Search

Rock mass characterization is required for many applications in rock engineering practice including excavation design, support design, stope design, amongst others. For these purposes, it is necessary to obtain design input parameters such as deformation moduli and strength parameters for numerical modeling. Although such parameters can ultimately be determined from in situ tests, at the preliminary design stage, where access to underground is limited, the practical way to obtain these parameters is to apply a rock mass classification system to characterize the rock mass and estimate the rock mass properties. Over the years, many classification systems, such as RQD, Rock Mass Rating, Q and Geological Strength Index (GSI) systems, have been developed. Amongst them, the Q system is widely used for rock support system design and the GSI system is used for estimating design parameters. The GSI system is the only rock mass classification system that is directly linked to engineering parameters such as Mohr–Coulomb, Hoek–Brown strength parameters or rock mass modulus. However, the application of the existing GSI system is hindered by the facts that the use of the system is to some extent subjective and requires long-term experience.In the present study, a quantitative approach to assist in the use of the GSI system is presented. It employs the block volume and a joint condition factor as quantitative characterization factors. The approach is built on the linkage between descriptive geological terms and measurable field parameters such as joint spacing and joint roughness. The newly developed approach adds quantitative means to facilitate use of the system, especially by inexperienced engineers.The GSI system is applied to characterize the jointed rock masses at two underground powerhouse cavern sites in Japan. GSI values are obtained from block volume and joint condition factor, which in turn are determined from site construction documents and field mapping data. Based on GSI values and intact rock strength properties, equivalent Mohr–Coulomb strength parameters and elastic modulus of the jointed rock mass are calculated and compared to in situ test results. The point estimate method is implemented to approximate the mean and variance of the mechanical properties of the jointed rock masses. It is seen that both the means and variances of strength and deformation parameters predicted from the GSI system are in good agreement with field test data. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]