Search

Background and Objective: The European, prospective, multicenter SATURN registry was developed to analyze surgical devices for male stress urinary incontinence. The primary objective is the cure rate during follow-up., Methods: Efficacy, complications, patient-reported outcomes, and prognostic factors are being analyzed at various intervals during 10-yr follow-up. The results at 1-yr follow-up are presented here., Key Findings and Limitations: The cohort included 1046 patients (mean age 70 yr) from 28 centers in nine countries. The main cause of incontinence was radical prostatectomy (83.5%), followed by radiotherapy (4.5%), endourological procedures (9.7%), neurogenic conditions (1.0%), and trauma (0.2%). Some 19.5% of the patients underwent at least one incontinence procedure before registry inclusion. A baseline pad test was performed in 64% of the patients (mean 525 g, range 3.5-3600), urodynamics in 66%, and cystoscopy in 80%. The main implants used were AMS800 (n = 684) and Advance (n = 210) devices, followed by Atoms (n = 63) Victo/Plus (n = 33), ProACT (n = 30), and others (n = 24). A total of 896 patients had 1-yr follow-up data, of whom 164 completed a 1-yr pad test. Self-reported complete incontinence rates at baseline by device were as follows: Advance, 17%; other slings, 33%; ProACT, 0%; AMS800, 49%; other sphincter prosthesis, 100%; and overall group, 44%. The corresponding 1-yr self-reported continence rates were 73%, 37%, 50%, 76%, 11%, and 68%. Some 32% of the patients were still incontinent. Overall, 132 patients had at least one revision. Among the 110 patients with an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), 122 revisions were performed, while there were 29 revisions for the 22 patients with a sling or ProACT device. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form and EuroQol 5-dimensions 5-levels scores improved with all devices., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: AUS implants are used in cases with more severe incontinence and are associated with better outcomes but more revisions than the alternatives. Patients report that every improvement is important. Choices for procedures should be made on the basis of these considerations., Patient Summary: We collected data from 29 urology departments in Europe on surgical treatments for patients who suffer from incontinence during exercise, sneezing, and coughing. Results after 1 year show that an artificial urinary sphincter has the best outcomes overall and for patients with heavy urine loss. However, this surgery also requires more revisions. Patients report that every improvement in continence is important to them., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Surgery for male incontinence with artificial urinary sphincters and slings (SATURN) is a prospective, multicentre registry (observational cohort) for male stress urinary incontinence surgery to collect prospective data from multiple European centres and surgeons, to evaluate the short- and long-term success and the impact on quality of life., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Adverse events induced by intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) to treat high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) often lead to treatment discontinuation. The EAU-RF NIMBUS trial found a reduced number of standard-dose BCG instillations to be inferior with the standard regimen. Nonetheless, it remains important to evaluate whether patients in the reduced BCG treatment arm had better quality of life (QoL) due to a possible reduction in toxicity or burden., Objective: To evaluate whether patients in the EAU-RF NIMBUS trial experienced better QoL after a reduced BCG instillation frequency., Design Setting and Participants: A total of 359 patients from 51 European sites were randomized to one of two treatment arms between December 2013 and July 2019. The standard frequency arm ( n  = 182) was 6 weeks of BCG induction followed by 3 weeks of maintenance at months 3, 6, and 12. The reduced frequency arm ( n  = 177) was BCG induction at weeks 1, 2, and 6, followed by maintenance instillations at weeks 1 and 3 of months 3, 6, and 12., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Analyses were performed using an intention-to-treat analysis and a per-protocol analysis. QoL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 version 3.0 (QLQ-C30 v.03) prior to the first and last instillations of each BCG cycle. Group differences were determined using linear regression corrected for QoL at baseline. Differences in QoL over time were tested for significance using a linear mixed model. Side effects were recorded by the treating physician using a standardized form. Chi-square tests were used to compare the side-effect frequency between the arms., Results and Limitations: There were no significant differences in the means of each QoL scale between the two arms. There were also no significant changes over time in all QoL domains for both arms. However, differences in the incidence of general malaise at T1 (before the last induction instillation), frequency, urgency, and dysuria at T7 (before the last maintenance instillation) were detected in favor of the reduced frequency arm., Conclusions: Reducing the BCG instillation frequency does not improve the QoL in NMIBC patients despite lower storage symptoms., Patient Summary: In this study, we evaluated whether a reduction in the number of received bacillus Calmette-Guérin instillations led to better quality of life in patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We found no difference in the quality of life between the standard and the reduced bacillus Calmette-Guérin instillation frequency. We conclude that reducing the number of instillations does not lead to better quality of life in patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer., (© 2023 The Author(s).)

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is useful for selected clinical indications in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) but it may have broader clinical utility owing to the emergence of lutetium-177-PSMA-617 ([ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA) therapy. However, robust data regarding the impact of PSMA PET/CT on patient management and treatment are lacking, and in many areas, the role of next-generation imaging has not been defined., Objective: To assess expert opinion on the use of PSMA-based imaging and therapy to develop interim guidance., Design, Setting, and Participants: A panel of 21 PCa experts from various disciplines received thematic topics and relevant literature. A questionnaire to assess proposed guidance statements regarding PSMA PET/CT and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy was developed for completion remotely in a first e-Delphi round. A subsequent panel discussion was conducted during a 1-d meeting, which included a second Delphi round., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Panellists voted anonymously on statements using a nine-point Likert scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 9 = strongly agree. Median scores were calculated and consensus was assessed using methods proposed by the Research and Development (RAND) corporation., Results and Limitations: Statements were developed to cover the following topics: PSMA PET/CT utility, clinical use, and choice of tracer; patient selection; and management of patients receiving [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA for metastatic PCa. Consensus was reached for 33/36 statements. In-group bias is a potential limitation, as some statements were rephrased during discussions at the 1-d meeting., Conclusions: Adoption of PSMA PET/CT as an imaging tool to guide [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy should be supported by indications for appropriate use., Patient Summary: A panel of experts in prostate cancer reached a consensus for the majority of statements proposed regarding the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging and therapy, particularly the use of PSMA-based imaging in patients suitable for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy and the need to perform PSMA-based imaging before considering patients as candidates for this therapy., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Owing to the large variation in treatment response among patients with high-risk prostate cancer, it would be of value to use objective tools to monitor the status of bone metastases during clinical trials. Automated Bone Scan Index (aBSI) based on artificial intelligence has been proposed as an imaging biomarker for the quantification of skeletal metastases from bone scintigraphy., Objective: To investigate how an increase in aBSI during treatment may predict clinical outcome in a randomised controlled clinical trial including patients with high-risk prostate cancer., Design, Setting, and Participants: We retrospectively selected all patients from the Zometa European Study (ZEUS)/SPCG11 study with image data of sufficient quality to allow for aBSI assessment at baseline and at 48-mo follow-up. Data on aBSI were obtained using EXINIbone BSI software, blinded for clinical data and randomisation of zoledronic acid treatment. Data on age, overall survival (OS), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at baseline and upon follow-up were available from the study database., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Association between clinical parameters and aBSI increase during treatment was evaluated using Cox proportional-hazards regression models, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and log-rank test. Discrimination between prognostic variables was assessed using the concordance index (C-index)., Results and Limitations: In this cohort, 176 patients with bone metastases and a change in aBSI from baseline to follow-up of ≤0.3 had a significantly longer median survival time than patients with an aBSI change of >0.3 (p<0.0001). The increase in aBSI was significantly associated with OS (p<0.01 and C-index=0.65), while age and PSA change were not., Conclusions: The aBSI used as an objective imaging biomarker predicted outcome in prostate cancer patients in the ZEUS/SPCG11 study. An analysis of the change in aBSI from baseline to 48-mo follow-up represents a valuable tool for prognostication and monitoring of prostate cancer patients with bone metastases., Patient Summary: The increase in the burden of skeletal metastases, as measured by the automated Bone Scan Index (aBSI), during treatment was associated with overall survival in patients from the Zometa European Study/SPCG11 study. The aBSI may be a useful tool also in monitoring prostate cancer patients with newly developed bone metastases., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Nocturia is one of the most prevalent and bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men, leading to increased morbidity and mortality and a considerable economic burden on healthcare systems. Understanding its natural history, effect of pharmacotherapy, and predictors of failure of pharmacotherapy would allow optimised patient management., Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and effect of clinically relevant nocturia (crN) on quality of life in a contemporary cohort of European men aged ≥50 yr in a "real-life" setting, to understand its natural history, to detect any effect of pharmacotherapy, and to identify predictors of pharmacotherapy failure., Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of the data from the Evolution Registry-a European, multicentre, prospective, observational registry, conducted in five European countries within a sample of general practitioners' and urologists' clinics. A consecutive sample of 2175 men aged ≥50 yr with LUTS in association with benign prostatic enlargement was enrolled between February 2010 and April 2011, and followed up for 2yr. Overall, data from 1838 men were suitable for analysis., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The primary outcome was evaluation of the baseline incidence of nocturia in the study population. Secondary outcomes included the impact of nocturia on quality of life, efficacy of pharmacotherapy, and predictive factors associated with persistence of nocturia. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the data. Logistic regressions were used to analyse associations between comorbid conditions and risk factors in men with nocturia., Results and Limitations: Overall, 1198 men (65%) reported crN (two or more voids per night). This increased age dependently from 59% in the 50-59-yr age group (n=74) to 89% in the 80-99-yr age group (n=25). Overall, the incidence of crN improved in those who commenced pharmacological treatment at study entry, from 69% at baseline to 49% at 24 mo (p<0.00001). This was statistically significant only in those <80 yr old. A weak correlation was found between the severity of nocturia at baseline and quality-of-life scores on the International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire (r=0.33, p<0.001). Of the patients treated with an alpha-blocker or a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, 62% still had crN at 24 mo., Conclusions: Almost two-thirds of men in the Evolution Registry reported clinically significant nocturia with increased incidence with age. Despite prostate-targeted treatment, most patients, especially older men, still had persistent or worsening nocturia at 2-yr follow-up, and in this study, it was not possible to identify specific clinical factors that predicted those who could respond well to treatment in this regard., Patient Summary: This large study of men from five different European countries has shown that waking up at night to pass urine (nocturia) is very common and becomes more common with older age, and treatments that target the prostate do not significantly improve symptoms over 2yr in most men., (Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The MAGNOLIA study, investigating the concept of perioperative immunotherapy in muscle- invasive bladder cancer, was prematurely terminated. The lessons learned that should be considered before initiating and conducting future clinical trials in this field are highlighted., (Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)