Search

Background: Clinicians lack robust data on quality of life and social functioning after pancreatectomy limiting their ability guide patient decision-making aligned with patients' goals of care., Methods: In this cross-sectional survey study, we administered the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30); pancreas-specific QLQ-PAN26; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS™) Ability to Participate in Social Roles; and PROMIS™ Activities and social Isolation scales to all elective pancreatectomies (2021-2023). Results were compared to both normative data and between groups to determine factors predicting better QOL with a >10-12-point change considered clinically significant., Results: 143 patients were included. 71 (49.6%) completed the distributed surveys. The average age of responders was 59.9±16.1 years with 56.3% men. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (54.9%) was performed for malignancy in 67.6% of cases. Compared to normative population controls, post-pancreatectomy patients reported lower role functioning scores (67.2±28.7 vs 81.7±28.2, 14.5 score difference) but less social isolation (40.6±5.7 vs 50.0±10.0, 9.4 score difference). Compared to patients with benign disease, those with malignancy reported clinically significant worse social functioning; more fatigue, pain, constipation, change in taste, weight loss, weakness, and altered bowel habits; worse body image; and increased worries about the future. Despite more symptoms they were more satisfied with the healthcare they received (all >10-point score difference)., Conclusions: QOL and social health are impacted by pancreatic resection and outcomes differ whether surgery was performed for benign or malignant disease. These issues are largely unaddressed and are potential targets for intervention to improve QOL., (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Pancreatic surgery often does not provide long-term survival in patients with cancer or consistently improve symptoms in benign disease. This study aimed to assess decision regret and satisfaction with the decision-making process among patients who underwent pancreatectomy., Methods: This study administered the Brehaut Decision Regret Scale (DRS), 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) to all patients who underwent elective pancreatectomies from 2021 to 2023. Decision regret was defined as a DRS of >25. In addition, this study evaluated SDM-Q-9 responses in patients with and without regret., Results: A total of 143 patients were included in this study, of whom 71 patients (49.6%) completed the distributed surveys. Demographics, pathology, and major complication rates were similar between responders and nonresponders. The indications for surgery were malignancy (67.6%) and benign disease (32.4%). Decision regret after pancreatic surgery was reported in 18.3% of patients. Patients who experienced regret were younger (50.8 ± 18.7 years [younger group] vs 62.0 ± 14.9 years [older group]; P = .03), more likely to have benign disease (39.1% [benign disease] vs 8.3% [malignant disease]; P < .01), underwent a distal pancreatectomy (34.5% [distal pancreatectomy] vs 7.7% [pancreaticoduodenectomy]; P = .02), or experienced a major complication (36.8% [major complication] vs 11.5% [no major complication]; P = .03). Patients with regret had lower global health (57.1 ± 20.1 [patients with regret] vs 76.2 ± 22.2 [patients without regret]; P < .01) and social function scores (61.5 ± 31.5 [patients with regret] vs 77.6 ± 22.0 [patients without regret]; P = .03) on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Patients with regret were less satisfied with the shared decision-making process., Conclusion: Strong decision regret was reported in 18% of patients who underwent pancreatectomy. Younger age, distal pancreatectomy, benign indications, and major postoperative complications were associated with regret. Data from the SDM-9 highlight areas for potential improvement to help patients make decisions aligned with their goals of care., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Both cognitive impairment/dementia (CID) and falls occur more commonly in older adults than in younger patients. This study aimed to analyze the association of a history of CID or falls with the postoperative outcomes of older adults undergoing major intra-abdominal surgeries on a national level., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2022 Participant Use Data File. Our primary outcome was postoperative mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis., Results: On multivariable regression analyses, a history of both CID (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9; CI: 1.5-2.5; P < .01) and a fall (OR = 1.8; CI: 1.4-2.3; P < .01) were independently associated with higher adjusted odds of mortality. History of CID or falls was also a predictor of overall complications, major complications, and discharge to a care facility., Conclusion: A history of CID or falls in older adults before major intra-abdominal surgeries was associated with a high risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Further studies are required to establish the causal relation of these factors and the steps to mitigate the risk of associated adverse outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Loss of independence (LOI) is a significant concern in patients undergoing liver surgery. Although the risks of morbidity and mortality have been well studied, there is a dearth of data regarding the risk of LOI. Therefore, this study aimed to assess predictors of LOI after liver surgery., Methods: This study utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data from 2015 to 2018 from a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing liver resections. LOI was defined as the change from preoperative functional independence to the postoperative discharge requirement in a post-care facility. Frailty was defined using the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5)., Results: A total of 22,463 patients underwent hepatectomy via the NSQIP during the study period. In total, 22,067 participants were included in the analysis. A total of 4.7% of patients had LOI after surgery and were discharged to a rehabilitation center or nursing facility. mFI-1 was an independent predictor of LOI (OR:2.2 [1.9-4.3]). However, the odds for LOI were higher (OR:5.1[2.5-8.2]) in patients with mFI ≥ 2., Conclusion: LOI is an important outcome of liver surgery. Frailty is a predictor of LOI and should be used as a guide to inform patients about the potential outcomes., (© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Introduction: Preoperative eGFR has been found to be a reliable predictor of post-operative outcomes in patients with normal creatinine levels who undergo surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative eGFR levels on short-term post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatectomy., Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) pancreatectomy file (2014-2017) was queried for all adult patients (age ≥ 18) who underwent pancreatic resection. Patients were stratified into two groups based on their preoperative eGFR (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m 2 and eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m 2 ). Outcome measures included post-operative pancreatic fistula, discharge disposition, hospital length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day morbidity and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed., Results: A total of 21,148 were included in the study of which 12% (n = 2256) had preoperative eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m 2 . Patients in the eGFR < 60 group had prolonged length of stay, were less likely to be discharged home, had higher minor and major complication rates, and higher rates of mortality. On logistic regression analysis, lower preoperative eGFR (< 60 mL/min/1.73m 2 ) was associated with higher odds of prolonged length of stay [aOR: 1.294 (1.166-1.436)], adverse discharge disposition [aOR: 1.860 (1.644-2.103)], minor [aOR: 1.460 (1.321-1.613)] and major complications [aOR: 1.214 (1.086-1.358)], bleeding requiring transfusion [aOR: 1.861 (1.656-2.091)], and mortality [aOR: 2.064 (1.523-2.797)]., Conclusion: Preoperative decreased renal function measured by eGFR is associated with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. The results of this study may be valuable in improving preoperative risk stratification and post-operative expectations., (© 2021. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Background: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of frailty on short-term outcomes after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM)., Methods: Patients were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Patients were divided into 3 categories using the 5-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI)., Results: There were 5230 patients included. 52%, 35%, and 13% had mFI scores of 0, 1, and ≥ 2 respectively. Patients with a ≥ 2 mFI score were more likely to experience minor complication (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06-1.69), major complication (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.15-2.12), readmission (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.12-2.14), unfavorable discharge (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.62-3.80), 30-day mortality (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.02-8.95), prolonged length of stay (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.18-1.83), and bile leak (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.24)., Conclusion: Frailty is associated with increased post-operative complications. The 5-item mFI can guide risk stratification, optimization, and counseling., (© 2021. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.)

Background: Previous studies have documented increased complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients who undergo preoperative biliary stenting (PBS). However, in the modern era, the vast majority of patients with jaundice are stented. We hypothesized that there is no difference in short-term postoperative outcomes between PBS and no PBS in patient with obstructive jaundice undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy., Methods: We performed an analysis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) participant use file (2014-2017). Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and required stenting were excluded from the analysis. A propensity-matched analysis was performed to select obstructive jaundice patients who underwent PBS and those who did not with similar characteristics prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Short-term postoperative outcome measures included superficial surgical site infection (S-SSI), deep surgical site infection (D-SSI), hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POF), hospital readmission, minor morbidity (Clavien-Dindo I-II), major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III, IV, V), and 30-day mortality., Results: A total of 5851 patients with obstructive jaundice underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 81.6% underwent PBS. Based on the propensity-matched analysis, 927 patients who received PBS and 927 patients who did not were selected for comparing the outcomes between the two groups. There was no significant difference in outcome measures between the two groups with respect to S-SSI (OR 1.30 , 95% CI = 0.94-1.80, p = 0.12), D-SSI (OR 1.07, 95% CI = 0.81-1.41, p = 0.62), POF (OR 1.11, 95% CI = 0.87-1.42, p = 0.40), hospital readmission (OR 0.99, 95% CI = 0.77-1.27, p = 0.94), minor morbidity (OR 0.91, 95% CI = 0.76-1.11, p = 0.36), major morbidity (OR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.67-1.06, p = 0.14), and 30-day mortality (OR 1.05, 95% CI = 0.57-1.95, p = 0.87). Patients who underwent PBS were more likely to have shorter LOS (RR 0.87, 95% CI = 0.81-0.93, p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Contrary to previously reported studies, there was no increased risk of short-term postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy between PBS and N-PBS in a propensity-matched analysis. Preoperative biliary stenting is safe and does not need to be avoided before surgical intervention in patients who present with obstructive jaundice.

Introduction: Walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) is a sequela of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in 15-40% of cases. We sought to compare the outcomes of minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic cyst gastrostomy (CG) and necrosectomy for the management for sterile WON at a tertiary care high-volume pancreas center., Method: This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent minimally invasive surgical or endoscopic CG and necrosectomy for clinically sterile WON between 2008 and 2013. Peri-procedural outcomes including costs were analyzed and compared., Results: Twenty patients underwent minimally invasive surgical (robotic = 14, laparoscopic = 6) CG and necrosectomy, and 20 patients underwent endoscopic treatment. The surgical cohort had a larger median cyst size and higher CCI score. For the surgical cohort, median OR time was 167.5 min, estimated blood loss was 30 ml, and 65% underwent concomitant cholecystectomy. There was no mortality in either group and no difference in complication rates (20%). The failure rate was similar (15 versus 10%, P = 0.66). Although surgery was associated with a lower re-intervention rate (0 versus 1, P = 0.008), the endotherapy group was associated with shorter total LOS (inclusive of re-interventions) (7 versus 3 days, P = 0.032). The cost of the index procedure was significantly higher for the surgery group (P = 0.014); however, when considering all readmissions and re-interventions until resolution of the WON, the total cost was similar for both groups., Conclusion: Minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic CG and necrosectomy are comparable treatments for sterile WON in terms of outcomes and overall cost. The surgical approach may be considered advantageous when a concomitant cholecystectomy is required.