Search

• This study introduces a taxonomically revised and credible occurrence dataset of Stachytarpheta in Brazil, including 4843 different specimens covering 90 species. • Stachytarpheta exhibit remarkable species richness and endemism particularly in the campos rupestres and savannas of the Espinhaço Range and Chapada dos Veadeiros. • A strong correlation exists between specimen occurrences and proximity to roads. Rarefaction curves show ongoing potential for species discovery in Tocantins state. • Temporal analysis shows an upward trend in occurrence records from 1970 to 2010 but declines in funding for scientific initiatives may have impeded recent collection efforts. Stachytarpheta (Verbenaceae) encompasses approximately 120 species distributed throughout tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas, with Brazil boasting the highest species richness (90 spp.) and endemism (82 spp.). This study introduces an updated, taxonomically revised, and credible occurrence dataset focusing on Stachytarpheta species in Brazil, comprising 4,843 records. This dataset results from expert revision of herbarium collections and integration with global repositories alongside national repositories in Brazil. It facilitates a thorough exploration of the temporal, geographical, and taxonomic patterns of Stachytarpheta across diverse regions and landscapes in Brazil. Stachytarpheta species and their occurrence records are concentrated in the states of Minas Gerais, Bahia, and Goiás, particularly in the campo rupestre and savanna formations of the Espinhaço Range and Chapada dos Veadeiros. Analysis of potential biases within our dataset revealed a correlation between specimen occurrences and proximity to roads. Rarefaction curves indicate ongoing potential for species discovery within the Cerrado and Caatinga domains, with the Tocantins state emerging as a particularly promising area for novel findings; therefore, presenting opportunities for exploration. The majority of the specimens are housed in Brazilian herbaria, particularly at RB, HUEFS, and CESJ. Temporal analysis of occurrence records showed an upward trend during the 20th century and the first decade of the 21st century, which can be attributed to the efforts of generalist collectors working mostly in Eastern and Central Brazil. Most collection efforts were carried out through Brazilian and European initiatives, often supported by local funding, especially during the mid-20th century. However, funding for scientific initiatives in Brazil has waned since the mid-2010s, potentially affecting recent trends in species recording. Our dataset serves as a resource enabling subsequent analysis delving into the systematics, biogeography, and conservation of this remarkable genus from open vegetation formations in Brazil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Spiders at 23 Portuguese protected area sites were sampled (pitfall trapped) over 10-month periods. The data allowed for a “biodiversity quality” assessment consisting of the following indices: Species Richness, Biomass, Simpson Index, Species Conservation Value Index and Population Density. These “biodiversity quality” characteristics were reviewed for relative indication of site spider “biodiversity quality”. Spiders are proposed as a group of organisms that could be used to indicate part of the “biodiversity quality” of a site since they can be sampled in a standardised way and yield biodiversity indices for comparison spatially and temporally. The approach adopted in this paper allows a range of “biodiversity quality” indices to be measured for spiders in Portuguese protected areas which, in turn requires decisions from scientists, managers and politicians on what element or characteristic of biodiversity it is intended to be targeted. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Despite their high diversity and importance for humankind, invertebrates are often neglected in biodiversity conservation policies. We identify seven impediments to their effective protection: (1) invertebrates and their ecological services are mostly unknown to the general public (the public dilemma); (2) policymakers and stakeholders are mostly unaware of invertebrate conservation problems (the political dilemma); (3) basic science on invertebrates is scarce and underfunded (the scientific dilemma); (4) most species are undescribed (the Linnean shortfall); (5) the distribution of described species is mostly unknown (the Wallacean shortfall); (6) the abundance of species and their changes in space and time are unknown (the Prestonian shortfall); (7) species ways of life and sensitivities to habitat change are largely unknown (the Hutchinsonian shortfall). Numerous recent developments in taxonomy, inventorying, monitoring, data compilation, statistical analysis and science communication facilitate overcoming these impediments in both policy and practice. We suggest as possible solutions for the public dilemma: better public information and marketing. For the political dilemma: red-listing, legal priority listing and inclusion in environmental impact assessment studies. For the scientific dilemma: parataxonomy, citizen science programs and biodiversity informatics. For the Linnean shortfall: biodiversity surrogacy, increased support for taxonomy and advances in taxonomic publications. For the Wallacean shortfall: funding of inventories, compilation of data in public repositories and species distribution modeling. For the Prestonian shortfall: standardized protocols for inventorying and monitoring, widespread use of analogous protocols and increased support for natural history collections. For the Hutchinsonian shortfall: identifying good indicator taxa and studying extinction rates by indirect evidence. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

A number of alternative approaches have been suggested during recent years to predict species richness of a given taxa, while retaining information on the identities of the observed individuals. Such information can be extremely useful for choosing conservation priority areas, either by using simple richness values or, preferentially, by considering the complementarity of potential sites. Among the most popular approaches is the use of higher taxa surrogates. Both family and genus richness are here tested in their ability to predict the number of spider (Araneae) species independently of sampling effort, geographical location and type of habitat. We use data from three Portuguese protected areas as a test case. Genus richness is considered a good surrogate of species richness, despite some caution being needed regarding the comparison of sites with considerably different sampling effort, the same not happening with families. Only genera are also found to be reliable either for ranking sites according to taxa richness or for determining near-minimum sets of sites for conservation. We therefore recommend surrogacy at this taxonomic level as a promising approach for the prediction of spider species richness or evaluation and ranking of areas according to their conservation importance. The reached conclusions should uphold for Portugal and the entire Mediterranean region. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]