Search

Objective Cardiac troponins T (cTnT) and I (cTnI) are the preferred biomarkers to detect myocardial damage. The present study explores the value of measuring cardiac troponins (cTn) in nursing home residents, by investigating its relation to heart failure and 1-year mortality using 1 cTnT and 2 cTnI assays that are widely used in clinical practice. Design All participants underwent extensive clinical examinations and echocardiographic assessment for the diagnosis of heart failure. cTn was measured using high-sensitive (hs)- cTnT (Roche), hs-cTnI (Abbott), and sensitive cTnI (Beckman) assays. The glomerular filtration rate was estimated (eGFR) using serum creatinine and cystatin C concentrations. Data on all-cause mortality were collected at 1-year follow-up. Participants and Setting Participants were 495 long-term nursing home residents, older than 65 years, of 5 Dutch nursing home organizations. Results Median (IQR) concentrations were 20.6 (17.8–30.6), 6.8 (4.1–12.5), and 4.0 (2.0–8.0) ng/L for hs-cTnT, hs-cTnI, and cTnI, respectively. In total, 79% had elevated hs-cTnT concentrations, whereas only 9% and 5% of hs-cTnI and cTnI concentrations were elevated. Most important and independent determinants for higher hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI concentrations were heart failure and renal dysfunction. Whereas both heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 3.4) and eGFR lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (OR 3.6) were equal contributors to higher hs-cTnT concentrations (all P < .001), hs-cTnI and cTnI were less associated with renal dysfunction (OR of, respectively, 1.9 and 2.1; P < .01) in comparison with heart failure (OR 4.3 and 4.7, respectively, P < .001). Furthermore, residents with higher hs-cTnT or hs-cTnI concentrations (fourth quartile) had respectively 4 versus 2 times more risk of 1-year mortality compared with lower concentrations. Conclusion Regardless of their cardiac health, hs-cTnT but not hs-cTnI concentrations were elevated in almost all aged nursing home residents, questioning the use of the current diagnostic cutoff in elderly with high comorbidity. Nonetheless, measuring cardiac troponins, especially hs-cTnT, had a promising role in assessing future risk of mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The study aim was to determine the prognostic value of a multimarker strategy for risk-assessment in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with dyspnea. Background: Combining biomarkers with different pathophysiological backgrounds may improve risk stratification in dyspneic patients in the ED. Methods: The study prospectively investigated the prognostic value of the biomarkers N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), Cystatin-C (Cys-C), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and Galectin-3 (Gal-3) for 90-day mortality in 603 patients presenting to the ED with dyspnea as primary complaint. Results: hs-CRP, hs-cTnT, Cyst-C, and NT-proBNP were independent predictors of 90-day mortality. The number of elevated biomarkers was highly associated with outcome (odds ratio: 2.94 per biomarker, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.29 to 3.78, p < 0.001). A multimarker approach had incremental value beyond a single-marker approach. Our multimarker emergency dyspnea-risk score (MARKED-risk score) incorporating age ≥75 years, systolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg, history of heart failure, dyspnea New York Heart Association functional class IV, hs-cTnT ≥0.04 μg/l, hs-CRP ≥25 mg/l, and Cys-C ≥1.125 mg/l had excellent prognostic performance (area under the curve: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.89), was robust in internal validation analyses and could identify patients with very low (<3 points), intermediate (≥3, <5 points), and high risk (≥5 points) of 90-day mortality (2%, 14%, and 44% respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: A multimarker strategy provided superior risk stratification beyond any single-marker approach. The MARKED-risk score that incorporates hs-cTnT, hs-CRP, and Cys-C along with clinical risk factors accurately identifies patients with very low, intermediate, and high risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]