Search

Abstract: Background: New strategies are needed for preventing HIV infection in women. One potential approach is female-initiated use of an effective topical microbicidal gel in combination with a cervical barrier such as the diaphragm. Study design: Randomized, placebo-controlled safety and feasibility trial of diaphragm with vaginal gel during 6 months of use among 120 HIV-negative sexually active women in Johannesburg, South Africa. Results: Pelvic event rates were 338.3 and 247.1 per 100 women-years in the ACIDFORM gel (plus diaphragm) and K-Y® Jelly (plus diaphragm) groups, respectively, with a rate ratio of 1.37 (95% CI: 0.89–2.11). Most women found diaphragm with gel use acceptable. Conclusion: There was a trend towards more safety events in the ACIDFORM plus diaphragm group, although no primary comparisons achieved statistical significance. Adding an effective microbicidal gel to a mechanical barrier may still prove to be an important and acceptable combination method to help prevent pregnancy and HIV/sexually transmitted infection transmission. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Only one female condom [FC1 Female Condom (FC1)] is currently marketed, but it is poorly utilized, perhaps due to difficulty with insertion, discomfort and suboptimal functional performance during intercourse. The Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH) Woman''s Condom (WC) was developed in an effort to overcome these obstacles. Study Design: This was a randomized crossover study to evaluate the functional performance, safety and acceptability of the FC1 and WC. Seventy-five couples were assigned to one of two condom use sequences (WC/FC1 or FC1/WC) at three centers. Four condoms of the first type were used by couples in four acts of intercourse at home over a 2–4-week period. After a follow-up visit, these procedures were repeated with the second assigned condom type. In a substudy of participants (n=25), a colposcopy was performed prior and subsequent to the first condom use of each of the two condom types. Condom performance was evaluated by calculating measures of function from questionnaires completed by the couple after each condom use. Safety was evaluated by reported urogenital symptoms with a given condom during or immediately following condom use and colposcopic signs of genital irritation in the substudy. Acceptability of each given condom type was measured by questionnaire. Results: Total condom failure (slippage, breakage, etc., divided by the number of female condoms opened) was 31% for the WC and 42% for the FC1. Total clinical failure (slippage, breakage, etc., divided by the number of female condoms used) was 17% for the WC and 24% for the FC1. The proportion of condom failures was 10.9 percentage points less, and the proportion of clinical failure 6.7 percentage points less, when couples used the WC compared to the FC1 [90% CI: −18.5 to −3.3 and −12.6 to −0.8, respectively). Fewer women reported symptoms of urogenital irritation when using the WC vs. the FC1 either overall or when analyzing each use of the condom [woman as unit: −20 percentage points (90% CI: −30.5 to −9.3); condom use as unit: −12.3 percentage points (90% CI: −18.0 to −6.7)]. A similar result was seen for signs of urogenital irritation [woman as unit: −20 percentage points (90% CI: −42.7 to 4.8)]. Among participants with a preference, WC was preferred over the FC1 by twice as many males and by 2.6 times as many females. Conclusions: While both female condoms were safe and acceptable in short-term use, the PATH Woman''s Condom leads to less failure, was associated with fewer adverse events, and was more acceptable than the FC1 Female Condom. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of a new, single-size silicone contraceptive diaphragm used with either spermicide [2% nonoxynol-9 (N-9)] or lubricant in preventing sperm from penetrating midcycle cervical mucus. Study design: A crossover postcoital test (PCT) in healthy, sexually active women not at risk for pregnancy due to tubal occlusion was conducted. Couples had a baseline PCT without a device to verify normal fertility parameters. Qualified couples underwent up to two test cycles using the SILCS diaphragm with a metal spring. A subgroup of couples underwent a third test cycle with the SILCS polymer spring diaphragm used with N-9 gel. Results: Fifteen couples completed a baseline cycle and were randomized to order of study gel. Of these, 14 couples completed a baseline cycle and at least one test cycle, 12 couples completed a baseline cycle and two test cycles and 8 couples completed a third test cycle with the polymer spring prototype. Sperm was detected in the vaginal pool in all completed test cycles. The SILCS metal spring diaphragms used with N-9 gel reduced the average number of progressively motile sperm per high power field in the cervical mucus from a baseline of 12.5 to 0, while use of this device with lubricant reduced the number to 0.5. The SILCS polymer spring diaphragm used with N-9 performed the same as the metal spring used with N-9. Conclusion: The SILCS diaphragm used with N-9 gel performed well. It is likely that the SILCS diaphragm will give acceptable results in a contraceptive effectiveness study but that adjunctive use of a chemical barrier such as N-9 gel will be necessary for it to be most effective. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional performance of the BufferGel® Duet™, a buffering microbicide and spermicide gel applied to the cervix and vagina by a novel applicator that also serves as a mechanical barrier. Study Design: This was a noncomparative Phase I safety trial in 30 healthy couples, aged 20–50 years, at low risk for sexually transmitted infections, who agreed to use the gel–device combination twice in 1 week and respond to detailed questionnaires about their experience. The female participants were examined with colposcopy before and 6–18 h after using the second device. Results: Based on written instructions alone, 25 women successfully placed and 28 women successfully removed the device. Three women reported feeling the device dislodge around the time of intercourse. The product was equally acceptable to both men and women. Most users concluded that intercourse was the same or better with the device than with no product. About 73% would choose Duet over male condoms, and no one preferred the standard diaphragm. Colposcopic findings were noted in 79% of women with external genital findings (9) or cervicovaginal peeling (18) predominating. Only one finding breached the epithelium. Most product-related adverse events were mild (10/11) and confined to the genitourinary tract. Conclusions: The successful placements and acceptability suggest that further product development is warranted and could target over-the-counter use. During increased duration of use or more frequent dosing, cervicovaginal monitoring is advised based on the extent of peeling and external colposcopic findings in this short-term study. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: This study evaluated the effect of the so-called universal placebo compared to the polystyrene sulfonate (PSS) placebo on genital irritation. Design: A single-center, Phase I, randomized, closed-label study was performed to evaluate the genital irritation of microbicide placebo gels. Thirty healthy, sexually abstinent women were randomly assigned to apply 3.5 mL of either the universal placebo or the PSS placebo gel intravaginally twice daily for 14 days. Methods: Genital irritation was assessed by signs as seen on pelvic examination and colposcopy and reports of symptoms. Vaginal health was assessed by wet mounts, Gram stains for Nugent score and polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and semiquantitative vaginal cultures. Acceptability was assessed as reported on the follow-up questionnaire. Results: The universal placebo was less irritating than the PSS placebo with a lower proportion of women experiencing signs and/or symptoms of genital irritation throughout follow-up (36% compared to 80%, p=.0253). The universal placebo was associated with few and mild genital symptoms, few and minor colposcopic findings and good vaginal health with no clinically significant changes in genital flora. Most participants found the feel of the universal placebo gel neutral or pleasant, and all participants found it odorless. Conclusions: The universal placebo appeared safe and acceptable when used twice daily for 14 days. The strategy of creating a de novo inert universal placebo is a successful approach. The universal placebo is appropriate for use as a placebo gel in HIV prevention trials with microbicide candidates. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: FemCap is a silicone-rubber barrier contraceptive approved for marketing in the United States. To address reported problems with removal and dislodgment, the device's developer added a strap to the device and increased the height of the brim. This trial assessed whether the new design reduced removal difficulties and had any effects on dislodgment, genital pain/discomfort, safety, and acceptability.Methods: Women used the strapped device for 8 weeks with follow-up visits at 2 and 8 weeks. Outcome measures were obtained through diary cards, questionnaires, and naked eye examination. Data from these 120 women were compared with data from 419 women who used the unstrapped FemCap in a previous contraceptive effectiveness study.Results: The strapped device was not significantly easier for users to remove than the unstrapped device. Similar odds of dislodgment and cervical/vaginal irritation were seen with the two devices. Both female and male participants were significantly more likely to report pain/discomfort with use of the strapped device. Female users of the strapped device were significantly more likely to say they disliked their device. In six weeks, two pregnancies were observed, but pregnancy was not an endpoint in the study and no conclusions should be drawn regarding pregnancy rates.Conclusions: The modifications to the FemCap did not significantly improve the ease of device removal and appears to have resulted in significantly more female and male partner pain/discomfort and decreased acceptability, compared with the unstrapped device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the effects of Lea''s Shield® plus nonoxynol-9 spermicide on signs and symptoms of female genital irritation and cervical and vaginal microflora during 8 weeks of use with intercourse and to analyze problems associated with the use of the device. Methods: In this open-label, single-arm study, participants were evaluated by pelvic examination, colposcopy and vaginal and cervical cultures. Results: About 13% of women (4/30) reported symptoms of irritation, and minor product-related colposcopic findings were seen in about one third (11/30). Although average colony counts for enterococcus, Escherichia coli and anaerobic gram-negative rods increased during product use, no clinical diagnoses of infection were made. Most users reported at least one problem using Lea''s Shield. Conclusion: Lea''s Shield, when used for 8 weeks during intercourse, is associated with evidence of genital irritation in a minority of users and with changes in vaginal microflora that do not appear to correlate with clinical infections. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: ACIDFORM gel is being studied as a vaginal contraceptive and microbicide. This study was conducted to make certain that males will not be subjected to an unacceptable risk of penile irritation as a result of exposure to the product in future studies. Methods: This was a randomized, double-masked, single-center Phase I study in circumcised and uncircumcised men to assess penile irritation, safety and acceptability of seven consecutive doses of ACIDFORM gel compared with K-Y® Jelly Personal Lubricant. Each participant was instructed to apply 2 mL of the study product to his penis at bedtime, to wash it off 6–10 h later and to record any symptoms on a diary card. At the follow-up visit, a genital examination was performed and participants were asked about adverse events (AEs) and completed an acceptability questionnaire. Results: Of the 36 men enrolled, 2 out of 24 (8.3%) ACIDFORM gel users and 5 out of 12 (41.7%) K-Y Jelly users reported genital symptoms. Genital examination findings were observed in 2 out of 24 (8.3%) ACIDFORM gel users and in 1 out of 12 (8.3%) K-Y Jelly users. All product-related AEs were considered mild except for two in the K-Y Jelly group. Both products were acceptable. Conclusion: ACIDFORM gel applied to the penis for seven consecutive days appears to be at least as safe and well-tolerated as the marketed lubricant K-Y Jelly among healthy low-risk men. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: C31G is being studied as a vaginal contraceptive and microbicide. This study was conducted to ensure that male partners of the women in future trials of C31G will not be subjected to an undue risk of penile irritation.Methods: This was a randomized, double-blinded, single-center Phase I study in circumcised and uncircumcised men to assess penile irritation, safety and acceptability of seven consecutive daily doses of 1.0% C31G compared with a marketed spermicide, Extra Strength Gynol II® (3% nonoxynol-9) (ES Gynol II). Each participant was instructed to apply the study product to his penis at bedtime, to wash it off 6–10 h later, and to record any symptoms on a diary card. At the follow-up visit, a genital examination was performed and participants were again asked about adverse events and to complete an acceptability questionnaire.Results: Of the 36 men enrolled, 12.5% of C31G users and 16.7% of Extra Strength Gynol II users reported product-related adverse events (AEs). All product-related AEs were considered mild by the investigator, except for one in the ES Gynol II group. Both products were acceptable.Conclusion: The manner in which the products were used in this study is not the route by which men will be exposed to such products in actual use, and results should be considered in this light. Based on the observations in this study, C31G appears to be at least as safe and acceptable for male penile exposure as the marketed product ES Gynol II. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Colposcopy is used to evaluate effects of new vaginal products on cervicovaginal epithelium as part of the US Food and Drug Administration-mandated product approval process, yet few aspects of its use have been investigated.Objectives: To determine the effect of the colposcopic examination itself on the number and type of findings seen, to compare colposcopy with the AviScope hand-held device and the naked eye and to compare the findings reported by two examiners during a single visit.Study design: Fourteen healthy women volunteered for five paired examinations in random order: (1) naked eye inspection plus colposcopy done twice by a single examiner; (2) naked eye inspection plus AviScope examination, then naked eye inspection plus colposcopy by a single examiner; (3) Examination 2 repeated with the order of device reversed; (4) naked eye inspection plus colposcopy done by two examiners; (5) Examination 4 repeated with the order of examiner reversed. The colposcopic examinations were done per published standards but were limited to the areas visible without manipulation of the speculum.Results: Length of colposcopic examination averaged 7 min. The number of colposcopic findings found when the examination was done twice by the same clinician was not statistically different (p = 0.12), suggesting that the examination itself did not induce findings. More findings were seen using magnification than naked eye. A similar number of findings were seen by AviScope compared to the colposcope (p = 0.99), but clinically significant findings were “undercalled” or “overcalled” by the AviScope. A weighted kappa score of the “worst” colposcopic finding was 0.32 (SE 0.10, p = 0.00), indicating moderate agreement between examiners.Conclusions: The colposcopic examination is not burdensome nor does it induce findings. If naked eye observation were used alone in practice, these data suggest that half the colposcopically detected findings would be missed. Using the naked eye observation for screening would minimally reduce the number of magnified observations carried out. For detecting epithelial changes, the colposcope seems to be the most sensitive technique, followed by the AviScope. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: C31G is an antimicrobial and spermicidal agent that contains two surface-active compounds, cetyl betaine and myristamine oxide. It is being developed as a vaginal microbicide and contraceptive.Method: Three C31G concentrations (0.5%, 1.0% and 1.7%) were tested and compared with Extra Strength Gynol II®, a marketed spermicide containing 3% nonoxynol-9 (N-9), in a randomized, double-blinded, Phase I, dose-escalation study to assess genital irritation (by subject report, visual examination at pelvic examination and colposcopy), plasma and vaginal lavage levels of C31G, product leakage, systemic safety and acceptability. Women were randomized to use 3.5 mL of one of the three C31G products or the N-9 gel at night for 7 days then twice daily for another 7 days. Pelvic and colposcopic evaluations were performed after 7 and 14 days of product use.Results: The percent of women experiencing irritation in the 0.5% and 1.0% C31G groups in the study were similar to each other and were lower than the percent experiencing irritation in the 1.7% and N-9 groups, which were also similar to each other. Differences were statistically significant between 1.0% C31G vs. N-9 at 7 days and between 0.5% C31G and 1.0% C31G vs. N-9 at 14 days. There was no significant difference between groups in leakage or acceptability. No C31G was detected in the plasma of any volunteer.Conclusions: These results suggest that 0.5% and 1.0% C31G are less irritating to the female genital tract than 1.7% C31G or Extra Strength Gynol II. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: C31G is a broad-spectrum antibacterial agent that shows contraceptive properties in vitro. This postcoital testing study evaluated the ability of three C31G concentrations, 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.7%, administered as a 3.5-mL dose of a vaginal gel to prevent sperm from entering mid-cycle cervical mucus. Irritation of the genitalia and acceptability were also assessed.Method: At baseline, a mid-cycle cervical mucus test and a postcoital test were performed within 24 h of each other without use of any study products to establish normal mid-cycle cervical mucus and sperm penetration. Subjects then completed up to three test cycles using one of the three concentrations of study product during intercourse.Results: Twenty-two of the 61 women enrolled completed a baseline cycle and at least one test cycle. An average of 14.6 progressively motile sperm per high power field was seen at baseline. This was reduced to 0.3 after use of 0.5% C31G, 0.5 after use of 1.0% C31G, and 0.4 after use of 1.7% C31G. There was no significant difference between test products (p ≥ 1.000) but each test product was significantly different from baseline (p < 0.002). Very little genital irritation was observed. There were more reports of leakage and messiness with increasing C31G concentration.Conclusion: This study suggests that all three concentrations of C31G are likely to give reasonable results in a contraceptive effectiveness trial. Based on the results of this and other trials, the 1.0% concentration has been selected for further development, including Phase III trials of contraceptive effectiveness. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: To evaluate symptoms and signs of genital irritation, vaginal leakage and acceptability of polystyrene sulfonate (PSS), which is being studied as a vaginal contraceptive and microbicide.Methods: Forty-nine women applied 2.5 mL of either 5% PSS, 10% PSS, PSS vehicle, or Conceptrol (a marketed spermicidal product containing 4% nonoxynol-9) for 6 consecutive days.Results: All women completed the study except one in the Conceptrol group who experienced vaginal symptoms after her first use and was discontinued. After both the first use and after all uses, irritation was seen among more women in the Conceptrol group than in the PSS groups, reaching statistical significance with regard to any evidence of irritation, signs of irritation and product-related irritation. There were no adverse events that were serious, unexpected and related to product use in any group. The 5% concentration of PSS may be preferable in terms of leakage and acceptability.Conclusion: The results suggest that PSS has a safety profile comparable to that of the marketed nonoxynol-9 product, Conceptrol, and appears to be associated with less genital irritation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]