Search

Abstract: Background: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early-breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node (SLN+) may not always be necessary. Aims: To predict the finding of ≥1 metastatic axillary node in addition to SLN+(s); to discriminate between patients who would or not benefit from ALND. Methods: Records of 397 consecutive patients with 1-2 SLN+s receiving ALND were reviewed. Clinico-pathological features were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to develop a logistic regression model predictive of the risk of ≥1 additional axillary node involved. The discrimination power of the model was quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and validated using an independent set of 83 patients. Results: In univariate analyses, the risk of ≥1 additional node involved was correlated with tumor size, grade, HER-2 and Ki-67 over-expression, number of SLN+s. All factors, but Ki-67, retained in multivariate regressions were used to generate a predictive model with good discriminating power on both the training and the validation sets (AUC 0.73 and 0.75, respectively). Three patient groups were defined based on their risk to present additional axillary burden. Conclusions: The model identifies SLN+-patients at low risk (≤15%) who could reasonably be spared ALND and those at high risk (>75%) who should receive ALND. For patients at intermediate risk, ALND appropriateness could be individually evaluated based on other clinico-pathological parameters. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Feasibility and accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) after the delivery of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. We here report our experience in NAC-treated patients with locally advanced breast cancer and clinically positive axillary nodes, and compare it with the results from our previous randomized trial assessing SLNB in early-stage breast cancer patients. Patients and methods: Sixty-four consecutive patients with large infiltrating tumor and clinically positive axillary nodes received NAC and subsequent lymphatic mapping, SLNB and complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The status of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was compared to that of the axilla. Results: At least one SLN was identified in 60 of the 64 patients (93.8%). Among those 60 patients, 37 (61.7%) had one or more positive SLN(s) and 23 (38.3%) did not. Two of the patients with negative SLN(s) presented metastases in other non-sentinel nodes. SLNB thus had a false-negative rate, a negative predictive value and an overall accuracy of 5.1%, 91.3% and 96.7%, respectively. All these values were similar to those we reported for SLNB in the settings of early-stage breast cancer. Conclusion: SLNB after NAC is safe and feasible in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and clinically positive nodes, and accurately predicts the status of the axilla. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Aim: To investigate whether omitting intra-operative staging of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) in T1-N0 breast-cancer patients is feasible and convenient because it could allow a more efficient management of human and logistic resources without leading to an unacceptable increase in the rate of delayed axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Methods: According to the experimental procedure, T1a–T1b-patients were to not receive any intra-operative SLN evaluation on frozen sections (FS). In all T1c-patients, the SLN was macroscopically examined; if the node appeared clearly free of disease, no further intra-operative assessment was performed; if the node was clearly metastatic or presented a dubious aspect, the pathologist proceeded with analysis on FS. T2-patients, enrolled in the study as reference group, were treated according to the institutional standard procedure; they all received SLN staging on FS. Results: The study included 395 T1-N0-patients. Among the 118 T1a–T1b-patients whose SLN was not analyzed at surgery, 12 (10.2%) were recalled for ALND. In the group of 258 T1c-patients, 112 received SLN analysis on FS and 146 did not. An SLN falsely negative either at macroscopic or FS examination was found in 33 (12.8%) cases. Overall, the rate of recall for ALND was 11.6% as compared to 8.4% in T2-patients. Using the experimental protocol, the institution reached a 9.6% cost saving, as compared to the standard procedure. Conclusions: Omission of SLN intra-operative staging in T1-N0-patients is rather safe. It provides the institution with both management and economical advantages. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary dissection in breast cancer patients with negative SLNs. Evidence of a similar efficacy, in terms of survival and regional control, of this strategy as compared with axillary resection is based on few clinical trials. In 1998, we started a randomized study comparing the two strategies, and we present here its results. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Aim: To identify by means of clinical and histopathological features a subset of breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph-node (sN) micrometastases and metastatic disease confined only to the sN in order to spare them an unnecessary axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Materials and methods: From January 1998 to December 2004, 116 patients with sN micrometastases underwent standard ALND for early-stage (T1–2 N0 M0) invasive breast cancer; clinical and histopathologic parameters were prospectively collected and evaluated by means of univariate and logistic regression analysis in order to identify which patients with sN micrometastases were free of metastasis in axillary non-sN. Results: Sixteen of 116 patients with sN micrometastases had tumour involvement of non-sN, with six and 10 patients having non-sN micrometastases and macrometastases, respectively. None of 19 patients with primary tumour measuring ≤10mm had tumour-positive non-sN; moreover, none of 15 patients with G1 tumours had non-sN metastases. The mean tumour size in patients with non-sN involvement was 21.3mm (range, 12–40mm). Univariate test of association between clinical and histopathologic features and non-sN status showed that the primary tumour size (P=0.005) and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (P=0.000) were the only significant predictors of non-sN involvement. By logistic regression, primary tumour size (P=0.011), lymphovascular invasion (P=0.001), and size of sN micrometastases were the only variables remaining into the model, although the latter parameter was not statistically significant. Conclusions: In patients with sN micrometastases, primary tumour size and lymphovascular invasion significantly predict non-sN status; notably, no patient with T1a–T1b and/or G1 tumours had non-sN metastases so that they could be spared an unnecessary ALND. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]