Search

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a cerebrovascular disease affecting the small arteries in the brain with hallmark depositions of amyloid-β in the vessel wall, leading to cognitive decline and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). An emerging MRI marker for CAA is cortical superficial siderosis (cSS) as it is strongly related to the risk of (recurrent) ICH. Current assessment of cSS is mainly done on T2*- weighted MRI using a qualitative score consisting of 5 categories of severity which is hampered by ceiling effects. Therefore, the need for a more quantitative measurement is warranted to better map disease progression for prognosis and future therapeutic trials. We propose a semi-automated method to quantify cSS burden on MRI and investigated it in 20 patients with CAA and cSS. The method showed excellent inter-observer (Pearson's 0.991, P < 0.001) and intra-observer reproducibility (ICC 0.995, P < 0.001). Furthermore, in the highest category of the multifocality scale a large spread in the quantitative score is observed, demonstrating the ceiling effect in the traditional score. We observed a quantitative increase in cSS volume in two of the 5 patients who had a 1 year follow up, while the traditional qualitative method failed to identify an increase because these patients were already in the highest category. The proposed method could therefore potentially be a better way of tracking progression. In conclusion, semi-automated segmenting and quantifying cSS is feasible and repeatable and may be used for further studies in CAA cohorts., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite the large overall beneficial effects of endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke, severe disability or death still occurs in almost one-third of patients. These patients, who might not benefit from treatment, have been previously identified with traditional logistic regression models, which may oversimplify relations between characteristics and outcome, or machine learning techniques, which may be difficult to interpret. We developed and evaluated a novel evolutionary algorithm for fuzzy decision trees to accurately identify patients with poor outcome after endovascular treatment, which was defined as having a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) higher or equal to 5. The created decision trees have the benefit of being comprehensible, easily interpretable models, making its predictions easy to explain to patients and practitioners. Insights in the reason for the predicted outcome can encourage acceptance and adaptation in practice and help manage expectations after treatment. We compared our proposed method to CART, the benchmark decision tree algorithm, on classification accuracy and interpretability. The fuzzy decision tree significantly outperformed CART: using 5-fold cross-validation with on average 1090 patients in the training set and 273 patients in the test set, the fuzzy decision tree misclassified on average 77 (standard deviation of 7) patients compared to 83 (±7) using CART. The mean number of nodes (decision and leaf nodes) in the fuzzy decision tree was 11 (±2) compared to 26 (±1) for CART decision trees. With an average accuracy of 72% and much fewer nodes than CART, the developed evolutionary algorithm for fuzzy decision trees might be used to gain insights into the predictive value of patient characteristics and can contribute to the development of more accurate medical outcome prediction methods with improved clarity for practitioners and patients., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)