Search

The aim of this study was to describe the approaches of nurses working in an inpatient psychiatry clinic during the pandemic period to managing suicide risk in the context of their work atmosphere. This ethnographic research design used a sample of 13 psychiatric nurses in a psychiatric clinic in Ankara, Turkey. Data were collected with in-depth interviews and 612h of observation. Qualitative thematic analysis was used for data analysis. Two themes emerged from the data analysis, including 'De-prioritizing the uniqueness of the patient in managing suicide risk' and 'A condition that remains important for uniqueness: personality disorders'. The current risk assessment methods for suicide, pandemic measures, and past inadequacies in the approach to patients with personality disorders have revealed the risk of alienating from the individual risk factors as well as the patients' history in risk management. Risk management practices that consider the psychosocial assets of patients at risk of suicide, addressing the risk level with a safe measurement scale and performing triage according to this grading system can provide an atmosphere that allows nurses to make risk assessments greater self-confidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oncology patients are one of the groups with high suicide risk and it is emphasized that oncology nurses' suicide risk management knowledge and skills are insufficient. Several studies have underlined the need to create training programs specifically for oncology nurses to increase their level of awareness, knowledge, skill, and efficacy in recognizing and managing suicide risk. A valid and reliable scale is required to assess the efficacy of suicide risk management for oncology nurses. This study aimed to develop the Efficacy Perception Scale for Suicide Risk Management for Oncology Nurses and evaluate its psychometric properties. This methodological study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the authors conducted a literature review and qualitative study and examined other efficacy scales to generate items. In the second stage, the validity and reliability of the 26 items were determined. The scale content was validated based on feedback from 10 experts. Exploratory analysis of the scale was conducted with the data of 234 oncology nurses. Internal consistency and 2-week test-retest stability measured reliability. The scale's items met the required level of content validity (content validity rate = 0,62), were found to be understandable by 15 nurse (face validity), and all 26 items were retained in the item pool. The exploratory factor analysis extracted a unifactorial solution for the scale. The value of Cronbach's alpha for the scale was 0.96, and the inter-class reliability coefficient was 0.92. The scale is a valid and reliable scale that might be used to assess the efficacy perception of oncology nurses for suicide risk management. The assessment of oncology nurses' perceptions of efficacy in suicide risk management may enable the identification of training needs and the development of the content of suicide prevention trainings in parallel with the needs of nurses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]