1. Impact of empowerment training on the professional work of family peer advocates
- Author
-
Olin, S. Serene, Hoagwood, Kimberly E., Rodriguez, James, Radigan, Marleen, Burton, Geraldine, Cavaleri, Mary, and Jensen, Peter S.
- Subjects
Caregivers -- Training ,Children -- Health aspects ,Psychiatric services ,Sociology and social work - Abstract
To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.06.012 Byline: S. Serene Olin (b), Kimberly E. Hoagwood (a)(b), James Rodriguez (b), Marleen Radigan (a), Geraldine Burton (b), Mary Cavaleri (b), Peter S. Jensen (c)(d) Keywords: Parent empowerment; Training model; Advocates; Child mental health Abstract: A pilot study using a prospective design examined the impact of a collaboratively developed training model, called the Parent Empowerment Program (PEP), for professionally-employed family peer advocates who work with caregivers of children with mental health needs. This training used a combination of didactic, practice exercises, and group discussion. It targeted specific mental health knowledge content and collaborative skills to facilitate the work of family peer advocates in empowering caregivers. Co-delivered by a family peer advocate and clinician, the training consisted of a 40-hour face-to-face training, followed by six monthly face-to-face booster sessions. A total of 15 advocates participated in assessments conducted at baseline and post-training. This group of experienced family peer advocates showed no significant increase in knowledge about mental health content, but post-training assessments indicated increased collaborative skills and mental health services self-efficacy. This initial evaluation has implications for expanding training and support for the emergent workforce of professionally-employed family peer advocates in children's mental health. Author Affiliation: (a) Bureau of Youth Services Evaluation Research New York State Office of Mental Health, Albany, NY, United States (b) Division of Mental Health Services and Policy Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States (c) The REACH Institute, New York, NY, United States (d) Division of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States Article History: Received 23 March 2010; Revised 8 June 2010; Accepted 16 June 2010
- Published
- 2010