Search

We tested the interactive effect of feedback and reward on visuospatial working memory in children with ADHD. Seventeen boys with ADHD and 17 Normal Control (NC) boys underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing four visuospatial 2-back tasks that required monitoring the spatial location of letters presented on a display. Tasks varied in reward size (large; small) and feedback availability (no-feedback; feedback). While the performance of NC boys was high in all conditions, boys with ADHD exhibited higher performance (similar to those of NC boys) only when they received feedback associated with large-reward. Performance pattern in both groups was mirrored by neural activity in an executive function neural network comprised of few distinct frontal brain regions. Specifically, neural activity in the left and right middle frontal gyri of boys with ADHD became normal-like only when feedback was available, mainly when feedback was associated with large-reward. When feedback was associated with small-reward, or when large-reward was expected but feedback was not available, boys with ADHD exhibited altered neural activity in the medial orbitofrontal cortex and anterior insula. This suggests that contextual support normalizes activity in executive brain regions in children with ADHD, which results in improved working memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ADHD, sleep, and ADHD treatments are highly interrelated. In this review, we describe the effects of stimulants and non stimulant medications on sleep in children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD. Clinical predictors of sleep problems during pharmacotherapy include age, sleep problems prior to initiating treatment, and dose and dosing schedule. As yet, we have little understanding of the biological or genetic factors related to individual variation in drug response and sleep. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify patient- and treatment-level factors that predict intervention engagement and outcome for adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), guiding efforts to enhance care.Method: Integrative data analysis was used to pool data from 4 randomized controlled trials of adolescent ADHD treatment with participants (N = 854) receiving various evidence-based behavioral therapy packages in 5 treatment arms (standard [STANDARD], comprehensive [COMP], engagement-focused [ENGAGE]), community-based usual care (UC), or no treatment (NOTX). Participants also displayed varying medication use patterns (negligible, inconsistent, consistent) during the trial. Regression and latent growth curve analyses examined treatment- and patient-level predictors of engagement and outcome.Results: Compared with COMP, ENGAGE was associated with higher parent engagement in behavioral therapy (d = 1.35-1.73) when delivered in university, but not community, clinics. Under some conditions, ENGAGE also predicted youth engagement in behavioral therapy (d = 1.21) and lower likelihood of negligible medication use (odds ratio = 0.49 compared with NOTX). UC was associated with poorer parent engagement compared with COMP (d = -0.59) and negligible medication use (odds ratio = 2.29) compared with NOTX. Compared with COMP, ENGAGE (in university settings) was consistently associated with larger ADHD symptom improvements (d = 0.41-0.83) at 6-month follow-up and sometimes associated with larger grade point average (d = 0.68) and parent-teen conflict (d = 0.41) improvements. Consistent medication use during behavioral therapy was associated with larger improvements in ADHD symptoms (d = 0.28) and parent-teen conflict (d = 0.25-0.36). An ADHD+internalizing clinical profile predicted larger improvements in grade point average (d = 0.45). Family adversity predicted poorer parent and youth engagement (rate ratio = 0.90-0.95), negligible medication use (odds ratio = 1.22), and smaller improvements in grade point average (d = -0.23). African American race predicted smaller improvements in parent-teen conflict (d = -0.49).Conclusion: Engagement-focused behavioral therapy and consistent medication use most frequently predicted stronger clinical engagement and outcomes for adolescents with ADHD. Youths who are African American or who experience family adversity may demonstrate treatment-related disparities for certain outcomes; youths with ADHD+internalizing symptoms may demonstrate excellent academic outcomes following behavioral therapy.Data Sharing: The full ADHD TIDAL dataset is publicly available through the National Data Archive (https://nda.nih.gov), including a data dictionary. The study protocol is also publicly available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02734-6. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It has been posited that glutamate dysregulation contributes to the pathophysiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Modulation of glutamate neurotransmission may provide alternative therapeutic options. The novel 2-amino-3-(5-methyl-3-oxo-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)propanoic acid receptor positive allosteric modulator Org 26576 was investigated with a translational approach including preclinical and clinical testing. Methods: Neonatal rat 6-hydroxydopamine lesion-induced hyperactivity was used as preclinical model. Seventy-eight ADHD adults entered a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover trial. After 1 week placebo lead-in, 67 subjects were randomized into one of four treatment sequences: sequence A (n = 15) Org 26576 (100 mg b.i.d.) for 3 weeks, followed by a 2-week placebo crossover and 3 weeks placebo; sequence B (n = 16) 5 weeks placebo followed by 3 weeks Org 26576 (100 mg b.i.d.); sequence C (n = 18) Org 26576 flexible dose (100–300 mg b.i.d.) for 3 weeks, then 5 weeks placebo; sequence D (n = 18) 5 weeks placebo followed by 3 weeks Org 26576 (100–300 mg b.i.d.). The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale was used to assess changes in ADHD symptomatology. Results: Org 26576 (1, 3, 10 mg/kg intraperitoneal) produced dose-dependent inhibition of locomotor hyperactivity in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Org 26576 (100 mg b.i.d.) was superior to placebo in treating symptoms of adult ADHD subjects. The primary Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale results were supported by some secondary analyses. However, Org 26576 (100–300 mg b.i.d.) did not confirm these results. Most frequently reported adverse events were nausea, dizziness, and headache. Conclusions: These preclinical and clinical findings suggest that Org 25676 may have utility in the treatment of ADHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Central dopaminergic activity is critical to the functioning of both motor and cognitive systems. Based on the therapeutic action of dopaminergic agents in treating attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), ADHD symptoms may be related to a reduction in central dopaminergic activity. We tested the hypothesis that dopaminergic activity, as reflected by plasma homovanillic acid (pHVA), may be related to dimensional aspects of ADHD in adults. Subjects were 30 healthy volunteer and 39 personality disordered subjects, in whom morning basal pHVA concentration and a dimensional measure of childhood ADHD symptoms (Wender Utah Rating Scale: WURS) were obtained. A significant inverse correlation was found between WURS Total score and pHVA concentration in the total sample. Among WURS factor scores, a significant inverse relationship was noted between pHVA and history of “childhood learning problems”. Consistent with the dopaminergic dysfunction hypothesis of ADHD and of cognitive function, pHVA concentrations were correlated with childhood history of ADHD symptoms in general and with history of “learning problems” in non-ADHD psychiatric patients and controls. Replication is needed in treated and untreated ADHD samples to confirm these initial results. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• ADHD occurs in 5.9 % of youth and 2.5 % of adults. • Most cases of ADHD are caused by the combined effects of many genetic and environmental risks. • There are small differences in the brain between people with and without ADHD. • Untreated ADHD can lead to many adverse outcomes. • ADHD costs society hundreds of billions of dollars each year, worldwide. Misconceptions about ADHD stigmatize affected people, reduce credibility of providers, and prevent/delay treatment. To challenge misconceptions, we curated findings with strong evidence base. We reviewed studies with more than 2000 participants or meta-analyses from five or more studies or 2000 or more participants. We excluded meta-analyses that did not assess publication bias, except for meta-analyses of prevalence. For network meta-analyses we required comparison adjusted funnel plots. We excluded treatment studies with waiting-list or treatment as usual controls. From this literature, we extracted evidence-based assertions about the disorder. We generated 208 empirically supported statements about ADHD. The status of the included statements as empirically supported is approved by 80 authors from 27 countries and 6 continents. The contents of the manuscript are endorsed by 366 people who have read this document and agree with its contents. Many findings in ADHD are supported by meta-analysis. These allow for firm statements about the nature, course, outcome causes, and treatments for disorders that are useful for reducing misconceptions and stigma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Normal brain development is highly dependent on adequate levels of iodine and thyroid hormone. It has been suggested that Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is the consequence of prenatal thyroidal endocrine disruption. The hypothesis was examined using neonatal thyroxine levels as a bio-marker of prenatal thyroid status and comparing it to subsequent development of ADHD.Design and methods: In a matched case-control study, cases were defined as children diagnosed with ADHD, while children born in the same hospital and tested on the same day served as matched controls. Conditional logistic regression analysis with unequal numbers of controls was performed.Results: The neonatal thyroxine levels were within normal limits for each of the children who were subsequently diagnosed as having ADHD, and their distribution was no different from that of their controls.Conclusions: Children diagnosed with ADHD do not demonstrate prenatal thyroidal dysfunction as reflected in the newborn thyroxine levels, therefore neonatal thyroxine levels are not a bio-marker for the subsequent development of ADHD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: Methylphenidate has prominent effects in the dopamine-rich striatum that are absent for the selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor atomoxetine. This study tested whether baseline striatal activation would predict differential response to the two medications in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Method: A total of 36 youth with ADHD performed a Go/No-Go test during functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline and were treated with methylphenidate and atomoxetine using a randomized cross-over design. Whole-brain task-related activation was regressed on clinical response.Results: Task-related activation in right caudate nucleus was predicted by an interaction of clinical responses to methylphenidate and atomoxetine (F1,30 = 17.00; p < .001). Elevated caudate activation was associated with robust improvement for methylphenidate and little improvement for atomoxetine. The rate of robust response was higher for methylphenidate than for atomoxetine in youth with high (94.4% vs. 38.8%; p = .003; number needed to treat = 2, 95% CI = 1.31-3.73) but not low (33.3% vs. 50.0%; p = .375) caudate activation. Furthermore, response to atomoxetine predicted motor cortex activation (F1,30 = 14.99; p < .001).Conclusion: Enhanced caudate activation for response inhibition may be a candidate biomarker of superior response to methylphenidate over atomoxetine in youth with ADHD, purportedly reflecting the dopaminergic effects of methylphenidate but not atomoxetine in the striatum, whereas motor cortex activation may predict response to atomoxetine. These data do not yet translate directly to the clinical setting, but the approach is potentially important for informing future research and illustrates that it may be possible to predict differential treatment response using a biomarker-driven approach.Clinical Trial Registration Information: Stimulant Versus Nonstimulant Medication for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children; https://clinicaltrials.gov/; NCT00183391. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]