Search

Objective: The aeration status of the middle ear is presumed to be one of the factors affecting the outcome in acquired cholesteatoma. The present study investigated the impact of postoperative middle ear aeration on hearing and recurrence after intact canal wall tympanoplasty.Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 127 pars flaccida cholesteatoma patients who underwent primary intact canal wall tympanoplasty at a tertiary academic medical center. We collected data on clinical characteristics, including extent of cholesteatoma, surgical procedure, pre- and postoperative middle ear aeration, hearing level, and recurrence. The aeration was measured before and at one year after operation on two axial computed tomography (CT) planes: at the lateral semicircular canal (mastoid cavity) and at the oval window (tympanic cavity). Based on the postoperative air-bone gap (ABG), patients were categorized into two groups: the successful hearing (ABG ≤15 dB) group and the unsuccessful hearing (ABG >15 dB) group. We used aeration ratio to assess the relationship between postoperative aeration improvement and hearing outcome or recurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors associated with hearing outcome.Results: At one year after operation, aeration ratio in both mastoid and tympanic cavities was significantly improved than the preoperative status (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The positive correlation was found between postoperative aeration ratios of mastoid cavity and tympanic cavity (r = 0.348, p < 0.001, Spearman's rank-correlation coefficient). In mastoid and tympanic cavities, the postoperative aeration ratio in successful hearing group (n = 57) was significantly higher than that in the unsuccessful hearing group (n = 45) at one year after operation (p < 0.001, p = 0.028, respectively, Mann-Whitney U test). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that postoperative aeration ratio in mastoid cavity and preoperative ABG were significant independent prognostic factors for successful hearing (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.630 [0.985 - 7.024], p = 0.045; 0.891[0.840 - 0.944], p < 0.001, respectively). However, postoperative aeration ratios did not significantly differ between with (n = 14) and without recurrence (n = 113) groups in both cavities.Conclusion: Our results suggest that better postoperative aeration in mastoid cavity is independently associated with satisfactory hearing outcome after intact canal wall tympanoplasty in pars flaccida cholesteatoma. However, no significant differences were observed between middle ear aeration at one year after operation and recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]