Search

Background: Nipple preservation contributes to aesthetic outcome and quality of life in women undergoing Skin-Sparing Mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction for the treatment of breast cancer. Intraoperative Frozen Section (IFS) has been advocated to facilitate conversion from Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) to SSM in cases with positive subareolar margins. This study investigated the application of IFS at our comprehensive cancer centre., Methods: In this single-centre retrospective study, for all patients who underwent therapeutic NSM with IFS from 2000 to 2021 pathological reports, patient- and tumour characteristics were retrieved., Results: In total 640 women were included in whom 662 intended NSMs with IFS had been performed. Sensitivity and specificity of frozen section compared with definitive histopathology were 75.2% and 98.5% respectively. In six women with a false positive result, the nipple had been removed. In 16 out of 32 women with a false negative result, the nipple was excised in a second procedure. In total 115 nipples were resected. In 40% of these nipples, no residual disease was detected., Discussion: IFS is a moderately sensitive and highly specific diagnostic tool to detect positive subareolar margins. An alternative approach is to omit frozen section but take intraoperative biopsies of the sub areolar margin, which are postoperatively analysed with definitive formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded histopathology. This allows for shared decision making regarding nipple excision in cases where minimal disease is found in subareolar tissue or cases with an indication for post-mastectomy radiotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ∼ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Genome sequencing (GS) enables comprehensive molecular analysis of tumors and identification of hereditary cancer predisposition. According to guidelines, directly determining pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) requires pretest genetic counseling, which is cost-ineffective. Referral for genetic counseling based on tumor variants alone could miss relevant PGVs and/or result in unnecessary referrals., Methods: We validated GS for detection of germline variants and simulated 3 strategies using paired tumor-normal GS data of 937 metastatic patients. In strategy-1, genetic counseling before tumor testing allowed direct PGV analysis. In strategy-2 and -3, germline testing and referral for post-test genetic counseling is based on tumor variants using Dutch (strategy-2) or Europen Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Precision Medicine Working Group (strategy-3) guidelines., Results: In strategy-1, PGVs would be detected in 50 patients (number-needed-to counsel; NTC = 18.7). In strategy-2, 86 patients would have been referred for genetic counseling and 43 would have PGVs (NTC = 2). In strategy-3, 94 patients would have been referred for genetic counseling and 32 would have PGVs (NTC = 2.9). Hence, 43 and 62 patients, respectively, were unnecessarily referred based on a somatic variant., Conclusion: Both post-tumor test counseling strategies (2 and 3) had significantly lower NTC, and strategy-2 had the highest PGV yield. Combining pre-tumor test mainstreaming and post-tumor test counseling may maximize the clinically relevant PGV yield and minimize unnecessary referrals., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Kim Monkhorst reports research grants from AstraZeneca and speakers’ fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, AstraZeneca, and Benecke. Kim Monkhorst received consultancy fees from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Diaceutics, Eli Lilly, Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim and nonfinancial support from Roche, Takeda, Pfizer, Personal Genome Diagnostics, and DELFi. Edwin Cuppen reports consultancy fees and support for attending meetings and traveling from Illumina. Emile E. Voest is member of the supervisory board of Hartwig Medical Foundation. Gerrit A. Meijer is cofounder and a board member (CSO) of CRCbioscreen BV, he has a research collaboration with CZ Health Insurances (cash matching to ZonMW grant), and he has research collaborations with Exact Sciences, Sysmex, Sentinel Ch. SpA, Personal Genome Diagnostics (PGDX), and DELFi; these companies provide materials, equipment, and/or sample/genomic analyses. Gerrit A. Meijer is an advisory board member of “Missie Tumor Onbekend.” All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: TNM staging of melanoma has recently been altered by the introduction of the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging manual. The purpose of this study is to analyze the inter-observer variation of histopathology reports and its effect on recommended treatment policy., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 296 cases, diagnosed as primary cutaneous head and neck melanoma (2005-2016), referred to the Netherlands Cancer Institute (NCI) for treatment after prior diagnosis in another hospital (non-NCI). All reports were analyzed for patients demographics, tumor characteristics and histopathologic features., Results: In 53% and 40% of the cases, the histopathologic parameters were discordant, according to AJCC 7th and 8th edition, respectively. This indicated a perfect inter-observer agreement for the measurement of Breslow thickness (Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.981) and a substantial agreement for subtype (kappa statistic (κ) = 0.648) and ulceration (κ = 0.802), while only moderate for dermal mitotic activity (κ = 0.472). After NCI review, recommended treatment policies were changed in 13% and 11% of the patients when applying TNM 7 and TNM 8, respectively. Scheduling sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) changed in 14 (5%) and 10 (3%) cases when using TNM 7 and TNM 8, respectively., Conclusion: Review by a NCI pathologist of histopathologic parameters of primary cutaneous head and neck melanoma led to significant changes in treatment decision. Introduction of the AJCC 8th edition led to slightly less discordances between NCI and non-NCI reports and consequently smaller impact on treatment planning. Expert review remains indicated when a SLNB is considered for additional staging in selected cases., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Podocyte foot process effacement is characteristic of proteinuric renal diseases. In minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) foot processes are diffusely effaced whereas the extent of effacement varies in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). Here we measured foot process effacement in FSGS and compared it to that in MCNS and in normal kidneys. A clinical diagnosis was used to differentiate idiopathic FSGS from secondary FSGS. Median foot process width, determined morphometrically by electron microscopy, was 3236 nm in 17 patients with idiopathic FSGS, 1098 nm in 7 patients with secondary FSGS, and 1725 nm in 15 patients with MCNS, as compared to 562 nm in 12 control patients. Multivariate analysis showed that foot process width did not correlate with proteinuria or serum albumin levels but was significantly associated as an independent factor with the type of disease. Foot process width over 1500 nm differentiated idiopathic from secondary FSGS with high sensitivity and specificity. Our results show that quantitative analysis of foot processes may offer a potential tool to distinguish idiopathic from secondary FSGS.

Background: Nephrotic syndromes result from increased glomerular permeability to proteins and are structurally believed to be associated with podocyte foot process effacement. Despite increasing knowledge of the molecular composition of the glomerular filtration barrier, the relationship between proteinuria and foot process effacement is unclear., Methods: We conducted a morphologic study on the relationship between podocyte foot process effacement and proteinuria. Electron microscope pictures of glomerular capillaries were randomly taken from 27 cases in various stages of minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS), from six cases of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) with high proteinuria and from seven control kidneys. From each picture, the mean width of the foot processes (FPW) was quantitated., Results: In normal kidney the mean FPW was 580 +/- 40 nm. In biopsies from patients with MCNS without treatment, foot processes were diffusely effaced, reflected by a FPW of 1600 +/- 440 nm. In biopsies from patients with MCNS relapsing under prednisolone treatment, foot processes were significantly less effaced than in untreated MCNS (FPW 920 +/- 200 nm). In biopsies displaying IgAN, effacement was significantly more segmental than in untreated MCNS (FPW 800 +/- 170 nm). Proteinuria did not differ significantly among the groups. Neither in MCNS nor in IgAN was the extent of foot process effacement correlated with the level of proteinuria., Conclusion: Podocyte foot process effacement is not correlated with proteinuria. The differences in podocyte effacement between MCNS, MCNS relapsing under prednisolone treatment, and IgAN may point to different mechanisms of podocyte injury in these diseases.

Background: In inflammation, urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) play an important role in fibrinolysis and in activation and chemotaxis of neutrophils and lymphocytes. Moreover, the uPA/uPAR system is involved in processes that affect turnover of the extracellular matrix (ECM). The aim of this study was to determine the local and systemic release of uPAR, and the expression of uPA and uPAR in renal tissues during acute renal allograft rejection., Methods: Blood, urine, and tissue samples were collected from 33 patients diagnosed with acute allograft rejection and from 14 transplant patients without rejection. From 10 healthy volunteers, blood and urine were collected as a control. In urine and blood samples, the levels of uPAR were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Immunostaining and in situ hybridization for uPA and uPAR were performed on renal biopsies., Results: uPAR was detectable at low levels in serum and urine of healthy volunteers and was increased in nonrejecting allograft recipients. Serum and urine levels of uPAR were higher in transplant recipients with rejection compared to nonrejectors. The urine and serum levels of uPAR correlated with the renal function. Immunostaining and in situ hybridization showed an up-regulation of both uPA and uPAR in rejection biopsies. Nonrejected grafts displayed no expression of uPA and uPAR by immunostaining, or of uPAR by in situ hybridization. uPA was detected in a limited number of tubular epithelial cells by in situ hybridization. During rejection, lymphocytes as well as tubular epithelial cells showed uPA and uPAR expression. In the vascular types of rejection, strong expression of uPA was also seen in the entire vessel wall, while uPAR was expressed by the endothelium., Conclusion: This study shows that (1) uPA and uPAR are up-regulated during acute renal allograft rejection; (2) uPAR levels in urine and serum correlate with serum creatinine levels, and (3) uPA and uPAR are produced by inflammatory cells, tubular epithelium, and vascular endothelium during acute renal allograft rejection.

Background: The urokinase receptor (uPAR; CD87) is a multifunctional molecule involved in fibrinolysis, in proteolysis, in renal tubular functions, and in migration and adhesion of inflammatory cells to the site of infection., Methods: To gain insight into systemic and local release of uPAR and into its regulation during urosepsis, which is one of the leading causes of chronic renal failure, uPAR was measured in urine and plasma of healthy human controls (N = 20), patients with culture-proven urosepsis (N = 30), and healthy human volunteers intravenously injected with endotoxin (N = 7)., Results: Patients had elevated uPAR levels in both plasma and urine. Three hours after endotoxin challenge in volunteers, there was also a significant increase of uPAR in plasma and in urine. The urine/plasma ratio for uPAR was highly elevated during urosepsis and experimental endotoxemia, suggesting local production in the kidney. Accordingly, damaged tubuli strongly expressed uPAR during pyelonephritis. Moreover, tubular epithelial cells produced uPAR in vitro, and this secretion was strongly up-regulated after stimulation with interleukin-1 beta or tumor necrosis factor-alpha., Conclusions: We found that uPAR is released systemically and in the urinary tract during urosepsis and experimental endotoxemia. This systemic and renal production of uPAR during pyelonephritis may play a central role in eliminating the infection and protecting renal function.