Search

Background: The Trillat procedure is a surgical treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. It consists of an inferior closed-wedge osteoclasy of the coracoid process. Nowadays, it is used to treat selected cases of shoulder instability. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of clinical and functional outcomes, recurrence rate, and complications of the Trillat procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Methods: A systematic review of the literature regarding the Trillat procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability was carried out on Medline, through PubMed, and Embase. The English and French literature published before the 4th of November 2023 was analyzed. The data regarding demographics, outcome, recurrency, and complications were reported. Results: From 38 articles with the primary search, seven manuscripts were enrolled. A total of 419 patients and 443 shoulders were analyzed, with a mean age of 35.46 (range 25-61) years. The mean follow-up was 65.01 (range 24.8-132) months postoperative. The pooled data showed 91.2% of subjective satisfaction, weighted mean postoperative Rowe score of 86.25 points, Walch–Duplay of 84.6 points, and a Constant–Murley Score of 84.82 points. The recurrence rate was 10.28% for all the articles involved and 8.51% for the articles proposing the procedure for selected case of anterior instability, with low-grade glenoid bone loss. The most common complications were a loss of external rotation and the development of osteoarthritis. Conclusion: The Trillat procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability showed promising results, especially in selected cases, such as low-grade glenoid bone loss, with massive irreparable cuff tears or hyperlaxity.

Background: Standardized consensus-based radiological reports for shoulder instability may improve clinical quality, reduce heterogeneity, and reduce workload. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine important elements for the x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) arthrography (MRA), and computed tomography (CT) report, the extent of variability, and important MRI views and settings. Methods: An expert panel of musculoskeletal radiologists and orthopedic surgeons was recruited in a three-round Delphi design. Important elements were identified for the x-ray, MRA, and CT report and important MRI views and setting. These were rated on a 0-9 Likert scale. High variability was defined as at least one score between 1-3 and 7-9. Consensus was reached when ≥80% scored an element 1-3 or 7-9. Results: The expert panel consisted of 21 musculoskeletal radiologists and 15 orthopedic surgeons. The number of elements identified in the first round was seventeen for the x-ray report, 52 for MRA, 21 for CT, and 23 for the MRI protocol. The number of elements that reached consensus was five for x-ray, twenty for MRA, nine for CT, and two for the MRI protocol. High variability was observed in 76.5% (n = 13) x-ray elements, 85.0% (n = 45) MRA, 76.2% (n = 16) CT, and 85.7% (n = 18) MRI protocol. Conclusion: Substantial variability was observed in the scoring of important elements in the radiological for the evaluation of anterior shoulder instability, regardless of modality. Consensus was reached for five elements in the x-ray report, twenty in the MRA report, and nine in the CT report. Finally, consensus was reached on two elements regarding MRA views and settings.

Background: This study aims to determine the effect of time and imaging modality (three-dimensional (3D) CT vs. 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) on the surgical procedure indicated for shoulder instability. The hypothesis is there will be no clinical difference in procedure selection between time and imaging modality. Methods: Eleven shoulder surgeons were surveyed with the same ten shoulder instability clinical scenarios at three time points. All time points included history of present illness, musculoskeletal exam, radiographs, and standard two-dimensional MRI. To assess the effect of imaging modality, survey 1 included 3D MRI while survey 2 included a two-dimensional and 3D CT scan. To assess the effect of time, a retest was performed with survey 3 which was identical to survey 2. The outcome measured was whether surgeons made a “major” or “minor” surgical change between surveys. Results: The average major change rate was 14.1% (standard deviation: 7.6%). The average minor change rate was 12.6% (standard deviation: 7.5%). Between survey 1 to the survey 2, the major change rate was 15.2%, compared to 13.1% when going from the second to the third survey (P = .68). The minior change rate between the first and second surveys was 12.1% and between the second to third interview was 13.1% (P = .8). Discussion: The findings suggest that the major factor related to procedural changes was time between reviewing patient information. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that there remains significant intrasurgeon variability in selecting surgical procedures for shoulder instability. Lastly, the findings in this study suggest that 3D MRI is clinically equivalent to 3D CT in guiding shoulder instability surgical management. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that there is significant variability in surgical procedure selection driven by time alone in shoulder instability. Surgical decision making with 3D MRI was similar to 3D CT scans and may be used by surgeons for preoperative planning.

Background: Recent evidence suggests that intra-articular lidocaine (IAL) is an appropriate analgesic alternative to intravenous sedation (IV sedation) during shoulder dislocation reduction, however little is known about patient factors associated with IAL failure and need for subsequent IV sedation. Avoiding crossover is important, as repeated reduction attempts have been previously shown to increase the rate of procedural complications. Objectives: To identify patient level factors associated with crossover from IAL to IV sedation and associated complication rates and operational impacts. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated the patient characteristics associated with crossover to unplanned IV sedation after IAL among adult patients undergoing ED reduction of an isolated, acute anterior shoulder dislocation from 2013 to 2021 in an urban, academic hospital system. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used. Results: In total, 630 participants were identified who received IAL or procedural sedation. Of these, 182 (28.9 ​%) received IAL of whom 49 (26.9 ​%) subsequently required unplanned IV sedation. Participants had 1.205 (95 ​% CI 1.030, 1.418) fold increase in odds of unplanned sedation for every 10-year increase in age. Crossover to IV sedation was associated with greater rates of adverse events, ED length of stay, and quantity of opioids received compared to either IAL or IV sedation alone. Conclusions: Participants with unplanned IV sedation after IAL had more adverse events than those who received either method alone. Older age was associated with unplanned sedation after IAL. Prospective studies are needed to further define patient factors likely to contribute to failure of IAL.

Background: Although there is a low incidence of shoulder instability in women, this population is still representative and is often associated with lower rates of return to sports. Few studies have evaluated the results of the Latarjet procedure in this population. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of female athletes who underwent the Latarjet procedure between 2013 and 2018. The participants were followed up for 3 years. The primary outcomes of the study included the visual analog scale for pain; range of motion: active elevation, passive elevation, active external rotation, and passive external rotation. The functional scores were as follows: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Rating Scale. Additional data were collected regarding return to sport, complication rates, and patient satisfaction. Results: Thirteen female athletes who practice Soccer, Volleyball, Basketball, Handball, Judo, or Weight training were evaluated. There was a significant reduction in the mean range of motion for all movements at 4 weeks after surgery. Patients recovered a range of motion similar to the preoperative values after 6 months. The mean visual analog scale reached 6.39 at the first week after surgery and decreased to values below preop at 8 weeks. The mean preoperative Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index was 126.77 (min 118; max 135), and at the end of follow-up, the WOSI index was 45.08 (min 37; max 65; P

Background/objective: The effect of glenoid version on the severity of glenoid bone loss is not completely understood, although the variation of glenoid version angles is considered to reflect the degree of glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability cases. The objective of this retrospective case-control study is to determine the relationship of the glenoid version and the severity of glenoid bone loss in a group of previously documented recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation patients. Methods: We retrospectively collected magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) data from 72 patients with unidirectional recurrent anterior shoulder instability. The best-fit circle method was used to identify the percentage of glenoid bone loss. Measurements of glenoid labral, chondral, and bony versions were performed using the Friedman method. Results: Using univariate regression analysis, it was found that a retroversion angle of more than 4 degrees was associated with an increased risk ratio for the occurrence of a critical glenoid defect by approximately 5 times. Conclusions: 24 Univariate logistic regression analysis, used to determine the presence of a critical glenoid bone defect, showed that both the bony version angle and the number of previous dislocations were significantly associated with the extent of glenoid bone loss. A retroversion angle of more than 4 degrees was associated with an approximately five-fold increase in the odds ratio for the presence of a critical glenoid defect. Surgeons may use the value of the measured glenoid version in prediction the required version of the reconstructive treatment.

Background: The purpose of this study is to present surgical outcomes after humeral head allograft augmentation and glenoid-based procedures in patients with active, uncontrolled seizure activity and anterior shoulder instability. Methods: A retrospective review of a surgical database for patients with active seizure disorder and with recurrent shoulder instability managed with humeral head augmentation was performed. All patients underwent surgical intervention. Postoperative outcomes including Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire, and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were recorded at a minimum of 2 years. We hypothesized that appropriate management of the bony defects in these bipolar injuries would result in low recurrence and satisfactory outcomes. Results: Ten patients including 8 males and 2 females (15 shoulders) with active seizure-related shoulder instability underwent surgical intervention including allograft bone grafting of the Hill-Sachs lesion for anterior shoulder instability. The average age was 27 years. All patients reported recurrent seizures postoperatively, but only one sustained a shoulder dislocation after surgery that was unrelated to seizure activity.Self-reported satisfaction was “much better” or “better” in 92% of shoulders. Average outcome scores were as follows: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score = 67 (33-100), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index = 32.5 (0-83), Simple Shoulder Test = 9.4 (5-12), SF-12 PCS = 44.1 (21-65), and SF-12 MCS = 50.6 (21-61). The average follow-up was 4.8 years. Conclusion: Management of bipolar shoulder injuries with humeral head allograft augmentation and glenoid based surgery leads to low recurrence rates and good clinical outcomes in patients with uncontrolled, seizure-related shoulder instability.

Anterior glenohumeral instability is one of the most common injuries suffered from sport. Despite padding and conditioning, the shoulder joint remains particularly vulnerable to injury, especially in the setting of contact. The overall rate of anterior instability is reported to be 0.12 injuries per 1000 athlete exposures, although this is increased up to 0.40 to 0.51 in the contact athlete. Successful treatment requires consideration of restoring stability while minimizing loss of glenohumeral motion. Common treatment strategies involve addressing the pathology that results from anterior shoulder dislocation including labral detachment as well as bony defects to the humeral head and glenoid., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Shoulder dislocations and elbow dislocations are common presentations to the emergency department (ED). Simultaneous ipsilateral elbow and shoulder dislocations are rarely reported and typically occur secondary to trauma., Case Report: A 45-year-old female presented to the ED after a fall from standing and complained of upper right extremity pain. Radiographs revealed posterior dislocation of the right elbow and anterior dislocation of the right shoulder without fractures. Successful reduction of the elbow and shoulder were both achieved, and the patient was placed in a long-arm splint and sling. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case describes the unique mechanism of injury of a simultaneous ipsilateral shoulder and elbow dislocation without trauma., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The axillary nerve is the most commonly injured nerve in the shoulder and is particularly susceptible to injury due to its anatomical relation in the quadrangular space on the posterior scapula. Objective: This review aimed to provide an updated summary of various injuries to the axillary nerve and its management. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for articles published in the English language pertaining to axillary nerve anatomy, injury, and treatment. Articles published between 1960 and May 2022 were included. Results: The axillary nerve is often injured after shoulder dislocations or humeral fractures and can heal without surgical intervention. Operative treatments are indicated if the injury does not show signs of recovery. Conclusion: Injuries to the axillary nerve are commonly encountered and it is imperative for providers to know how to effectively treat patients with these conditions. After a thorough physical exam and determining the diagnosis of axillary nerve injury, patients should undergo physical therapy to restrengthen affected musculature and range of motion. If conservative methods are unsuccessful, surgical interventions such as neurolysis or nerve transfer could be indicated.

Purpose: Posterior fracture-dislocation of shoulder is an infrequent traumatic event; however, most orthopaedic surgeons may face the challenge of treating it. The aim of this study is to review and summarise systematically the current principles of the management of this complex injury, and create a treatment algorithm. Methods: Both PubMed and Scopus Databases were systematically searched for the terms “posterior shoulder fracture-dislocation” or “posterior glenohumeral fracture-dislocation” or “posterior glenoid fracture-dislocation” for articles written in English and published in the last decade. Results: A total of 900 articles were identified, of which 13 were retained for analysis. A total of 153 patients (161 shoulders) were identified. These patients were treated either with open reduction and internal fixation, modified McLaughlin procedure, allograft/autograft humeral head reconstruction or shoulder arthroplasty. The mean age was 40.15 years. The mean postoperative Constant score in cases treated by open reduction and internal fixation was 86.45, whereas by bone graft was 84.18. Further, the mean postoperative Constant score was between 79.6 and 67.1 in those that were managed by modified McLaughlin and arthroplasty procedure, respectively. Conclusion: The management of posterior shoulder fracture-dislocation may be challenging, and the best surgical option depends on many variables such as the chronicity of the injury, the presence of a fracture at the level of the surgical neck or tuberosities and the extend of the Hill-Sachs lesion if any. A treatment algorithm is proposed, based on the current literature in an effort to create a consensus for these injuries. For the acute shoulder fracture-dislocations, an open reduction should be performed. For the chronic fracture/dislocations in the elderly low-demand patients, conservative treatment should be performed. For the rest of the patients, depending on the severity of the Hill-Sachs lesion different surgical options are available such as the McLaughlin technique, the use of an allograft, osteotomy or arthroplasty.

Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic labral repair for anteroinferior glenohumeral instability with the use of double-loaded suture anchors. Methods: This study evaluated a series of consecutive patients treated after the senior author changed from single- to double-loaded suture anchors for the treatment of anteroinferior glenohumeral instability with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. We collected the following outcomes at final follow-up: visual analog scale pain score, Simple Shoulder Test score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and instability recurrence data. Results: A total of 41 consecutive patients underwent arthroscopic labral repair with double-loaded anchors, of whom 30 (71%) were able to be contacted at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. These patients included 4 contact or collision athletes (13%). The patients had an average of 12 ± 13 prior dislocations over an average period of 56 ± 57 months preoperatively. Mean glenoid bone loss measured 16% ± 10%, and 67% (18 of 27 patients) had glenoid bone loss ≥ 13.5%. Intraoperatively, 3.2 ± 0.4 anchors were used. No posterior repairs or remplissage procedures were performed. At an average of 6.7 ± 2.7 years' follow-up, the visual analog scale pain score was 0.8 ± 1.4; Simple Shoulder Test score, 11 ± 2; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, 90 ± 14. Patients with bone loss < 13.5% had a 0% redislocation rate and 11% subluxation rate, whereas those with bone loss ≥ 13.5% had a 6% reoperation rate, 22% redislocation rate, and 22% subluxation rate. Conclusion: Arthroscopic labral repair with double-loaded anchors provides satisfactory clinical results at early to mid-term outcome assessment when glenoid bone loss is

Background: An arthroscopic Bankart operation is the most common operative procedure to treat shoulder instability. In case of recurrence, both Bankart and Latarjet procedures are used as revision procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare the re-recurrence rate of instability and clinical results after arthroscopic revision Bankart and open revision Latarjet procedures following failed primary arthroscopic Bankart operations. Methods: Consecutive patients operatively treated for shoulder instability at Turku University Hospital between 2002 and 2013 were analyzed. Patients who underwent a primary arthroscopic Bankart operation followed by a recurrence of instability and underwent a subsequent arthroscopic Bankart or open Latarjet revision operation with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up were called in for a follow-up evaluation. The re-recurrence of instability, Subjective Shoulder Value, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index were assessed. Results: Of 69 patients, 48 (dropout rate, 30%) were available for follow-up. Recurrent instability symptoms occurred in 13 patients (43%) after the revision Bankart procedure and none after the revision Latarjet procedure. A statistically and clinically significant difference in the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index was found between the patients after the revision Bankart and revision Latarjet operations (68% and 88%, respectively; P = .0166). Conclusions: The redislocation rate after an arthroscopic revision Bankart operation is high. Furthermore, patient-reported outcomes remain poor after a revision Bankart procedure compared with a revision Latarjet operation. We propose that in cases of recurring instability after a failed primary Bankart operation, an open Latarjet revision should be considered.

Background: Although surgical shoulder stabilization is a substantial cost nationally within the United States, little information exists to analyze this cost. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with variation in direct costs with the arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability between January 12, 2012 and July 11, 2017. Patient and procedure factors were collected. Direct perioperative costs were collected using a validated internal tool. Patient and procedure characteristics significantly associated with costs were identified using multivariate generalized linear models. Results: The study included 302 patients, of whom 12% were undergoing revision and 32% were contact or collision athletes. Anterior instability was present in 73%, whereas 14% had posterior and 10% had multidirectional instability. Of the patients, 67% were recurrent dislocators and 33% were first-time dislocators or subluxators. Remplissage was performed in 13%; biceps tenodesis, 5%; and rotator cuff repair, 3%. An average of 4.0 ± 1.4 anchors were used. Of costs, 39% were operative facility utilization costs and 41% were implant costs. Factors associated with cost increase included an increased number of anchors (P < .0001), posterior vs. anterior instability (P = .001), recurrent instability vs. first-time dislocation (P = .025), remplissage (P = .006), rotator interval closure (P = .021), bicep tenodesis (P = .020), rotator cuff repair (P < .0001), an inpatient stay (P = .003), and repair of humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments (P = .012). Conclusion: Most perioperative costs associated with the arthroscopic treatment of glenohumeral instability are facility utilization and implant costs. Nonmodifiable factors associated with increased cost included posterior direction of instability and recurrent instability. Modifiable factors included additional procedures and inpatient stay.

A young male presented to a nearby hospital with a left shoulder dislocation after an alleged kickboxing injury. The patient reported worrying clinical findings including excruciating pain and absent sensation distally. Reduction was successful but his shoulder re-dislocated shortly after. His reported symptoms worsened and he was transferred to our institution. Imaging findings were not immediately concerning and he went to theatre the next day for an examination under anaesthetic. His shoulder was re-located easily and an immobiliser applied. Less than an hour later, the patient managed to re-dislocate his shoulder in recovery. He was subjected to another general anaesthetic and successful reduction. He absconded the following day after being declined multiple and increasing doses of opioid analgesia. He re-presented three weeks later with similar clinical findings but a different mechanism of injury. Further exploration of his collateral history revealed that he had been using a false identity. He had presented to all hospitals in our city within the previous 6 months. Once confronted, he did not return to these hospitals. He was also capable of self-relocating his shoulder. This case bore a striking resemblance to a case described by Warren in 2000 of a young lady with an apparently dislocated shoulder presenting to multiple city hospitals looking for analgesia and general anaesthetics. We wished to highlight the diagnostic and ethical challenges associated with these patients. They are vulnerable and so a high index of clinical suspicion is needed on the part of the surgeon to avoid unnecessary interventions. Effective communication between orthopaedic departments is a key recommendation from this case to mitigate risk of harm to these patients.

Introduction: Shoulder dislocation is a costly problem and can have a high risk for recurrent instability after initial dislocation based on well-defined patient characteristics. Patients with recurrent instability can be treated with shoulder stabilizing procedures. Although more costly, surgery may decrease the overall health care burden of managing a patient with multiple shoulder dislocations nonoperatively. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of a shoulder dislocation at a level 1 academic trauma center during the year 2016. Patient information regarding the current dislocation episode, previous dislocations, shoulder surgeries, and postreduction follow-up was gathered. These data were then used to determine the average cost of an ED presentation for a shoulder dislocation episode as obtained from the hospital finance department. The average cost of shoulder stabilization surgery was used to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of operative vs. nonoperative management. Results: Data were collected on 104 individuals who presented to the ED with shoulder dislocations. Of these, 65 were primary dislocations and 39 were recurrent dislocations. Twelve patients underwent shoulder stabilization surgery after their ED presentation. The average cost to the institution for an ED visit requiring the closed reduction of a shoulder dislocation was $2207 ($973.21 without sedation and $3744 with conscious sedation). The average cost of a shoulder stabilization procedure performed at this same institution was $7807. Discussion and conclusion: Although shoulder stabilization has a higher cost on the front end, this intervention results in cost savings if it prevents 2-3 future shoulder dislocations resulting in ED visits. These findings suggest that, for patients with a high risk for recurrent instability, not only would stabilization surgery help prevent subsequent dislocation events but would also minimize health care costs.

Anterior shoulder dislocation is the most common joint dislocation, unreducible dislocations however are a rare occurrence. The causes of the irreducibility vary, with interposition of soft tissues or bony fragments within the glenohumeral joint being the usual culprits. We present the case of an irreducible anterior shoulder dislocation with concomitant greater and lesser tuberosity fractures, with interposition of the subscapularis and lesser tuberosity thereby preventing reduction.We present the case of a 54-year-old female presenting with a left shoulder fracture dislocation after a fall from a 1.8-meter ladder. Patient was taken to the operating room after undergoing a CT scan. Attempts of closed reduction after administration of general anesthesia were unsuccessful. Open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws was done through a deltopectoral approach. Intra-operatively, the lesser tuberosity and the subscapularis were found to be the cause of the irreducibility of the dislocation. At the latest follow up at 6 months post-op, the patient had regained a normal ROM with a good function.The vast majority of shoulder fracture dislocations are easily reducible, with only a limited number of case reports discussing irreducible fracture-dislocations. The causes of the irreducibility comprise interposition of soft tissue or bony fragments within the glenohumeral joint such as avulsed labrum or tendons, glenoid or humeral bony fragments interposition, and tensioning of nerves or tendons such as the biceps or subscapularis around the humeral head. CT scans are in our opinion very important for proper surgical planning when needed and for possible identification of an irreducible dislocation.Orthopedic surgeons should be aware that difficult closed reductions of the glenohumeral joint, whenever encountered, should raise the possibility of interposition of bony fragments or soft tissues where surgical treatment might be mandatory.

Background: Management of acute shoulder dislocation in the emergency department (ED) is common., Objective: This study describes the rate, risk factors, and length of stay (LOS) associated with shoulder dislocation reduction failure in the ED., Methods: The study was a retrospective case-control study of patients 18 years and older presenting to the ED with acute shoulder dislocation who underwent attempted reduction. Patients with successful reduction on post-reduction first confirmatory imaging are compared with those requiring multiple attempts., Results: Of 398 ED encounters when a shoulder reduction was attempted in the ED, 18.8% (75/398 [95% CI 15.2-22.9%]) required multiple reduction attempts. Patients with successful reduction on first confirmatory imaging were more commonly male (80.2% [95% CI 75.6-84.3%] vs. 68.0% [95% CI 56.8-77.8%]; p = 0.0220), discharged home from the ED (95.4% [95% CI 92.6-97.3%] vs. 84.0% [95% CI 74.4-91.0%]; p = 0.0004), reduced using a traction/countertraction technique (42.1% [95% CI 36.8-47.6%] vs. 29.3% [95% CI 19.9-40.4%]; p = 0.0415), and less likely to have a pre-reduction fracture (26.0% [95% CI 21.4-31.0%] vs. 45.3% [95% CI 34.4-56.7%]; p = 0.0010). Mean length of stay (LOS) for those with successful reduction on first confirmatory imaging was 2 hours and 8 minutes shorter than for those with more than one attempt (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The rate of failed first-pass reduction is higher than previously reported. Furthermore, the ED LOS was significantly longer in patients requiring multiple attempts. Knowledge of the failure rate and risk factors may raise physician awareness and guide future studies evaluating approaches for verification of reduction success., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) has been accepted as a standard procedure for anterior shoulder instability with a minimum or no glenoid bone loss and an on-track Hill-Sachs lesion if present. However, several controversies exist in the surgical treatment of anterior shoulder instability. This article will discuss some of these controversies in, "simple," dislocations (without bone loss) as well as, "complex," (with critical bone loss). Determining which patients will benefit from an arthroscopic procedure depends on multiple factors including age, activity level, adequate determination of bone loss, performed with feasible and reliable imaging techniques. In the absence of concomitant significant bony and soft tissue pathology, ABR alone can provide satisfactory clinical results on a long-term basis. Controversies, including whether to remove cartilage from the edge of the glenoid, knotted versus knotless anchors, and routine rotator interval closure, still exist. In cases with significant bone loss, several bone restoring procedures have been described, such as, the Latarjet procedure, iliac crest bone graft, arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction with a frozen distal tibial allograft, and fresh distal tibial allograft reconstruction. This article will address these controversies and provide guidance based on available published data., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Raffy Mirzayan, MD reports a relationship with Arthrex Inc that includes: speaking and lecture fees. Ivan Wong reports a relationship with DePuy Mitek Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Ivan Wong reports a relationship with Smith and Nephew Inc that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Ivan Wong reports a relationship with CONMED Corp that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Ivan Wong reports a relationship with Stryker Orthopaedics that includes: consulting or advisory and speaking and lecture fees. Ivan Wong reports a relationship with Arthrex Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. Ivan Wong reports a relationship with Bioventus LLC that includes: speaking and lecture fees., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: It has not been clarified yet how much force is acting on the shoulder joint to create Hill-Sachs/reverse Hill-Sachs lesions which are commonly observed in patients with anterior or posterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of force to create these bony lesions using cadaveric shoulders., Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used. Compression tests were performed using the universal testing machine. The specimens were randomly divided into two groups. In group A, the posterior humeral head (the bare area and articular cartilage) was first compressed against the anterior glenoid rim to simulate a Hill-Sachs lesion, followed by the anterior humeral head being compressed against the posterior glenoid rim. In group B, the same procedure was repeated in the reverse order. X-ray microcomputed tomography (microCT) was also performed., Results: The maximum compression force to create a Hill-Sachs lesion was 771 ± 214 N (mean ± SD) on the articular cartilage of the posterior humeral head, which was significantly greater than the force of 447 ± 215 N to create it on the bare area (P = 0.0086). Regarding the reverse Hill-Sachs lesions, the maximum compression force was 840 ± 198 N when it was created on the articular cartilage of the anterior humeral head, which was significantly greater than the force of 471 ± 100 N when it was created at the footprint of the subscapularis tendon (P = 0.0238). MicroCT showed multiple breakage of the trabecular bone., Conclusion: A force to create a Hill-Sachs lesion or a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion was significantly greater when it was created on the humeral articular cartilage than at the non-cartilage area. Also, the force to create a reverse Hill-Sachs lesion was significantly greater than the one to create a Hill-Sachs lesion., (Copyright © 2022 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Shoulder dislocations are among the most common orthopedic emergencies encountered in the emergency department (ED). Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks (USG-PNBs) are increasingly being used for acute pain management in the ED, but clinical evidence supporting their utility for shoulder dislocation is limited and often conflicting., Objective: The aim of this review was to summarize and evaluate the utility of USG-PNB for analgesia during closed reduction of dislocated shoulders in the ED., Methods: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed from database inception to September 2022. We included clinical studies examining USG-PNB for pain management of dislocated shoulders in the ED. Information collected from eligible studies included patient demographic characteristics, USG-PNB approach, alternate analgesia techniques, anesthetic regimens, clinical outcomes, and adverse events., Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria, all of which were randomized controlled trials comparing USG-PNB with procedural sedation and analgesia. Pooled patient satisfaction scores were similar for both analgesia methods (3.5 ± 0.6 vs. 3.9 ± 0.6 out of 5; p = 0.76). Patients managed with procedural sedation and analgesia achieved higher rates of overall shoulder reduction (100% vs. 67%; p < 0.001) and successful reduction on the first attempt (86% vs. 48%; p < 0.001). The USG-PNB groups in all but one study had shorter lengths of ED stay. Overall, USG-PNB was associated with a lower risk of adverse events and complications (3.9% vs. 24.9%; p < 0.001), especially adverse respiratory events (0% vs. 14.7%; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: USG-PNBs performed by adequately trained emergency physicians should be considered a safe and effective alternative for analgesia during closed reduction of dislocated shoulders in the ED, particularly in patients with cardiorespiratory comorbidities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Open reconstruction of the coracoclavicular (CC) and acromioclavicular (AC) ligaments results in excellent reduction of severely displaced AC dislocations, most commonly Grades III and V. Anatomic CC reconstruction through clavicular bone tunnels can prevent vertical instability, whereas the addition of an acromial limb of the graft can increase horizontal stability. Autograft tendon is preferred in the young athletic group of collision sports participants, although allograft has had acceptable results. Accessory fixation may be placed to protect the graft during healing, or for severe instability, especially for athletes involved in contact sports., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A 53-year-old man underwent implantation of a totally subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD; Boston Scientific). He was positioned supine, with the left arm abducted, externally rotated (i.e. palm up) and strapped to the arm extender. The generator was placed in the left mid-axillary line along the 5th-6th intercostal spaces and the defibrillation coil was tunneled anterior to the sternum. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing with 65 Jcaused a forceful pectoralis twitch. The patient woke up with a painful anteriorly dislocated left shoulder. Glenohumeral dislocation due to DFT testing has not been previously reported. It is likely that this complication is specific to the S-ICD implantation, and is related to positioning with the arm abducted, externally rotated, and immobilized, and use of greater defibrillation energy with current pathway through the bulk of the pectoralis muscle.Precautions may include extending the arm palm down, strapping the arm loosely, and adduction of the arm for DFT testing.

INTRODUCTıON: It is estimated that 5-30% of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations are accompanied by greater tuberosity fracture (GTF), and the pathomechanism of these fractures is not yet clear. Our hypothesis is to examine the relationship between the scapula morphology and anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD) accompanying GTF. MATERıALS AND METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups according to the accompanying GTF. 40 patients with isolated traumatic ASD and 31 patients with accompanying GTF were included in the study. Critical shoulder angle (CSA), glenoid inclination (GI), acromial index (AI) and greater tuberosity angle (GTA) values were measured in two sessions by two independent observers in the standard antero-posterior radiographs of the patients in both groups. RESULTS: The mean CSA was 40.82°±3.19° and 35.49°±2.19° in accompanying GTF group and the isolated ASD group, respectively. The mean CSA was significantly higher in accompanying GTF group than isolated ASD group(P<0.001). The GI was significantly higher in the isolated ASD than in accompanying GTF group (P = 0.001). The mean GI was 18.7°±6.85° and 10.45°±4.87° in accompanying GTF group and the isolated ASD, respectively. Cut-off value of CSA and GI was 38° (88.2% sensitivity,88.9% specificity) and 14.5° (70.6% sensitivity and 72.2% specificity), respectively. There was no significant difference regarding the mean GTA and AI values between GTF group and the isolated ASD group (P = 0.98, P = 0.63). CONCLUSıONS: Increased CSA and GI values are associated with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation accompanied by greater tuberosity fracture., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Treatment of acute Rookwood type III AC joint dislocation is still controversially discussed. ISAKOS suggested to subdivide type III AC joint injuries into type IIIA (stable) and type IIIB (unstable). The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between hook plate fixation and mini-open tightrope for the treatment of acute Rookwood type IIIB acromioclavicular joint dislocation., Methods: We conducted a retrospective clinical study of 112 patients with acute Rookwood type IIIB acromioclavicular joint dislocation who were treated surgically using either mini-open TightRope or hook plate from 2013 to 2019. All patients were followed up for 12 months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Constant-Murley Score (CMS). Radiological results were assessed with the coracoclavicular distance (CCD), the change in clavicular elevation (ΔCE) and horizontal translation., Results: The length of incision was significantly shorter in the mini-open TightRope group than that in hook plate group (6.62±0.60 vs. 2.58±0.43 p <0.001). Duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the mini-open TightRope group than that in hook plate group (30.12±6.65 vs. 53.33±12.03; p < 0.001). Total blood loss volume was significantly less in the mini-open TightRope group than in the hook plate group. (23.85±7.88 vs. 70.67±24.62, p < 0.001). VAS and CMS in mini-open TightRope group were better than that in hook plate group at 2 weeks after surgery (VAS: 2.19±0.92 vs. 3.30±1.51, p = 0.002 and CMS 69.80±5.61 vs. 57.53±9.24, p<0.001) and 3 month after surgery (VAS: 1.19±0.48 vs. 3.07±1.36, p<0.001 and CMS 89.30±4.47 vs. 83.20±12.11, p = 0.205). There was no statistically significant difference between two groups at 12 months follow-up including VAS, CMS, the CC distance,ΔCE and the degree of dynamic horizontal translation. There were 2 complications in the hook plate group including 1cut out and 1 superficial wound infection., Conclusion: The mini-open tightrope has better function and relieves pain in the early postoperative period compared to hook plate, and at the last follow up two groups have similar clinical and radiological outcomes. Mini-open TightRope fixation is a good option for the treatment of acute Rockwood types ⅢB AC joint dislocation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The management of first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations has been a topic of extensive study yet remains controversial. Development of a treatment plan requires an understanding of patient-specific considerations, including demographics, functional demands, and extent of pathology. Each of these can influence rates of recurrence and return to activity. The purpose of this review is to provide a framework for decision-making following a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation, with particular focus on the high-risk young and athletic population. A summary of surgical treatment options and their outcomes is outlined, along with future biomechanical and clinical perspectives., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anterior glenohumeral dislocation is a common injury seen in the emergency department (ED) that sometimes requires procedural sedation for manual reduction. When compared with procedural sedation for dislocation reductions, peripheral nerve blocks provide similar patient satisfaction scores but have shorter ED length of stays. In this case report, we describe the first addition of an ultrasound-guided axillary nerve block to a suprascapular nerve block for reduction of an anterior shoulder dislocation in the ED., Case Report: A 34-year-old man presented to the ED with an acute left shoulder dislocation. The patient was a fit rock climber with developed muscular build and tone. An attempt to reduce the shoulder with peripheral analgesia was unsuccessful. A combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block was performed with 0.5% bupivacaine, allowing appropriate relaxation of the patient's musculature while providing excellent pain control. The shoulder was then successfully reduced without procedural sedation. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Procedural sedation for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocations is time consuming, resource intensive, and can be risky in some populations. The addition of an axillary nerve block to a suprascapular nerve block allows for more complete muscle relaxation to successfully reduce a shoulder dislocation without procedural sedation., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We reviewed our cases of infraclavicular brachial plexus injuries associated with anterior shoulder dislocation to determine patterns of injury, recovery rates, and factors associated with a poor motor outcome., Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients who had sustained a concomitant nerve injury following dislocation of the glenohumeral joint treated with closed manipulation. The data collected included patient demographics, injury factors, and patterns of neurological deficits. The Medical Research Council (MRC) grade for motor power was the primary outcome measure, where a grade of 4 or 5 was regarded as achieving good motor recovery. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify factors associated with persistent motor weakness (MRC grades 0-3) at the final follow-up., Results: Between 2015 and 2019, 61 patients were assessed. There were 36 males and 25 females, with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR], 53-73 years). Four patterns of injury were identified: (1) isolated axillary nerve lesions; (2) single cord lesions; (3) combined lesions involving the medial and posterior cords; and (4) diffuse lesions affecting all 3 cords. Of 28 patients with isolated axillary nerve injuries, 22 recovered. All lateral cord injuries (11/11) and 20 of 24 posterior cord injuries recovered spontaneously. Recovery of hand intrinsic function from medial cord injuries had the worst outcome, with 14 of 27 patients not recovering beyond MRC grades 0 to 3. The median duration of dislocation before reduction was 6 hours (IQR, 3-12 hours). A multivariate analysis showed an association between the duration of shoulder dislocation and the likelihood of persistent motor weakness., Conclusions: Shoulder dislocations with motor deficits should be regarded as orthopedic emergencies and reduced expediently. Persistent motor weakness may be associated with a prolonged duration of dislocation prior to glenohumeral relocation., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Prognostic IV., (Copyright © 2022 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Anterior shoulder dislocation is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). Dislocations are spontaneous or traumatic. Generally, a reduction is performed under procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA). Other approaches include the use of intra-articular lidocaine or, in rare instances, nerve blocks. Here we discuss the case of a 66-year-old female patient who presented with left shoulder pain and limited range of motion after a fall. After discussing potential treatment options to reduce the dislocation, the patient agreed to a nerve block., Discussion: The dislocation was reduced successfully with a suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) without complications. The duration of the patient's ED stay was shorter than those who had received PSA., Conclusions: SSNB could be an alternative method for shoulder dislocation reduction, particularly for patients who are obese, older, or have cardiopulmonary comorbidities., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)