Search

Background: Recently, a novel left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI) has been introduced providing prognostic value to predict cardiovascular events beyond common risk factors in patients without cardiovascular disease. Since data on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived LACI in patients following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are scarce, we aimed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic implications of LACI in a large AMI patient cohort. Methods: In total, 1046 patients following AMI were included. After primary percutaneous coronary intervention CMR imaging and subsequent functional analyses were performed. LACI was defined by the ratio of the left atrial end-diastolic volume divided by the left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including death, reinfarction or heart failure within 12 months after the index event were defined as primary clinical endpoint. Results: LACI was significantly higher in patients with MACE compared to those without MACE (p < 0.001). Youden Index identified an optimal LACI cut-off at 34.7% to classify patients at high-risk (p < 0.001 on log-rank testing). Greater LACI was associated with MACE on univariate regression modeling (HR 8.1, 95% CI 3.4–14.9, p < 0.001) and after adjusting for baseline confounders and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) on multivariate regression analyses (HR 3.1 95% CI 1.0–9, p = 0.049). Furthermore, LACI assessment enabled further risk stratification in high-risk patients with impaired LV systolic function (LVEF ≤ 35%; p < 0.001 on log-rank testing). Conclusion: Atrial-ventricular interaction using CMR-derived LACI is a superior measure of outcome beyond LVEF especially in high-risk patients following AMI. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00712101 and NCT01612312 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-systolic volume (ESV) remain the main imaging biomarkers for post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) risk stratification. However, they are limited to global systolic function and fail to capture functional and anatomical regional abnormalities, hindering their performance in risk stratification. This study aimed to identify novel 3-dimensional (3D) imaging end-systolic (ES) shape and contraction descriptors toward risk-related features and superior prognosis in AMI. A multicenter cohort of AMI survivors (n = 1,021; median age 63 years; 74.5% male) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at a median of 3 days after infarction were considered for this study. The clinical endpoint was the 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; n = 73), consisting of all-cause death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure. A fully automated pipeline was developed to segment CMR images, build 3D statistical models of shape and contraction in AMI, and find the 3D patterns related to MACE occurrence. The novel ES shape markers proved to be superior to ESV (median cross-validated area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.681 [IQR: 0.679-0.684] vs 0.600 [IQR: 0.598-0.602]; P < 0.001); and 3D contraction to LVEF (0.716 [IQR: 0.714-0.718] vs 0.681 [IQR: 0.679-0.684]; P < 0.001) in MACE occurrence prediction. They also contributed to a significant improvement in a multivariable setting including CMR markers, cardiovascular risk factors, and basic patient characteristics (0.747 [IQR: 0.745-0.749]; P < 0.001). Based on these novel 3D descriptors, 3 impairments caused by AMI were identified: global, anterior, and basal, the latter being the most complementary signature to already known predictors. The quantification of 3D differences in ES shape and contraction, enabled by a fully automated pipeline, improves post-AMI risk prediction and identifies shape and contraction patterns related to MACE occurrence. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Since cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging allows comprehensive quantification of both myocardial function and structure we aimed to assess myocardial remodeling processes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: CMR imaging was performed in 40 patients with severe AS before and 1 year after TAVR. Image analyses comprised assessments of myocardial volumes, CMR-feature-tracking based atrial and ventricular strain, myocardial T1 mapping, extracellular volume fraction-based calculation of left ventricular (LV) cellular and matrix volumes, as well as ischemic and non-ischemic late gadolinium enhancement analyses. Moreover, biomarkers including NT-proBNP as well as functional and clinical status were documented. Results: Myocardial function improved 1 year after TAVR: LV ejection fraction (57.9 ± 16.9% to 65.4 ± 14.5%, p = 0.002); LV global longitudinal (− 21.4 ± 8.0% to -25.0 ± 6.4%, p < 0.001) and circumferential strain (− 36.9 ± 14.3% to − 42.6 ± 11.8%, p = 0.001); left atrial reservoir (13.3 ± 6.3% to 17.8 ± 6.7%, p = 0.001), conduit (5.5 ± 3.2% to 8.4 ± 4.6%, p = 0.001) and boosterpump strain (8.2 ± 4.6% to 9.9 ± 4.2%, p = 0.027). This was paralleled by regression of total myocardial volume (90.3 ± 21.0 ml/m2 to 73.5 ± 17.0 ml/m2, p < 0.001) including cellular (55.2 ± 13.2 ml/m2 to 45.3 ± 11.1 ml/m2, p < 0.001) and matrix volumes (20.7 ± 6.1 ml/m2 to 18.8 ± 5.3 ml/m2, p = 0.036). These changes were paralleled by recovery from heart failure (decrease of NYHA class: p < 0.001; declining NT-proBNP levels: 2456 ± 3002 ng/L to 988 ± 1222 ng/L, p = 0.001). Conclusion: CMR imaging enables comprehensive detection of myocardial remodeling in patients undergoing TAVR. Regression of LV matrix volume as a surrogate for reversible diffuse myocardial fibrosis is accompanied by increase of myocardial function and recovery from heart failure. Further data are required to define the value of these parameters as therapeutic targets for optimized management of TAVR patients. Trial registration DRKS, DRKS00024479. Registered 10 December 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00024479 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Identification of increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) by right heart catheterization (RHC) is the reference standard for the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Recently, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging estimation of PCWP at rest was introduced as a non-invasive alternative. Since many patients are only identified during physiological exercise-stress, we hypothesized that novel exercise-stress CMR-derived PCWP emerges superior compared to its assessment at rest. The HFpEF-Stress Trial prospectively recruited 75 patients with exertional dyspnea and diastolic dysfunction who then underwent rest and exercise-stress RHC and CMR. HFpEF was defined according to PCWP (overt HFpEF ≥15 mmHg at rest, masked HFpEF ≥25 mmHg during exercise-stress). CMR-derived PCWP was calculated based on previously published formula using left ventricular mass and either biplane left atrial volume (LAV) or monoplane left atrial area (LAA). LAV (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and LAA PCWP (rest/stress: r = 0.50/r = 0.48, p < 0.001) correlated significantly with RHC-derived PCWP while numerically overestimating PCWP at rest and underestimating PCWP during exercise-stress. LAV and LAA PCWP showed good diagnostic accuracy to detect HFpEF (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) LAV rest 0.73, stress 0.81; LAA rest 0.72, stress 0.77) with incremental diagnostic value for the detection of masked HFpEF using exercise-stress (AUC LAV rest 0.54 vs stress 0.67, p = 0.019, LAA rest 0.52 vs stress 0.66, p = 0.012). LAV but not LAA PCWP during exercise-stress was a predictor for 24 months hospitalization independent of a medical history for atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.02–1.55, p = 0.032). Non-invasive PCWP correlates well with the invasive reference at rest and during exercise stress. There is overall good diagnostic accuracy for HFpEF assessment using CMR-derived estimated PCWP despite deviations in absolute agreement. Non-invasive exercise derived PCWP may particularly facilitate detection of masked HFpEF in the future. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myocardial deformation analyses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (CMR-FT) have incremental value in the assessment of cardiac function beyond volumetric analyses. Since guidelines do not recommend specifc imaging parameters, we aimed to defne optimal spatial and temporal resolutions for CMR cine images to enable reliable post-processing. Methods: Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was assessed in 12 healthy subjects and 9 heart failure (HF) patients. Cine images were acquired with diferent temporal (20, 30, 40 and 50 frames/cardiac cycle) and spatial reso‑ lutions (high in-plane 1.5×1.5 mm through-plane 5 mm, standard 1.8×1.8 x 8mm and low 3.0×3.0 x 10mm). CMR-FT comprised left ventricular (LV) global and segmental longitudinal/circumferential strain (GLS/GCS) and associated systolic strain rates (SR), and right ventricular (RV) GLS. Results: Temporal but not spatial resolution did impact absolute strain and SR. Maximum absolute changes between lowest and highest temporal resolution were as follows: 1.8% and 0.3%/s for LV GLS and SR, 2.5% and 0.6%/s for GCS and SR as well as 1.4% for RV GLS. Changes of strain values occurred comparing 20 and 30 frames/cardiac cycle including LV and RV GLS and GCS (p<0.001–0.046). In contrast, SR values (LV GLS/GCS SR) changed signifcantly com‑ paring all successive temporal resolutions (p<0.001–0.013). LV strain and SR reproducibility was not afected by either temporal or spatial resolution, whilst RV strain variability decreased with augmentation of temporal resolution. Conclusion: Temporal but not spatial resolution signifcantly afects strain and SR in CMR-FT deformation analyses. Strain analyses require lower temporal resolution and 30 frames/cardiac cycle ofer consistent strain assessments, whilst SR measurements gain from further increases in temporal resolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Myocardial fibrosis is a major determinant of outcome in aortic stenosis (AS). Novel fast real-time (RT) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) mapping techniques allow comprehensive quantification of fibrosis but have not yet been compared against standard techniques and histology. Methods: Patients with severe AS underwent CMR before (n = 110) and left ventricular (LV) endomyocardial biopsy (n = 46) at transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Midventricular short axis (SAX) native, post-contrast T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) maps were generated using commercially available modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) (native: 5(3)3, post-contrast: 4(1)3(1)2) and RT single-shot inversion recovery Fast Low-Angle Shot (FLASH) with radial undersampling. Focal late gadolinium enhancement was excluded from T1 and ECV regions of interest. ECV and LV mass were used to calculate LV matrix volumes. Variability and agreements were assessed between RT, MOLLI and histology using intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficients of variation and Bland Altman analyses. Results: RT and MOLLI derived ECV were similar for midventricular SAX slice coverage (26.2 vs. 26.5, p = 0.073) and septal region of interest (26.2 vs. 26.5, p = 0.216). MOLLI native T1 time was in median 20 ms longer compared to RT (p < 0.001). Agreement between RT and MOLLI was best for ECV (ICC > 0.91), excellent for post-contrast T1 times (ICC > 0.81) and good for native T1 times (ICC > 0.62). Diffuse collagen volume fraction by biopsies was in median 7.8%. ECV (RT r = 0.345, p = 0.039; MOLLI r = 0.40, p = 0.010) and LV matrix volumes (RT r = 0.45, p = 0.005; MOLLI r = 0.43, p = 0.007) were the only parameters associated with histology. Conclusions: RT mapping offers fast and sufficient ECV and LV matrix volume calculation in AS patients. ECV and LV matrix volume represent robust and universally comparable parameters with associations to histologically assessed fibrosis and may emerge as potential targets for clinical decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) improves left ventricular (LV) function in patients with LV systolic dysfunction, suggestive of underlying arrhythmia-induced adverse remodeling.Objectives: The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether arrhythmia-induced LV remodeling occurs in patients with AF and preserved LV systolic function and to assess whether this remodeling is reversible after restoration of sinus rhythm by catheter ablation.Methods: Forty-three patients with AF and preserved LV systolic function (LV ejection fraction 62% ± 7%) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging before catheter ablation including native T1 mapping using a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence. Twenty-five patients underwent follow-up CMR 3 months after catheter ablation. Twenty-two matched controls without AF underwent the same CMR protocol.Results: Patients with AF had higher baseline LV native T1 values than did controls (1296 ± 55 ms vs 1243 ± 55 ms; P < .01). During a median follow-up of 9 months (interquartile range 4-14 months), 17 patients (40%) experienced AF recurrence. No differences in baseline T1 values were observed between patients with and without AF recurrence. There was a significant decrease in native T1 values in patients with successful restoration of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation at 3 months of follow-up CMR (1300 ± 45 ms vs 1270 ± 55 ms; P < .01), while they remain unchanged in patients with AF recurrence (1303 ± 51 ms vs 1309 ± 31 ms; P = .64).Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that subclinical arrhythmia-induced LV structural remodeling occurs in patients with AF and preserved LV systolic function. This remodeling might be reversible after catheter ablation with successful restoration of sinus rhythm as quantified noninvasively and gadolinium-free by CMR native T1 mapping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) represents the clinical gold standard for the assessment of biventricular morphology and function. Since manual post-processing is time-consuming and prone to observer variability, efforts have been directed towards automated volumetric quantification. In this study, we sought to validate the accuracy of a novel approach providing fully automated quantification of biventricular volumes and function in a "real-world" clinical setting. Methods: Three-hundred CMR examinations were randomly selected from the local data base. Fully automated quantification of left ventricular (LV) mass, LV and right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV/ESV), stroke volume (SV) and ejection fraction (EF) were performed overnight using commercially available software (suiteHEART®, Neosoft, Pewaukee, Wisconsin, USA). Parameters were compared to manual assessments (QMass®, Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Leiden, Netherlands). Sub-group analyses were further performed according to image quality, scanner field strength, the presence of implanted aortic valves and repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF). Results: Biventricular automated segmentation was feasible in all 300 cases. Overall agreement between fully automated and manually derived LV parameters was good (LV-EF: intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.95; bias − 2.5% [SD 5.9%]), whilst RV agreement was lower (RV-EF: ICC 0.72; bias 5.8% [SD 9.6%]). Lowest agreement was observed in case of severely altered anatomy, e.g. marked RV dilation but normal LV dimensions in repaired ToF (LV parameters ICC 0.73–0.91; RV parameters ICC 0.41–0.94) and/or reduced image quality (LV parameters ICC 0.86–0.95; RV parameters ICC 0.56–0.91), which was more common on 3.0 T than on 1.5 T. Conclusions: Fully automated assessments of biventricular morphology and function is robust and accurate in a clinical routine setting with good image quality and can be performed without any user interaction. However, in case of demanding anatomy (e.g. repaired ToF, severe LV hypertrophy) or reduced image quality, quality check and manual re-contouring are still required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]