Search

Abstract SHP2 is a ubiquitously expressed protein tyrosine phosphatase, which is involved in many signaling pathways to regulate the skeletal development. In endochondral ossification, SHP2 is known to modify the osteogenic fate of osteochondroprogenitors and to impair the osteoblastic transdifferentiation of hypertrophic chondrocytes. However, how SHP2 regulates osteoblast differentiation in intramembranous ossification remains incompletely understood. To address this question, we generated a mouse model to ablate SHP2 in the Prrx1-expressing mesenchymal progenitors by using "Cre-loxP"-mediated gene excision and examined the development of calvarial bone, in which the main process of bone formation is intramembranous ossification. Phenotypic characterization showed that SHP2 mutants have severe defects in calvarial bone formation. Cell lineage tracing and in situ hybridization data showed less osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal cells and reduced osteogenic genes expression, respectively. Further mechanistic studies revealed enhanced TGFβ and suppressed BMP2 signaling in SHP2 ablated mesenchymal progenitors and their derivatives. Our study uncovered the critical role of SHP2 in osteoblast differentiation through intramembranous ossification and might provide a potential target to treat craniofacial skeleton disorders. Highlights • SHP2 is required for intramembranous ossification. • SHP2 regulates the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal progenitors. • SHP2 in Prrx1+ mesenchymal progenitors modifies BMP2 and TGFβ signaling and osteogenic transcription factor expression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • iNKT subsets are defined by expression of lineage specifying transcription factors. • Epigenetic mechanisms are critical for regulating gene expression. • DNA methyltransferases and TET proteins control the dynamics of DNA methylation. • TET proteins exert multifaceted roles in regulating gene expression. • iNKT cell lineage specification is controlled by TET proteins. Abstract During the last years, intensive research has shed light in the transcriptional networks that shape the invariant NKT (iNKT) cell lineage and guide the choices towards functionally distinct iNKT cell subsets (Constantinides and Bendelac, 2013; Engel and Kronenberg, 2014; Gapin, 2016; Kim et al., 2015). However, the epigenetic players that regulate gene expression and orchestrate the iNKT cell lineage choices remain poorly understood. Here, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of epigenetic regulation of iNKT cell development and lineage choice. Particular emphasis is placed on DNA modifications and the Ten Eleven Translocation (TET) family of DNA demethylases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most single-cell approaches to date are based on destructive snapshot measurements which do not permit to correlate a current molecular state with future fate. However, to understand how cell fate choices are established by transcription factor networks (TFNs) regulating cell fates, TFN dynamics must be continuously monitored in single cells. Here we review how quantitative time-lapse imaging can contribute to understanding TFN dependent cell fate regulation at the single-cell level. We outline potentials of the technology and highlight challenges for interpreting the dynamics of fluorescent protein reporters that may interfere with endogenous TF function. We provide an outlook on how continuous observation of TF dynamics and single-cell fates may be complemented by perturbation studies and be linked to multidimensional molecular profiling in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the last decade significant advances have been made toward reprogramming the fate of somatic cells, typically by overexpression of cell lineage-determinant transcription factors. As key regulators of cell fate, the SOX family of transcription factors has emerged as potent drivers of direct somatic cell reprogramming into multiple lineages, in some cases as the sole overexpressed factor. The vast capacity of SOX factors, especially those of the SOXB1, E and F subclasses, to reprogram cell fate is enlightening our understanding of organismal development, cancer and disease, and offers tremendous potential for regenerative medicine and cell-based therapies. Understanding the molecular mechanisms through which SOX factors reprogram cell fate is essential to optimize the development of novel somatic cell transdifferentiation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The combinatorial action of transcription factors drives cell-type-specific gene expression patterns. However, transcription factor binding and gene regulation occur in the context of chromatin, which modulates DNA accessibility. High-resolution chromatin interaction maps have defined units of chromatin that are in spatial proximity, called topologically associated domains (TADs). TADs can be further classified based on expression activity, replication timing, or the histone marks or non-histone proteins associated with them. Independently, other chromatin domains have been defined by their likelihood to interact with non-DNA structures, such as the nuclear lamina. Lamina-associated domains (LADs) correlate with low gene expression and late replication timing. TADs and LADs have recently been evaluated with respect to cell-type-specific gene expression. The results shed light on the relevance of these forms of chromatin organization for transcriptional regulation, and address specifically how chromatin sequestration influences cell fate decisions during organismal development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Positive autoregulation is an effective mechanism for the long-term maintenance of a transcription factor’s expression. This strategy is widely deployed in cell lineages, where the autoregulatory factor controls the activity of a battery of genes that constitute the differentiation program of a postmitotic cell type. In Drosophila, the Notch pathway transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless activates its own expression, specifically in the socket cell of external sensory organs, via an autoregulatory enhancer called the ASE. Here, we show that the ASE is composed of several enhancer submodules, each of which can independently initiate weak Su(H) autoregulation. Cross-activation by these submodules is critical to ensure that Su(H) rises above a threshold level necessary to activate a maintenance submodule, which then sustains long-term Su(H) autoregulation. Our study reveals the use of interlinked positive-feedback loops to control autoregulation dynamically and provides mechanistic insight into initiation, establishment, and maintenance of the autoregulatory state. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]