Search

• ALA-PDI induces reduction of planktonic and biofilm Gram-positive bacteria. • Porphyrins synthesis from ALA depends highly on the experimental conditions. • Slight changes in ALA concentration and time exposure greatly impact PDI outcome. • Porphyrins are located inside the bacteria and do not attach to the EPS. • Gram-negative bacteria are quite refractory to ALA-PDI although they do incorporate ALA. Bacterial photodynamic inactivation (PDI) employing endogenous production of porphyrins from 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) – named ALA-PDI-, is a new promising tool to achieve bacteria control in non-spread infections. The technique combines the action of the porphyrins acting as photosensitisers with light, to produce reactive oxygen species to target the pathogen. To date, some clinical applications of ALA-PDI have been reported although variable responses ranging from total eradication to absence of photokilling were found. ALA-PDI conducted at suboptimal conditions may lead to misleading results and the complexity of haem synthesis in bacteria hinders the optimization of the treatment. The present work aimed to gain insight on the variables affecting ALA-PDI in Gram-positives and Gram-negatives bacteria growing on planktonic and biofilm cultures and to correlate the degree of the response with the amount and type of porphyrin synthesised. Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli clinical isolates and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 2 7853 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 strains were utilised, and the optimal conditions of concentration and time exposure of ALA, and light dose were set. In both Gram-positive species analysed, a peak of porphyrin synthesis was observed at 1–2 mM ALA in biofilm and planktonic cultures, which fairly correlated with the decrease in the number of CFU after PDI (5 to 7 logs) and porphyrin content was in the same order of magnitude. In addition, ALA-PDI was similarly effective for planktonic and biofilm S. aureus cultures, and more effective in S. epidermidis planktonic cultures at low light doses. Beyond a certain light dose, it was not possible to achieve further photosensitization. Similarly, a plateau of cell death was attained at a certain ALA incubation time. Accumulation of hydrophilic porphyrins at longer incubation periods was observed. The proportion of porphyrins changed as a function of ALA concentration and incubation time in the Gram-positive bacteria, though we did not find a clear correlation between the porphyrin type and PDI response. As a salient feature was the presence of isococroporphyrin isoforms in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria were quite refractory to the treatment: P. aeruginosa was slightly inactivated (4-logs reduction) at 40 mM ALA, whereas E. coli was not inactivated at all. These species accumulated high ALA quantities and the amount of porphyrins did not correlate with the degree of photoinactivation. Our microscopy studies show that porphyrins are not located in the envelopes of Gram-negative bacteria, reinforcing the hypothesis that endogenous porphyrins fail to attack these structures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]