Search

Background: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), also known as mesenchymal stromal cells, have been proposed as a promising therapeutic option for people with multiple sclerosis on the basis of their immunomodulatory and neuroprotective properties. The MEsenchymal StEm cells for Multiple Sclerosis (MESEMS) study was devised to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and activity of autologous MSCs derived from bone marrow and infused intravenously in patients with active multiple sclerosis.Methods: MESEMS is a randomised phase 2 trial done at 15 sites in nine countries. Patients (aged 18-50 years) with active relapsing-remitting or progressive multiple sclerosis were included if they had a disease duration of 2-15 years since onset of multiple sclerosis and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 2·5-6·5. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), according to a crossover design, to receive a single intravenous dose of autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs followed by placebo at week 24, or to receive placebo followed by autologous MSCs at week 24, with a follow-up visit at week 48. Primary objectives were to test safety and activity of MSC treatment. The primary safety endpoint was to assess the number and severity of adverse events within each treatment arm. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions (GELs) counted over week 4, 12, and 24 compared between treatment groups. The primary efficacy endpoint was assessed in the full analyis set, after all participants completed the week 24 visit. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated using a predefined statistical testing procedure. Safety was monitored throughout the study by recording vital signs and adverse events at each visit.Findings: From July 16, 2012, until July 31, 2019, 144 patients were randomly assigned to first receive early intravenous infusion of autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (n=69) or placebo (n=75). MSC treatment did not meet the primary endpoint of efficacy on the total number of GELs accumulated from baseline to week 24 (rate ratio [RR] 0·94, 95% CI 0·58-1·50; p=0·78). 213 adverse events were recorded, similarly distributed between groups (93 cases recorded in 35 [51%] of 69 patients treated first with MSCs vs 120 cases in 42 [56%] of 75 patients infused first with placebo). The most frequent adverse events reported were infection and infestations, with a total of 54 (25%) of 213 adverse events (18 [19%] of 93 in the early-MSC group and 36 [30%] of 120 in the delayed-MSC group). Nine serious adverse events were reported in seven patients treated with placebo versus none in the MSC group. All serious adverse events were considered to be unrelated to the treatment infusion. No deaths were reported during the study.Interpretation: Bone marrow-derived MSC treatment was safe and well tolerated but did not show an effect on GELs, an MRI surrogate marker of acute inflammation, in patients with active forms of multiple sclerosis, at week 24. Thus, this study does not support the use of bone marrow-derived MSCs to treat active multiple sclerosis. Further studies should address the effect of MSCs on parameters related to tissue repair.Funding: Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM), the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS), and the Multiple Sclerosis International Federation (MSIF) for centralised activities. Individual trials participating in the MESEMS network are funded by the following agencies: FISM and Compagnia di San Paolo (Italy); The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society, The Toyota Foundation, and Danish Blood Donors' Research Foundation (Denmark); the Spanish Health Research Institute Carlos 3 and the Andalusian Public Foundation Progreso y Salud (Spain); the Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology (Iran); the Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Centre Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, and Salzburg (Austria); the Fondation pour l'aide à la recherche sur la sclérose en plaques (ARSEP), French Muscular Dystrophy Association (AFM)-Telethon (France); the UK Multiple Sclerosis Society and the UK Stem Cell Foundation (UK); and the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada and The Multiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation and Research Manitoba (Canada). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the past decade, health technology assessment bodies have faced new challenges in establishing the benefits of new drugs for individuals and health-care systems. A topic of increasing importance to the field of oncology is the so-called agnostic regulatory approval of targeted therapies for cancer (independent of tumour location and histology) granted on the basis of basket trials. Basket trials in oncology offer the advantage of simultaneously evaluating treatments for multiple tumours, even rare cancers, in a single clinical trial. To address the novel challenges introduced by these trials, an interdisciplinary panel was convened on behalf of the Transparency Committee of the French National Authority for Health to clarify an approach designed to guarantee a transparent, reproducible, and fair assessment of histology-agnostic treatments for reimbursement by the French National Health Insurance Fund. The requirements of this approach include the need for randomisation, clinically relevant endpoints, appropriate correction for multiple significance testing, characterisation of subgroup heterogeneity, and validation of underlying biomarker assays. A prospectively designated external control is encouraged when the implementation of a direct comparison is deemed infeasible. We also underline the importance of recording outcomes from basket trials in a registry for use as future external controls. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the morbidity, mortality, and impact on quality of life and renal function after laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit in patients with multiple sclerosis with lower urinary tract symptom refractory to conservative management. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted between February 2004 and December 2010 on 44 consecutive patients with multiple sclerosis who underwent laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit for lower urinary tract symptom. Median Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 8 (6.5-8.5). Mean duration of multiple sclerosis was 19.3 ± 7.9 years. The quality of life was determined using the validated Qualiveen questionnaire preoperatively and at minimum 6 months after the surgery. Results: No conversion to open surgery was required. Postoperative morbidity rate was 18.2%; minor (Clavien ≤ 2) and major (Clavien ≥ 3) complications occurred in 13.6% and 6.8%, respectively. Mean follow-up was 44.5 ± 20.6 months. Complications noted were asymptomatic ureteroileal stenosis (n = 6) and pyelonephritis (n = 3). Neurological status and Expanded Disability Status Scale score remained stable throughout. Renal function remained unchanged. Limitations, constraints, and specific urinary impact index subscores of the Qualiveen were significantly improved at 6 months time. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cystectomy and ileal conduit for lower urinary tract symptom in advanced multiple sclerosis is a safe procedure with low complications. Neurological status and renal function remain stable and quality of life improves and continues to remain improved during long-term follow-up, suggesting this to be an attractive option in patients with advanced multiple sclerosis with lower urinary tract symptom refractory to conservative treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]