Search

The human brain generally remains structurally and functionally sound for many decades, despite the post-mitotic and non-regenerative nature of neurons. This is testament to the brain’s profound capacity for homeostasis: both neurons and glia have in-built mechanisms that enable them to mount adaptive or protective responses to potentially challenging situations, ensuring that cellular viability and functionality is maintained. The high and variable metabolic and mitochondrial activity of neurons places several demands on the brain, including the task of neutralizing the associated reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced, to limit the accumulation of oxidative damage. Astrocytes play a key role in providing antioxidant support to nearby neurons, and redox regulation of the astrocytic Nrf2 pathway represents a powerful homeostatic regulator of the large cohort of Nrf2-regulated antioxidant genes that they express. In contrast, the Nrf2 pathway is weak in neurons, robbing them of this particular homeostatic device. However, many neuronal antioxidant genes are controlled by synaptic activity, enabling activity-dependent increases in ROS production to be offset by enhanced antioxidant capacity of both glutathione and thioredoxin-peroxiredoxin systems. These distinct homeostatic mechanisms in neurons and astrocytes together combine to promote neuronal resistance to oxidative insults. Future investigations into signaling between distinct cell types within the neuro-glial unit are likely to uncover further mechanisms underlying redox homeostasis in the brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microglia, brain-resident macrophages, require instruction from the CNS microenvironment to maintain their identity and morphology and regulate inflammatory responses, although what mediates this is unclear. Here, we show that neurons and astrocytes cooperate to promote microglial ramification, induce expression of microglial signature genes ordinarily lost in vitro and in age and disease in vivo , and repress infection- and injury-associated gene sets. The influence of neurons and astrocytes separately on microglia is weak, indicative of synergies between these cell types, which exert their effects via a mechanism involving transforming growth factor β2 (TGF-β2) signaling. Neurons and astrocytes also combine to provide immunomodulatory cues, repressing primed microglial responses to weak inflammatory stimuli (without affecting maximal responses) and consequently limiting the feedback effects of inflammation on the neurons and astrocytes themselves. These findings explain why microglia isolated ex vivo undergo de-differentiation and inflammatory deregulation and point to how disease- and age-associated changes may be counteracted. [Display omitted] • Neurons and astrocytes combine to promote the microglial homeostatic signature • This rescues changes that happen in microglia ex vivo and in disease • Mechanistically, this involves transforming growth factor beta 2 (TBGF-β2) signaling • Neurons and astrocytes also repress microglial inflammatory responses Baxter et al. show that the transformation of microglia from a healthy to disease-associated state can be suppressed by the combined actions of neurons and astrocytes via a mechanism involving TBGF-β2 signaling. They also repress exaggerated microglial responses to mild stimuli and limit the feedback signaling from activated microglia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary The GluN2 subtype (2A versus 2B) determines biophysical properties and signaling of forebrain NMDA receptors (NMDARs). During development, GluN2A becomes incorporated into previously GluN2B-dominated NMDARs. This "switch" is proposed to be driven by distinct features of GluN2 cytoplasmic C-terminal domains (CTDs), including a unique CaMKII interaction site in GluN2B that drives removal from the synapse. However, these models remain untested in the context of endogenous NMDARs. We show that, although mutating the endogenous GluN2B CaMKII site has secondary effects on GluN2B CTD phosphorylation, the developmental changes in NMDAR composition occur normally and measures of plasticity and synaptogenesis are unaffected. Moreover, the switch proceeds normally in mice that have the GluN2A CTD replaced by that of GluN2B and commences without an observable decline in GluN2B levels but is impaired by GluN2A haploinsufficiency. Thus, GluN2A expression levels, and not GluN2 subtype-specific CTD-driven events, are the overriding factor in the developmental switch in NMDAR composition. Graphical Abstract Highlights • Mutating the GluN2B CaMKII site affects phosphorylation of its C-terminal domain • The developmental changes in NMDAR composition and synaptogenesis occur normally • Changes in NMDAR composition do not require distinct GluN2 C-terminal domains • Developmental changes in NMDAR composition are primarily sensitive to GluN2A levels An important milestone in forebrain neuronal development is the switch in composition of the NMDA receptor: GluN2A becomes incorporated into previously GluN2B-dominated NMDARs. Using knockin mice, McKay et al. find that, contrary to earlier proposed models, the switch does not require GluN2A and GluN2B to possess distinct C-terminal domain sequences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]