1. Human papillomavirus viral load on careHPV testing of self-collected vaginal samples vs. clinician-collected cervical samples.
- Author
-
Labani, S. and Asthana, S.
- Subjects
- *
CERVICAL cancer diagnosis , *PAPILLOMAVIRUS diseases , *VIRAL load , *DNA , *VAGINA physiology , *SPECULUM (Medicine) - Abstract
Objective To compare viral load on care HPV DNA testing in self-collected vaginal (VHPC) and clinician-collected cervical (CHPC) samples for the detection of high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN). Study design Cross-sectional study. Ever-married women aged 30–59 years were targeted for cervical screening. On attendance for screening, vaginal self-sampling was performed by the woman, and an auxiliary nurse midwife subsequently performed a per-speculum examination, collected a CHPV sample and a Pap smear, and made a visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid. The ratio of viral load expressed in relative light units to positive controls set at a cut-off of 1 pg/ml was used for care HPV quantitative assessment. The median viral load was compared using non-parametric tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for the detection of CINII+ and CINIII+ in CHPV and VHPV samples. Results Overall, the median viral load in the 4658 women screened was higher in CHPV samples compared with VHPV samples (9.8-fold higher in cases of high-grade CIN). The median viral load was significantly higher among Pap-positive women compared with Pap-negative women in both CHPV and VHPV samples ( p < 0.01). Assessment by ROC analysis for the detection of high-grade CIN did not differ significantly between CHPV and VHPV samples. Conclusion Viral load on care HPV testing was comparable between self- and clinician-collected samples for the detection of high-grade CIN. The self-sampling approach may be an option for screening in low-resource countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF