Search

Background: In multiple sclerosis (MS) neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a marker of neuronal damage secondary to inflammation and neurodegeneration. NfL levels drop after commencement of disease-modifying treatment, especially the highly active ones. However, the factors that influence this drop are unknown., Objective: To examine the patient and treatment-related factors that influence CSF NfL before and after starting treatment., Methods: Eligible patients across two centres with two CSF NfL measurements, clinical and MRI data were included as part of an observational cohort study., Results: Data were available in 61 patients, of which 40 were untreated at the first CSF sampling (T1) and treated at the second (T2; mean T1-T2: 19 months). CSF NfL reduction correlated with age (beta = 1.24 95%CI(1.07,1.43); R 2 = 0.17; p = 0.005), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (beta = 1.12 95%CI(1.00,1.25); R 2 = 0.21; p = 0.05) and the type of MS (beta = 0.63 95%CI(0.43, 0.92); R 2 = 0.12; p = 0.018; reference=relapsing MS). The treatment effect on a baseline NfL of 702 pg/mL was 451 pg/ml 95%CI(374,509) in a 30-year-old versus 228 pg/ml 95%CI(63,350) in a 60-year-old. There was no association in CSF NfL reduction with BMI, disease duration or sex. In cladribine- and alemtuzumab-treated patients, the CSF NfL T2/T1 ratio did not correlate with lymphocyte depletion rate at 23 weeks., Conclusions: In this observational study, we found that factors reflecting early disease stage, including a younger age, lower disability and relapsing MS were associated with treatment response in CSF NfL. Other factors were not found to be related, including lymphopaenia in highly-active treatments., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: There is an urgent clinical need for reliable remote monitoring methods in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). We evaluated the use of remotely patient-recorded timed 25-foot walk (rT25FW) and nine-hole peg test (r9HPT)., Methods: Seventy-one people with MS completed a previously-validated online EDSS (webEDSS) and r9HPT, and 108 completed the webEDSS and rT25FW., Results: There was a mild-moderate positive correlation between webEDSS and rT25FW, and no significant correlation between webEDSS and r9HPT. Distributions of rT25FW and r9HPT times were positively skewed., Conclusions: Our results provide pilot evidence that remote monitoring of MS is potentially valid but requires refinement before wide-scale implementation. With a median EDSS of 4.5 and EDSS range of 0 - 8.0, at least some patients with ambulatory difficulty are able to complete the assessments., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To report three cases of severe skin reactions in patients treated with cladribine for multiple sclerosis., Methods: Case study., Results: Patients developed severe rash 3-192 days after receiving cladribine. All were effectively treated with steroids and antihistamines. Additional doses of cladribine were administered after pretreatment with steroids and anti-histamines. One patient developed mild recurrence following re-exposure, which resolved within three days, whilst another patient tolerated re-exposure without further adverse reaction., Conclusion: Severe skin reactions, well described in patients receiving cladribine for treatment of haematological conditions, may occur in patients treated with this compound for multiple sclerosis. Neurologists need to be aware of this rare, but significant adverse reaction. Re-exposure may be safe with standard pre-treatment against allergic reactions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None considered relevant. MMC, SR, EO, DTS, YO and APK have nothing to declare. JM has received advisory boards fees from Novartis and Merck. DB has received compensation for consultancies presentations and/or advisory board activities from Merck. DB is shareholder of Canbex Therapeutics and has received compensation for activities related to Canbex therapeutics, Japan tobacco, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme; GG has received honoraria and meeting support from AbbVie Biotherapeutics, Biogen, Canbex, Ironwood, Novartis, Merck, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Synthon, Teva and Vertex; KS has received honoraria and/or meeting support from Biogen, Lipomed, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To examine the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prescribing patterns in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS)., Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among pwRRMS treated with a DMT in the neuroinflammation service at The Royal London Hospital (Barts Health NHS Trust). Study data were collected between July and September 2017. SES was determined by patient income and education extracted from the English Index of Multiple Deprivation. Based on their efficacy, DMTs were categorized as moderate efficacy (Glatiramer Acetate and Beta-Interferons), high efficacy (Cladribine, Fingolimod and Dimethyl Fumarate) and very-high efficacy therapies (Natalizumab and Alemtuzumab). Multinomial logistic regressions were performed for univariate and multivariate models to assess differences between SES and DMT prescribing patterns., Results: Treatment consisted of moderate efficacy (n = 76, 12%), high efficacy (n = 325, 51.3%) and very-high efficacy therapies (n = 232, 36.7%). Medians for income and education deciles were 4 (IQR 3-7) and 6 (IQR 4-8), respectively. After multinomial logistic regression analysis, patient income was not associated with increased odds of being treated with high efficacy (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.04; p = 0.177) or very-high efficacy DMTs (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.06; p = 0.371). Similarly, patient education was not associated with being treated with high efficacy (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.80-1.03; p = 0.139) or very-high efficacy therapies (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-1.04; p = 0.188)., Conclusions: SES was not predictive of DMT prescribing patterns in pwRRMS. Whilst this appears reassuring within this universal health care setting, the same methodology needs to be applied to other MS services for comparison. Data could then be further interrogated to explore potential socioeconomic inequities in DMT prescribing patterns across the UK., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest SS, KAP, OY, FE and CJ have nothing to declare. SR is supported by an ECTRIMS (European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis) fellowship. JM has received advisory boards fees from Novartis and Merck. GA has received grant support from Biogen. BT has received travel bursaries, grants and advisory boards fees from Biogen, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis and Merck. MM has received speaker honoraria from Sanofi-Genzyme and Merck. SG has received speaker honoraria from Genzyme and Novartis. SG has received travel grants from Biogen and ECTRIMS. SG has received grant support from Genzyme and Takeda. KS has received honoraria and meeting support from Biogen, Lipomed, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva. GG has received honoraria and meeting support from AbbVie Biotherapeutics, Biogen, Canbex, Ironwood, Novartis, Merck, Merck Serono, Roche, Sanofi Genzyme, Synthon, Teva and Vertex. GG serves as chief editor for Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Whilst there is a broad selection of drugs licensed as disease modifying treatments (DMTs) for people with relapsing multiple sclerosis (pwRMS), access to DMTs remains restricted, particularly for people with progressive MS (pwPMS). Cladribine has shown efficacy at all stages of MS. Following withdrawal from the market of oral cladribine in 2011, partly due to issues associated with lymphopenia, and following a thorough risk assessment, we started using subcutaneously injected cladribine (Litak ® ) to treat both pwRMS and pwPMS. Here, we report on the real life safety and tolerability of this treatment option., Methods: Cladribine was offered to (i) pwRMS as a choice despite fulfilling NHS England (NHSE) criteria for licensed DMTs, and (ii) pwRMS and pwPMS not eligible for NHSE approved DMTs. To avoid lymphocyte depletion lower than 0.5 × 10 9 /l (WHO grade 2) cladribine was administered using a personalised dosing scheme (30-40 mg in week 1; and another 0-30 mg in week 5 pending total lymphocyte count at week 4). Anti-viral prophylaxis was given from day 1 for 60 days. Patients approaching week 48 were given a second treatment cycle. Data collection included side effects, relapses, change in disability and MRI indices., Results: Seventy-one pwMS (40 female, 31 male; 36 RMS, 35 PMS,) received at least one treatment cycle. Mean age for starting cladribine was 44 years (range 22-72 years), median EDSS was 5 (range 1-8.5). Maximum follow-up was 28 months. 35/71 pwMS were followed up for at least 20 weeks. These patients had a median EDSS of 5.0 (range 1.0-7.5) at baseline and 5.5 (range 1.0-8.0) after a mean follow-up of 11 months (range 5-28). Cladribine was well tolerated with very few treatment-related adverse events observed. Personalised dosing led to grade 1-2 lymphopenia in 50% of cases. A single patient developed transient grade 3 lymphopenia. No cases of varicella or other infections were observed. Four/17 people with relapsing MS, experienced a total of six relapses during a mean follow-up of 13 months (range 5-28 months). In people with PMS (n = 18) median EDSS was 5.5 (2.0-7.5) at baseline and 6.0 (2.5-7.5) after a median of 10 months (range 5-18). In pwPMS MRI showed that 25% had active scans at baseline, and 0% at follow-up., Conclusion: Personalised dosing of cladribine avoided severe lymphopenia in all but one patients and was very well tolerated across a large spectrum of disease severity. Our data suggests cladribine may offer benefit people with relapsing and progressive MS alike. The personalised protocol used appears safe, however warrants controlled studies to more definitively assess efficacy and safety, particularly in groups of pwMS who are not eligible for licensed DMT including oral cladribine (Mavenclad ® )., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Evidence suggests people with non-relapsing deteriorating ("progressive") multiple sclerosis (pwPMS) may benefit from disease-modifying immune therapy (DMT). However, only one such treatment (ocrelizumab) has been licensed and is highly restricted to pwPMS suffering from the primary progressive phenotype. The difficulties assessing treatment outcome in pwPMS is one important reason for the lack of respective DMT. The concentration of neurofilaments in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) provides a biomarker of neuro-axonal damage, and both neurofilament light (NfL) and heavy chain (NfH) levels have been used as outcome indices and to guide treatment choices., Methods: We report on two pwPMS, who were treated with subcutaneous cladribine undergoing CSF NfL testing, alongside MRI and clinical follow-up, before and after treatment., Results: Cladribine treatment was well tolerated without any side effects. CSF NfL after treatment revealed significant reduction (by 73% and 80%, respectively) corroborating the MRI detectable drop in disease activity. Disability mildly progressed in one, and remained stable in the other pwPMS., Conclusions: pwPMS with detectable disease activity (MRI, elevated NfL) should be considered for DMT. NfL appears to be a sensitive index of treatment effect in pwPMS, and may be a useful outcome in clinical trials targeting this patient group. Over and above its licensed indication (relapsing MS), cladribine may be an effective treatment option for pwPMS., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)