Search

Background and Objective: Next-line systemic treatment (NEST) is the standard of care for patients presenting with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Progression-directed therapy (PDT), defined as a lesion-directed approach in patients with a limited number of progressive and/or new lesions, could postpone the need for NEST in these patients with so-called oligoprogressive mCRPC. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of postponing NEST initiation in oligoprogressive mCRPC by using PDT., Methods: MEDCARE was a prospective, single-arm, nonrandomized phase 2 trial. Eligible patients had oligoprogressive mCRPC and were treated with PDT while their ongoing systemic therapy was continued. The primary endpoint was NEST-free survival (NEST-FS). Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen response, clinical progression-free survival (cPFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), overall survival (OS), and PDT-induced toxicity., Key Findings and Limitations: Twenty patients underwent PDT for 38 oligoprogressive lesions. At median follow-up of 28 mo, median NEST-FS was 17 mo and the 2-yr NEST-FS rate was 35%. Median PCSS and median OS were not reached. The PCSS and OS rates at 2 yr were 80% and 70%, respectively. The 2-yr local control rate was 95%. No patient experienced early or late grade ≥3 toxicity. NEST-FS was longer for patients who received PDT to all lesions visible on 18 F-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (30 vs 13 mo; p = 0.002)., Conclusions and Clinical Implications: This single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial demonstrated that PDT in oligoprogressive mCRPC resulted in median NEST-FS of 17 mo without any early or late grade ≥3 toxicity., Patient Summary: For patients with metastatic prostate cancer no longer responding to hormone therapy, we investigated radiotherapy targeted at progressive cancer lesions while continuing their ongoing systemic treatment. The results show that this targeted therapy had very low toxicity and delayed the need to start a new line of systemic treatment by 17 months., (Copyright © 2024 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Penile cancer (PeCa) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge given the low patient volume, which may result in inadequate physician expertise and poor guideline adherence. Since 2015, we have developed a specific care pathway for PeCa in our tertiary referral center., Objective: To evaluate the impact of a dedicated PeCa care pathway on patient management, the adequacy of pathological reporting, and oncological outcomes., Design, Setting, and Participants: We retrospectively queried our institutional registry (S-66482) to identify patients who were surgically treated for PeCa between January 1989 and April 2022. The patient numbers were evaluated within a broader national context., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: We compared patient, surgery, tumor, and pathological data before and after 2015. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare local and regional recurrence rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS)., Results and Limitations: Overall, 313 patients were included, of whom 204 (65.1%) were surgically treated after 2015. The median number of patients treated yearly was significantly higher after 2015 (26 vs 5; p < 0.01). Patients treated after 2015 more frequently had no palpable lymph nodes at diagnosis, despite similar primary tumor stage. After adoption of the PeCa care pathway, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) was more commonly performed (79.9% vs 57.8%; p < 0.01) despite local staging being similar and without observing a significant increase in positive margins. Surgical staging in patients with European Association of Urology intermediate- or high-risk tumors was conducted more frequently after 2015 (90% vs 41%; p < 0.01). Pathology reporting was standardized, and there was more frequent reporting of p16 staining status (81.4% vs 8.3%; p < 0.01), lymphovascular invasion (93.8% vs 44.3%; p < 0.01), and perineural invasion (92.4% vs 44.3%; p < 0.01) following implementation., Conclusions: Implementation of a standardized care pathway for PeCa resulted in higher rates of OSS and pathological nodal staging and more complete pathology reports. Considering that these changes were associated with an increase in the number of patients treated, academic-driven centralization may play a role in optimizing the management of these patients., Patient Summary: We evaluated the impact of a care pathway for patients with penile cancer on patient management, the completeness of pathology reporting, and cancer control. We found that implementation of this pathway was associated with an increase in the number of patients treated, higher rates of organ-sparing surgery and lymph node staging, and more complete pathology reports. Centralization of care may play a role in optimizing the management of penile cancer., (Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study evaluated the safety and performance of a drop-in gamma probe for prostate cancer (PCa) sentinel lymph node biopsy (SeLNB) in a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm clinical trial., Objective: The main objective was to determine the sentinel lymph node (SeLN) detection rate with the drop-in gamma probe system. The secondary objectives were overall performance and safety., Design, Setting, and Participants: At three European centres, patients received an ultrasound-guided systemic and tumour-targeted injection of [ 99m Tc]Tc-nanocolloid followed by planar lymphoscintigraphy and/or single-photon emission computerised tomography. The next day, manual laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was performed, including SeLN dissection (SeLND) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND)., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: SeLNs were detected with the drop-in probe and a rigid laparoscopic gamma probe (RLGP). The primary endpoint of the study was the SeLND rate defined as the percentage of patients with at least one SeLN detected in vivo by the drop-in probe. The secondary endpoints included diagnostic performance, ease of SeLN detection, number of SeLNs detected, and safety. The first two patients at each site (six in total) were used for familiarisation., Results and Limitations: A total of 27 patients were included in the main analysis. SENSEI successfully detected at least one SeLN in all 27 patients, resulting in a detection rate of 100% (95% confidence interval 87.2-100%). The total number of SeLNs identified with SENSEI was 85 (median three SeLNs per patient, range 1-6); of these 85 SeLNs, 12 were located outside of the ePLND template. In the nine patients in whom the RLGP was used, SENSEI detected two SeLNs that could not be detected with the RLGP due to manoeuvrability restrictions. Ten of the 27 patients were pN1; four patients had a false-negative SeLNB. No adverse events or complications were related to the use of the drop-in probe., Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the drop-in gamma probe meets the performance and safety requirements for SeLNB in PCa. The device provided improved manoeuvrability and SeLN detection compared with the conventional RLGP., Patient Summary: A novel device was tested for detecting sentinel lymph nodes during minimally invasive surgery for prostate cancer. In this first evaluation, the performance and safety of the device were evaluated positively., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is useful for selected clinical indications in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) but it may have broader clinical utility owing to the emergence of lutetium-177-PSMA-617 ([ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA) therapy. However, robust data regarding the impact of PSMA PET/CT on patient management and treatment are lacking, and in many areas, the role of next-generation imaging has not been defined., Objective: To assess expert opinion on the use of PSMA-based imaging and therapy to develop interim guidance., Design, Setting, and Participants: A panel of 21 PCa experts from various disciplines received thematic topics and relevant literature. A questionnaire to assess proposed guidance statements regarding PSMA PET/CT and [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy was developed for completion remotely in a first e-Delphi round. A subsequent panel discussion was conducted during a 1-d meeting, which included a second Delphi round., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Panellists voted anonymously on statements using a nine-point Likert scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 9 = strongly agree. Median scores were calculated and consensus was assessed using methods proposed by the Research and Development (RAND) corporation., Results and Limitations: Statements were developed to cover the following topics: PSMA PET/CT utility, clinical use, and choice of tracer; patient selection; and management of patients receiving [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA for metastatic PCa. Consensus was reached for 33/36 statements. In-group bias is a potential limitation, as some statements were rephrased during discussions at the 1-d meeting., Conclusions: Adoption of PSMA PET/CT as an imaging tool to guide [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy should be supported by indications for appropriate use., Patient Summary: A panel of experts in prostate cancer reached a consensus for the majority of statements proposed regarding the role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based imaging and therapy, particularly the use of PSMA-based imaging in patients suitable for [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy and the need to perform PSMA-based imaging before considering patients as candidates for this therapy., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Presence of lymph node metastases (LNM) is an important prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). In various neoplasms, 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is an established modality for preoperative lymph node (LN) staging. In UTUC, the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for LN staging is unknown., Objective: To determine the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for LN staging in patients with UTUC., Design, Setting, and Participants: Data of 152 patients with UTUC who underwent FDG-PET/CT followed by surgical treatment in eight centers between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: FDG-PET/CT results were compared with histopathology after lymph node dissection (LND). Recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and compared for patients with and without suspicious LNs on FDG-PET/CT., Results and Limitations: We included 117 patients, of whom 62 underwent LND. Seventeen patients had LNM at histopathological evaluation. Sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of LNM were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57-96) and 84% (95% CI: 71-94), respectively. RFS was significantly worse in patients with LN-positive FDG-PET/CT than in those with LN-negative FDG-PET/CT (p=0.03). CSS (p=0.11) and OS (p=0.5) were similar between groups. This study is limited by its retrospective design and by its sample size. Our results warrant further validation., Conclusions: FDG-PET/CT has 82% sensitivity and 84% specificity for the detection of LNM in patients with UTUC. Presence of suspicious LNs on FDG-PET/CT is associated with worse RFS., Patient Summary: In patients with upper tract urothelial cancer, positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) scans can detect lymph node metastases with noteworthy accuracy. Presence of suspicious lymph nodes on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT is associated with worse recurrence-free survival., (Copyright © 2019 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The data presented in this article are related to the research article entitled "The Diagnostic Value of Rescaled Renal Biomarkers Serum Creatinine and Serum Cystatin C and their Relation with Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate" (Pottel et al. (2017) [1]). Data are presented demonstrating the rationale for the normalization or rescaling of serum cystatin C, equivalent to the rescaling of serum creatinine. Rescaling biomarkers brings them to a notionally common scale with reference interval [0.67-1.33]. This article illustrates the correlation between rescaled biomarkers serum creatinine and serum cystatin C by plotting them in a 2-dimensional graph. The diagnostic value in terms of sensitivity and specificity with measured Glomerular Filtration Rate as the reference method is calculated per age-decade for both rescaled biomarkers. Finally, the interchangeability between detecting impaired kidney function from renal biomarkers and from the Full Age Spectrum FAS-estimating GFR-equation and measured GFR using a fixed and an age-dependent threshold is shown.