Search

Background: Insufficient sleep is common nowadays and it can be associated with chronic pain., Objective: To describe the main polysomnographic findings in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and to estimate the association between sleep quality, polysomnography variables and chronic musculoskeletal pain., Methods: This cross-sectional research analyzed a database from polysomnography type 1 exams results and then collected data via an electronic form from these patients. The form collected sociodemographic data and presented clinical questionnaires for measuring sleep quality, sleepiness, pain intensity and central sensitization signs. Pearson's correlation coefficient and odds ratio were used to estimate the associations., Results: The mean age of the respondents was 55.1 (SD 13.4) years. The mean score of the Central Sensitization Inventory showed signs of central sensitization (50.1; SD 13.4) in the participants. Most patients (86%) had 1 or more nocturnal awakenings, 90% had one or more episodes of sleep apnea, 47% had Rapid Eye Movement sleep phase latency greater than 70-120 min and the mean sleep efficiency among all participants was 81.6%. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score was correlated with the CSI score (r = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.61). People with central sensitization signs have 2.6 times more chance to present sleep episodes of blood oxygen saturation below 90% (OR = 2.62; 95% CI:1.23, 6.47)., Conclusion: Most people with central sensitization signs had poor sleep quality, night waking episodes and specific disturbances in sleep phases. The findings showed association between central sensitization, sleep quality, nocturnal awakening, and changes in blood oxygen saturation during sleep., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients' beliefs have an important influence on the clinical management of low back pain and healthcare professionals should be prepared to address these beliefs. There is still a gap in the literature about the influence of patients' perceptions of their clinical diagnosis on the severity of their pain experience and disability., Objectives: To identify the perceptions of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain regarding the influence of their clinical diagnosis on pain, beliefs, and daily life activities., Methods: Qualitative study of 70 individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain. A semi structured interview was conducted about patients' beliefs and perceptions regarding the influence of clinical diagnosis on their daily activities and pain intensity., Results: Most participants believed that higher number of different clinical diagnoses for the same individual may be associated with high pain intensity and disability for daily activities and that pain and injury are directly related. Patients beliefs were grouped into four main themes: (1) pain has multifactorial explanation in physical dimension; (2) improvement expectation is extremely low in patients with chronic pain; (3) clinical diagnosis influences pain and disability levels; (4) clinical diagnosis is extremely valued by patients., Conclusions: Patients believe that there is a strong relationship between structural changes in the lower back, pain, and daily life activities; thus, providing evidence of a strong influence of the biomedical model on their beliefs., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)