Search

Background: Denifanstat, an oral fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitor, blocks de-novo lipogenesis, a key pathway driving progressive lipotoxicity, inflammation, and fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of denifanstat for improving liver histology in individuals with MASH and moderate to advanced fibrosis., Methods: This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial was conducted at 100 clinical sites in the USA, Canada, and Poland. After a screening period of up to 90 days, participants aged 18 years and older with biopsy-confirmed MASH and stage F2 or F3 fibrosis were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either 50 mg oral denifanstat or placebo once per day for 52 weeks. Participants were dynamically allocated to treatment groups via a centrally administered interactive web-based response system and stratified by type 2 diabetes, region, and fibrosis stage. Investigators, patients, and the sponsor were masked to group allocation until database lock. The primary efficacy endpoints were a 2-point or greater improvement in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) without a worsening of fibrosis or MASH resolution with a 2-point or greater improvement in NAS without a worsening of fibrosis at week 52, assessed by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04906421, and is closed for enrolment., Findings: Of the 1087 individuals screened between June 2, 2021, and June 28, 2022, 168 eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive a dose of 50 mg denifanstat once per day (n=112) or placebo (n=56). All 168 participants (100 female, 68 male) received at least one dose of study treatment. In the ITT population, 42 (38%) of 112 participants in the denifanstat group had a 2-point or greater improvement in NAS without a worsening of fibrosis versus nine (16%) of 56 participants in the placebo group (common risk difference 21·0%, 95% CI 8·1-33·9; p=0·0035). 29 (26%) of 112 participants in the denifanstat group showed MASH resolution with a 2-point or greater improvement in NAS without a worsening of fibrosis compared with six (11%) of 56 participants in the placebo group (common risk difference 13·0%, 0·7-25·3; p=0·0173). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were COVID-19 (19 [17%] of 112 in the denifanstat group vs six [11%] of 56) in the placebo group, dry eye symptoms (ten [9%] of 112 vs eight [14%] of 56), and alopecia (21 [19%] of 112 vs two [4%] of 56). All adverse events considered to be related to the study drug were of grade 1 or grade 2. None of the serious adverse events (13 [12%] of 112 participants in the denifanstat group vs three [5%] of 56 in the placebo group) were considered drug-related., Interpretation: Treatment with denifanstat resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in disease activity, MASH resolution, and fibrosis. The results of this phase 2b trial support the advancement of denifanstat to phase 3 development., Funding: Sagimet Biosciences., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RL serves as a consultant to Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Cascade Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Glympse Bio, Inipharma, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Lipidio, Madrigal, Neurobo, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89Bio, Takeda, Terns Pharmaceuticals and Viking Therapeutics. RL has stock options in Sagimet Biosciences. In addition, his institution received research grants from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Gilead, Intercept, Hanmi, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes, and Terns Pharmaceuticals. He is a co-founder of LipoNexus. RL receives funding support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK120515) and the John C Martin Foundation (RP124). KG, EBM, GK, MO'F, WM, and W-WT are current or former employees of Sagimet Biosciences and own or have options to purchase stock in the company. EL is a researcher for 89Bio, Akero Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, DSM, Eli Lilly, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Enyo Pharma, Exalenz Bioscience, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Biopharma, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, Takeda, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Viking Therapeutics, and Zydus Pharmaceuticals. SAH was a scientific advisor or consultant for Akero, Aligos, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Auransa, Echosens, Galecto, Gilead, GSK, Hepion, Hepta Bio, HistoIndex, Humana, Inventiva, Kriya, Madrigal, Medpace, Merck, NeuroBo, Northsea, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum, Pfizer, Seal Rock, Sonic Incytes, Sagimet, Terns, and Viking. They received grant or research support from Akero, Altimmune, Axcella, BMS, Corcept, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, GSK, Hepion, Hightide, Immuron, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Madrigal, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Pfizer, Poxel, Sagimet, Terns, and Viking. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Robust performance of non-invasive tests (NITs) across ages is critical to assess liver disease among patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease (MASLD). We evaluated the impact of age on the performance of NIS2+™ vs. other NITs., Methods: An analysis cohort (N = 1,926) with biopsy-proven MASLD was selected among individuals screened for the phase III RESOLVE-IT clinical trial and divided into ≤45, 46-55, 56-64, and ≥65 years groups. To avoid potential confounding effects, a well-balanced cohort (n = 708; n = 177/age group) was obtained by applying a propensity score-matching algorithm to the analysis cohort. Baseline values of biomarkers and NITs were compared across age groups using one-way ANOVA, and the impact of age and histology were compared through three-way ANOVA. The impact of age on NIT performance for the detection of at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH; MASLD activity score [MAS] ≥4 and fibrosis stage [F] ≥2) was also evaluated., Results: Age did not affect the distributions of NIS2+™ and APRI (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index), but significantly ( p <0.0001) impacted those of NFS (NAFLD fibrosis score), FIB-4 (Fibrosis-4 index), and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF™) score. NIS2+™ was the only NIT on which fibrosis and MAS exerted a moderate to large effect. While the impact of fibrosis on APRI was moderate, that of MAS was low. The impact of age on FIB-4 and NFS was larger than that of fibrosis. NIS2+™ exhibited the highest AUROC values for detecting at-risk MASH across age groups, with stable performances irrespective of cut-offs., Conclusions: NIS2+™ was not significantly impacted by age and was sensitive to both fibrosis and MAS grade, demonstrating a robust performance to rule in/out at-risk MASH with fixed cut-offs., Impact and Implications: While metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) can affect individuals of all ages, patient age could represent an important confounding factor when interpreting non-invasive test (NIT) results, highlighting the need for reliable and efficient NITs that are not impacted by age and that could be interpreted with fixed cut-offs, irrespective of patient age. We report the impact of age on different well-established NITs - among those tested, only two panels, NIS2+™ and APRI, were not impacted by age and can be used and interpreted independently of patient age. NIS2+™ was also sensitive to both fibrosis and MAS, further confirming its efficiency for the detection of the composite endpoint of at-risk MASH and its potential as a valuable candidate for large-scale implementation in clinical practice and clinical trials., Competing Interests: QMA: research support from LITMUS (Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis) consortium funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative Program of the European Union under Grant Agreement 777377 (this multistakeholder consortium includes industry partners and received funding from EFPIA); grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals; royalties or licenses from Elsevier Ltd.; consulting fees (on behalf of Newcastle University) from Alimentiv, Akero Therapeutics, Inc., AstraZeneca, Axcella Health, Inc., 89bio, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Genfit S.A., Genentech, Gilead Sciences Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Hanmi, HistoIndex Pte Ltd., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Prosciento, Poxel S.A., Resolution Therapeutics, Roche, Ridgeline Therapeutics, RTI, Shionogi, and Terns Pharmaceuticals; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare; served on advisory boards or data safety monitoring boards (on behalf of Newcastle University) for Medpace (NorthSea Therapeutics B.V., DSMB). BS: consulting fees from Genfit S.A. MAC: Labcorp employee. RL: grants/funding support from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Hanmi, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes, and Terns Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Anylam/Regeneron, Amgen, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, CohBar, Inc., Eli Lilly, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glympse Bio, HighTide Therapeutics, Ini Pharma, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, Theratechnologies, Inc., 89bio, Inc., Terns Pharmaceuticals, and Viking Therapeutics; other financial interests: LipoNexus, Inc. (co-founder). SAH: grants or contracts from Akero Therapeutics, Alentis Therapeutics, Altimmune, B. Riley FBR, ChronWell, Corcept Therapeutics, Echosens, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay Therapeutics, Inc., Enyo Pharma S.A., Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Galmed Research & Development, Ltd., Genfit S.A., Gilead Sciences, Inc., Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hepta Bio, HighTide Therapeutics, Inc, HistoIndex, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ionis, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., NeuroBo, NorthSea Therapeutics B.V., Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Path AI, Perspectum, Poxel S.A., Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes, Terns Pharmaceuticals, and Viking Therapeutics; stock or stock options for Akero Therapeutics, ChronWell, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Genfit S.A., Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., HistoIndex Pte Ltd., Metacrine, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., NorthSea Therapeutics B.V. VR: grants or contracts from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead Sciences, Inc.; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Poxel S.A., Enyo Pharma S.A., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, NGM Biopharmaceuticals Inc., and Pfizer. AJS: stock options in Genfit S.A., Tiziana, Indalo, Durect, Inversago, and Galmed Pharmaceuticals; consultant to AstraZeneca, Salix, Tobira, Takeda, Jannsen, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Terns Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., Sagimet Biosciences, Valeant, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Hemoshear, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Enyo, Akero Therapeutics, 89bio, Inc., Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Amgen, Genentech, Regeneron, Alnylam, Hanmi, LG Chem, Histoindex, Thera Technologies, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Target-RWE, Surrozen, Zydus, Path AI, Exhalenz, and Genfit S.A.; his institution has received grant support from Gilead Sciences, Inc., Salix, Tobira, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Merck, AstraZeneca, Mallinckrodt, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals; royalties received from Elsevier and UpToDate. JM, YH, AC, ZM, CR, and DWH: stock or stock options from Genfit S.A. and serve as Genfit S.A. employees. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) regulates metabolism and protects cells against stress. Efruxifermin is a bivalent Fc-FGF21 analogue that replicates FGF21 agonism of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1c, 2c, or 3c. The aim of this phase 2b study was to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and moderate (F2) or severe (F3) fibrosis., Methods: HARMONY is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 96-week, phase 2b trial that was initiated at 41 clinics in the USA. Adults with biopsy-confirmed NASH, defined by a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) of 4 or higher and scores of 1 or higher in each of steatosis, ballooning, and lobular inflammation, with histological stage F2 or F3 fibrosis, were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via an interactive response system, to receive placebo or efruxifermin (28 mg or 50 mg), subcutaneously once weekly. Patients, investigators, pathologists, site staff, and the sponsor were masked to group assignments during the study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with improvement in fibrosis of at least 1 stage and no worsening of NASH, based on analyses of baseline and week 24 biopsies (liver biopsy analysis set [LBAS]). A sensitivity analysis evaluated the endpoint in the full analysis set (FAS), for which patients with missing biopsies were considered non-responders. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04767529, and is ongoing., Findings: Between March 22, 2021, and Feb 7, 2022, 747 patients were assessed for eligibility and 128 patients (mean age 54·7 years [SD 10·4]; 79 [62%] female and 49 male [38%]; 118 [92%] white; and 56 [41%] Hispanic or Latino) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=43), efruxifermin 28 mg (n=42; two randomised patients were not dosed because of an administrative error), or efruxifermin 50 mg (n=43). In the LBAS (n=113), eight (20%) of 41 patients in the placebo group had an improvement in fibrosis of at least 1 stage and no worsening of NASH by week 24 versus 15 (39%) of 38 patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group (risk ratio [RR] 2·3 [95% CI 1·1-4·8]; p=0·025) and 14 (41%) of 34 patients in the efruxifermin 50 mg group (2·2 [1·0-5·0]; p=0·036). Based on the FAS (n=128), eight (19%) of 43 patients in the placebo group met this endpoint versus 15 (36%) of 42 in the efruxifermin 28 mg group (RR 2·2 [95% CI 1·0-4·8]; p=0·033) and 14 (33%) of 43 in the efruxifermin 50 mg group (1·9 [0·8-4·3]; p=0·123). The most frequent efruxifermin-related adverse events were diarrhoea (16 [40%] of 40 patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group and 17 [40%] of 43 patients in efruxifermin 50 mg group vs eight [19%] of 43 patients in the placebo group; all events except one were grade 1-2) and nausea (11 [28%] patients in the efruxifermin 28 mg group and 18 [42%] patients in the efruxifermin 50 mg group vs ten [23%] patients in the placebo group; all grade 1-2). Five patients (two in the 28 mg group and three in the 50 mg group) discontinued due to adverse events. Serious adverse events occurred in four patients in the 50 mg group; one was defined as drug related (ulcerative esophagitis in a participant with a history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease). No deaths occurred., Interpretation: Efruxifermin improved liver fibrosis and resolved NASH over 24 weeks in patients with F2 or F3 fibrosis, with acceptable tolerability, supporting further assessment in phase 3 trials., Funding: Akero Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The reference standard for detecting non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and staging fibrosis-liver biopsy-is invasive and resource intensive. Non-invasive biomarkers are urgently needed, but few studies have compared these biomarkers in a single cohort. As part of the Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis (LITMUS) project, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 17 biomarkers and multimarker scores in detecting NASH and clinically significant fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and identify their optimal cutoffs as screening tests in clinical trial recruitment., Methods: This was a comparative diagnostic accuracy study in people with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD from 13 countries across Europe, recruited between Jan 6, 2010, and Dec 29, 2017, from the LITMUS metacohort of the prospective European NAFLD Registry. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with paired liver biopsy and serum samples were eligible; those with excessive alcohol consumption or evidence of other chronic liver diseases were excluded. The diagnostic accuracy of the biomarkers was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with liver histology as the reference standard and compared with the Fibrosis-4 index for liver fibrosis (FIB-4) in the same subgroup. Target conditions were the presence of NASH with clinically significant fibrosis (ie, at-risk NASH; NAFLD Activity Score ≥4 and F≥2) or the presence of advanced fibrosis (F≥3), analysed in all participants with complete data. We identified thres holds for each biomarker for reducing the number of biopsy-based screen failures when recruiting people with both NASH and clinically significant fibrosis for future trials., Findings: Of 1430 participants with NAFLD in the LITMUS metacohort with serum samples, 966 (403 women and 563 men) were included after all exclusion criteria had been applied. 335 (35%) of 966 participants had biopsy-confirmed NASH and clinically significant fibrosis and 271 (28%) had advanced fibrosis. For people with NASH and clinically significant fibrosis, no single biomarker or multimarker score significantly reached the predefined AUC 0·80 acceptability threshold (AUCs ranging from 0·61 [95% CI 0·54-0·67] for FibroScan controlled attenuation parameter to 0·81 [0·75-0·86] for SomaSignal), with accuracy mostly similar to FIB-4. Regarding detection of advanced fibrosis, SomaSignal (AUC 0·90 [95% CI 0·86-0·94]), ADAPT (0·85 [0·81-0·89]), and FibroScan liver stiffness measurement (0·83 [0·80-0·86]) reached acceptable accuracy. With 11 of 17 markers, histological screen failure rates could be reduced to 33% in trials if only people who were marker positive had a biopsy for evaluating eligibility. The best screening performance for NASH and clinically significant fibrosis was observed for SomaSignal (number needed to test [NNT] to find one true positive was four [95% CI 4-5]), then ADAPT (six [5-7]), MACK-3 (seven [6-8]), and PRO-C3 (nine [7-11])., Interpretation: None of the single markers or multimarker scores achieved the predefined acceptable AUC for replacing biopsy in detecting people with both NASH and clinically significant fibrosis. However, several biomarkers could be applied in a prescreening strategy in clinical trial recruitment. The performance of promising markers will be further evaluated in the ongoing prospective LITMUS study cohort., Funding: The Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests QMA is the coordinator of the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 (IMI2) LITMUS consortium funded by the IMI2 Program of the EU (777377) and is a Newcastle National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre investigator. The multistakeholder LITMUS consortium includes industry partners and received funding from the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations. QMA also declares research grant funding from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Glympse Bio, Intercept, Novartis, and Pfizer; is a consultant on behalf of Newcastle University to Alimentiv, Akero, AstraZeneca, Axcella, 89Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galmed, Genfit, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Hanmi, HistoIndex, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, Medpace, Merck, NGMBio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Poxel, Resolution Therapeutics, Roche, Ridgeline Therapeutics, RTI International, Shionogi, and Terns; has received speaker fees from Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare; is on the North Sea Therapeutics Data Safety and Monitoring Committee at Medpace on behalf of Newcastle University; and has received royalties from Elsevier. JB declares research grant funding from Echosens, Intercept, Inventiva, and Siemens; consulting fees from Echosens, Intercept, and Siemens; speaker fees from Gilead, Intercept, Lilly, and Siemens; and is a member of advisory boards of Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Intercept, Novo Nordisk, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. DT declares grants from and contracts with Histoindex; consulting fees from Alimentiv, Clinnovate Health UK, Allergan, Cirius Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, ICON Clinical Research, and Ionis Pharmaceuticals; and was the past President of the European Society of Pathology (unpaid). PB is the owner and Director of Liverpat. AG declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and research grants from Falk and Intercept; consulting fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead, Intercept, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, and Sequana; research fees from AbbVie, Alexion, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Burger Stein, CSL Behring, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, Mert, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche, and Sequana; travel and meeting support from Intercept, Gilead, AbbVie, and Falk; and is a member of an advisory board of Falk. SF has a Senior Clinical Investigator fellowship from the Research Foundation Flanders (1802154N); declares grants to his institution (University of Antwerp, Belgium) from Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Roche, and Bristol-Meyers Squibb; has been a consultant to Roche, Intercept, Gilead Sciences, Echosens, Allergan, Genentech, AbbVie, Novo Nordisk, Bayer, Novartis, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galmed, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Promethera, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Coherus, Actelion Madrigal, Astellas, Julius Clinical, Genfit, NGM Bio, and Inventiva; and has been lecturer for AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Genfit, and Gilead Sciences. MA declares research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, and AstraZeneca and consulting fees from Intercept and AstraZeneca. GP declares support from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and Takeda; consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Astra Zeneca, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Roche; speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, and Takeda; and travel support from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Ipsen, Janssen, and Novo Nordisk. HC-P declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project; consulting fees from Intercept, Novo Nordisk, and Orphalan; and speaker fees from Eisai and Roche Portugal. J-FD is a member of the advisory committees of Alentis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Enyo, Esai, Falk, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Ipsen, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Roche; declares travel and meeting support from Gilead and speaking and teaching fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, and Roche; has received fees from the journal GUT as an Associate Editor and Uptodate; and is President of the Swiss NASH Foundation and the Swiss Foundation against Liver Cancer. DJL declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and Nordic Bioscience and has stock in Nordic Bioscience. SAH declares grants from Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Enyo Pharma, Galectin, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics; consulting and speaker fees from AgomAB, Akero Therapeutics, Alentis Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Altimmune, Axcella Health, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Riley FBR, BVF Partners, Cohbar, Canfite, Corcept Therapeutics, Cymabay, Echosens North America, Enyo Pharma, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress Biotech, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Genius Group, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, HistoIndex, Inipharm, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, Microba, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Northsea Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, Nutrasource, Perspectum Diagnostics, Piper, Sandler, Poxel, Prometic Pharma, Ridgeline, Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes, Medical, Terns, and Viking Therapeutics; is a member of advisory boards of 89 Bio, Akero Therapeutics, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella Health, Chronwell, CiVi, Cymabay, Echosens North America, Foresite Labs, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, HistoIndex, Indalo, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Prometic Pharma, Ridgeline, Sagimet Biosciences, Sonic Incytes Medical, Terns, and Theratechnologies; has stock in Akero Therapeutics, Chronwell, Cirius Therapeutics, Galectin Therapeutics, Genfit, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Sonic Incytes, and Medical Corp; and declares consultancy services to Akero Therapeutics, Axcella Health, Cirius Therapeutics, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Enyo Pharma, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Research and Development, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics. YC is an employee of Eli Lilly and the company and hold stocks and shares in Eli Lilly. JFC declares support from Oxford National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre; consulting fees from Intercept and Alnylam; speaker fees from AstraZeneca; and is a member of an advisory board of Intercept. MP declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and grants from Cancer Research UK (C30358/A29725); has a patent for medical imaging (WO2015155521A1); and is a shareholder in Perspectum. HY-J declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project; grants from Academy of Finland, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and EVO foundation; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; speaker fees from Novo Nordisk and GlaxoSmithKline; and is a member of advisory boards of Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eli Lilly, and Hamni. JC declares grants and research support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and Intercept Pharmaceuticals; consultant fees from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Shionogi, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, and Alexion; speaker support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Shionogi, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Celgene; meeting and travel support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals; and is President of the Spanish Society of Digestive Pathology. MK declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and Nordic Bioscience. He is a Nordic Bioscience stock share holder. RO is an employee of SomaLogic; declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project (SomaLogic funded the SomaScan proteomic assay results as a contribution to LITMUS); is on the patent application of SomaLogic for NASH biomarkers; and has stock in SomaLogic. RT is an employee of and holds stock in AstraZeneca, Sweden. KD is an employee of Eli Lilly and the company and hold stocks and shares in Eli Lilly. CY is an employee and stock and share holder of Pfizer. CB is a former employee of Novartis Pharma and declares financial support from Novartis Pharma; has pending patents for treatment of NASH (Novartis); and has stock in Novartis Pharma and Merck. ME is a member of the advisory board of AMRA Medical. GPA declares support from the IMI2 LITMUS project and consulting fees from Clinicpace, Servier Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, NuCana, AstraZeneca, and Benevolent AI. JMS declares grants from Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, Nordic Bioscience, and Siemens Healthcare; consulting fees from Apollo Endosurgery, Albireo Pharma, Bayer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Heel, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Julius Clinical, Madrigal, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Nordic Bioscience, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Shinogi, Siemens Healthcare, and Summit Clinical Research; speaker fees from Apollo Endosurgery, MedPublico, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and is a member of advisory boards of Novo Nordisk and Boehringer Ingelheim. EB declares consulting fees from Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept; speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Intercept, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; and is a member of advisory boards of Novo Nordisk and Intercept. MR-G declares grants from Siemens, Gilead, and Intercept; consulting fees from AbbVie, Alpha-sigma, Allergen, AstraZeneca, Inventia, Kaleido, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Axcella, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Gilead; speaker fees from Inventia, Sobi, Novo Nordisk, Rubio, and Shionogi; meeting and travel support from Abbvie and Gilead; and is a member of an advisory board of Galmed. VR declares grants from Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals and consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Galmed, Novo Nordisk, Prosciento, Terns, NorthSea Therapeutics, Enyo, Sagimet, NGM Pharmaceuticals, and Madrigal. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Histologically assessed liver fibrosis stage has prognostic significance in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and is accepted as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials for non-cirrhotic NAFLD. Our aim was to compare the prognostic performance of non-invasive tests with liver histology in patients with NAFLD., Methods: This was an individual participant data meta-analysis of the prognostic performance of histologically assessed fibrosis stage (F0-4), liver stiffness measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography (LSM-VCTE), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) in patients with NAFLD. The literature was searched for a previously published systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging and simple non-invasive tests and updated to Jan 12, 2022 for this study. Studies were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, and authors were contacted for individual participant data, including outcome data, with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, or cirrhosis complications (ie, ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, or progression to a MELD score ≥15). We calculated aggregated survival curves for trichotomised groups and compared them using stratified log-rank tests (histology: F0-2 vs F3 vs F4; LSM: <10 vs 10 to <20 vs ≥20 kPa; FIB-4: <1·3 vs 1·3 to ≤2·67 vs >2·67; NFS: <-1·455 vs -1·455 to ≤0·676 vs >0·676), calculated areas under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (tAUC), and performed Cox proportional-hazards regression to adjust for confounding. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022312226., Findings: Of 65 eligible studies, we included data on 2518 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD from 25 studies (1126 [44·7%] were female, median age was 54 years [IQR 44-63), and 1161 [46·1%] had type 2 diabetes). After a median follow-up of 57 months [IQR 33-91], the composite endpoint was observed in 145 (5·8%) patients. Stratified log-rank tests showed significant differences between the trichotomised patient groups (p<0·0001 for all comparisons). The tAUC at 5 years were 0·72 (95% CI 0·62-0·81) for histology, 0·76 (0·70-0·83) for LSM-VCTE, 0·74 (0·64-0·82) for FIB-4, and 0·70 (0·63-0·80) for NFS. All index tests were significant predictors of the primary outcome after adjustment for confounders in the Cox regression., Interpretation: Simple non-invasive tests performed as well as histologically assessed fibrosis in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with NAFLD and could be considered as alternatives to liver biopsy in some cases., Funding: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KS is an employee of Versantis AG. MT received speaker fees from BMS, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, MSD, and Roche; advised for AbbVie, Albireo, BiomX, Boehringer Ingelheim, Falk Pharma, Genfit, Gilead, Hightide, Intercept, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Phenex, Pliant, Regulus, Siemens, and Shire; received travel grants from AbbVie, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, and Janssen; and received research grants from Albireo, Alnylam, Cymabay, Falk, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, Takeda, and UltraGenyx. MT is also co-inventor of patents on the medical use of norUDCA filed by the Medical Universities of Graz and Vienna. AGH reports consultancy for Julius Clinical, Novo Nordisk, Echosens, Inventiva, and has received research grants from Novo Nordisk and Gilead. EB has served as a consultant or advisory board member for Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, ProSciento, and as a speaker for Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. EB has also received a research grant from Gilead Sciences for fatty liver research. VW-SW has served as a consultant or advisory board member for 3V-BIO, AbbVie, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Diseases, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, Intercept, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum, Pfizer, ProSciento, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions, and Terns; and as a speaker for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, and Gilead Sciences. VW-SW has also received a research grant from Gilead Sciences for fatty liver research. TK and JW received unrestricted research grants from Echosens. TK has served as a speaker for Echosens. GPA has served as a consultant and an advisory board member for Pfizer, Inventiva Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, and KaNDy Therapeutics; has been a consultant to BerGenBio, Median Technologies, FRACTYL, Amryt Pharmaceuticals, and AstraZeneca; and has given presentations on behalf of Roche Diagnostics and Medscape all through the University of Nottingham contract. GS has acted as speaker for Merck, Gilead, AbbVie, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer; served as an advisory board member for Pfizer, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Gilead, and Intercept; and has received unrestricted research funding from Theratechnologies. ETs has served on the advisory boards for Boehringer, Pfizer, NovoNordisk, Orphalan, Univar, and Alexion; and has been a speaker for NovoNordisk and Dr Falk. MY received research support from Kowa Co. HH's institutions have received research grants from Astra Zeneca, EchoSens, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, and Pfizer. W-KC has served as a consultant or advisory board member for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk; and as a speaker for Hisky Medical and Viatris. SM received honorarium fees from Echosens. MV has served as a consultant or a speaker for Gilead Sciences and Intercept Pharmaceuticals. VdL reports consultancy fees for AbbVie, BMS, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Myr-Pharma, Pfizer, Supersonic Imagine, and Tillotts. MN has been on the advisory board or has been a consultant for 89BIO, Altimmune, BI, Gilead, cohBar, Cytodyn, Pfizer, GSK, Novo Nordisk, EchoSens, Madrigal, NorthSea, Perspectum, Terns, Takeda, Sami-Sabina group, Siemens, and Roche diagnostic; has received research support from Allergan, Akero, BMS, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Conatus, Corcept, Enanta, Madrigal, Novartis, Pfizer, Shire, TERNS, Viking, and Zydus; and is a shareholder or has stocks in Anaetos, Chrownwell, Cytodyn, Ciema, Rivus Pharma, and Viking. CF-P is employed by Echosens. AG has served as a speaker and consultant for AbbVie, Alexion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, CSL Behring, Eisai, Falk, Gilead, Heel, Intercept, Ipsen, Merz, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Sequana; and received research funding from Intercept, Falk, and Novartis. MM is employed by Novartis. TT is employed by Pfizer. QMA is coordinator of the IMI2 LITMUS consortium; has received research grant funding from AbbVie, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer, Vertex; has received consultancy fees on behalf of Newcastle University for Abbott Laboratories, Acuitas Medical, Allergan/Tobira, Blade, BNN Cardio, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Indalo, Imperial Innovations, Intercept Pharma Europe, Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Kenes, Madrigal, MedImmune, Metacrine, NewGene, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pharma, Servier, Viking Therapeutics; and has received speaker fees from Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit, Gilead, Integritas Communications, MedScape. SAH has received research grants from Akero, Altimmune, Axcella-Cirius, CiVi Biopharma, Cymabay, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Hightide Therapeutics, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM Bio, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet, and Viking; and has received consulting fees from Akero, Altimmune, Alentis, Arrowhead, Axcella, Echosens, Enyo, Foresite Labs, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hepion, Hightide, HistoIndex, Intercept, Kowa, Madrigal, Metacrine, NeuroBo, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Perspectum, Sagimet, Terns, and Viking. MP is a shareholder of Perspectum. All other authors declared no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Efruxifermin has shown clinical efficacy in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and F1-F3 fibrosis. The primary objective of the BALANCED Cohort C was to assess the safety and tolerability of efruxifermin in patients with compensated NASH cirrhosis., Methods: Patients with NASH and stage 4 fibrosis (n = 30) were randomized 2:1 to receive efruxifermin 50 mg (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) once-weekly for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability of efruxifermin. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included evaluation of non-invasive markers of liver injury and fibrosis, glucose and lipid metabolism, and changes in histology in a subset of patients who consented to end-of-study liver biopsy., Results: Efruxifermin was safe and well-tolerated; most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 (n = 7, 23.3%) or grade 2 (n = 19, 63.3%). The most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal, including transient, mild to moderate diarrhea, and/or nausea. Significant improvements were noted in key markers of liver injury (alanine aminotransferase) and glucose and lipid metabolism. Sixteen-week treatment with efruxifermin was associated with significant reductions in non-invasive markers of fibrosis including Pro-C3 (least squares mean change from baseline [LSMCFB] -9 μg/L efruxifermin vs.  -3.4 μg/L placebo; p  = 0.0130) and ELF score (-0.4 efruxifermin vs.  +0.4 placebo; p  = 0.0036), with a trend towards reduced liver stiffness (LSMCFB -5.7 kPa efruxifermin vs.  -1.1 kPa placebo; n.s.). Of 12 efruxifermin-treated patients with liver biopsy after 16 weeks, 4 (33%) achieved fibrosis improvement of at least one stage without worsening of NASH, while an additional 3 (25%) achieved resolution of NASH, compared to 0 of 5 placebo-treated patients., Conclusions: Efruxifermin appeared safe and well-tolerated with encouraging improvements in markers of liver injury, fibrosis, and glucose and lipid metabolism following 16 weeks of treatment, warranting confirmation in larger and longer term studies., Lay Summary: Cirrhosis resulting from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the progressive form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, represents a major unmet medical need. Currently there are no approved drugs for the treatment of NASH. This proof-of-concept randomized, double-blind clinical trial demonstrated the potential therapeutic benefit of efruxifermin treatment compared to placebo in patients with cirrhosis due to NASH., Clinical Trial Number: NCT03976401., Competing Interests: Stephen A. Harrison holds a leadership or fiduciary role at, advises, consults for, receives grants or contracts from Northsea Therapeutics. He advises, consults for, receives grants or contracts, support for attending meetings and/or travel from Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. He advises, consults for, and receives grants or contracts from Akero Therapeutics, Inc. He advises, consults for, and receives grants or contracts from Axcella Health, Inc., Cymabay Therapeutics, Inc., Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Hightide Therapeutics, Inc., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Metacrine Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals Inc., Genfit Corp, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences. He advises and receives grants or contracts from Gilead Sciences, Inc., Galmed Research & Dev. LTD., and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. He consults for and receives grants or contracts from Viking Therapeutics, Inc. and Enyo Pharma S.A. He advises and consults for Altimmune, Echosens North America Inc. Foresite Labs, LLC, HistoIndex PTE LTD, Medpace Inc., Prometic, Pharma SMT LTD, Ridgeline and Sonic Incytes Medical Corp, Terns Inc. He advises for 89bio, Arrowhead, Chronwell, CiVi, Indalo, PathAI, and Theratechnologies. He consults for AgomAB, Alentis Therapeutics AG, Alimentiv, Inc, Boston Pharmaceuticals, B Riley FBR Inc. BVF Partners LP, Cohbar, Inc. Canfite, Corcept Therapeutics, Inc, Fibronostics, Fortress Biotech, Inc GNS, Inipharm, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Microba, Nutrasource, Perspectum Diagnostics, and Piper Sandler. He receives grants or contracts from Cirius Therapeutics, Inc., and CiVi Biopharma Inc. He holds stock or stock options at Akero Therapeutics, Inc., Chronwell Inc., Cirius Therapeutics, Inc, Galectin Therapeutics, Inc., Genfit Corp, Hepion Pharmaceuticals Inc., HistoIndex PTE LTD, Metacrine Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals., Northsea Therapeutics B.V, and Sonic Incytes Medical Corp. Peter J. Ruane: none. Bradley Freilich: none. Guy Neff has received payment or honoraria from Intercept Pharmaceuticals. Rashmee Patil has received grants to institution from 89 Bio, AltImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corcept Therapeutics, Fibronostics, Galectin Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead, Helio Health, Hepagene, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, NGMBio, NorthSea Therapeutics, Poxel, Sagimet Biosciences, and Viking Therapeutics. He consults for Intercept Pharmaceuticals. Cynthia Behling has received payment via Pacific Rim Pathology for liver biopsy scoring. She has received grants as a co-investigator under N100 K U01 DK61734. She has received honoraria for lectures from Pfizer and Alimentev. She is a co-chair on NASH CRN Pathology Committee. Chen Hu: none. Reshma Shringarpure, Brittany de Temple, Erica Fong, Erik J. Tillman, Timothy Rolph, Andrew Cheng, and Kitty Yale are employees of Akero Therapeutics and own stock and/or stock options of Akero Therapeutics. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterised by hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and injury, and is associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation and death. NASH affects more than 16 million people in the USA, and there is no approved therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aldafermin, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)., Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study (ALPINE 2/3) in patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis, we randomly assigned patients stratified by fibrosis stage in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, aldafermin 0·3 mg, 1·0 mg, or 3·0 mg once daily for 24 weeks at 30 study sites in the USA. Patients, investigators, the funder, and all other staff, were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary endpoint was an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH at week 24. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03912532, and has been completed., Findings: Between May 16, 2019, and Sept 4, 2020, 786 patients were screened, of whom 171 were randomly assigned to a treatment group and included in the intention-to-treat population: 43 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, 42 in the 1·0 mg group, 43 in the 3·0 mg group, and 43 in the placebo group. In total, 145 (85%) of patients completed treatment. At week 24, among patients with biopsies at both baseline and week 24, was seven (19%) of 36 patients in the placebo group, 11 (31%) of 36 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group (difference 90% CI 12% [-9 to 33]; p=0·11), five (15%) of 34 patients in the 1·0 mg group (difference -5% [-24 to 13]; p=0·80), and 11 (30%) of 37 patients in the 3·0 mg group (difference 10% [-9 to 30]; p=0·12) had an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, without meeting the prespecified significance for dose response (p=0·55). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Diarrhoea occurred in six (14%) of 43 patients in the placebo group, three (7%) of 43 patients in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, five (12%) of 41 patients in the 1·0 mg group, and ten (23%) of 43 patients in the 3·0 mg group. Incidences of serious adverse events and discontinuations owing to adverse events were similar between groups., Interpretation: Aldafermin was generally well tolerated but did not produce a significant dose response on fibrosis improvement of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, despite positive effects on a number of secondary endpoints. The findings of this trial may have implications for the design of future NASH trials., Funding: NGM Biopharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SAH reports grant and research support from Akero, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Pfizer, Sagimet, Viking, and 89 Bio; is a scientific advisor or consultant for Akero, Alentis, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Forest Labs, Galectin, Gilead, Hepion, Hepagene, HistoIndex, Intercept, Madrigal, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Sagimet, Sonic Incytes, Terns, and Viking; and has stock options in Akero, Cirius, Chronwell, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM, and Northsea. MFA reports grant and research support from Allergan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boeringher Ingelheim, Celgene, Genentech, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Magrigal, NGM, NovoNordisk, and Viking; is a consultant for Hanmi and Madrigal; and serves on an advisory committee for 89Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hanmi, NGM, Novo Nordisk, and Thera. CDG reports grant and research support from 89Bio, CymaBay, Madrigal, and NGM; and is a consultant for 89Bio, CymaBay, Madrigal, and NGM. NA reports serving on advisory boards for 89Bio, Gilead, Intercept, LG Chem, NGM, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Terns, and Zydus; is a speaker for AbbVie, Alexion, Echosens, Gilead, Intercept, Perspectum, and Simply Speaking; and has received research support from 89Bio, Akero, Albireo, Allergan, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corcept, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Enanta, Enyo, Fibronostics, Hanmi, Hepagene, Inventiva, Madrigal, Merck, Metacrine, Northsea, Noom, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, and Zydus. MRB reports grant and research support from the National Institutes of Health (5U01-DK061713-19, 1R01CA249765-01) as well as Carmot, Corcept, CymaBay, Diabetes & Endocrinology Consultants, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Pinnacle Clinical Research, Polarean Imaging, and Siemens Healthineers. MER reports consulting for Alnylam, Amgen, AMRA, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Centara, Coherus, Enanta, Galecto, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl, Gelesis, Siemens, Thetis, Terns, Rivus, 3vBio (Sagimet), 89Bio, and Novartis. MSS reports consulting for Pfizer and serves on an advisory committee for AMRA. MK reports research grants from Medtronic, SARO, Pfizer, Dexcom, Abbott, Regenacy, Metacrine, Lumos, Ascendis, Sagimet, MannKind, Aeterna-Zentaris, 89Bio, Gilead, Senseonics, KOWA, Allergan, NGM, Tolerion, and Lilly, and is on an advisory board for Quest Diagnostics. ZHY reports grant and research support from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, HighTide, Madrigal, NGM, Conatus, Novartis, Allergan, Intercept, and Novo Nordisk, and is a consultant for Gilead. MB reports grant support from the National Institutes of Health. SJB reports serving on a scientific advisory board for Altimmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi, and is a consultant for Altimmune, Amgen, Madrigal, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi. BB reports research support from Akero, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Conatus, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Viking, AbbVie, Gynkotex, GlaxoSmithKline, Arena, Protagonist, Mirum, Eli Lilly, Ionis, and Poxel. PJR reports serving as speaker and adviser for Gilead Sciences and ViiV. PJT reports grant and research support from AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cara, Celgene, Cirius, Conatus, Cymabay, Dova, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Elobix, Enanta, Enyo, Exelixis, Gilead, HighTide, Intercept, Mallinckrodt, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sillajen, and Targ, and is a consultant for Mallinckrodt. MG, MK, CC, LM-K, WC, AMD, LL, and HDL report being employees and stockholders of NGM. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: AMP kinase (AMPK) is an energy sensor implicated in regulation of lipid metabolism, inflammation, and insulin sensitivity. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of PXL770, a novel direct AMPK activator, in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)., Methods: STAMP-NAFLD, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2a study, was done across 15 US clinical sites. Patients aged 18-75 years with liver fat content of at least 10% at baseline when assessed by MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1), via an interactive web response system, to receive oral PXL770 250 mg once daily, 250 mg twice daily, or 500 mg once daily, or matched placebo. Patients were stratified according to type 2 diabetes status and study site. The primary endpoint was relative change in liver fat content from baseline compared with placebo at week 12, assessed by MRI-PDFF. The primary endpoint was analysed in an ANCOVA model with treatment and stratification criteria as factors and baseline liver fat content as a covariate in the modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all as-randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. Safety was analysed in the safety population, defined as all as-treated patients receiving at least one dose of the study treatment. The trial has been completed and the final results are reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03763877., Findings: Between March 29, 2019, and March 13, 2020, 387 patients were screened, of whom 120 were included in the modified intention-to-treat and safety analyses (30 in the 250 mg once daily group, 30 in the 250 mg twice daily group, 29 in the 500 mg once daily group, and 31 in the placebo group). The mean relative change from baseline in liver fat content at week 12 was -1·1% in the placebo group, -1·0% in the 250 mg once daily group (mean difference versus placebo 0·1% [95% CI -15·4 to 15·7], p=0·99), -14·3% in the 250 mg twice daily group (-13·1% [-28·1 to 1·8], p=0·084), and -14·7% in the 500 mg once daily group (-13·5% [-28·5 to 1·4], p=0·076). At least one treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 23 (77%) of 30 patients in the 250 mg once daily group, 20 (67%) of 30 patients in the 250 mg twice daily group, 21 (72%) of 29 patients in the 500 mg once daily group, and 21 (68%) of 31 patients in the placebo group. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhoea (five [17%] of patients in the 250 mg once daily group, seven [23%] in the 250 mg twice daily group, six [21%] in the 500 mg once daily group, and none in the placebo group). No life-threatening events or treatment-related deaths occurred., Interpretation: PXL770 treatment did not meet the primary outcome of liver fat improvement compared with placebo. Treatment was well tolerated. Given indications that metabolic features improved with PXL770 treatment, AMPK activation might be a promising pharmacological target for patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD, and could also be considered for further assessment in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis., Funding: Poxel., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests KC reports grant and research support from Cirius, Echosens, Inventiva, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, and Zydus, and is a consulting adviser for Allergan, Altimmune, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Boehringer Ingelheim, Coherus, Eli Lilly, Fractyl, Hanmi, Genentech, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, Pfizer, Poxel, Prosciento, Madrigal, and Novo Nordisk. NA reports grant and research support from 89Bio, Akero, Axcella, BI, BMS, Celgene, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Enanta, Enyo, Hanmi, Inventiva, Madrigal, Merck, NGM Bio, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, and Zydus; is a consulting adviser for 89Bio, Fibronostics, Gilead, Intercept, Pfizer, Terns, and Zydus; and reports educational fees from AbbVie, Alexion, CLDF, Gilead, Intercept, and Simply Speaking. SAH reports grant and research support from Akero, Axcella, Cirius, Civi Biopharma, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Sagimet, and Viking; is a consulting adviser for 89 Bio, AgomAB, Akero, Alentis, Alimentiv, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella, Boston Pharmaceuticals, B Riley FBR, Canfite, Chronwell, Civi Biopharma, Corcept, Cymabay, Echosens, Enyo, Fibronostics, Foresite Labs, Fortress, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, GNS Healthcare, Hepion, Hightide, Histoindex, Indalo, Inipharm, Intercept, Ionis, Kowa Research Institute, Madrigal, Medpace, Metacrine, Microba, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Nutrasource, PathAI, Piper Sandler & Co, Poxel, Prometic, Ridgeline, Sagimet, Sonic Incytes Medical, Terns, Theratechnologies, and Viking; and holds shares in Akero, Chronwell, Cirius, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, Histoindex, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, PathAI, and Sonic Incytes Medical. PF, DEM, SH-B, and SB are employees of and shareholders in Poxel. J-MG is a consulting adviser for Poxel. JD is a former employee of and shareholder in Poxel. VR reports grant and research support from Gilead and is a consulting adviser for Boehringer Ingelheim, Galmed, Genfit, Poxel, Intercept, Novo-Nordisk, Terns, Alexion, Alnylam, Theratechnologies, NGMBio, Sagimet, Prosciento, Inventiva, Hanmi, Covance, and 89 Bio. SJM declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Higher serum bile acid levels are associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis and liver-related morbidity and mortality. Herein, we report secondary analyses of aldafermin, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone fibroblast growth factor 19, on the circulating bile acid profile in prospective, phase II studies in patients with metabolic or cholestatic liver disease., Methods: One hundred and seventy-six patients with biopsy-confirmed non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis and elevated liver fat content (≥8% by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction) received 0.3 mg (n = 23), 1 mg (n = 49), 3 mg (n = 49), 6 mg (n = 28) aldafermin or placebo (n = 27) for 12 weeks. Sixty-two patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (>1.5× upper limit of normal) received 1 mg (n = 21), 3 mg (n = 21) aldafermin or placebo (n = 20) for 12 weeks. Serum samples were collected on day 1 and week 12 for determination of bile acid profile and neoepitope-specific N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen (Pro-C3), a direct measure of fibrogenesis., Results: Treatment with aldafermin resulted in significant dose-dependent reductions in serum bile acids. In particular, bile acids with higher hydrophobicity indices, such as deoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid, glycodeoxycholic acid, glycochenodeoxycholic acid, and glycocholic acid, were markedly lowered by aldafermin in both NASH and PSC populations. Moreover, aldafermin predominantly suppressed the glycine-conjugated bile acids, rather than the taurine-conjugated bile acids. Changes in levels of bile acids correlated with changes in the novel fibrogenesis marker Pro-C3, which detects a neo-epitope of the type III collagen during its formation, in the pooled NASH and PSC populations., Conclusions: Aldafermin markedly reduced major hydrophobic bile acids that have greater detergent activity and cytotoxicity. Our data provide evidence that bile acids may contribute to sustaining a pro-fibrogenic microenvironment in the liver across metabolic and cholestatic liver diseases., Lay Summary: Aldafermin is an analogue of a gut hormone, which is in development as a treatment for patients with chronic liver disease. Herein, we show that aldafermin can potently and robustly suppress the toxic, hydrophobic bile acids irrespective of disease aetiology. The therapeutic strategy utilising aldafermin may be broadly applicable to other chronic gastrointestinal and liver disorders., Clinical Trials Registration: The study is registered at Clinicaltrials.govNCT02443116 and NCT02704364., Competing Interests: A.J.S. reports serving as an unpaid consultant to Intercept, Zydus, Echosense, Immuron, Madrigal, Galectin, Blade, Pliant, Albireo, and AMRA; is a consultant to Gilead, Allergan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Merck, Galmed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Siemens, Genentech, Boehringer Ingelhiem, Glympse Bio, Genfit, Coherus, Surrozen, Poxel, 89 Bio, Perspectum, AstraZeneca, Medimmune, and Lipocine; owns stock options in Indalo, Durect, Tiziana, Exhalenz, and Northsea; and is president of Sanyal Bio. L.L., A.M.D., and H.D.L. are employees and stockholders of NGM Biopharmaceuticals. U.B. reports consulting for Novartis, Intercept; grant/research support from Norwegian, American, and South African PSC patient foundations and German DCCV; received lecture fees from Abbvie, Falk Foundation, Gilead, Intercept, Novartis, Roche, Shire, and Zambon; and received research support for investigator-initiated studies from Dr. Falk Pharma and Intercept. S.A.H. reports research support from Conatus, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Akero, Axcella, Metacrine, Sagimet, Enyo, NorthSea, Genentech, Hepion, Cymabay, and Hightide; and is a consulting adviser for the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation, Cirius, Echosens, Akero, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Perspectum, Metacrine, Medpace, Sagimet, Blade, Viking, Poxel, Axcella, Terns, HistoIndex, Hightide, Hepion, Ridgeline Therapeutics, CiVi, and Prometic. G.M.H. reports consulting for Cymabay, Genfit, Falk, Intercept, GSK, Mirum, Roche, and Pliant. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (© 2021 The Author(s).)

Background: Non-invasive tests that can identify patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) at higher risk of disease progression are lacking. We report the development and validation of a blood-based diagnostic test to non-invasively rule in and rule out at-risk NASH (defined as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD] activity score [NAS] ≥4 and fibrosis stage ≥2)., Methods: In this prospective derivation and global validation study, blood samples, clinical data, and liver biopsy results from three independent cohorts with suspected NAFLD were used to develop and validate a non-invasive blood-based diagnostic test, called NIS4. Derivation was done in the discovery cohort, which comprised 239 prospectively recruited patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH (NAFLD NAS ≥3; fibrosis stage 0-3) from the international GOLDEN-505 phase 2b clinical trial. A complete matrix based on 23 variables selected for univariate association with the presence of at-risk NASH and avoiding high multi-collinearity was used to derive the model in a bootstrap-based process that minimised the Akaike information criterion. The overall diagnostic performance of NIS4 was externally validated in two independent cohorts: RESOLVE-IT diag and Angers. The RESOLVE-IT diag cohort comprised the first 475 patients screened for potential inclusion into the RESOLVE-IT phase 3 clinical trial. Angers was a retrospective cohort of 227 prospectively recruited patients with suspected NAFLD and clinical risk factors for NASH or fibrosis stage 2 or more according to abnormal elastography results or abnormal liver biochemistry. Both external validation cohorts were independently analysed and were combined into a pooled validation cohort (n=702) to assess clinical performance of NIS4 and other non-invasive tests., Findings: The derived NIS4 algorithm comprised four independent NASH-associated biomarkers (miR-34a-5p, alpha-2 macroglobulin, YKL-40, and glycated haemoglobin; area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUROC] 0·80, 95% CI 0·73-0·85), and did not require adjustment for age, sex, body-mass index (BMI), or aminotransferase concentrations. Clinical cutoffs were established within the discovery cohort to optimise both rule out and rule in clinical performance while minimising indeterminate results. NIS4 was validated in the RESOLVE-IT diag cohort (AUROC 0·83, 95% CI 0·79-0·86) and the Angers cohort (0·76, 0·69-0·82). In the pooled validation cohort, patients with a NIS4 value less than 0·36 were classified as not having at-risk NASH (ruled out) with 81·5% (95% CI 76·9-85·3) sensitivity, 63·0% (57·8-68·0) specificity, and a negative predictive value of 77·9% (72·5-82·4), whereas those with a NIS4 value of more than 0·63 were classified as having at-risk NASH (ruled in) with 87·1% (83·1-90·3) specificity, 50·7% (45·3-56·1) sensitivity, and a positive predictive value of 79·2% (73·1-84·2). The diagnostic performance of NIS4 within the external validation cohorts was not influenced by age, sex, BMI, or aminotransferase concentrations., Interpretation: NIS4 is a novel blood-based diagnostic that provides an effective way to non-invasively rule in or rule out at-risk NASH in patients with metabolic risk factors and suspected disease. Use of NIS4 in clinical trials or in the clinic has the potential to greatly reduce unnecessary liver biopsies in patients with lower risk of disease progression., Funding: Genfit., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The burden of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing globally, and a major priority is to identify patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) who are at greater risk of progression to cirrhosis, and who will be candidates for clinical trials and emerging new pharmacotherapies. We aimed to develop a score to identify patients with NASH, elevated NAFLD activity score (NAS≥4), and advanced fibrosis (stage 2 or higher [F≥2])., Methods: This prospective study included a derivation cohort before validation in multiple international cohorts. The derivation cohort was a cross-sectional, multicentre study of patients aged 18 years or older, scheduled to have a liver biopsy for suspicion of NAFLD at seven tertiary care liver centres in England. This was a prespecified secondary outcome of a study for which the primary endpoints have already been reported. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measured by FibroScan device were combined with aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or AST:ALT ratio. To identify those patients with NASH, an elevated NAS, and significant fibrosis, the best fitting multivariable logistic regression model was identified and internally validated using boot-strapping. Score calibration and discrimination performance were determined in both the derivation dataset in England, and seven independent international (France, USA, China, Malaysia, Turkey) histologically confirmed cohorts of patients with NAFLD (external validation cohorts). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01985009., Findings: Between March 20, 2014, and Jan 17, 2017, 350 patients with suspected NAFLD attending liver clinics in England were prospectively enrolled in the derivation cohort. The most predictive model combined LSM, CAP, and AST, and was designated FAST (FibroScan-AST). Performance was satisfactory in the derivation dataset (C-statistic 0·80, 95% CI 0·76-0·85) and was well calibrated. In external validation cohorts, calibration of the score was satisfactory and discrimination was good across the full range of validation cohorts (C-statistic range 0·74-0·95, 0·85; 95% CI 0·83-0·87 in the pooled external validation patients' cohort; n=1026). Cutoff was 0·35 for sensitivity of 0·90 or greater and 0·67 for specificity of 0·90 or greater in the derivation cohort, leading to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0·83 (84/101) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0·85 (93/110). In the external validation cohorts, PPV ranged from 0·33 to 0·81 and NPV from 0·73 to 1·0., Interpretation: The FAST score provides an efficient way to non-invasively identify patients at risk of progressive NASH for clinical trials or treatments when they become available, and thereby reduce unnecessary liver biopsy in patients unlikely to have significant disease., Funding: Echosens and UK National Institute for Health Research., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)