Search

• The study examined the deterioration in FMS and its predictive value for functional disability (FD) progression in Parkinson's disease (PD). • Utilized data from the Taiwan Data Bank of Persons with Disability, assessing FMS (like pen-holding, buttoning, and knotting) and FD through the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. • Significant correlations between the decline in FMS and FD. • Deterioration in buttoning ability was notably correlated with overall FD worsening. • Baseline FMS were indicative of future FD progression, particularly in cognition, motility, and life activity areas. Parkinson disease (PD) caused substantially disability. The impairment of fine motor skills (FMSs) is correlated with the severity of functional disability (FD) cross-sectionally in people with PD (PwP). The present study investigated the decline in FMSs and the predictive value of baseline FMSs for the progression of FD. People with moderate-to-advanced PD who received two evaluations within 1–5 years were identified from the Taiwan Data Bank of Persons with Disability database. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) was used to evaluate FD, and FMSs including pen-holding, buttoning, and knotting were assessed. Our study included 2,271 people with moderate-to-advanced PD. We observed annual progression of FD in each domain of the WHODAS 2.0, with no difference between the sexes. The most significant correlation between FD and FMSs was that of decline in buttoning ability and deterioration of summary WHODAS 2.0 scores. Deterioration in FD across all domains of WHODAS 2.0 was associated with at least one FMS. The extent of disability in all three types of FMS at baseline was also correlated with deterioration of motility. Additionally, baseline disability in buttoning was significantly correlated with cognitive decline, and disability in knotting was significantly associated with the progression of FD. FMSs may be reliable markers for further FD, particularly in the areas of cognition, motility, and life activity. Because of the significant FD observed in people with moderate-to-advanced PD, the availability of predictors is essential for applying precautionary measures and providing appropriate treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Seven latent statuses of physical function were identified. • Physical function decline progress in some typical stages. • Indicative limitation and transition trend are useful for developing preventive intervention and tailored care for physically limited elderly. Multiple limitations often co-occur and accumulate, leading to subsequent function decline. However, there is a scarcity of longitudinal studies examining the progression of physical function among the general population of older adults in China. This study aimed to define typical physical function status and its change, which were characterized by the coexistence and accumulation of diverse limitations targeting a Chinese sample of older adults. This study used the three recent public data waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey during a 6-year follow-up period. 9765 individuals who were over 65 and participated in the 2011 survey were included. Latent transition analysis was used to identify the latent physical function status and explore the transition of older adults among different latent statuses. Seven latent statuses of physical function were identified, with visual impairment and related limitations being particularly prevalent among older adults. Upper limb mobility appeared to be a differentiated indicator of physical functional status. Physical function decline mainly started with the limitations in squatting, carrying weights and walking, then to the status with intact upper limb mobility and hearing function only, or converted directly into the latter, then to complete dysfunction. Our findings suggest some indicative limitations and critical steps in the process of functional decline among older adults. These results may provide insight for researchers and policymakers to develop tailored preventive and rehabilitation care and provide support for physically limited elderly according to their latent status and course of functional decline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Patients with incontinence had a higher mortality rate compared to the continent. • Incontinence is a marker of vulnerability, explaining differences in mortality. • Every fourth patient developed new-onset incontinence 1-year post-fracture. • Physical function is key in promoting continence in older women with hip fracture. To investigate the association of urinary incontinence (UI) and double incontinence (DI, concurrent UI and fecal incontinence) with one-year mortality among older female hip fracture patients and to identify predictors of incident UI and DI. A prospective cohort study 1,468 female patients aged ≥ 65 treated for their first hip fracture during the period 2007–2019 Continence status was elicited at baseline and one-year post-fracture. Age- and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards and multinomial logistic regression models were used to determine the associations of incontinence with one-year mortality and to examine the associations of baseline predictors with incident UI and DI respectively. Of the women with no incontinence, UI and DI, 78 (13%), 159 (23%) and 60 (34%), died during follow-up. UI (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.31–2.26) and DI (HR 2.61, 95% CI 1.86–3.66) were associated with mortality after adjusting for age. These associations lost their predictive power in multivariable analysis while age over 90, living in an institution, impaired mobility, poor nutrition, polypharmacy, and late removal of urinary catheter remained associated with mortality. Of continent women, 128 (21%) developed UI and 23 (4%) DI during follow-up. In multivariable analysis, impaired mobility was associated with incident UI (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.48–4.44) and DI (OR 4.82, 95% CI 1.70–13.7), as well as living in an institution (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.56–7.61 and OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.17–13.0). Underlying vulnerability likely explains differences in mortality between continence groups and development of incident UI and DI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare the Fried criteria for frailty diagnosis with the Frailty Screening Index (FSI) and the fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and loss of weight (FRAIL) scale in older patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We conducted a retrospective 1-year follow-up cohort study of adult inpatients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation program between June 2016 and September 2018. We included 1472 Japanese patients age 65 years and older with CVD. After excluding 765 patients with incomplete frailty measurements, 707 patients were included in the analysis. Frailty and physical function were measured before hospital discharge according to each of the 3 definitions. Outcomes were all-cause mortality and physical dysfunction. The prevalence of frailty according to the Fried criteria, the FRAIL scale, and the FSI was 213 (30.1%), 181 (25.6%), and 186 (26.3%), respectively. The FSI and the FRAIL scale showed moderate agreement with the Fried criteria [vs FSI: K = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–0.59; vs FRAIL scale: K = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37–0.52; all P <.001]. We found a significant correlation between all-cause mortality and frailty assessed by all of the definitions, even after multivariate adjustment [FSI: hazard ratio (HR): 2.43, 95% CI: 1.30–4.58, P =.006; FRAIL scale: HR: 2.32, 95% CI: 1.21–4.45, P =.011; Fried criteria: HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.04–3.82, P =.038). However, the prediction accuracy of the FRAIL scale was higher than that of the FSI and comparable to that of the Fried criteria for physical dysfunction. The FSI and the FRAIL scale showed moderate agreement with the Fried criteria regarding frailty diagnostic performance and had comparable prognostic value. However, only the FRAIL scale was as accurate as the Fried criteria in screening for physical dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Slowness, generally assessed by walking speed (WS), is an estimator of frailty and its outcomes. Because of potential difficulties in assessing WS, the Moberg picking-up test (MPUT) might be an alternative. This study investigated the capacity of slowness measurements (WS and MPUT) to predict nonfatal adverse consequences of frailty: primarily, decline in basic activities of daily living (BADL); and secondarily, decline in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), fall, hospitalization, and incident disease. Observational (prospective longitudinal study). This study used data from the population-based Lausanne cohort 65+. At baseline, 1887 individuals (aged 72-77 years) completed both WS (time to walk 20 m at usual pace) and MPUT (time to pick up 12 objects) assessments. All outcomes, assessed at 1- and 4-year follow-ups, were entered in separate logistic regression models with adjustment for age, sex, and respective values at baseline. The prediction of all outcomes by either WS or MPUT was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and compared by χ2 tests. There were positive associations between slowness either assessed by WS [relative risk (RR) = 2.48; P <.001] or MPUT (RR = 1.91; P <.001) and decline in BADL at 1-year follow-up. These associations remained significant at 4-year follow-up for both WS (RR = 2.28; P <.001) and MPUT (RR = 1.95; P <.001). There was no significant difference between predictive values of slow WS and MPUT for decline in BADL at 1-year (P =.328) and 4-year follow-ups (P =.413). The prediction was not significantly different for secondary outcomes, except for decline in IADL for which the prediction was slightly better for WS. MPUT may be an alternative measurement of slowness with predictive value of functional decline. No significant difference in predictive capabilities of MPUT and WS for specific adverse consequences of frailty is promising in favor of using MPUT for measuring slowness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Slow gait speed and sit-to-stand performance are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in older adults. Identifying older adults with functional performance "below norms" is the first step toward prevention. We aimed to (1) examine the associations of age, body height, and gender with gait speed and sit-to-stand performance and (2) develop subgroup-specific reference ranges in older adults with no self-reported mobility limitations. Cross-sectional study. This study analyzed data from 775 community-dwelling older adults who reported no difficulty walking 100 m, climbing stairs, and rising from the chair. Gait speed and sit-to-stand performance were measured by the 10-m gait speed test and 5-times sit-to-stand test, respectively. Bayesian linear regression was used to derive 95% reference ranges for gait speed and sit-to-stand performance, defined by different levels of age, body height, and gender. Overall, 95% reference range was 0.89-1.79 m/s for habitual gait speed and 7.4-27.9 stands/30 s for sit-to-stand pace. Age had the highest posterior probability (>99%) of a meaningful association with both functional outcomes. Additionally, height was strongly associated with gait speed: a 10-cm increase in height was associated with 0.07 m/s (95% credible interval, 0.05-0.10) faster gait speed. For sit-to-stand test, the lower 95% reference range limits tended to be similar across gender and gender-specific height subgroups, owing to the associations of faster sit-to-stand pace with shorter height and male gender. Because extensive tables of reference ranges are impractical, a web-based application (https://sghpt.shinyapps.io/ippts/) is created to provide subgroup-specific reference ranges. In a large sample of mobile-intact older adults, reference ranges for gait speed and sit-to-stand performance differed meaningfully by age. Furthermore, gait speed was stature dependent. Although requiring validation, our findings may be used to define subgroup-specific "below-range" values and to complement existing universal clinical cut points for gait speed and sit-to-stand performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psychological traits, such as character strengths, have been already established in experimental studies as factors playing a favorable role for well-being and potentially reducing the risk of depression. Positive associations have been also reported between character strengths and physical fitness, self-reported physical and mental health. Yet, evidence with large scale, epidemiological data on the role of character strength of honesty and integrity (CSHI) in shaping subsequent health outcomes and daily functioning remains unexplored. We examined whether the character strength of honesty and integrity was prospectively associated with six physical health outcomes, two depression outcomes, and two daily functioning outcomes. We used data from the Health and Retirement Study obtained from a sample of 9813 older adults. We found that after a 4-year follow-up period, compared with individuals who scored the lowest in CSHI, participants who scored in the third tertile had a 18% lower risk of lung disease (RR = 0.824; 95% CI = 0.732; 0.927), and a 11% lower risk of depression (RR = 0.891; 95% CI = 0.806; 0.986). They also reported lower limitations in mobility (β = −0.048; 95% CI (−0.089; −0.008)] and less difficulty in instrumental activities of daily living [β = −0.088; 95% CI (−0.128; −0.047)]. These associations were independent of demographics, prior socioeconomic status, psychological factors, health conditions, and health behaviors. Policy makers and practitioners may consider the character strength of honesty and integrity as a factor for promoting healthy longevity, limiting risks of becoming physically inactive and reducing risk of physical and mental disease. • The role of character strength of honesty and integrity (CSHI) for health is examined. • CSHI is a significant predictor of subsequent physical and mental health outcomes. • CSHI is significantly associated with subsequent daily functioning outcomes. • CSHI may be a factor for promoting healthy longevity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although several studies have demonstrated the associations between lifetime cumulative adversity and late-life physical health, many of them were conducted at a single time point and examined events that occurred in childhood only. Less is known about the effect of lifelong adversity on the aging process over time. This study aimed to investigate the impact of cumulative adversity on the accelerated deterioration in health over time - mobility limitation and self-rated state of health in old age. This study provides a 14-year, 6-time-point follow-up on a representative sample of Europeans using the SHARE Project - longitudinal survey panel. The sample included a total of 7195 respondents aged 65 and older from nine countries in Europe. The outcome measurements were the number of mobility limitations and self-rated health – trajectories along 6 measurements. The independent variable was Lifetime Cumulative Adversity, and the analyses included also control variables – age, gender, socioeconomic status, depression, and country. Time-based Latent Growth Curve Modeling has demonstrated that the effects of Lifetime Cumulative Adversity were significant on both health measures, by means of the intercepts and the slopes: Greater experience of adversities correlated with a higher physical health impairment at baseline and a higher decline along time. The effects of self-rated health were weaker than the effects of mobility limitations. Given that the populations of numerous countries are rapidly aging, understanding the risk factors associated with health deterioration is important, especially for policymakers and medical health care experts, to raise awareness of the relationship between lifelong adversity and health decline and to build preventive interventions to deal with these consequences. • Evaluated a 14-year growth model of cumulative adversity and late-life physical health. • Used Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe as database. • Higher cumulative adversity was related to an accelerated decline in health. • The effects on mobility limitation were stronger than self-rated health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]