Narui, Kazutaka, Ishikawa, Takashi, Shimizu, Daisuke, Yamada, Akimitsu, Tanabe, Mikiko, Sasaki, Takeshi, Oba, Mari S., Morita, Satoshi, Nawata, Shuichi, Kida, Kumiko, Mogaki, Masatoshi, Doi, Takako, Tsugawa, Koichiro, Ogata, Haruki, Ota, Tomohiko, Kosaka, Yoshimasa, Sengoku, Norihiko, Kuranami, Masaru, Niikura, Naoki, and Saito, Yuki
It is important to determine whether anthracycline-containing regimens or taxane-containing regimens are more effective in individual patients. The present study compared the efficacy of six cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC6) with that of three cycles of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (FEC-D) in Japanese patients with hormone receptor (HR)-negative breast cancer (BC) to identify subtypes requiring anthracycline treatment. The study included 103 patients with operable HR-negative BC. Of these patients 53 received FEC-D and 50 received TC6. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). The secondary endpoints were safety, breast-conserving surgery, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The predictive factors for each regimen were evaluated. Of the 103 patients, 97 completed the study (FEC-D, 50 patients; TC6, 47 patients). The pCR rate was higher with FEC-D (36%) than with TC6 (25.5%); however, the difference was not significant (P = 0.265). TC6 was safer than FEC-D, as the adverse events with docetaxel in the FEC-D regimen were similar to those with the TC6 regimen. Among patients with basal BC, the pCR rate was significantly higher with FEC-D (42.9%) than with TC6 (13.6%; P = 0.033). Among patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the DFS and OS were significantly better with FEC-D than with TC6 (P = 0.016 and P = 0.034, respectively). TC6 was not as effective as FEC-D for treating HR-negative BC, as TC6 was not sufficient to treat TNBC, particularly the basal subtype. Our findings suggest that anthracyclines are better treatment options than taxanes for basal BC. • The pCR rate was higher with FEC-D than with TC6 (P = 0.265). • For basal BC, the pCR rate was higher with FEC-D than with TC6 (P = 0.033). • For TNBC, DFS and OS were better with FEC-D than with TC6 (P = 0.016 and P = 0.034). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]