Search

This study aimed to determine the optimal position of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) draining cannulas for refractory respiratory failure based on short-term clinical results. In total, 278 patients underwent V-V ECMO at our hospital between 2012 and 2020. Those who underwent V-V ECMO with a femorojugular configuration were included. In the final cohort, 96 patients were divided into groups based on the draining cannula tip site: an inferior vena cava (IVC) group (n = 35) and a right atrium (RA) group (n = 61). The primary outcome was the change in fluid balance and ratio of awake ECMO 72 hours after V-V ECMO initiation. The only significant difference in baseline characteristics before V-V ECMO between the groups was a higher PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio in the RA group than in the IVC group (79.1 ± 26.21 vs 64.7 ± 14, P =.001). The degree of recirculation and arterial oxygenation, 90-day mortality, and clinical outcomes were similar between the groups. However, more patients achieved negative intake and output fluid balances (57.4% vs 31.4%, P =.01) and reductions in body weight (68.9% vs 40%, P =.006) in the RA group. At 72 hours after V femoral -V jugular ECMO initiation, more patients in the RA group than in the IVC group were managed under awake ECMO (42.6% vs 22.9%, P =.047). Placement of a V-V ECMO draining cannula in the RA rather than the IVC is more effective for restricted fluid management and awake ECMO without significant recirculation. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The JH-HLM has excellent reliability when used by physical therapists in the ICU. • The JH-HLM has excellent reliability across several types of ICUs. • Trained physical therapists can use the JH-HLM to reliably measure observed patient mobility in the ICU. The Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) scale is used to document the observed mobility of hospitalized patients, including those patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the JH-HLM, completed by physical therapists, across medical, surgical, and neurological adult ICUs at a single large academic hospital. The JH-HLM is an ordinal scale for documenting a patient's highest observed level of activity, ranging from lying in bed (score = 1) to ambulating > 250 feet (score = 8). Eighty-one rehabilitation sessions were conducted by eight physical therapists, with 1 of 2 reference physical therapist rater simultaneously observing the session and independently scoring the JH-HLM. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to determine the inter-rater reliability. A total of 77 (95%) of 81 assessments had perfect agreement. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient for inter-rater reliability was 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.96, 0.99), with similar scores in the medical, surgical, and neurological ICUs. A Bland–Altman plot revealed a mean difference in JH-HLM scoring of 0 (limits of agreement: −0.54 to 0.61). The JH-HLM has excellent inter-rater reliability as part of routine physical therapy practice, across different types of adult ICUs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to develop a risk prediction model for neurologic outcomes in patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Between May 2004 and April 2016, a total of 274 patients who underwent ECPR were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was neurologic status on discharge from the hospital, as assessed by Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale. To develop a new predictive scoring system, backward stepwise elimination and a z-score–based scoring scheme were used on the basis of logistic regression analyses. A total of 95 patients (34.7%) survived until discharge. Of these, 78 patients (28.5%) had favorable neurologic outcomes (CPC scores of 1 or 2). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, significant predictors of poor neurologic outcome included age older than 65 years, initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score greater than 13 points, first monitored arrest rhythm, low-flow time longer than 30 minutes, initial pulse pressure less than 25 mm Hg, initial mean arterial pressure less than 70 mm Hg, and serum glucose level greater than 300 mg/dL. There was also a significant interaction between age and low-flow time. The newly developed neurologic outcome score after ECPR (nECPR) more effectively predicted poor neurologic outcome (C-statistic, 0.867; 95% confidence interval, 0.823 to 0.912) than the former ECPR score (p = 0.019) and the survival after venoarterial ECMO score (p < 0.001). The investigators created a risk prediction model for neurologic outcomes using independent predictors and the interaction between age and low-flow time, and this new scoring system could predict early neurologic prognosis more effectively in ECPR-treated patients. It may be help guide decisions in ECPR management for intensivists, cardiovascular surgeons, or cardiologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Limited data are available regarding mechanical ventilation strategies in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A retrospective analysis of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on ECMO was conducted in 9 hospitals in Korea. Data on ventilator settings (pre-ECMO and 0, 4, 24, and 48 hours after ECMO) were collected. Based on the effect of the duration and intensity of mechanical ventilator on outcomes, time-weighted average values were calculated for ventilator parameters. The 56 patients included in the study had a mean age of 55.5 years. The hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 48.1% and 54.0%, respectively, with a median ECMO duration of 9.4 days. After initiation of ECMO, peak inspiratory pressure, above positive end-expiratory pressure, tidal volume, and respiration rate were reduced, while lung compliance did not change significantly. Before and during ECMO support, tidal volume and lung compliance were higher in 6-month survivors than in nonsurvivors. In Cox proportional models, both lung compliance (odds ratio, 0.961; 95% confidence interval, 0.928 to 0.995) and time-weighted average–lung compliance (odds ratio, 0.943; 95% confidence interval, 0.903 to 0.986) were significantly associated with 6-month mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that patients with higher lung compliance before ECMO had a longer survival time at the 6-month follow-up than did those with lower lung compliance. Lung compliance, whether before or during ECMO, may be an important predictor of outcome in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients receiving ECMO. However, this result requires confirmation in larger clinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Dedicated intensive care unit (ICU) physician staffing is associated with a reduction in ICU mortality rates in general medical and surgical ICUs. However, limited data are available on the role of a cardiac intensivist in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU).Objectives: This study investigated the association of cardiac intensivist-directed care with clinical outcomes in adult patients admitted to the CICU.Methods: This study analyzed 2,431 patients admitted to the CICU at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, South Korea, from January 2012 to December 2015. In January 2013 the CICU was changed from a low-intensity staffing model to a high-intensity staffing model managed by a dedicated cardiac intensivist. Eligible patients were divided into either a low-intensity management group (n = 616) or a high-intensity management group (n = 1,815). One-to-many (1:N) propensity score matching with variable matching ratios was also performed. The primary outcome was death in the CICU.Results: Death in the CICU occurred in 55 patients (8.9%) in the low-intensity group versus 74 patients (4.1%) in the high-intensity group (p < 0.001). Of 135 patients who underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the CICU mortality rate in the high-intensity group was also lower than that in the low-intensity group (54.5% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.001). On propensity score matching, high-intensity staffing was found associated with a lower CICU mortality rate in the matched cohort of patients (7.5% vs. 3.7%; adjusted odds ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.32 to 0.86; p = 0.010). In overall and propensity-matched patients, there were no substantive differences in either median length of CICU stay or readmission rates between the 2 groups.Conclusions: The presence of a dedicated cardiac intensivist was associated with a reduction in CICU mortality rates in patients with cardiovascular disease who required critical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: After the 2015 Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in Korea, prediction of pneumonia development and progression to respiratory failure was emphasized in control of MERS outbreak.Methods: MERS-CoV infected patients who were managed in a tertiary care center during the 2015 Korean MERS outbreak were reviewed. To analyze predictive factors for pneumonia development and progression to respiratory failure, we evaluated clinical variables measured within three days from symptom onset.Results: A total of 45 patients were included in the study: 13 patients (28.9%) did not develop pneumonia, 19 developed pneumonia without respiratory failure (42.2%), and 13 progressed to respiratory failures (28.9%). The identified predictive factors for pneumonia development included age ≥45 years, fever ≥37.5 °C, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, CRP ≥ 2 mg/dL, and a threshold cycle value of PCR less than 28.5. For respiratory failure, the indicators included male, hypertension, low albumin concentration, thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and CRP ≥ 4 mg/dL (all P < 0.05). With ≥ two predictive factors for pneumonia development, 100% of patients developed pneumonia. Patients lacking the predictive factors did not progress to respiratory failure.Conclusion: For successful control of MERS outbreak, MERS-CoV infected patients with ≥ two predictive factors should be intensively managed from the initial presentation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Serum lactate clearance (LC) during initial resuscitation is a potentially useful prognostic marker in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. However, it is unclear whether LC is also associated with the outcome in septic patients with hepatic dysfunction that may impair lactate elimination, which may contribute to elevated serum lactate levels or decreased LC.Methods: The relationships between LC measured within 6 and 24h after initial resuscitation and hospital mortality were evaluated with multiple logistic regression analysis.Results: Of 770 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, 208 (27%) with hepatic dysfunction were included in the analysis. The median LC within 6h in survivors (31.4%) was significantly higher than that of non-survivors (9.3%) (P=.010). In addition, the median LC within 24h was also significantly different between groups (51% vs. 12%, P<.001). Low LCs, defined as less than 10% of clearance, at 6 and 24h were associated with in-hospital mortality. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, low LCs at 6 and 24h remained associated with hospital mortality (adjusted OR 4.940, 95% CI 1.762-13.854 at 6h; adjusted OR 5.997, 95% CI 2.149-16.737 at 24h). However, LC at 24h (area under the curve of 0.704) had higher discriminatory power to predict hospital mortality than LC at 6h (area under the curve of 0.608) (P=.033).Conclusions: LC may be useful for predicting outcomes in septic patients with hepatic dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) requires urgent decision-making and high-quality skills, which may not be uniformly available throughout the week. Few data exist on the outcomes of patients with cardiac arrest who receive in-hospital ECPR on the weekday versus weekend. Therefore, we investigated whether the outcome differed when patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest received ECPR during the weekend compared with a weekday. Methods Two hundred patients underwent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after in-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2004 and December 2013. Patients treated between 0800 on Monday to 1759 on Friday were considered to receive weekday care and patients treated between 1800 on Friday through 0759 on Monday were considered to receive weekend care. Results A total of 135 cases of ECPR for in-hospital cardiac arrest occurred during the weekday (64 during daytime hours and 71 during nighttime hours), and 65 cases occurred during the weekend (39 during daytime/evening hours and 26 during nighttime hours). Rates of survival to discharge were higher with weekday care than with weekend care (35.8% versus 21.5%, p = 0.041). Cannulation failure was more frequent in the weekend group (1.5% versus 7.7%, p = 0.038). Complication rates were higher on the weekend than on the weekday, including cannulation site bleeding (3.0% versus 10.8%, p = 0.041), limb ischemia (5.9% versus 15.6%, p = 0.026), and procedure-related infections (0.7% versus 9.2%, p = 0.005). Conclusions ECPR on the weekend was associated with a lower survival rate and lower resuscitation quality, including higher cannulation failure and higher complication rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated serologic response of 42 Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)-infected patients according to 4 severity groups: asymptomatic infection (Group 0), symptomatic infection without pneumonia (Group 1), pneumonia without respiratory failure (Group 2), and pneumonia progressing to respiratory failure (Group 3). None of the Group 0 patients showed seroconversion, while the seroconversion rate gradually increased with increasing disease severity (0.0%, 60.0%, 93.8%, and 100% in Group 0, 1, 2, 3, respectively; P = 0.001). Group 3 patients showed delayed increment of antibody titers during the fourth week, while Group 2 patients showed robust increment of antibody titer during the third week. Among patients having pneumonia, 75% of deceased patients did not show seroconversion by the third week, while 100% of the survived patients were seroconverted ( P = 0.003). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Surgical resection remains as the treatment of choice for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and provides the best opportunity for cure and long-term survival. Minimally invasive percutaneous ablative therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating lung cancers, are currently being studied as treatment alternatives. But, to date, there is little information on comparison of therapeutic effects between surgery and RFA in patients with early stage lung malignancy. We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of RFA as an alternative curative modality for the early stage lung cancer through analyzing the long-term mortality of both treatment groups; surgery vs. RFA. Twenty-two patients of stage I NSCLC were included for this comparative analysis. To minimize confounding effects, we conducted a matching process. In which patients of RFA group (n =8) were matched with patients of surgery group (n =14) on the following variables; gender, age (±3 years), tumor node metastasis stage, and calendar year of surgery or RFA (±2 years). The mean survival duration of RFA group and surgery group were 33.18±7.90 and 45.49±7.21, respectively (months, p =0.297). Log-rank analysis showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival (p =0.054) between two groups. These results have shown that RFA can offer the survival comparable to that by surgery to stage I NSCLC patients, especially to the patients impossible for the surgery. This study provides an evidence for the use of RFA as a treatment alternative with low procedural morbidity for inoperable early-stage NSCLC patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: A subset of patients with COVID-19 require intensive respiratory care and tracheostomy. Several guidelines on tracheostomy procedures and care of tracheostomized patients have been introduced. In addition to these guidelines, further details of the procedure and perioperative care would be helpful. The purpose of this study is to describe our experience and tracheostomy protocol for patients with MERS or COVID-19.Materials and Methods: Thirteen patients with MERS were admitted to the ICU, 9 (69.2%) of whom underwent surgical tracheostomy. During the COVID-19 outbreak, surgical tracheostomy was performed in one of seven patients with COVID-19. We reviewed related documents and collected information through interviews with healthcare workers who had participated in designing a tracheostomy protocol.Results: Compared with previous guidelines, our protocol consisted of enhanced PPE, simplified procedures (no limitation in the use of electrocautery and wound suction, no stay suture, and delayed cannula change) and a validated screening strategy for healthcare workers. Our protocol allowed for all associated healthcare workers to continue their routine clinical work and daily life. It guaranteed safe return to general patient care without any related complications or nosocomial transmission during the MERS and COVID-19 outbreaks.Conclusion: Our protocol and experience with tracheostomies for MERS and COVID-19 may be helpful to other healthcare workers in building an institutional protocol optimized for their own COVID-19 situation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]