Search

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy and total assessment time (TAT) of the "All-in-one" (AIO)-window/level setting for whole-body computed tomography (CT) image compared to multiple tissue-specific window/level settings conventionally used for detection of traumatic injuries.Method: Contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT scans of 50 patients who presented to our emergency department (ED) for major trauma were retrospectively selected. In a simulation of a "wet read" performed at the CT scanner console, 6 readers with different levels of experience had up to 3 min to describe any traumatic finding identified on the CTs. The readers reviewed each patient in two different sessions separated by a washout period to suppress any recall bias from one session to the next. Each scan was reviewed once using the AIO-window/level setting and another time using the conventional bone, lung, and soft tissue window/level display settings, in a randomized order. The CT reports were used as reference standard.Results: Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the assessment accuracy of the review based on the AIO or the conventional window/level settings (0.89 ± 0.09 vs 0.90 ± 0.08). Using the AIO-window/level settings, TAT was 14.3 s faster when compared with the conventional window/level settings (2.33 ± 0.63 vs 2.57 ± 0.51 min; p < 0.001).Conclusions: In a time-delimited image review, similar diagnostic accuracy was reached faster using the AIO vs the conventional window/level settings. When providing a "wet read" at the CT console, the ability to identify traumatic injury using a single AIO-window/level may help expedite patient management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to the globalization and the fragmentation of industrial production processes, the logistics sector, organizing the linkages between different production plants and the market, is growing fast. This results in an increasing demand for suitable new business locations. Previous research has indicated that accessibility is a key factor in the location decision making process. Though the literature on this subject is extensive, little research has been done to quantify the impact of the different dimensions of accessibility on the location decision process of logistics companies. This paper aims to fill this void in the literature by means of a revealed preference study (using a Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis) and a stated preference study (using a designed discrete choice experiment) in Flanders (Belgium). The results of the revealed preference study served as input to the design of the choice situations in the stated preference study. In the stated preference study, the respondents were confronted with a series of choice situations described by means of accessibility variables as well as land rent information. An analysis of the resulting data by means of discrete choice modeling revealed that land rent is the most important factor in the location choice of logistics companies in Flanders. Access to a port is the second most important factor, followed by access to a motorway, the location in a business park and an inland navigation terminal, which are all about equally important. Access to a rail terminal plays no significant role in the location choice of logistics companies in Flanders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]