-up time for comparison of the 3-year PFS in each group, but we are hopeful the major improvement in RT planning quality will translate to future improvement in PFS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF